|
1. Class Level (pick one)
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Freshman |
Sophomore |
Junior |
Senior |
Grad |
Other |
| 4.0 |
6 |
0.63 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
4 (67%) |
1 (17%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
2. Course
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Elective |
Required |
| 1.17 |
6 |
0.41 |
Freq(%) |
5 (83%) |
1 (17%) |
|
|
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
6 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (33%) |
4 (67%) |
|
|
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.33 |
6 |
0.82 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
2 (33%) |
3 (50%) |
|
|
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.17 |
6 |
0.75 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
3 (50%) |
2 (33%) |
|
|
6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.33 |
6 |
0.82 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
2 (33%) |
3 (50%) |
|
|
7. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.33 |
6 |
0.82 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
2 (33%) |
3 (50%) |
|
|
8. I create my own learning experiences in connection with the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
6 |
0.55 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (50%) |
3 (50%) |
|
|
9. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
6 |
0.84 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
1 (17%) |
4 (67%) |
|
|
10. The instructor appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
6 |
0.84 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
1 (17%) |
4 (67%) |
|
|
11. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.33 |
6 |
0.82 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
2 (33%) |
3 (50%) |
|
|
12. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.17 |
6 |
0.75 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
3 (50%) |
2 (33%) |
|
|
13. The instructor treated students fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
6 |
0.84 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
1 (17%) |
4 (67%) |
|
|
14. The flexibility of this course helps all kinds of students learn.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.33 |
6 |
0.82 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
2 (33%) |
3 (50%) |
|
|
15. Assistance from the instructor outside the class was readily available.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.17 |
6 |
0.98 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (33%) |
1 (17%) |
3 (50%) |
|
|
16. The objectives of the course were clearly explained.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.67 |
6 |
1.03 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
1 (17%) |
3 (50%) |
1 (17%) |
|
|
17. The amount of work required is appropriate for the credit received.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.17 |
6 |
0.75 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
3 (50%) |
2 (33%) |
|
|
18. The TA is friendly and accessible.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.33 |
6 |
0.82 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
2 (33%) |
3 (50%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
19. Assignments are graded fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.83 |
6 |
0.98 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (50%) |
1 (17%) |
2 (33%) |
|
|
20. Laboratory assignments are interesting and stimulating.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.17 |
6 |
0.98 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (33%) |
1 (17%) |
3 (50%) |
|
|
21. The course materials (texts, handouts) make a valuable contribution to the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
6 |
0.89 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (33%) |
2 (33%) |
2 (33%) |
|
|
22. The course was well-organized in terms of continuity and presentation.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.33 |
6 |
0.82 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
2 (33%) |
3 (50%) |
|
|
23. Examinations cover the important aspects of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.17 |
6 |
0.75 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
3 (50%) |
2 (33%) |
|
|
24. The exams concentrated on reasoning and applying concepts.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
6 |
0.89 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (33%) |
2 (33%) |
2 (33%) |
|
|
25. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
|
| I enjoyed working in the greenhouse identifying problems and developing solutions. I am much
more likely now than before to consider Nursery Manager or Nursery Owner as my next profession. |
| The plant growing! And the snacks, of course. |
| Hands on experience. |
|
|
26. Which aspects of the course did you like least?
|
| Marathon lecture. We spent upwards of 3 hours at a time in lecture. I wanted more hands on more
problem solving like you might have in the real world as a Nursery Manager. Our lab time was often
a continuation of the lecture with few opportunities to put the information to practical use. |
|
|
27. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Very Poor |
Poor |
Average |
Good |
Excellent |
| 4.33 |
6 |
0.82 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
2 (33%) |
3 (50%) |
|
|
28. Other comments:
|
| Neutral comments mean the question was not applicable for our class.
The scope of this class was not communicated efficiently. The majority of our lab time was lost and
we spent much more time then needed being growers and less time as nursery managers.
