eCAFE - Course and Faculty Evaluation, University of Hawaii

eCAFE: Course and Faculty Evaluations


Instructor: Christopher Bae

Available Survey Results

ANTH215, Spring 2013
ANTH215L, Spring 2013
ANTH215, Spring 2012
ANTH215L, Spring 2012
ANTH310, Spring 2012
ANTH375, Fall 2011
ANTH215, Spring 2011
ANTH215, Spring 2010
ANTH310, Spring 2010
ANTH375, Fall 2009
ANTH460, Fall 2009

Christopher Bae: ANTH215, Spring 2013

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Anthropology
Course: ANTH 215 - Physical Anthropology Crn (Section): 84130 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
3.44 19 1.2 Freq(%) 1 (5%) 3 (16%) 4 (21%) 8 (42%) 1 (5%) 1 (5%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.94 19 0.24 Freq(%) 1 (5%) 17 (89%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.79 19 0.42 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (21%) 15 (79%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.79 19 0.42 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (21%) 15 (79%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.47 19 0.84 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 1 (5%) 5 (26%) 12 (63%)
6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.58 19 0.51 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 8 (42%) 11 (58%)
7. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.58 19 0.69 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (11%) 4 (21%) 13 (68%)
8. I felt that this course challenged me intellectually.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.68 19 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 4 (21%) 14 (74%)
9. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
The videos were great reaffirmation for the course content.
Learning the tenets of evolution! Fabulous!
The entire course; it really challenged my brain power.
Although we were not given the powerpoint slides but were responsible for all materials covered, I felt like it not only pushed me to study but it also reinforced the materials on my mind since I was physically writing everything down. I like that we have TAs and both the TAs and Dr Bae showed a lot of knowledge on the materials covered in class and they were really helpful
The content
I feel like the most valuable aspects were covered during the middle of the course. Those were the ones about different species and their anatomies. They helped me fully understand how to differentiate primates and humans (even our earlier ancestors) later in the semester.
The methods of physical anthropology and learning how to age/sex remains.
I thought that one of the most valuable aspects of this course were the PowerPoint slides that coincided with Professor Bae's lecture.
The origin of human
The professor making opportunities towards students to succeed in the class
10. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?
It all held value, because of the lengthy tests that we took.
N/A
n/a
Maybe the copying down part because the down side of it is that I didn't have enough time to digest everything and concentrate in listening to what Dr Bae was saying that gives further details to what was stated on the powerpoint slides
I saw the teachings on old scientific beliefs important since they were the foundation for our research today, but some of the information was not necessarily crucial in my opinion. This would include learning about how genes are passed on. Those types of information were studied in regular biology in high school.
Confusing, contradicting timelines.
The least valuable aspect of this course were the extra credit questions, I feel like they should be relevant to material studied for the exam.
N/A
n/a
11. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.63 19 0.76 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 0 (0%) 4 (21%) 14 (74%)
12. The instructor puts material across in an interesting way.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.32 19 0.89 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 2 (11%) 6 (32%) 10 (53%)
13. The instructor seems to enjoy teaching.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.53 19 0.7 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (11%) 5 (26%) 12 (63%)
14. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.53 19 0.61 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 7 (37%) 11 (58%)
15. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.68 19 0.48 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (32%) 13 (68%)
16. The instructor treated students fairly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.58 19 0.69 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (11%) 4 (21%) 13 (68%)
17. The instructor seems well prepared for each class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.83 19 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (16%) 15 (79%)
18. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
Having a class in the morning is tough, so perhaps adding a video to start the class, or more visuals.
I think the class is fine the way it is conducted.
Give the study guides out soon so that the students have a higher chance of doing well on the exams.
This course seemed to place more importance on grading how fast students can copy down notes instead of making sure that everyone actually understood the materials, information, and concepts presented.
Make better study guides.
Maybe make some parts of the course material ready or available to students? haha
Dr. Bae was very on top of things. I honestly don't think he could improve his teaching. His grading is a little hard, so a better review would be nice.
Slow down, offer more examples and really check students understanding of course material. Don't just assume that students know scientific details. Encourage questions.
None.
More video to demonstrate for the lecture
its pefect to me
19. What two or three single words best describe this instructor?
articulate, knowledgable, intellectual
Intelligent, intimidating and interesting.
Humorous, smart
Knowledgeable Fair and Funny
Intellectual, Thorough, Helpful
Intelligent, impersonal, impatient
Organized, straight-forward
Professional, Enthusiasm
Humerous, understanding
20. The TA appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.78 19 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 2 (11%) 15 (79%) 1 (5%)
21. The TA is friendly and accessible.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.78 19 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 2 (11%) 15 (79%) 1 (5%)
22. Other comments:
This class has excessive material, there could have been some more help in preparation for tests.
I love that he refuses electronics in his class. At first it seems harsh but it honestly really helps the learning process.
The lab and lecture classes played well off of each other. Having both helped me understand the course material more in depth.
This class moved very fast and had little support from readings to lectures or study guides. The tests seemed like their goal was to trick you instead of assess your learning.
None.
N/A
Im glad professor Bae is teaching ANTH215

