|
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.71 |
24 |
0.46 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
7 (29%) |
17 (71%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.75 |
24 |
0.44 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (25%) |
18 (75%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.58 |
24 |
0.58 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (4%) |
8 (33%) |
15 (63%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.67 |
24 |
0.56 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (4%) |
6 (25%) |
17 (71%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.5 |
24 |
0.72 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (13%) |
6 (25%) |
15 (63%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
6. The instructor was well prepared.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.5 |
24 |
0.66 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (8%) |
8 (33%) |
14 (58%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.67 |
24 |
0.56 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (4%) |
6 (25%) |
17 (71%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.46 |
24 |
0.66 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (8%) |
9 (38%) |
13 (54%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.74 |
24 |
0.54 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (4%) |
4 (17%) |
18 (75%) |
1 (4%) |
|
|
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.42 |
24 |
0.65 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (8%) |
10 (42%) |
12 (50%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.63 |
24 |
0.65 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (8%) |
5 (21%) |
17 (71%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.63 |
24 |
0.65 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (8%) |
5 (21%) |
17 (71%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
|
| It was very intense but it taught me alot with my writting skills and how to write a 1000 word essay |
| I liked the "helping me write better" part. (: |
| I really liked Ms. Gartners dedication to her students to understand what kind of essay to write. |
| I like how Ms. Gartner is so chill :D |
| The class. |
| The aspect of this course that I enjoyed most was actually writing the papers. The types of papers I had to write where challenging for me. It was challenging because some of the papers I had to write I have never done before and I also didn't get to choose what I wrote about most of the time. I liked that I had to choose between choices she gave us. |
| I like how she would explain things in detail. |
| Like the fact of her always helping me and giving me that thrive that I can succeed in the
course. Also she is very motivating professor and always there when you need help with an
assignment. |
| Ms. Gartner was very effective in her projects, assignments and discussions. I really enjoyed the
course and wish more teachers were as laid back and approachable as she is. Thank you! HL |
|
|
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
|
| maybe not to much papers at once. |
| None that I can think of right now. |
| No she is fine with her teaching techniques. |
| No. |
| Not really. As long as the class gets there papers back its all good. |
| N/A |
| Nothing to improve. Its good the way it is. |
|
|
15. Other comments:
|
| this was a good class and the teacher made it easy to learn. |
| Thank you! |
| Thanx Ms. Gartner!!! |
| Nope. |
| N/A |
| Thank you again for being able to respond to my emails. Aloha Ms. Gartner! |
|
|
1. Course objectives and procedures (for example, attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.71 |
14 |
0.61 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
2 (14%) |
11 (79%) |
|
|
2. Course objectives were met.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.2 |
15 |
0.77 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (20%) |
6 (40%) |
6 (40%) |
|
|
3. The text(s) and class materials were helpful.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.07 |
15 |
0.88 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
2 (13%) |
7 (47%) |
5 (33%) |
|
|
4. Class activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were helpful and well suited to the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.13 |
15 |
0.83 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (27%) |
5 (33%) |
6 (40%) |
|
|
5. Assignments were clear and helpful in mastering course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
15 |
1.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (13%) |
1 (7%) |
7 (47%) |
5 (33%) |
|
|
6. Assignment and exams were fair and appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.14 |
14 |
0.86 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
1 (7%) |
7 (50%) |
5 (36%) |
|
|
7. The total course workload was fair and appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.13 |
15 |
0.99 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (13%) |
0 (0%) |
7 (47%) |
6 (40%) |
|
|
8. Regular attendance or participation was important to student success in the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.4 |
15 |
0.63 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
7 (47%) |
7 (47%) |
|
|
9. The instructor was always prepared.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.14 |
14 |
0.95 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
2 (14%) |
5 (36%) |
6 (43%) |
|
|
10. The instructor presented difficult concepts clearly and understandably.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.93 |
15 |
0.88 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
3 (20%) |
7 (47%) |
4 (27%) |
|
|
11. The instructor knew the subject matter well.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.33 |
15 |
0.82 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (20%) |
4 (27%) |
8 (53%) |
|
|
12. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.27 |
15 |
0.7 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (13%) |
7 (47%) |
6 (40%) |
|
|
13. The instructor was willing to help students during office hours and/or via email.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.47 |
15 |
0.64 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
6 (40%) |
8 (53%) |
|
|
14. The instructor clearly motivated the students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.27 |
15 |
0.7 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (13%) |
7 (47%) |
6 (40%) |
|
|
15. The instructor encouraged critical thinking.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.2 |
15 |
0.77 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (20%) |
6 (40%) |
6 (40%) |
|
|
16. The instructor graded fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.43 |
14 |
0.65 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
6 (43%) |
7 (50%) |
|
|
17. The instructor made helpful comments on assignments and exams in a timely manner.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.13 |
15 |
0.92 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (7%) |
2 (13%) |
6 (40%) |
6 (40%) |
|
|
18. I would rate the overall effectiveness of the instructor: F=Inferior; D=Poor; C=Average; B=Good; A=Superior.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
F |
D |
C |
B |
A |
| 4.53 |
15 |
0.74 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (13%) |
3 (20%) |
10 (67%) |
|
|
19. If you were teaching this course:
a. What would you do to improve it?
b. What would you change?
|
| I would suggest having more time for this class |
| none |
| I think my reading skill is getting better.
My vocabulary increased because we had a quiz every week
It was good for me. |
| I wouldn't improve anything; she's great at what she does! |
| Good course. |
| Give more examples of what the subject was about.
More talking about the subject. |
| Nothing |
| nutin |
| To improve the class I would make it more interesting by having more hands-on projects instead of reading out of the books all the time. I think that we should have more resources to study with and more outdoor resources.
The settings of the class everytime we talk about something enviromental. |
| Is would be much better if she made the class more exciting. |
|
|
20. What do you think of the teacher and his/her teaching methods?
|
| she does a very good job teaching. She is always focused and clear on what she is teaching her students |
| its good |
| I think her methods is good.
She used many materials such as youtube and music.
I was interested in these materials. |
| Good teacher. |
| Very good, it had good examples that really caught peoples attention, like a video for example. |
| Great |
| ok |
| I think the teacher is good but it could use a little more enthusiasm. |
| Her methods of teaching is fair. |
|
|
21. Has he/she contributed to your general knowledge or to learning job skills?
|
| Yes Very much so |
| Yes, she has. |
| Yes. |
| Yes. |
| Good |
| yeah |
| sort of. |
| No she has not help me. |
|
|
22. Other comments:
|
| She is a great professor. |
| Thank you very much. |
| Good class. |
| N/A |
| good job! |
| GREAT.............................. |
| In orverall this class is pretty cruise. |
|