I believe that their needs to be a balance between growing and management. |
| Thank you for such a great experience! I've really enjoyed the semester. |
|
|
1. Class Level (pick one)
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Freshman |
Sophomore |
Junior |
Senior |
Grad |
Other |
| 3.44 |
9 |
0.88 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
4 (44%) |
3 (33%) |
1 (11%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
2. Course
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Elective |
Required |
| 1.63 |
8 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
3 (38%) |
5 (63%) |
|
|
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
9 |
0.71 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
1 (11%) |
7 (78%) |
|
|
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.44 |
9 |
0.88 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (22%) |
1 (11%) |
6 (67%) |
|
|
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.78 |
9 |
0.44 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (22%) |
7 (78%) |
|
|
6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.11 |
9 |
1.36 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (22%) |
1 (11%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (67%) |
|
|
7. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.89 |
9 |
1.17 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
3 (33%) |
1 (11%) |
4 (44%) |
|
|
8. I enjoyed this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.11 |
9 |
1.17 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
2 (22%) |
1 (11%) |
5 (56%) |
|
|
9. I have become more competent in this subject area during this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.22 |
9 |
0.97 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (33%) |
1 (11%) |
5 (56%) |
|
|
10. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
|
| The final project which we have not done yet. |
| I learned the basic principles of starting a business. |
| learning to run our own biz
& eating dim sum, and shrimp taro!!!!! |
| The handouts and the real life examples of business management |
|
|
11. Ten years from now I'll probably remember this course most by ...
|
| The final project. |
| The necessity of mutating business ideas and the real life examples of businesses like P&G and Post-it Notes etc. |
| Her great way of teaching and relating to the students... as well as appealing to their better nature
by taking them out for lunch! |
| My business proposal ideas and hopefully they will one day be successful. |
|
|
12. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
9 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
9 (100%) |
|
|
13. The instructor appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.78 |
9 |
0.44 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (22%) |
7 (78%) |
|
|
14. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
9 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (33%) |
6 (67%) |
|
|
15. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.44 |
9 |
0.73 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
3 (33%) |
5 (56%) |
|
|
16. The instructor treated students fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.89 |
9 |
0.33 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
8 (89%) |
|
|
17. The instructor adjusts to fit individual abilities and interests.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.78 |
9 |
0.67 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (89%) |
|
|
18. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.78 |
9 |
0.44 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (22%) |
7 (78%) |
|
|
19. The instructor suggests specific ways students can improve.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.56 |
9 |
0.73 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
2 (22%) |
6 (67%) |
|
|
20. Assistance from the instructor outside the class was readily available.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.78 |
9 |
0.44 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (22%) |
7 (78%) |
|
|
21. The objectives of the course were clearly explained.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.56 |
9 |
0.88 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (22%) |
0 (0%) |
7 (78%) |
|
|
22. Work requirements and grading system were clear from the beginning.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.44 |
9 |
0.73 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
3 (33%) |
5 (56%) |
|
|
23. In general, the course was well organized.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.44 |
9 |
0.88 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (22%) |
1 (11%) |
6 (67%) |
|
|
24. The amount of work required is appropriate for the credit received.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.56 |
9 |
0.73 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
2 (22%) |
6 (67%) |
|
|
25. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the instructor?
|
| Very helpful and interested in giving students anything they need. |
| She is highly enthusiastic about the course material and is a great story teller. |
| She is so easy to talk to and is always willing to help as much as you need, whenever you need it! |
| Very friendly and approachable. |
|
|
26. The TA is friendly and accessible.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.67 |
9 |
0.71 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
1 (11%) |
7 (78%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
27. Assignments are graded fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
9 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (33%) |
6 (67%) |
|
|
28. Student presentations in class are interesting and stimulating.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.33 |
9 |
0.87 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (22%) |
2 (22%) |
5 (56%) |
|
|
29. The course materials (texts, handouts) make a valuable contribution to the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.22 |
9 |
0.97 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (33%) |
1 (11%) |
5 (56%) |
|
|
30. The instructional materials (e.g., texts, handouts, etc.) were relevant to course objectives.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