Christopher Bae: ANTH215L, Spring 2013     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Anthropology
Course: ANTH 215L - Physical Anthropology Lab Crn (Section): 84131 (001)     84132 (002)     89173 (003)     89174 (004)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
3.0 5 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 1 (13%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.67 4 0.58 Freq(%) 1 (25%) 5 (100%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 4 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (38%) 4 (80%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.63 8 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (38%) 3 (60%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 8 0.53 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (50%) 2 (40%)
6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (25%) 3 (60%)
7. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.63 8 0.74 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 3 (60%)
8. I felt that this course challenged me intellectually.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 8 0.46 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (25%) 3 (60%)
9. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
The variety of material available to work with in a hands on manner.
Understanding the history and present information on humans
I felt that the most valuable aspect of this course were the hands-on interactive labs.
I feel like the forensic anthropology section was the most valuable since we always discussed and analyzed bones in class. It was important to fully cover all the bones in the human body because we kept comparing these to our early ancestors to the end of the semester.
Kristen was really helpful and always readily available even after lab hours ended. That really helps reinforce our learning or understanding of the materials covered in class
IM NOT IN THE LECTURE
All of the material was engaging.
The lecture overviews before each lab helped to reinforce the information needed for the lab work. Also the clearly defined worksheets that were given for the lab made the lab work itself easier to grasp because rather than being confused on the assignment details, we were able to focus on the topics we were learning. Also the ability to be hands on with the materials helped to further my understanding of the course subjects. Also not being allowed computers in the lab itself forced me to not rely on the Internet to answer questions, but rather forced me to use deduction and critical thinking to solve problems and issues.
Learning about human bones and structure
The hands on approach. Being about to actually handle bones really helps the learning process.
Being able to have hands on experience with the fossils were the most valuable to me.
How to identify the gender, ancestral, feature of species.
10. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?
The book doesn't complement the lab too much.
None.
Everything was valuable and was carried on to the next topic.
That everything has to be typed out
NOT IN LECTURE
The least valuable were the post lab worksheets.
Taking the online quizzes were least valuable. They really did not further my understanding of the information, but rather felt like "busy" work.
Sometimes there is extra information that is just onfusing.
N/A
11. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.63 8 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (38%) 5 (63%)
12. The instructor puts material across in an interesting way.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.38 8 0.92 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 1 (13%) 5 (63%)
13. The instructor seems to enjoy teaching.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 8 0.76 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 2 (25%) 3 (75%)
14. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.63 8 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (38%) 2 (40%)
15. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.63 8 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (38%) 5 (63%)
16. The instructor treated students fairly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 8 0.76 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 1 (25%) 5 (63%)
17. The instructor seems well prepared for each class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 4 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 7 (88%)
18. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
Find a better textbook
Kristen taught this lab and i Think she is doing an awesome job withit. It made it easy for me to understand the class lectures and labs. Also she engages in her students to help with their work to pass the course.
None.
The lab was great and doesn't need improvement.
Maybe Kristen could speak a bit slower
NOT IN LECTURE
The notes that we were given were extensive and the lab instructor would often speak very fast. At times I felt like she just wanted to stop lecturing because she would sigh. I realize that it was alot of material to present, but to us taking notes it seems like more, I wish she had been more enthusiastic about it like she is when she is helping people do the labs.
Josie should run all of the labs. She is amazing.
I feel that the course could be improved by giving us some of the answers to a few of the questions to the homework we just turned in. That way when we do the next lab we won't make the same mistakes. How do we know if we are getting it and doing it right if we don't find out the results from our homework til a week later.
N/A
19. What two or three single words best describe this instructor?
Cool, calm, clear
Humble, Fun, aaawweessoooommmmmeee
Our TA Kristin was organized and approachable.
Smart, helpful, approachable
Friendly, professional
NOT IN LECTURE
Knowledgable, fair, clear.
Smart, funny, knowledgable
Josie Yucha: bright, cheery and prepared.
Professional and Enthusiasm.
20. The TA appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (100%) 0 (0%)
21. The TA is friendly and accessible.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
5.0 4 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (100%) 0 (0%)
22. Other comments:
Thank you for a great class
None.
Kristen was great!! Always available and willing to help!!
Kristen Baker was amazing and very helpful. i loved coming to lab and learning. She also gives really sound career advice! great TA! She opened my eyes to what contributions an anthropologist can have to world.
The TA was great minus the lecturing portion, the content of this class is too much, I wish we could have had less variation and focused more on the two themes that surround/makeup the practicles.
Josie Yucha was an excellent TA for the class and really promoted understanding of the information and made sure we were truly understanding not only the information but the concepts behind them.
It is easier for students to learn if the lecture of Lab posted on laulima

Christopher Bae: ANTH215, Spring 2012     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Anthropology
Course: ANTH 215 - Physical Anthropology Crn (Section): 84447 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
3.14 14 0.95 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 5 (36%) 2 (14%) 7 (50%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.87 15 0.35 Freq(%) 2 (13%) 13 (87%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.79 14 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 1 (7%) 12 (86%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.73 15 0.59 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 2 (13%) 12 (80%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.57 14 0.65 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 4 (29%) 9 (64%)
6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 15 0.98 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 2 (13%) 3 (20%) 9 (60%)
7. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.47 15 0.83 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 5 (33%) 9 (60%)
8. I felt that this course challenged me intellectually.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 15 0.62 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 3 (20%) 11 (73%)
9. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
lecture
The subject itself is very interesting and the power-points weren't the typical boring lectures.
I learned a lot of different concepts of physical anthropology.
I'm an anthropology major, so everything that was presented in the lectures had some relevance to my field. Furthermore, all of the information I was given was very interesting and presented well, so I think that in itself makes it valuable.
Dr. Bae was very thorough in his lecture presentations
Honestly, it was all valuable to me. The more I learned the more it all made sense, and continues to. All excellent.
The Great information that was given in every class...
I think I've learned the most from this class during my two years at UH. The course has inspired me to take on a minor in anthropology. I'm very interested in human evolution (evolution in general) and I think I mainly loved this class a lot because it helped me really understand the idea that anthropology actually is, at least to a degree, "the most scientific of the humanities, and the most humanistic of the social sciences". I never really knew what physical anthropology entailed until I took this class. Slideshows, movies, and lecture content were all great. Nothing there could really be improved further.
The test gave a wide variety of opportunities to succeed
10. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?
The way the course is set up isn't the greatest. I feel that I would learn a lot more if I was required to do homework or write papers and do some outside learning rather than just studying for the exams.
The instructor overwhelmed us with too much information.
I would've liked more detail in the slides, because I felt that they were too simplistic at times for some of the more complex concepts.
There was nothing that was of no value. It was all pertinent, relative and interconnected. Immature whiny inattentive students were the worst part.
Nothing
-- snipped --
most of what we learned were just memorized facts. i feel that that kind of "learning" is outdated with modern technology and the internet
* Showing 6 out of 7 survey responses.

