|
1. Course objectives and procedures (for example, attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.6 |
10 |
0.97 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
8 (80%) |
|
|
2. Course objectives were met.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.6 |
10 |
0.97 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
8 (80%) |
|
|
3. The text(s) and class materials were helpful.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
10 |
1.08 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
1 (10%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (80%) |
|
|
4. Class activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were helpful and well suited to the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.0 |
10 |
1.33 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (20%) |
2 (20%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (60%) |
|
|
5. Assignments were clear and helpful in mastering course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
10 |
1.08 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
1 (10%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (80%) |
|
|
6. Assignment and exams were fair and appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
10 |
0.97 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (20%) |
7 (70%) |
|
|
7. The total course workload was fair and appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
10 |
1.08 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
1 (10%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (80%) |
|
|
8. Regular attendance or participation was important to student success in the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.3 |
10 |
1.16 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
2 (20%) |
0 (0%) |
7 (70%) |
|
|
9. The instructor was always prepared.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.6 |
10 |
0.97 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
8 (80%) |
|
|
10. The instructor presented difficult concepts clearly and understandably.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.6 |
10 |
0.97 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
8 (80%) |
|
|
11. The instructor knew the subject matter well.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
10 |
1.08 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
1 (10%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (80%) |
|
|
12. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.6 |
10 |
0.97 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
8 (80%) |
|
|
13. The instructor was willing to help students during office hours and/or via email.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
10 |
1.08 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
1 (10%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (80%) |
|
|
14. The instructor clearly motivated the students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.6 |
10 |
0.97 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
8 (80%) |
|
|
15. The instructor encouraged critical thinking.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
10 |
0.97 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (20%) |
7 (70%) |
|
|
16. The instructor graded fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.4 |
10 |
1.07 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
1 (10%) |
1 (10%) |
7 (70%) |
|
|
17. The instructor made helpful comments on assignments and exams in a timely manner.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.4 |
10 |
1.07 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
1 (10%) |
1 (10%) |
7 (70%) |
|
|
18. I would rate the overall effectiveness of the instructor: F=Inferior; D=Poor; C=Average; B=Good; A=Superior.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
F |
D |
C |
B |
A |
| 4.5 |
10 |
0.97 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (20%) |
7 (70%) |
|
|
19. If you were teaching this course:
a. What would you do to improve it?
b. What would you change?
|
| nothing |
| Mr. Van Tuyl did a wonderful job teaching this course, I feel there are no changes that should be made! |
| with all sorts of accounting classes, possibly simplify the material if possible through certain examples. |
| I would not change a thing. |
| I think the material is well suited for the class, the only obstacle was trying to get on line for the homework page. |
| Nothing its just how online classes should be. Not to hard and not to easy. |
|
|
20. What do you think of the teacher and his/her teaching methods?
|
| I think that he has very good people skills, which allows him to be considerate and fair. |
| This course was delivered online but the resourses and quick repsonses from the teacher gave me the opportunity to better my education. |
| His methods of trying to understand the course he also trys to understand the course as well. He does his best to understand the course as best as possible. |
| Peter Van Tuyl was always there for me, anytime I needed to ask him a question he was always right there to help me. Even though this is a online course anytime I needed to call him, he always picked up. Day or Night. If it came down to it he was always more then happy to do a video chat with me so that he can actually show me what I am doing wrong. |
| I think it is hard for my instructor to answer all students on line, but his support and concern has helped me have a good attitude towards taking on line classes |
| Distance learning. |
| I think the teacher was great. |
|
|
21. Has he/she contributed to your general knowledge or to learning job skills?
|
| Yes |
| Mr. Van Tuyl is a wonderful teacher with so much knowledge and experience in the field of accounting. He has taught me different parts of the accounting process which will be beneficial to my future career goals in accounting. |
| Got a bit of insight to understanding the course a lil more than before, but still at odds trying to understand accounting as a whole. |
| Absolutly. |
| He has most definitely contributed to my general knowledge of learning accounting. I am sure if I was to pursue accounting as a career, I would be well versed in what I have learned. |
| Yes, I learned the basics of accounting. |
| Yes |
|
|
22. Other comments:
|
| Thank you Mr. Van Tuyl for all your help this semester, you have been a very caring teacher who takes the time to explain when I had a problem with my work. You are a great asset to the accounting field and I hope to see you offering more courses in our field. Once again thank you for all your help! Bev |
| Another way of possibly simplifying the course material? |
| He is my favorite Teacher. And I wish I was having him as a teacher next year. |
|