8 |
0.76 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
2 (25%) |
5 (63%) |
|
|
31. The course was well-organized in terms of continuity and presentation.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.44 |
9 |
0.88 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (22%) |
1 (11%) |
6 (67%) |
|
|
32. The course has significantly increased my knowledge and interests.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 3.78 |
9 |
1.39 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (33%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (22%) |
4 (44%) |
|
|
33. Examinations cover the important aspects of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.33 |
9 |
0.87 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (22%) |
2 (22%) |
5 (56%) |
|
|
34. The exams gave students an opportunity to demonstrate what they had learned.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.44 |
9 |
0.88 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (22%) |
1 (11%) |
6 (67%) |
|
|
35. The exams concentrated on the important aspects of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.56 |
9 |
0.73 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
2 (22%) |
6 (67%) |
|
|
36. The grading system was clearly explained.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.44 |
9 |
0.73 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
3 (33%) |
5 (56%) |
|
|
37. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Very Poor |
Poor |
Average |
Good |
Excellent |
| 4.0 |
8 |
1.2 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
2 (25%) |
1 (13%) |
4 (50%) |
|
|
38. Other comments:
|
| Didn't learn that much. Wish there was interaction with real-world
businesses/examples, and small exercises on actual business practices, like
accounting, finance, and managing employees. |
| I do not think this course should be a TPSS requirement. I think an option of taking either this class or the accounting focused class should be allowed if it is necessary. I do not really feel like I have any knowledge of how to start a business or run one or have an understanding of real business terminology or processes. It was more of a feel good class that taught me about creativity in mutating possible business ideas and that profit is important. I personally would rather learn about actual profit and managing numbers. It was an easy class though and entertaining. |
| She is a fantastic professor, I wish all professors would learn from her! I would strongly recommend
ANYONE taking her class!! She's the most helpful and easy to talk to professor I've had in the three
years I've been at UH. Thank you Dr. Cheah!!! |
| my suggestions for professor cheah are to allow students more time to work on their projects in
class. The story telling, while interesting, gets a little old after a while. I would suggest she tell a
relevant story, then allow the students to work on the related activity. |
|
|
1. Class Level (pick one)
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Freshman |
Sophomore |
Junior |
Senior |
Grad |
Other |
| 3.33 |
6 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (67%) |
2 (33%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
2. Course
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Elective |
Required |
| 1.75 |
4 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
1 (25%) |
3 (75%) |
|
|
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
8 |
0.46 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (25%) |
6 (75%) |
|
|
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.38 |
8 |
0.74 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
3 (38%) |
4 (50%) |
|
|
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.25 |
8 |
1.04 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (38%) |
4 (50%) |
|
|
6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
8 |
0.46 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (25%) |
6 (75%) |
|
|
7. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
8 |
0.46 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (25%) |
6 (75%) |
|
|
8. I have become more competent in this subject area during this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.88 |
8 |
0.35 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
7 (88%) |
|
|
9. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
|
| 1-on-1 lab work. |
| The morphogenetic factors of plants as well as learning to research effectively to manage a
business in tissue culture |
| performing lab works and hands-on was really helpful and made the class more
interesting. the powerpoint presentations prepared for class were all really
helpful and prepared well. |
| lab!!! |
| Hands on learning |
|
|
10. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.88 |
8 |
0.35 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
7 (88%) |
|
|
11. The instructor appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.88 |
8 |
0.35 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
7 (88%) |
|
|
12. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
8 |
0.53 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (50%) |
4 (50%) |
|
|
13. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
8 |
0.76 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
2 (25%) |
5 (63%) |
|
|
14. The instructor treated students fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
8 |
1.07 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
6 (75%) |
|
|
15. The instructor adjusts to fit individual abilities and interests.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
8 |
0.46 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (25%) |
6 (75%) |
|
|
16. Assistance from the instructor outside the class was readily available.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
8 |
0.76 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
2 (25%) |
5 (63%) |
|
|
17. The amount of work required is appropriate for the credit received.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
8 |
1.07 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
6 (75%) |
|
|
18. The TA is friendly and accessible.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.63 |
8 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (38%) |
