|
1. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
6 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (100%) |
|
|
2. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.83 |
6 |
0.41 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
5 (83%) |
|
|
3. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
5 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (100%) |
|
|
4. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
6 |
0.84 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
1 (17%) |
4 (67%) |
|
|
5. I learned to identify main points and central issues in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.33 |
6 |
0.82 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
2 (33%) |
3 (50%) |
|
|
6. I developed the ability to solve real problems in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.33 |
6 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (67%) |
2 (33%) |
|
|
7. I developed creative ability in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
6 |
0.84 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
1 (17%) |
4 (67%) |
|
|
8. I developed the ability to communicate clearly about this subject.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
6 |
0.55 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (50%) |
3 (50%) |
|
|
9. I developed the ability to carry out original research in this area.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
6 |
0.55 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (50%) |
3 (50%) |
|
|
10. I learned to recognize quality work in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.83 |
6 |
0.41 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
5 (83%) |
|
|
11. I developed plans to take additional related courses.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
6 |
0.84 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
1 (17%) |
4 (67%) |
|
|
12. I learned a lot in this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
6 |
0.84 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
1 (17%) |
4 (67%) |
|
|
13. I enjoyed this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
6 |
0.82 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (83%) |
|
|
14. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
|
| Learning the current state of the art |
| 1. Doing shrinky dinky device project
2. Giving seminar on research article
3. Doing class project
4. Homeworks |
| The presentation slides were quite helpful and the videos shown during the
lectures made it easier to understand the concepts more clearly. |
| The insightful review of the up-to-date research in bio microfluidic
devices.
The introduction of essential biological knowledge from an engineer's stand
point. |
|
|
15. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?
|
| Some lectures felt like thesis defenses |
| Nothing |
| No |
|
|
16. The instructor gives clear explanations.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.83 |
6 |
0.41 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
5 (83%) |
|
|
17. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.83 |
6 |
0.41 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
5 (83%) |
|
|
18. The instructor puts material across in an interesting way.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.33 |
6 |
1.03 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (33%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (67%) |
|
|
19. The instructor was accessible to students outside of class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.83 |
6 |
0.41 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
5 (83%) |
|
|
20. The amount of work required is appropriate for the credit received.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.83 |
6 |
0.41 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
5 (83%) |
|
|
21. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
|
| Shrinky Dink |
| Class project |
| The course covered a wide range of topics and the instructor was successful
in compiling everything together. Also the homeworks given were useful and at
the same time interesting too, especially the one in which we actually
fabricated the device, |
| The insightful review of the up-to-date research in bio microfluidic devices.
The introduction of essential biological knowledge from an engineer's stand
point. |
|
|
22. Which aspects of the course did you like least?
|
| none |
| Nothing |
| Did not find anything to dislike in the course |
| Nothing |
|