 

11. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.53 15 0.83 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 4 (27%) 10 (67%)
12. The instructor puts material across in an interesting way.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.4 15 0.83 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (20%) 3 (20%) 9 (60%)
13. The instructor seems to enjoy teaching.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.47 15 0.74 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 4 (27%) 9 (60%)
14. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.47 15 0.74 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 4 (27%) 9 (60%)
15. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 15 0.74 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 2 (13%) 11 (73%)
16. The instructor treated students fairly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.2 15 1.08 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 1 (7%) 4 (27%) 8 (53%)
17. The instructor seems well prepared for each class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.87 15 0.35 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 13 (87%)
18. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
low credit quizes
Rather than having the class be just exams maybe include some homework assignments or readings or papers. Adding something that will get us students learning outside of lecture will make learning the material a lot easier and more enjoyable.
-- snipped --
I think he's already doing a very good job. He's strict, but not too strict. He's precise about what he expects of the students in a comprehensible fashion. He rewards students that put a serious effort in the class regardless of major. Finally, he has a nice personality, which makes paying attention and engaging in his lectures easy and enjoyable.
-- snipped --
I don't know that he can. It was all very good. Keep it challenging. Sometimes there are questions that we simply don't have enough time to discuss at length. Maybe a short discussion period for interested students.
Have a online data base available, or at least a small portion of it so that it'd be easier to reflect on the previous class. I know it'd be unfair for those who come to class vs those who don't, but maybe a online system in which you could allow an email to go out to those only who are in attendance of that lecture...
-- snipped --
* Showing 5 out of 8 survey responses.

 

19. What two or three single words best describe this instructor?
Knowledgable
Z Best
Knowledgable and nice
not compassionate
Friendly, Engaging, & Well-Versed
Knowledgeable, challenging, thought producing, fair.
Fair and Intelligent
He's generally a friendly, humorous professor who definitely demonstrates much understanding in his field. He's great at explaining all of the concepts and he's very organized. He's good at interacting with the students and getting us to contribute to the lecture. He's supportive and seems to care about his students. I actually really appreciated the quality of his slide show presentations too. He used the perfect amount of text and images together and the white background with black Times New Roman text was great (my pet peeve - professors who suck at making powerpoint slide shows). The movies he showed us every now and then were also very interesting.
20. The TA appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
3.73 15 1.19 Freq(%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 3 (20%) 4 (27%) 3 (20%) 4 (27%)
21. The TA is friendly and accessible.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
2.45 15 1.63 Freq(%) 5 (33%) 1 (7%) 2 (13%) 1 (7%) 2 (13%) 4 (27%)
22. Other comments:
Dr. Bae challenges students and answers questions with other questions in order to get the students to think about it. he eventually answers the questions, but allows time for the students to learn and discover before he goes into detail.
-- snipped --
-- snipped --
I loved this course. Fascinating subject, great job by Dr. Bae. I think his cell phone policy is terrific. Maybe Dr. Bae can more strongly emphasize the requirement for hard work, and that it is not easier than biology, although he made it clear that if you don't come to class, take notes, pay attention and work hard, you will have a lot of difficulty, much less do well.
I'm not an athro major and took this class out of curiosity. Found it interesting and very informative. I enjoyed the lectures very much. think more regular quizzes or essays would be nice in this course. More chances to refresh your knowledge and boost your grade. With the tough and infrequent tests in the course, it'd be nice. The only low point of the course is the TA.
* Showing 3 out of 5 survey responses.

 

Christopher Bae: ANTH215L, Spring 2012     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Anthropology
Course: ANTH 215L - Physical Anthropology Lab Crn (Section): 84448 (001)     84449 (002)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
3.25 4 0.96 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (29%) 1 (25%) 2 (50%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
2.0 4 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 5 (71%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 3 (60%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.75 4 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 3 (75%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.5 6 1.97 Freq(%) 2 (33%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%) 3 (75%)
6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 4 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (29%) 2 (50%) 3 (43%)
7. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 4 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%) 3 (50%)
8. I felt that this course challenged me intellectually.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.5 4 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%) 4 (57%)
9. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
Actually handling the bones and skeletal components of all the species.
i learned the bones in the body
The vast information that is given throughout the course
Learning how to identify the key features of the bones of humans, early humans, apes, and primates was useful.
Working with actual bones
Nothing.
Note: ALL these ratings apply to the teacher's assistant, Karen Kadohiro, NOT Christopher Bae who didn't teach the lab. Nice to get to study from real specimens.
10. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?
Rating the relative size of features on the scale of 1-8 was not that productive to me. It seemed a little subjective, and could be confusing.
The labs where we had to watch a movie and then take notes to write up in a lab report
nothing really i thought it was a great course!
The genetics labs didn't seem to have enough relevance to the purpose of the course.
Being taught by a TA, couldn't always answer questions asked
Everything. The TA refused to work with the students. She refused to answer questions of the students. She always rushed us to get our work done so she could leave early. This was the worst display of teaching I have ever seen. She did not care about her students at all. It was obvious that she did not want to be there. I tried to talk to the professor and asked him for help on the subject since she refused to help me and he said that it was her class.
Note: ALL these ratings apply to the teacher's assistant, Karen Kadohiro, NOT Christopher Bae who didn't teach the lab. Complete lack of assistance from the TA.
11. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.0 5 1.58 Freq(%) 1 (20%) 1 (20%) 1 (20%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%)
12. The instructor puts material across in an interesting way.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.25 4 0.96 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 1 (20%) 1 (20%)
13. The instructor seems to enjoy teaching.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.2 5 2.05 Freq(%) 2 (40%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 2 (40%)
14. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.0 5 1.87 Freq(%) 2 (40%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%) 2 (40%) 1 (20%)
15. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.2 5 1.64 Freq(%) 1 (20%) 1 (20%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 1 (20%)
16. The instructor treated students fairly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
2.8 5 1.64 Freq(%) 1 (20%) 2 (40%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (100%)
17. The instructor seems well prepared for each class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.6 5 1.67 Freq(%) 1 (20%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 1 (20%) 2 (40%)
18. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
I don't know that much can be done to improve the class. without exception most students (in the early lab) left before the end of class. I was most often the last to leave. Karen is soft spoken and sometimes I could not hear her well. But she never failed to help me in any way.
The TA taught the lab, she seemed dis interested, and didn't explain things very well
He's doing a Great Job
Since the TA taught the lab, I cannot say for sure. However, I do think the professor should be more involved in teaching the lab courses.
He can improve by becoming more active as a professor and firing his TA.
Note: ALL these ratings apply to the teacher's assistant, Karen Kadohiro, NOT Christopher Bae who didn't teach the lab. He can get a different TA who wants to be in the lab.
19. What two or three single words best describe this instructor?
In describing Karen I would say knowledgeable, patient and caring.
Funny, Smart, and Fair
Fair, Friendly, & Approachable
Uninterested, insulting, arrogant
20. The TA appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.5 4 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%) 0 (0%)
21. The TA is friendly and accessible.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.0 4 1.41 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 1 (14%) 1 (25%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
22. Other comments:
The one thing that I know would help me (and a few others) would be to have the lab open a couple of days for a few hours before practical exams to review the bones. It can be difficult to study without the actual items. I can lose a lot of data in my brain in a weeks' time, in this type of situation. It would be of substantial benefit to me and a few in my study group, anyway.
I hated writing labs on videos that we watched, it felt like a waste of time
I think the TA needs to be more approachable, and needs to be ready to help students since the lab manual was very unhelpful at times. Or, another source of reference needs to be handed out or available in order to complete lab write-ups and study for exams.
Nothing about the TA Karen's demeanor reflected a desire to be in that lab. Her only answer when asked a question: "It's in the book." She read through the lectures hastily, and on the multiple occasions she was asked to slow down/asked a question about the subject matter, she was clearly annoyed. Again, she would reply that "This is all in the book." Even reading instructions for the day's lab seemed to be incredibly boring for her. It was difficult to jot down all the instructions as she went through them as quickly as possible. If asked to repeat herself, she would give the shortest and least helpful answer. Her voice literally trails off as she talks, as if its incredibly inconvenient for her to even complete the sentence properly. I am not suggesting we be spoon-fed by the instructors or the TAs. However, the attitude of the TA was very off-putting and absolutely NOT helpful to my learning or my GPA (which is the sore point for me). She had no desire to help anyone. Not only that, but looked irritated when asked to do so. I didn't feel welcome to ask a question. And even when I did, the answers were barely satisfactory. She should have made much more of an effort, ANY sort of effort, to help us. She did not. She should have done the job she was paid to do.