5 (63%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
19. Assignments are graded fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
8 |
0.76 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
2 (25%) |
5 (63%) |
|
|
20. Class projects are related to course goals and objectives.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
8 |
0.46 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (25%) |
6 (75%) |
|
|
21. The laboratory was a valuable part of this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
8 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (100%) |
|
|
22. The course materials (texts, handouts) make a valuable contribution to the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.63 |
8 |
1.06 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
7 (88%) |
|
|
23. The course was well-organized in terms of continuity and presentation.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
8 |
0.76 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
2 (25%) |
5 (63%) |
|
|
24. Examinations cover the important aspects of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.63 |
8 |
0.74 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
1 (13%) |
6 (75%) |
|
|
25. The exams gave students an opportunity to demonstrate what they had learned.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.63 |
8 |
0.74 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
1 (13%) |
6 (75%) |
|
|
26. The grading system was clearly explained.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
8 |
0.53 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (50%) |
4 (50%) |
|
|
27. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Very Poor |
Poor |
Average |
Good |
Excellent |
| 4.71 |
7 |
0.49 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (29%) |
5 (71%) |
|
|
28. Other comments:
|
| Very fun course. If I could redo it, I'd choose to propagate ferns or
something that grows very quickly. |
| It seemed as though understanding of what the instructor varied, but those who had er as an
instructor did better overall because they knew what she wanted in terms of assignments. Her
passion for the topic made it easier to learn from her. Over all a very good course. Everyone
should have a basic biology or chemistry class though it would make the class run more
smoothly. |
| learned a lot |
| Its unfortunate this class is offered only once every two years as some students will be
unable to take it. The class should be split into two semesters for in depth learning and
upon completion certification should be a possibilty. |
|
|
1. Class Level (pick one)
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Freshman |
Sophomore |
Junior |
Senior |
Grad |
Other |
| 5.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
2. Course
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Elective |
Required |
| 1.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
4 (100%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
|
|
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
|
|
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
4 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
3 (75%) |
|
|
6. I learned to apply principles from this course to new situations.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
|
|
7. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
|
|
8. I have become more competent in this subject area during this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
|
|
9. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
|
| This course was extremely beneficial for me. I have applied the skills and knowledge which I have gained from this course to my career, academics and personal life. I also have helped many other people understand the basics of project and productivity management. I found all of the aspect of the course complement each other to create a well rounded stress free productivity system. |
| becoming a better people manager. |
| The overall scope of the class, which was based on practical and applicable knowledge and not completely on theoretical aspects. It was also adapted to the specific needs and interests of the students. |
| ORGANIZATION was number one for me! I've found that a lot of the concepts we talked about are all inter-related and comprise a system, and if one component of that system is unbalanced it will throw everything else off balance, as well. Energy management was also a valuable aspect for me, as was the selection of the ideal system of time management. |
|
|
10. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
|
|
11. The instructor appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
|
|
12. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
|
|
13. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
|
|
14. The instructor treated students fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
|
|
15. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
|
|
16. Assistance from the instructor outside the class was readily available.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
|
|
17. Work requirements and grading system were clear from the beginning.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
4 |
1.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (25%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (75%) |
|
|
18. The amount of work required is appropriate for the credit received.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
|
|
19. Assignments are graded fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
3 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (100%) |
|
|
20. The course materials (texts, handouts) make a valuable contribution to the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
|
|
21. The course was well-organized in terms of continuity and presentation.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
|
|
22. The course is highly recommended if it were taught by this instructor.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
|
|
23. Examinations cover the important aspects of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
|
|
24. The exams gave students an opportunity to demonstrate what they had learned.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
