eCAFE - Course and Faculty Evaluation, University of Hawaii

eCAFE: Course and Faculty Evaluations


Instructor: Nelson Rebert

Available Survey Results

Nelson Rebert: CHEM151, Spring 2009

Campus: Windward Community College Department: Natural Sciences
Course: CHEM 151 - Elementary Survey of Chemistry Crn (Section): 60305 (0)    
1. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.44 16 1.09 Freq(%) 1 (6%) 2 (13%) 4 (25%) 7 (44%) 2 (13%)
2. What two or three single words best describe this instructor?
Enthusiastic, knowledgeable, and nice
Helpful and patient
Intelligent,
This was a difficult class for me. I felt I was on my own most of the semester. It seemed the teacher spent the most part of the semester trying to figure out how to teach the class. Chemistry is difficult class as it is and when the instructor isn't clear, it makes it extremely difficult for students to learn. At first the teacher didn't follow the study guide so I didn't have anything to follow. As the semester went on, it got better. He started following the study guide more closely. However, from the beginning I needed to be taught the basics and sometimes he was talking way beyond my understanding, causing me to feel even more lost.
Way too intelligent. His knowledge is way to up there and even though we are college level, it was hard to understand his way of explanations. He needs to come down to our level.
Very good instructor!
knowledgable, straight forward, & productive.
Caring sincere
passionate about subject.
enthusiasticish fun reasonable
Knowledgeable, Concise
very confusing
nice and understanding
military
descriptive, nice
3. The assigned readings were instrumental in the development of my knowledge of the subject matter.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 16 0.97 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 4 (25%) 5 (31%) 6 (38%)
4. The exams were a fair test of your knowledge of the course material.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.13 16 0.89 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 2 (13%) 7 (44%) 6 (38%)
5. The instructor clearly explains course procedures (attendance, assignments, exams, etc.).
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.94 16 1.12 Freq(%) 1 (6%) 0 (0%) 4 (25%) 5 (31%) 6 (38%)
6. The instructor is well-prepared and organized for class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 16 0.73 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (25%) 8 (50%) 4 (25%)
7. The instructor is available for help outside of class.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.06 16 1.0 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 4 (25%) 4 (25%) 7 (44%)
8. The instructor clearly explains the goals, objectives, and overall purpose of the course.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
3.88 16 1.15 Freq(%) 1 (6%) 0 (0%) 5 (31%) 4 (25%) 6 (38%)
9. The instructor allows time for questions and encourages them.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.06 16 1.18 Freq(%) 1 (6%) 1 (6%) 1 (6%) 6 (38%) 7 (44%)
10. The instructor stimulates student's thinking about the subject.
Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly Agree  
4.0 16 1.03 Freq(%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 5 (31%) 3 (19%) 7 (44%)