Christopher Bae: ANTH310, Spring 2012     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Anthropology
Course: ANTH 310 - Human Origins Crn (Section): 85928 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
3.6 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 3 (60%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 5 (100%) 0 (0%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (100%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (100%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%)
6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (100%)
7. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (100%)
8. I felt that this course challenged me intellectually.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (100%)
9. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
Having such a small amount of students in the course
Everything is still changing with the new technology we develop.
Again, all of it. I loved this course. It all comes together and makes sense.
The lectures were always packed with information but supplemented well with powerpoints and pictures. Also, the classroom style where we can interrupt lectures to ask questions while on topic were very much appreciated.
I don't think the class size is usually so small, but I really enjoyed having a class with only seven people in it. It made it easier to learn as there was a lot more teacher/student interaction as well as more discussion within the class itself. I also liked the papers and doing oral presentations - I think doing your own outside research for a topic often allows you to learn a lot more than just attending lecture.
10. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?
Everything was valuable. It it all incredibly interconnected.
Buying the textbook was probably the least valuable aspect of the course because after the second exam I have not read from it because it seems that the entirety of our grade is dependent on lecture.
no complaints
11. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%)
12. The instructor puts material across in an interesting way.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 3 (60%)
13. The instructor seems to enjoy teaching.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 3 (60%)
14. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 3 (60%)
15. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%)
16. The instructor treated students fairly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%)
17. The instructor seems well prepared for each class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%)
18. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
Have more hands on activities.
I don't know that he can. It was all fascinating, and not easy. A lot of work, but a great course.
I think a little less information in his powerpoints and lecture could help in the absorption of information. At times I felt I was bombarded with facts and figures that weren't necessarily important to understanding broader ideas and concepts.
19. What two or three single words best describe this instructor?
Very educated in field.
Knowledgeable, passionate, inspiring, makes you think, challenges you.
Intimidating knowledgeable caring
fair, interesting
20. The TA appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
0.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (100%)
21. The TA is friendly and accessible.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
0.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (100%)
22. Other comments:
A terrific course, extremely interesting. A lot of of material. Not easy. Be prepared to work and study hard.