|
|
25. The grading system was clearly explained.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
|
|
26. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Very Poor |
Poor |
Average |
Good |
Excellent |
| 5.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (100%) |
|
|
27. State in two or three sentences how this course could be improved.
|
| I was very impressed at the organization and execution of the entire course. I would not have changed any aspect. |
| Do not go over time, otherwise the class was a huge success and will be very
helpful moving forward |
| The course is fine the way it is. If students could do a quick assessment of themselves through an aptitude test to realize their strengths and weaknesses, that would also help them in the future. |
|
|
28. Other comments:
|
| This was an amazing course. I would highly recommend it to other students. I feel like the topics covered in this course are essential to academic and personal success, but are rarely discussed in other classes. I plan to practice and build upon the material taught, as I find it extremely valuable. I feel very fortunate that this class was offered to our department and that I was able to participate. |
|
|
1. Class Level (pick one)
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Freshman |
Sophomore |
Junior |
Senior |
Grad |
Other |
| 3.67 |
12 |
0.78 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
3 (25%) |
7 (58%) |
1 (8%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
2. Course
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Elective |
Required |
| 1.73 |
11 |
0.47 |
Freq(%) |
3 (27%) |
8 (73%) |
|
|
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.91 |
11 |
0.3 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
10 (91%) |
|
|
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.92 |
12 |
0.29 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
11 (92%) |
|
|
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.58 |
12 |
0.51 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (42%) |
7 (58%) |
|
|
6. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
12 |
0.45 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (25%) |
9 (75%) |
|
|
7. I enjoyed this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
12 |
0.65 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
2 (17%) |
9 (75%) |
|
|
8. I have become more competent in this subject area during this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
12 |
0.45 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (25%) |
9 (75%) |
|
|
9. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
|
| The personal anecdotes from the instructor from her real-world experiences were highly informative. |
| The visualization, and reality of buissness owning facts. |
| Thinking for yourself instead as a class. The individual learning made it more beneficial for us as students. |
| The basics taught on business and the fact that you need to understand them because you will be presenting on them. After a while of presenting you gain confidence and skills. |
| All the real life examples were especially helpful in understanding the business concepts. |
| Mrs. Cheah developed the course very well to fit the students intrests. It was fun and a great learning tool to develope our business as we learn new business techniques in the class. Her slide shows and use of laulima were also very helpful. |
| The visualization was very useful. Also the ability to plan effectively. |
| lectures and personal experiences and stories, also powerpoint presentations - thank you for the color |
| have a vision in life! |
| Dr. Cheah's personal experience helped to make key concepts understandable. She is reasonable
and always willing to help. |
|
|
10. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.83 |
12 |
0.39 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (17%) |
10 (83%) |
|
|
11. The instructor appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.92 |
12 |
0.29 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
11 (92%) |
|
|
12. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.83 |
12 |
0.39 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (17%) |
10 (83%) |
|
|
13. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.92 |
12 |
0.29 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
11 (92%) |
|
|
14. The instructor treated students fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.92 |
12 |
0.29 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
11 (92%) |
|
|
15. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.92 |
12 |
0.29 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
11 (92%) |
|
|
16. The instructor suggests specific ways students can improve.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.83 |
12 |
0.39 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (17%) |
10 (83%) |
|
|
17. Assistance from the instructor outside the class was readily available.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
12 |
0.62 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
1 (8%) |
10 (83%) |
|
|
18. Work requirements and grading system were clear from the beginning.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
12 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (50%) |
6 (50%) |
|
|
19. In general, the course was well organized.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.92 |
12 |
0.29 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
11 (92%) |
|
|
20. The amount of work required is appropriate for the credit received.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.92 |
12 |
0.29 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
11 (92%) |
|
|
21. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the instructor?
|
| Her knowledge of the subject matter is truly staggering and once again, her real-world experience in a field such is this is absolutely invaluable. |
| Business stragtegies and marketing skills. |
| Always willing to help outside of class if the help was needed. |
| her organization and care to teach us. |
| She took time out of class to meet with me and my partner, to help us understand and develop a business plan. She even let us borrow a book and video for more ideas. |
| She was very clear with her concepts and always available for help. She was also very encouraging of peoples business ideas and developed practical examples in class. |
| The handouts were very helpful. It was convenient for us students to have
them printed out for us. |
| her desire to share knowledge and help others to learn and be successful |
| -have a vision
- don't be afraid of planning your life
-dream BIG |
| Same as nine |
|
|
22. The TA is friendly and accessible.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.75 |
12 |
0.45 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (25%) |
9 (75%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
23. Assignments are graded fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
12 |
0.45 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (25%) |
9 (75%) |
|
|
24. The course materials (texts, handouts) make a valuable contribution to the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.58 |
12 |
0.67 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
3 (25%) |
8 (67%) |
|
|
25. The instructional materials (e.g., texts, handouts, etc.) were relevant to course objectives.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.83 |
12 |
0.39 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (17%) |
10 (83%) |
|
|
26. The course was well-organized in terms of continuity and presentation.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.83 |
12 |
0.39 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (17%) |
10 (83%) |
|
|
27. Audiovisual materials (or computers) used in this course were well integrated with course topics.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.83 |
12 |
0.39 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (17%) |
10 (83%) |
|
|
28. Examinations cover the important aspects of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
12 |
0.45 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (25%) |
9 (75%) |
|
|
29. The exams gave students an opportunity to demonstrate what they had learned.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.91 |
