|
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.9 |
10 |
0.32 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
9 (90%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.7 |
10 |
0.67 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
1 (10%) |
8 (80%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.7 |
10 |
0.67 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
1 (10%) |
8 (80%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.9 |
10 |
0.32 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
9 (90%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.8 |
10 |
0.42 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (20%) |
8 (80%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
6. The instructor was well prepared.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.9 |
10 |
0.32 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
9 (90%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.9 |
10 |
0.32 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
9 (90%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.7 |
10 |
0.48 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (30%) |
7 (70%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.89 |
10 |
0.33 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (10%) |
8 (80%) |
1 (10%) |
|
|
10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.8 |
10 |
0.42 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (20%) |
8 (80%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.78 |
9 |
0.67 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (89%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
12. Overall, the instructor was effective.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
| 4.78 |
9 |
0.67 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (11%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (89%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?
|
| just like the way she teach. made you want to dig deep into it. You just don't want to let her down.
so, you go a little more. I only had three great instructor at hcc and she is one of them. |
| I liked the variety of tasks the instructor assigned. I especially liked the project where we had to
observe people shopping for toys. It definitely took us to the "real world" to view individuals/families
shopping. |
| The course had fun activities that pertained to the subject matter! It was a
great way to relate the topics to real life. The assignments were relevant
and Lucy gave us feedback on our assignments very quickly!!! |
| I like the convenience of the online class. |
| I like the course because Lucy was able to teach me about human devlopment online and it was not any different from taking a face-to-face lecture. i felt as thogh she was right there beside me teaching. |
| I learned how we live and how we take care of children, this would be useful for my future a lot! Thanks |
| The communication between my classmates, myself and my instructor was great. I was amazed with the types of topics that I've done including puberty. I have young children and I was glad to have learned about this subject because it did help me understand my children more and it allowed me to communicate better with them as well. I didn't get that much education when I was growing up so it's a big plus for me to know and get to know how and what to say to them. |
| I liked the fact that we were able to access the assignments or a relative resource to the assignments currently worked on! |
| I like how this course incorporated the other courses (Sociology, Psychology, History, Geography) together. With the other courses it allowed this course to come together. It also allowed me to understand how the human body works, and why we are all unique in our own way. |
| The assignments were all great in that they reinforced the readings from the textbook and often made the information easier to understand. |
|
|
14. Any suggestions to improve this course?
|
| only let ms. lucy teach it. |
| Maybe the lectures by the medical professional should be limited to 15 minutes for each chapter.
His voice and speaking style made it difficult to keep engaged. It definitely made me LESS interested
in the subject matter. |
| This course was constructed well and executed well! Nothing to improve! |
| none |
| iTunes U complicated me pretty much, but this kind of new functions is going to be important from now. |
| non at this moment |
| I wish this class had an option for classroom instruction. Lucy's classes are very group oriented and it is always good to get other student's perspective of her lectures. |
| Because of the time constraints on the class, I don't really think many suggestions could be made. If there was more time, I would have liked to have had class discussions on the weekly topics. |
|
|
15. Other comments:
|
| my instructor of the year |
| Otherwise, this was a great class and the instructor was extremely organized. She was great! |
| I feel that I benefited a lot from this class! I can apply the information
gained from the projects in my own life! That is the sign of a great class! |
| great job lucy Jones |
| Thank you for your kindness, I appreciate it! |
| I respect Lucy Jones because she did make an effort to meet with me while I was working to help me with my websites and communication on Laulima for her course. |
| I have taken a few online classes which were done via a system called instructure. This system was very systematic, and every teacher had a page that was consistent. Like when I wanted to look at my grade for the class there was a link there on all pages as for the current system used here "Laulima" The links to the left of the pages were in different locations, and some teachers used some links for other things. In other words there was no continuity. That would probably be my only issue with taking an online class via Laulima. |
|
|
1. Course objectives and procedures (for example, attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
8 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (100%) |
|
|
2. Course objectives were met.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
8 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (100%) |
|
|
3. The text(s) and class materials were helpful.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.88 |
8 |
0.35 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
7 (88%) |
|
|
4. Class activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were helpful and well suited to the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.88 |
8 |
0.35 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
7 (88%) |
|
|
5. Assignments were clear and helpful in mastering course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
8 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (100%) |
|
|
6. Assignment and exams were fair and appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
8 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (100%) |
|
|
7. The total course workload was fair and appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.88 |
8 |
0.35 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
7 (88%) |
|
|
8. Regular attendance or participation was important to student success in the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
8 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (100%) |
|
|
9. The instructor was always prepared.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
8 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (100%) |
|
|
10. The instructor presented difficult concepts clearly and understandably.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
7 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
7 (100%) |
|
|
11. The instructor knew the subject matter well.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
8 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (100%) |
|
|
12. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
8 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (100%) |
|
|
13. The instructor was willing to help students during office hours and/or via email.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
8 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (100%) |
|
|
14. The instructor clearly motivated the students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.88 |
8 |
0.35 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (13%) |
7 (88%) |
|
|
15. The instructor encouraged critical thinking.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.86 |
7 |
0.38 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (14%) |
6 (86%) |
|
|
16. The instructor graded fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
8 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (100%) |
|
|
17. The instructor made helpful comments on assignments and exams in a timely manner.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
8 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (100%) |
|
|
18. I would rate the overall effectiveness of the instructor: F=Inferior; D=Poor; C=Average; B=Good; A=Superior.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
F |
D |
C |
B |
A |
| 5.0 |
7 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
7 (100%) |
|
|
19. If you were teaching this course:
a. What would you do to improve it?
b. What would you change?
|
| Lucy Jones are a really good teacher and I will not change nothing and hopefully a lot of student after me will have chance to have that adorable and good teacher. |
| I feel that everything offered and provided was more than enough for me to learn in this class. I wouldn't do anything to change it. |
| Wouldn't add anything. |
| NOTHING! |
| Offer the course two days a week rather than once a week for two and a half hours. |
|
|
20. What do you think of the teacher and his/her teaching methods?
|
| At the beginning I didn't like Laulima and all the assigment we need to do on Laulima but now I know about it and I love it. |
| I think her teaching method is highly efficient and well structured. |
| Great teaching methods. I think we were blessed to have a both Gordon and
Lucy who have clinical experience and the passion to share their knowledge in
a stimulating way. |
| Lucy's methods of teaching is great! When I take on of her classes, I understand the subject very well, because she has us do assignments and projects that help us to understand the subject matter. |
| Good examples were helpful to gain understanding of material |
|
|
21. Has he/she contributed to your general knowledge or to learning job skills?
|
| Lucy Jones are always there for you. She answer her e-mail all the time and she contribute very good at our knowledge and make sure we are learning the matiere. |
| Yes and even more! |
| Tremendously. |
| ABSOLUTELY YES!!!!!!!!! |
| Yes, the information was very helpful |
|
|
22. Other comments:
|
| I just love my teacher and hopefully I will have chance to have her again in some semester.
Thank You to Lucy Jones and I am grateful to have meet Lucy.
I LOVE LUCY! :) |
| Awesome instructor who is true and loves what she does. Thank you! |
| Lucy is a valuable instructor. I'm fortunate to have been a student in her
class. |
| I have taken several classes with Lucy and has learned so much from her and I think that she is well-liked and respected by all of the students that are in her classes. |
|
