eCAFE: Course and Faculty Evaluations
Instructor: Jill Wakabayashi
Available Survey Results
HLTH120, Spring 2010HLTH270, Spring 2010
HLTH290, Spring 2010
HLTH290L, Spring 2010
PTA101, Spring 2010
PTA231, Spring 2010
Jill Wakabayashi: HLTH120, Spring 2010
Campus:  Kapiolani Community College  Department:  Health Sciences 

Course:  HLTH 120  Intro to Health Professions  Crn (Section):  34108 (0) 
1. The course objectives and procedures were clear.  


2. The instructor was accessible to students outside of class.  


3. The course was well organized.  


4. The instructor knew the subject area.  


5. The instructor encouraged students' participation.  


6. The course material was presented in a clear and effective way.  


7. The instructor provided a good atmosphere for learning.  


8. The instructor encouraged me to think for myself.  


9. The instructor graded tests and assignments fairly.  


10. The instructor informed students of their grades on exams and assignments promptly.  


11. The instructor demonstrated concern for students.  


12. The instructor treated students fairly.  


13. What are the instructor's major strengths as a teacher?  


14. What changes, if any, do you suggest to the instructor?  


15. How did the instructor show concern for students?  


16. Would you recommend this instructor to students? Why or why not?  


17. What else would you like to say about this instructor?  


18. I developed a clearer sense of professional identity.  


19. I performed up to my potential in this course.  


20. What things did you get from this course that will benefit you personally?  


21. The instructor was able to stimulate and lead group discussions.  


22. What two or three single words best describe this instructor?  


23. Other comments:  

Jill Wakabayashi: HLTH270, Spring 2010 Back to top
Campus:  Kapiolani Community College  Department:  Health Sciences 

Course:  HLTH 270  Aging and Rehabilitation  Crn (Section):  33604 (0) 
1. The course objectives and procedures were clear.  


2. The instructor was accessible to students outside of class.  


3. The course was well organized.  


4. The instructor knew the subject area.  


5. The instructor encouraged students' participation.  


6. The course material was presented in a clear and effective way.  


7. The instructor provided a good atmosphere for learning.  


8. The instructor encouraged me to think for myself.  


9. The instructor graded tests and assignments fairly.  


10. The instructor informed students of their grades on exams and assignments promptly.  


11. The instructor demonstrated concern for students.  


12. The instructor treated students fairly.  


13. What are the instructor's major strengths as a teacher?  


14. What changes, if any, do you suggest to the instructor?  


15. How did the instructor show concern for students?  


16. Would you recommend this instructor to students? Why or why not?  


17. What else would you like to say about this instructor?  


18. Assignments are interesting and stimulating.  


19. The online course format allowed me to contribute to the discussion more readily than in a facetoface format.  


20. Online communication with class members and the instructor helped me to learn course materials in an effective manner.  


21. Participation in online conversations (e.g., chats/bulletin boards/discussions boards) facilitated by the instructor contributed to my understanding of the course material.  


22. What did you like most about your online course experience?  


23. Other comments:  

Jill Wakabayashi: HLTH290, Spring 2010 Back to top
Campus:  Kapiolani Community College  Department:  Health Sciences 

Course:  HLTH 290  Kinesiology  Crn (Section):  33311 (0) 34294 (0) 
1. The course objectives and procedures were clear.  


2. The instructor was accessible to students outside of class.  


3. The course was well organized.  


4. The instructor knew the subject area.  


5. The instructor encouraged students' participation.  


6. The course material was presented in a clear and effective way.  


7. The instructor provided a good atmosphere for learning.  


8. The instructor's way of teaching assisted my learning.  


9. The instructor encouraged me to think for myself.  


10. The instructor graded tests and assignments fairly.  


11. The instructor informed students of their grades on exams and assignments promptly.  


12. The instructor demonstrated concern for students.  


13. The instructor treated students fairly.  


14. What are the instructor's major strengths as a teacher?  


15. What changes, if any, do you suggest to the instructor?  


16. How did the instructor show concern for students?  


17. Would you recommend this instructor to students? Why or why not?  


18. What else would you like to say about this instructor?  


19. I learned to apply principles from this course to new situations.  


20. I performed up to my potential in this course.  


21. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?  