11 |
0.3 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
10 (91%) |
|
|
30. The grading system was clearly explained.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.91 |
11 |
0.3 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
10 (91%) |
|
|
31. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Very Poor |
Poor |
Average |
Good |
Excellent |
| 4.92 |
12 |
0.29 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
11 (92%) |
|
|
32. Global appraisal: considering everything how would you rate the overall effectiveness of this Teaching Assistant?
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Very Poor |
Poor |
Average |
Good |
Excellent |
| 4.75 |
12 |
0.45 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (25%) |
9 (75%) |
|
|
33. State in two or three sentences how this course could be improved.
|
| More field work would be interesting, though difficult to integrate into the current format of the course. |
| More stucture given to students while deciding their business. less powerpoints. |
| Maybe more class discussions. It was good to hear from other students about their ideas. |
| I think if the slides and class presentation was mixed up a little more it would have been more interesting and exciting. It was both interesting and exciting though. |
| more class participation and interaction would make the class more interest... ie like a group circle/discussion |
| Class was held late a few times along with an exam. |
| More field trips :D |
| Taught in another classroom...without mosquitos, bugs, and noisy air conditioner...these things do a dis-service to the instructor and students |
| I do not believe there is a need for all the printed powerpoints. Just as long as its online, students
are fine. I do not have any other suggestions as far as that goes. |
|
|
34. Other comments:
|
| Awesome class. |
| Great class, really enjoyed making my business and seeing other class mates businesses. |
| Thank you so much Dr. Cheah for being generous with your time and taking time out or your busy schedule to meet with us.
Also, I probably will never go into business but i learned so much useful information that i will be passing on to my father. Your enthusiasm and knowledge on the subjst really made the class a pleasure to attend.
And of course, thanks again for taking us out for dim sum! |
| This was a great class and I learned a lot. |
| Thanks for everything. I've learned a lot of useful information from your
class. |
| Thank you for everything |
|
|
1. Class Level (pick one)
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Freshman |
Sophomore |
Junior |
Senior |
Grad |
Other |
| 3.88 |
8 |
0.83 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (38%) |
3 (38%) |
2 (25%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
2. Course
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Elective |
Required |
| 1.33 |
6 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
4 (67%) |
2 (33%) |
|
|
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
9 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (33%) |
6 (67%) |
|
|
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.78 |
9 |
0.44 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (22%) |
7 (78%) |
|
|
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.56 |
9 |
0.53 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (44%) |
5 (56%) |
|
|
6. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.56 |
9 |
0.53 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (44%) |
5 (56%) |
|
|
7. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.44 |
9 |
0.73 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
3 (33%) |
5 (56%) |
|
|
8. I create my own learning experiences in connection with the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.78 |
9 |
0.44 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (22%) |
7 (78%) |
|
|
9. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.88 |
8 |
0.35 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
7 (88%) |
|
|
10. The instructor appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.78 |
9 |
0.44 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (22%) |
7 (78%) |
|
|
11. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.56 |
9 |
0.53 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (44%) |
5 (56%) |
|
|
12. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.78 |
9 |
0.44 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (22%) |
7 (78%) |
|
|
13. The instructor treated students fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
9 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
9 (100%) |
|
|
14. The flexibility of this course helps all kinds of students learn.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
8 |
0.76 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
2 (25%) |
5 (63%) |
|
|
15. Assistance from the instructor outside the class was readily available.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.78 |
9 |
0.44 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (22%) |
7 (78%) |
|
|
16. The objectives of the course were clearly explained.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.33 |
9 |
1.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (33%) |
5 (56%) |
|
|
17. The amount of work required is appropriate for the credit received.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.33 |
9 |
1.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (33%) |
5 (56%) |
|
|
18. Assignments are graded fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
9 |
0.71 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
1 (11%) |
7 (78%) |
|
|
19. Laboratory assignments are interesting and stimulating.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.44 |
9 |
0.73 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
3 (33%) |
5 (56%) |
|
|
20. The course materials (texts, handouts) make a valuable contribution to the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.44 |
9 |
0.88 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (22%) |
1 (11%) |
6 (67%) |
|
|
21. There was considerable agreement between the announced course and what was taught.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.33 |
9 |
0.71 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
4 (44%) |
4 (44%) |
|
|
22. The instructional materials (e.g., texts, handouts, etc.) were relevant to course objectives.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.44 |
9 |
0.88 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (22%) |
1 (11%) |
6 (67%) |
|
|
23. The course was well-organized in terms of continuity and presentation.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.56 |
9 |
0.73 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
2 (22%) |
6 (67%) |
|
|
24. Examinations cover the important aspects of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.88 |
8 |
0.35 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
7 (88%) |
|
|
25. The exams concentrated on reasoning and applying concepts.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
9 |
0.71 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
1 (11%) |
7 (78%) |
|
|
26. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
|
| The sales experience |
| This was a very good course. Not entirely what I expected going in, but it
proved to be valuable. Gave me more of business sense than what a lot of the
other TPSS courses have offered in the past--hey, we all have to make some
money someday. |
| I loved the fact that at the end of the semester you were able to make a profit based on how well you researched your product as well as how hard you worked on your project. |
| Creating my own business and taking risks to do so. |
| Big island trip.