Christopher Bae: ANTH375, Fall 2011     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Anthropology
Course: ANTH 375 - Race and Human Variation Crn (Section): 76858 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
3.85 13 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (23%) 9 (69%) 1 (8%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.08 13 0.28 Freq(%) 12 (92%) 1 (8%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.92 13 0.28 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 12 (92%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.85 13 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (15%) 11 (85%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.92 13 0.28 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 12 (92%)
6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.85 13 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (15%) 11 (85%)
7. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.92 13 0.28 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 12 (92%)
8. I felt that this course challenged me intellectually.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.69 13 0.63 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 2 (15%) 10 (77%)
9. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
Everything! This class MADE me think about a lot things that I would have other wise never noticed. Awesome class! Everyone should be REQUIRED to take this class!
- Organized and Interesting curriculum
Learning what is race and what defines it if possible.
Bae made each lecture captivating through use of examples and these examples had practical application to the modern world. I felt this is valuable because it offers me a very broad, yet at the same time condensed view of the term "race" which is highly important for my major.
i was able to easily understand all the material and it applied to my everyday life
The differnces between blacks and whites in a sociol standpoint.
the lecture
The way this course combined social constructs of race as well as the biology was extremely well done. I also appreciated the way the requirements for the WI aspect of the class were spaced out, guaranteeing that anybody could do a good job and complete the task.
H
10. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?
none
He didn't provide lecture notes on Laulima :(
N/A
15p. paper
The bell curve
11. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.77 13 0.44 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (23%) 10 (77%)
12. The instructor puts material across in an interesting way.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.62 13 0.51 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (38%) 8 (62%)
13. The instructor seems to enjoy teaching.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.77 13 0.44 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (23%) 10 (77%)
14. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.85 13 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (15%) 11 (85%)
15. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.85 13 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (15%) 11 (85%)
16. The instructor treated students fairly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.85 13 0.38 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (15%) 11 (85%)
17. The instructor seems well prepared for each class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.92 12 0.29 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 11 (92%)
18. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
Great as it is.
Other than giving out his lecture notes, there is nothing else to improve on.
i would have liked to topics to research and 2 papers 7-8 pages, I suck at 15 page papers...even if it meant to presentations
Shorten the 15 page paper to maybe 10.
Create a few more bench marks for the final paper.
19. What two or three single words best describe this instructor?
Interesting,creative, knowledgeable
Intelligent, Unamused
funny and informative
Efficient, Fair
structured, punctual, thought envoking
super smart
intelligent, understanding, resourceful
Intelligent, humorous, and Smart
Knowledgeable, approachable, interesting
20. The TA appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.67 12 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 2 (17%) 9 (75%)
21. The TA is friendly and accessible.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.67 12 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 2 (17%) 9 (75%)
22. Other comments:
Great course! Very interesting and Dr. Bae did a great job at teaching it in a way that we students gained a healthy understand of the topics. Dr. Bae is very approachable, fair and passionate about the course. I think if more people took this class this world would be a better place. I strongly feel that EVERYONE should be required to take this course. We need more professors like Dr. Bae and more classes like human and race variation! Can't praise this class enough!
solid class, def recommend if the person is able to study...
Did we have a TA?

Christopher Bae: ANTH215, Spring 2011     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Anthropology
Course: ANTH 215 - Physical Anthropology Crn (Section): 84794 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
3.24 17 0.66 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (12%) 9 (53%) 6 (35%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.88 17 0.33 Freq(%) 2 (12%) 15 (88%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.76 17 0.56 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 2 (12%) 14 (82%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.59 17 0.71 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (12%) 3 (18%) 12 (71%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.38 16 0.96 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 2 (13%) 3 (19%) 10 (63%)
6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.47 17 0.8 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 0 (0%) 6 (35%) 10 (59%)
7. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.35 17 0.7 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (12%) 7 (41%) 8 (47%)
8. I felt that this course challenged me intellectually.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.47 17 0.72 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (12%) 5 (29%) 10 (59%)
9. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
Prof. Bae is straight-forward with his presenting and testing. His ability to not discourage the students is perfect.
The lectures are very good.
I really enjoyed the videos that dr. Bae showed in class and the guest lecturers that he invited.
Professor Bae's ability to get students involved and thinking during the lectures.
it could be a very informative course. the material was interesting but the delivery was not.
The information the course offers was not valuable because of the way the information was presented. The course was not engaging and the information did not "stick". After the test the information was pretty much forg
The videos definitely helped a lot. They were more interesting than most videos shown in anthropology classes and helped to visualize concepts shown in class. I also think it was really helpful that Dr. Bae often would ask us why we thought something was instead of just telling it and making it an hour worth of straight lecture.
audiovisuals, temporal and comparative analysis, guest lectures
Knowing a lot of the basics of what makes humans human and where did humans come from.
learning things that will stick with me for a long time
The power point presentations.
The in-depth power point presentations with information that was most important for our understanding of the course material.
10. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?
The book but, that is okay because Prof. Bae was clear from the begining that we were only responsible for the information discussed in class. He held his word. I appreciate that.
It's unfortunate that the grade is based off of only two tests. It's a very difficult course and maybe people would average higher grades in the class if a portion of the grade was a paper of some sort to demonstrate the knowledge that we have gained in the course.
-- snipped --
-- snipped --
we got the study guides a day and a half before the test. even though we had the notes, it is nice to get it a little earlier
* Showing 3 out of 5 survey responses.

 

11. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.41 17 0.8 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (18%) 4 (24%) 10 (59%)
12. The instructor puts material across in an interesting way.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.12 17 1.05 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (12%) 2 (12%) 5 (29%) 8 (47%)
13. The instructor seems to enjoy teaching.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.35 17 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (12%) 0 (0%) 5 (29%) 10 (59%)
14. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.29 17 0.92 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 2 (12%) 5 (29%) 9 (53%)
15. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.35 17 0.86 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 1 (6%) 6 (35%) 9 (53%)
16. The instructor treated students fairly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.24 17 1.15 Freq(%) 1 (6%) 0 (0%) 3 (18%) 3 (18%) 10 (59%)
17. The instructor seems well prepared for each class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.65 17 0.61 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 4 (24%) 12 (71%)
18. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
Go just a little bit slower on the slides. Sometimes I get caught up writing so fast that I forget to comprehend the material.
-- snipped --
I feel that he teaches this course to the best of his abilities. He is a very motivated and passionate professor.
more discussion, thoughtfulness in lectures, interactive portions, etc.
Don't turn the lights completely off while teaching because it puts students to sleep.
MAKE IT EASIER
-- snipped --
I feel that making some classes have short group discussions in certain areas can help students in focusing on the main points that are usually found on the tests. While Professor Bae may state that some information is important to know, each student may not remember well and having them recall these points over the semester may help ingrain it in their minds.
* Showing 6 out of 8 survey responses.

 

19. What two or three single words best describe this instructor?
Fair, Proficient, Precise
Smart, professional,
Funny, experienced, reasonable
Motivated and knowledgeable.
one track mind, passive
-- snipped --
respectful, knowledgeable, prompt
intelligent, thought provoking,
Nice, knowledgeable, understanding
Enthusiastic and knowledgable
* Showing 9 out of 10 survey responses.