22. The instructor shows appreciation of my efforts to learn.  


23. Other comments:  

Jill Wakabayashi: HLTH290L, Spring 2010 Back to top
Campus:  Kapiolani Community College  Department:  Health Sciences 

Course:  HLTH 290L  Kinesiology Lab  Crn (Section):  33313 (0) 34295 (0) 
1. The course objectives and procedures were clear.  


2. The instructor was accessible to students outside of class.  


3. The course was well organized.  


4. The instructor knew the subject area.  


5. The instructor encouraged students' participation.  


6. The course material was presented in a clear and effective way.  


7. The instructor provided a good atmosphere for learning.  


8. The instructor encouraged me to think for myself.  


9. The instructor graded tests and assignments fairly.  


10. The instructor informed students of their grades on exams and assignments promptly.  


11. The instructor demonstrated concern for students.  


12. The instructor treated students fairly.  


13. What are the instructor's major strengths as a teacher?  


14. What changes, if any, do you suggest to the instructor?  


15. How did the instructor show concern for students?  


16. Would you recommend this instructor to students? Why or why not?  


17. What else would you like to say about this instructor?  


18. The laboratory was a valuable part of this course.  


19. Lab assignments are relevant to what is presented in class.  


20. Examinations cover the important aspects of the course.  


21. No one instructor dominated the teaching in this course.  


22. Which aspects of the course did you like the best?  


23. Other comments:  

Jill Wakabayashi: PTA101, Spring 2010 Back to top
Campus:  Kapiolani Community College  Department:  Health Sciences 

Course:  PTA 101  Professional Issues I  Crn (Section):  33340 (0) 
1. The course objectives and procedures were clear.  


2. The instructor was accessible to students outside of class.  


3. The course was well organized.  


4. The instructor knew the subject area.  


5. The instructor encouraged students' participation.  


6. The course material was presented in a clear and effective way.  


7. The instructor provided a good atmosphere for learning.  


8. The instructor encouraged me to think for myself.  


9. The instructor graded tests and assignments fairly.  


10. The instructor informed students of their grades on exams and assignments promptly.  


11. The instructor demonstrated concern for students.  


12. The instructor treated students fairly.  


13. What are the instructor's major strengths as a teacher?  


14. What changes, if any, do you suggest to the instructor?  


15. How did the instructor show concern for students?  


16. Would you recommend this instructor to students? Why or why not?  


17. What else would you like to say about this instructor?  


18. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.  


19. I developed a clearer sense of professional identity.  


20. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the course?  


21. Assignments make students think.  


22. The exams were a fair test of your knowledge of the course material.  


23. Other comments:  

Jill Wakabayashi: PTA231, Spring 2010 Back to top
Campus:  Kapiolani Community College  Department:  Health Sciences 

Course:  PTA 231  Professional Issues II  Crn (Section):  33906 (0) 
1. The course objectives and procedures were clear.  


2. The instructor was accessible to students outside of class.  


3. The course was well organized.  


4. The instructor knew the subject area.  


5. The instructor encouraged students' participation.  


6. The course material was presented in a clear and effective way.  


7. The instructor provided a good atmosphere for learning.  


8. The instructor encouraged me to think for myself.  


9. The instructor graded tests and assignments fairly.  


10. The instructor informed students of their grades on exams and assignments promptly.  


11. The instructor demonstrated concern for students.  


12. The instructor treated students fairly.  


13. What are the instructor's major strengths as a teacher?  


14. What changes, if any, do you suggest to the instructor?  


15. How did the instructor show concern for students?  


16. Would you recommend this instructor to students? Why or why not?  


17. What else would you like to say about this instructor?  


18. The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.  


19. Assignments are relevant to what is presented in class.  


20. The instructor was very helpful in my developing good clinical techniques.  


21. The instructor made reasonable demands of the students considering our level of clinical training.  


22. The instructor was objective in evaluating student's work.  


23. Other comments:  