Her enthusiasm and sense of humor when presenting
Hands on learning in nursery production |
| Real-world experience -- the plant sale. Being able to attempt to conduct a real sale, with real business attributes and outcomes. |
| field trips, class at the green house with nursery activities |
| I enjoyed working with a partner all semester as a business owner and production manager. |
|
|
27. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this COURSE?
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Very Poor |
Poor |
Average |
Good |
Excellent |
| 4.67 |
9 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (33%) |
6 (67%) |
|
|
28. Other comments:
|
| One suggestion--order the plants earlier |
| I wish the course was a bit longer so you could have more time to prep your finished product. But otherwise I thought it was an insightful learning experience. |
| Great teacher w/ good charisma. |
|
|
1. Class Level (pick one)
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Freshman |
Sophomore |
Junior |
Senior |
Grad |
Other |
| 3.25 |
8 |
0.46 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (75%) |
2 (25%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
2. Course
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Elective |
Required |
| 1.75 |
8 |
0.46 |
Freq(%) |
2 (25%) |
6 (75%) |
|
|
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.82 |
11 |
0.4 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (18%) |
9 (82%) |
|
|
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.45 |
11 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (55%) |
5 (45%) |
|
|
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.27 |
11 |
0.9 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (27%) |
2 (18%) |
6 (55%) |
|
|
6. I developed the ability to solve real problems in this field.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.36 |
11 |
0.81 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (18%) |
3 (27%) |
6 (55%) |
|
|
7. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.25 |
8 |
1.49 |
Freq(%) |
1 (13%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (75%) |
|
|
8. I was stimulated to discuss related topics outside of class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.27 |
11 |
0.9 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (45%) |
5 (45%) |
|
|
9. I increased my awareness of my own interests and talents.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.18 |
11 |
0.87 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (27%) |
3 (27%) |
5 (45%) |
|
|
10. My opinions about some topics changed because of this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
11 |
1.1 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
3 (27%) |
2 (18%) |
5 (45%) |
|
|
11. What things did you get from this course that will benefit you personally?
|
| I have learned a lot about the way that a business is run. I also learned how to work more
effectively as a team. |
| Great extensive knoledge on the subjects. Personal one to one contultation |
| knowing how businesses operate is very useful, even if i will not be owning one or working for one in the future |
| The list could really go on forever, the personal knowledge and first hand experience that we are fortunate enough to hear about on a regular basis was key in the learning. Personal experience is something that cannot be taught, having an insider look was great. |
| The knowledge of how much it takes to come up with a successful business plan. |
|
|
12. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
8 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (100%) |
|
|
13. The instructor appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
8 |
0.46 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (25%) |
6 (75%) |
|
|
14. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.13 |
8 |
0.83 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (25%) |
3 (38%) |
3 (38%) |
|
|
15. The instructor broadened my understanding and grasp of the subject.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.27 |
11 |
0.65 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
6 (55%) |
4 (36%) |
|
|
16. The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
8 |
0.53 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (50%) |
4 (50%) |
|
|
17. The instructor was enthusiastic about the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.88 |
8 |
0.35 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
7 (88%) |
|
|
18. The instructor treated students fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.38 |
8 |
0.74 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
3 (38%) |
4 (50%) |
|
|
19. The flexibility of this course helps all kinds of students learn.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.64 |
11 |
0.67 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
2 (18%) |
8 (73%) |
|
|
20. One real strength of this course is the classroom discussion.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.27 |
11 |
0.9 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (27%) |
2 (18%) |
6 (55%) |
|
|
21. Assistance from the instructor outside the class was readily available.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.88 |
8 |
0.35 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
7 (88%) |
|
|
22. In general, the course was well organized.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.18 |
11 |
0.87 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (27%) |
3 (27%) |
5 (45%) |
|
|
23. The amount of work required is appropriate for the credit received.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.63 |
8 |
0.52 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (38%) |
5 (63%) |
|
|
24. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the instructor?