 

20. The TA appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
3.24 17 1.35 Freq(%) 2 (12%) 3 (18%) 5 (29%) 3 (18%) 4 (24%) 0 (0%)
21. The TA is friendly and accessible.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
3.29 17 1.16 Freq(%) 1 (6%) 4 (24%) 3 (18%) 7 (41%) 2 (12%) 0 (0%)
22. Other comments:
Everything was explained well, all details regarding the structure and etc.. of the class were straight-forward. Prof. Bae has a great teaching style. His test structures are known from the begining. He explains, the tests come straight from the lectures and to study strategically. Which you can do. Some of his multiple choice questions can be 'zingers' or 'curve balls' but its okay. Prof. Bae is the epitome of keeping students on their toes, while teaching in a friendly, insightful, interactive lecture style.
For a lecture class, Dr. Bae really makes it fun and involves the class. He also is very willing to work with those who are struggling. He's willing to work with athletes that miss some classes, which is a really nice change from those that don't seem to care at all.
Very fun and thought-provoking class!
-- snipped --
-- snipped --
-- snipped --
-- snipped --
-- snipped --
-- snipped --
-- snipped --
-- snipped --
* Showing 3 out of 11 survey responses.

 

Christopher Bae: ANTH215, Spring 2010     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Anthropology
Course: ANTH 215 - Physical Anthropology Crn (Section): 85213 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
3.5 18 0.79 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (11%) 6 (33%) 9 (50%) 1 (6%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.83 18 0.38 Freq(%) 3 (17%) 15 (83%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.95 19 0.23 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 18 (95%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.84 19 0.37 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (16%) 16 (84%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.61 18 0.78 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 0 (0%) 4 (22%) 13 (72%)
6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.63 19 0.76 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 0 (0%) 4 (21%) 14 (74%)
7. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.84 19 0.37 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (16%) 16 (84%)
8. I felt that this course challenged me intellectually.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.89 19 0.32 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (11%) 17 (89%)
9. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
Going to class was mandatory in receiving a good grade overall for understanding the material. Tests were strictly off of the notes gone over in lecture so there was no need to purchase a textbook. This saves money and lots of time for reading as concepts are clearly taught in lecture.
all
His teaching style.
The information which was presented was all extremely valuable and very interesting.
hominins were pretty interesting, i wasn't aware of how many early ancestors we had.
Going to the lectures because they were very interesting.
The owerpoint preentations were excellent. Alwasy plenty of photos, charts maps, etc to help the student visualize the concepts.
The most valuable was re-learning A LOT of basic things about genetics, anatomy and evolution that I had forgotten or never really understood to my full potential. I was able to better understand important scientific aspects of people and the world, and I was able to make greater connections with other classes and readings, and especially in my Physical Anthro Lab.
The lectures.
I enjoyed learning about the primate evolution
I value the fact that this class challenges my intelligence. I feel as though I always learn something new.
lecture and lab, and discussions on the subject.
This course covered a broad swath of knowledge pulling in concepts from many fields including biology, geology, history, medicine, genetics, archaeology and botany.
10. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?
Again, coming to class is mandatory for understanding and a good grade overall. If you aren't the type of student that doesn't like to attend class, this course is NOT recommended because you will not be successful.
Not being able to use electronics in the class.
the tests were ridiculous. 300 terms and only 1.5 days to study.
None
None really, except so much information to absorb.
Everything was extremely valuable. I just wish we spent less time on human anatomy and more time on primates, hominids, or getting deeper into biological anthropology. But that is more of a matter of time.
The textbooks.
I hate the time of the class but I don't think there is much that can be done about that.
The days right before each exam. He would pass out study guides and ask if there were any questions. But after a pretty short period of time, we were free to go, so those days were not terribly productive.
11. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.68 19 0.58 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 4 (21%) 14 (74%)
12. The instructor puts material across in an interesting way.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.42 19 0.84 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 1 (5%) 6 (32%) 11 (58%)
13. The instructor seems to enjoy teaching.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.53 19 0.51 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 9 (47%) 10 (53%)
14. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.72 18 0.46 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (28%) 13 (72%)
15. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.74 19 0.56 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 3 (16%) 15 (79%)
16. The instructor treated students fairly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.53 19 0.9 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 2 (11%) 2 (11%) 14 (74%)
17. The instructor seems well prepared for each class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.89 19 0.32 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (11%) 17 (89%)
18. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
the course is good overall and he pretty much has it set up just right.
more time with the study guides
Include attendance as a part of the grade.
Allow the use of computers, or send the slideshows which don't have copyright infringement.
the final was a week before finals week, and this was really upsetting to me since I'm taking credit overload. The week we had the final, I had numerous papers due for many other classes so I had only 3 hours available to study.
No comment. I enjoyed it and it was better than I expected so I cannot comment on improvement because I wasn't expecting to walk out of this course alive. The fact that I am and I learned a lot compared to students before me under different professors must mean that there already has been significant improvement.
More reasonable extra credit questions on exams.
I think the way he does things works perfectly. I would not mind if we could access his powerpoints in other places but it does make you attend class, which we should do anyway. :)
With so much important materials gievn on the class, it will be better if we have some handouts or PDF files from power-point used in the class.
-- snipped --
* Showing 9 out of 10 survey responses.

 

19. What two or three single words best describe this instructor?
awesome, understanding
strict, friendly, fair
well prepared
intelligent, understanding
Eccentric, passionate, informative.
meticulous but relaxed.
knowledgeable, enthusiastic
He knows what he's talking about!!!!
quick, effective, challenging
Intense, knowledgeable.
interesting intelligent interactive
enthusiastic and energetic
*Pride in academic rigor *Sense of humor *Great graphics
20. The TA appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.11 19 0.94 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 4 (21%) 6 (32%) 8 (42%) 0 (0%)
21. The TA is friendly and accessible.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.58 19 0.61 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 6 (32%) 12 (63%) 0 (0%)
22. Other comments:
AMAZING COURSE! All I heard before taking this course was how hard it was and how bad the teacher was.... Yes it was a different teacher that taught me the material, but it was extremely informative and very very very very interesting.
The course was hard and challenging, and you have to work and put effort into it, and the professor sticks to this without altering and I believe it should be this way. The TA was great as a buffer, and though sticking to the same challenging concepts, he helped as much he could and honestly tried to give us as much points as possible.
The lectures were chock-full of information. At first we could not write fast enough to keep up but he slowed the pace during the semester. He did try to encourage discussion, eliciting ideas from as many who were willing to speak up - even partially-formed ideas were treated with humor. For a 200 level course, I gave more time and effort than a three-credit 200 level course gives credit for.

Christopher Bae: ANTH310, Spring 2010     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Anthropology
Course: ANTH 310 - Human Origins Crn (Section): 87584 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
3.47 15 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 8 (53%) 7 (47%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.08 13 0.28 Freq(%) 12 (92%) 1 (8%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 15 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 15 (100%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.93 15 0.26 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 14 (93%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 15 0.74 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 2 (13%) 11 (73%)
6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 15 0.83 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 3 (20%) 11 (73%)
7. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 15 0.62 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 3 (20%) 11 (73%)
8. I felt that this course challenged me intellectually.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.87 15 0.35 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 13 (87%)
9. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
Enjoied and learned alot from watching the videos
Coming to class is essential in obtaining a good grade since everything that is taught in lecture goes on the test. Purchasing a textbook is not required since all test material comes from the lecture notes. This is time consuming as well as a money saver.
during class questions would be asked to us that in a sense were a daily dose of what was to come on the tests. as well as the way the class was structured via 3 major topics in human origins. overall it was these two ways in which the class was most valuable and helpful in my passing with a good grade
I would say that all the aspects of the course were valuable.
lectures well constructed and well presented. use of 3 non cumulative exams was also good.
I enjoyed this class initially because it assumes that evolution of humans is true. I agree with this however, I feel most classes have to walk the line between school and religion whereas this course abolishes the idea of religion as creation from the beginning.
Instructor was very knowledgeable on the course, lectures were often very engaging and interesting.
All
Everthing was very valuable.
The build upon techniques used
Dr. Bae made it extremely clear what information was pertinent and insisted that we committed it to memory so that it could be applied to broader concepts concerned with human evolution. By so doing all the students were able to have informed discussions about related topics. He really made sure we had the right tools to intelligently discuss all of the issues raised.
Professor Bae clearly and thoughtfully presented class material through concise slides and lectures. He was also able to answer impromptu questions in ways that were understandable and relevant to the course material.
Professor Bae provided his students with informative lectures that aided in my learning of the subject matter. Personally I really enjoy this topic, so coming to class each day was a pleasure.
updates on new finds including austrolophiths
The whole course presented future value, making no specific section more or less valuable than the other.
10. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?
Not being able to view the power points on your own, like on laulima. It helps to see the material and study from it because sometimes you miss things while you are taking notes.
Attending class is a must to pass the class and if you don't like to attend class then you will most likely not pass with a good grade. Powerpoints are not posted online for the purpose of attending class which i think is reasonable.
Though i did not mind the two writing assignments, it seemed that their freedom of topic made it less applicable to the class. if this were a little more narrow i feel i could have been able to apply my paper to what i was learning in a better and stronger way.
None were "least valuable," though printouts of the slides would be helpful because sometimes the professor clicks through the slides too quickly.
text book...it had so much petential as the course is so interesting and while it is comprehensive and full of relevant information it could use some colourful pictures or something to make it more read-able
-- snipped --
i can not think of an aspect that was least valuable
N/A
Confusing details.
The videos were a little silly, but they still helped put things in context, so there weren't entirely unvaluable.
The textbook.
n/a
learning 5 different names for one piece of DATA
* Showing 12 out of 13 survey responses.

 

11. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.67 15 0.49 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (33%) 10 (67%)
12. The instructor puts material across in an interesting way.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 15 0.51 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 6 (40%) 9 (60%)
13. The instructor seems to enjoy teaching.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 15 0.83 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 3 (20%) 11 (73%)
14. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.87 15 0.35 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 13 (87%)
15. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.73 15 0.46 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (27%) 11 (73%)
16. The instructor treated students fairly.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.33 15 0.9 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 1 (7%) 5 (33%) 8 (53%)
17. The instructor seems well prepared for each class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 15 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 15 (100%)
18. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
More pictures in the lectures so the students can see what you are talking about as well
If anything he can post the powerpoints online, but that would defeat the purpose of him wanting students to attend class on a daily basis. He is actually helping the students out in that sense. Electronics are also not allowed, so he goes by an "old school" type of teaching which you write all your notes down with pen and paper. I feel this is good in the way that students don't have a reason to drift off in class and full attention on the professor.
Though the power point is great if it varied a little from time to time it might make it seem less repetitive and easier to not essentially "zone" out.
I would say that he is an excellent professor and the only thing that could be improved would be to make printouts of the slides available in class because he tends to flip through them faster than some people can write.
perhaps making some of the examples that are pictures or charts accessible online as while we can write all the information sometimes it is less relevant when the picture is absent, and pictures/fossils/graphs/charts can not be drawn so well (atleast not by me anyway). also real fossil specimens would be cool to show traits and evolution of them.
I would like to have slower lectures but, there is an abundance of information to cover. The class is pretty hard too.
He is excellent all around
Put the powerpoints online. Sometimes he went to fast in class and if you miss a slide you never get to see it again.
Dr. Bae is an incredibly informative man who NEVER talks down to students or disregards their questions. He presents the material in an interesting and efficient way. Whenever a student presents a question that he isn't sure about he looks it up and consistently returns to the next class with an answer. Plus, he's a really approachable guy.
He could perhaps distribute test-prep handouts slightly earlier, for the sake of my stress-levels and sanity.
I can't think of anything he can change. He is open to students, and teaches the material in a clear and understandable.
less rushing through lecture.I would've enjoyed spending more time on theories or debates within the practice. If we spent more time on essay topics then perhaps less people would fail the first test.
Improvement is not needed, he teaches the course effectively and challenges the knowledge given to us with tests and essays.
19. What two or three single words best describe this instructor?
fair, friendly
interesting, intelligent, articulate
Scintillating, Focused
knowledgeable, good speaker/presenter
Punctual, Intelligent
knowledgeable, approachable
Helpful, Enthusiastic
Intelligent Interesting Informative
Awesome and/or incredibly intelligent.
intelligent, Great teacher
Genius Condescending Funny
Intelligent, Strict
20. The TA appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.73 15 0.65 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 1 (7%) 9 (60%) 4 (27%)
21. The TA is friendly and accessible.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree   N/A  
4.82 15 0.4 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 9 (60%) 4 (27%)
22. Other comments:
the book didnt really help
really awesome class! alot of information but presented in a way that makes it understandable and easy to learn as does the fact that it is a really interesting subject (this is the part the text book fails to convey)
-- snipped --
This was the most interesting Anthropology class i have taken at UH.
-- snipped --
I really enjoy coming to class. Professor Bae cares about his student's learning, and ensures we understand the material in order to do well in the class as a whole
* Showing 4 out of 6 survey responses.