|
| her life experiences, she was able to give a lot of hands on examles which were helpful. |
| Her willingness to spend extra time to explain and develop concepts and specific concerns from class. |
| Happy |
| she is always willing to devote time to one on one help, and she also knows the students well and is really caring about their needs |
| Her openness and ability to share the personal experiences that has brought her to where she is today. Having the material in front of you at all times is nice. lots of paper though.. |
| Her real life experience in the business world. |
|
|
25. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would rate this INSTRUCTOR?
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Very Poor |
Poor |
Average |
Good |
Excellent |
| 4.73 |
11 |
0.47 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (27%) |
8 (73%) |
|
|
26. The TA was able to stimulate class participation.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 3.4 |
11 |
1.26 |
Freq(%) |
1 (9%) |
1 (9%) |
3 (27%) |
3 (27%) |
2 (18%) |
1 (9%) |
|
|
27. The TA was easy to talk with and available for consultation.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 3.91 |
11 |
1.04 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
3 (27%) |
3 (27%) |
4 (36%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
28. Assignments are graded fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.13 |
8 |
0.83 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (25%) |
3 (38%) |
3 (38%) |
|
|
29. The course materials (texts, handouts) make a valuable contribution to the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.38 |
8 |
0.74 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
3 (38%) |
4 (50%) |
|
|
30. The course was well-organized in terms of continuity and presentation.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
8 |
1.07 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (50%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (50%) |
|
|
31. The course was a valuable contribution to my education.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
11 |
1.1 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (18%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (45%) |
4 (36%) |
|
|
32. The course has significantly increased my knowledge and interests.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
11 |
1.1 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (18%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (45%) |
4 (36%) |
|
|
33. Examinations cover the important aspects of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
8 |
0.93 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (25%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (75%) |
|
|
34. The exams concentrated on reasoning and applying concepts.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.18 |
11 |
0.98 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (36%) |
1 (9%) |
6 (55%) |
|
|
35. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?
|
| no exams, just a project. She lets us vote on things that effected the entire class. |
| Teaching style |
| real world scenario |
| The first hand stories of the real life business world. stories stimulate the brain and allow you to really think about what you are learning. |
|
|
36. Which aspects of the course did you like least?
|
| The course was a bit disorganized. |
| group project with not enough in-class time to work on it |
| It seemed like there was an overabundance of paper being used in the class, although it may be beneficial to us, the environment may not be as happy. |
|
|
37. Please list: suggestions for improving the TA's relationships and communication (student - student and student - TA interactions).
|
| ta didnt really do anything with our class, maybe the ta coud meet with the groups on an individual
basis to make sure that everyone has their things together and fully understand the jobs that we are
assigned. |
| Everything was top notch! no need change. |
|
|
38. State in two or three sentences how this course could be improved.
|
| plan for significant in-class time for the group projects. if the grade for the class is going to be based on one big thing, then that one big thing must have ample time allotted to it during class time. provide time evenly spaced throughout semester for this. |
| This course could not be improved. |
|
|
39. Other comments:
|
| Dr. Cheah was an awesome teacher. she really cares about if the students are learning and
understaning the context of the lecture. She really wants us to learn, which is necessary of a
teacher |
| it is extremely difficult to coordinate 4-5 busy students to work on a huge group project outside of class. otherwise, an excellent course with an excellent teacher. |
| Thank you very much for the time you took to prep and lecture for this class, not to mention the out of class time. The stories are great and I am excited to see the new and innovative ideas to come! Mahalo |
|