 

Christopher Bae: ANTH375, Fall 2009     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Anthropology
Course: ANTH 375 - Race and Human Variation Crn (Section): 79335 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
3.55 11 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (45%) 6 (55%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.45 11 0.52 Freq(%) 6 (55%) 5 (45%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 11 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (100%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.91 11 0.3 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 10 (91%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.45 11 0.93 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 0 (0%) 3 (27%) 7 (64%)
6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.55 11 0.69 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 3 (27%) 7 (64%)
7. I developed the ability to communicate clearly about this subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.55 11 0.69 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 3 (27%) 7 (64%)
8. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.55 11 0.69 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 3 (27%) 7 (64%)
9. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.55 11 0.69 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%) 3 (27%) 7 (64%)
10. I performed up to my potential in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.55 11 1.29 Freq(%) 1 (9%) 1 (9%) 3 (27%) 3 (27%) 3 (27%)
11. I felt that this course challenged me intellectually.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 10 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (40%) 6 (60%)
12. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
The whole thing. So interesting and very applicable to daily life thought processes.
The lectures itself were compact, informative and provided an in depth look at race and human variation.
Tee teaching style was effective for me.
the readings and text books were essential to learning this material.
Looking at race/human variation from both a cultural and a biological perspective.
Clear layout
The size of the class was nice because it gave us more of a chance to talk to Dr. Norton in class.
13. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?
I don't think that any of it was invaluable.
Perhaps providing extra credit relevant to the course.
NOne.
possibly the presentation, they were very brief and seemed to have no real point due to time constraints
Difficult
nothing, i felt it was all valuable.
14. The instructor stresses important points in lectures/discussions.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.18 11 1.17 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (18%) 0 (0%) 3 (27%) 6 (55%)
15. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.64 11 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (36%) 7 (64%)
16. The instructor appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.73 11 0.47 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (27%) 8 (73%)
17. The instructor is skillful in observing student reactions.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.64 11 0.5 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (36%) 7 (64%)
18. The instructor broadened my understanding and grasp of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 10 0.52 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (40%) 6 (60%)
19. The instructor maintains an atmosphere of good feeling in class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.73 11 0.47 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (27%) 8 (73%)
20. The instructor's feedback about my writing helped me become a better writer.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.64 11 1.12 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 2 (18%) 3 (27%) 3 (27%) 3 (27%)
21. The instructor sets high standards for students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.73 11 0.47 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (27%) 8 (73%)
22. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
Different text book
If the class lectures were provided in a PDF accessible to the student, class time can be spent paying attention as opposed to paying attention and scribbling notes that you would hope were legible later.
possibly give more time for the final presentations in the class
I think that Professor Norton is a great teacher. He is friendly and he has found a balance between having students respect and enjoy is class while at the same time challenging them. He seems to enjoy what he does and this in turn interest students. I do how ever feel that the his format for testing could be change in order to better evaluate how much students really learned. For example he often would have matching questions, to match a persons name with his or her book/key concepts. All that is important in studying for this type of question is word association. Actually understanding the concepts or what the book was about it not tested and this is a shame because in the end gaining knowledge of the subject matter is more important than just memorizing associated words. In addition the study guide provided is not really a study guide it is just a list of every possible term that could appear on the test. I think that if Professor Norton gave slight more indication of what to focus more or less on it would push students to examine the content of the course more in depth. This is because when you know what to focus on you can narrow in and truly understand that particular issue, yet if students are given a long list of terms all appearing to hold equal weight they are much more likely to just skim the surface of the the issues and thus miss key points.
Maybe, have a review session with the whole class to clarify anything we didn't understand or weren't sure about... that way we could all hear the questions and help ourselves study. but otherwise nothing, he was a great teacher and i loved this class.
I think he does a great job as is.
23. What two or three single words best describe this instructor?
awesome, intelligent, personable. I like him a lot.
Chillaxification. (yet stern)
knowledgeable, clear, concise.
very competent
Friendly, aware, relatable
organized
knowledgeable, helpful
enthusiastic, interesting

Christopher Bae: ANTH460, Fall 2009     Back to top

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Department: Anthropology
Course: ANTH 460 - Asian Paleoanthropology Crn (Section): 79371 (001)    
1. Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman   Sophomore   Junior   Senior   Grad   Other  
4.4 5 1.34 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (80%) 0 (0%)
2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective   Required  
1.2 5 0.45 Freq(%) 4 (80%) 1 (20%)
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%)
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 3 (60%)
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 3 (60%)
6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 3 (60%)
7. I developed the ability to communicate clearly about this subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%)
8. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 3 (60%)
9. I learned a lot in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%)
10. I performed up to my potential in this course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 3 (60%)
11. I felt that this course challenged me intellectually.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
5.0 5 0.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (100%)
12. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
The critical thinking processes.
13. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?
No survey responses were found.
14. The instructor stresses important points in lectures/discussions.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 3 (60%)
15. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%)
16. The instructor appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%)
17. The instructor is skillful in observing student reactions.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 3 (60%)
18. The instructor broadened my understanding and grasp of the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.6 5 0.55 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%) 3 (60%)
19. The instructor maintains an atmosphere of good feeling in class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%)
20. The instructor's feedback about my writing helped me become a better writer.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.4 5 0.89 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 1 (20%) 3 (60%)
21. The instructor sets high standards for students.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.8 5 0.45 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%)
22. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
n/a. The course fulfilled every goal.
23. What two or three single words best describe this instructor?
Intelligent, skeptical, friendly