University of Hawai'i eCAFE

eCAFE: Course and Faculty Evaluations

Instructor: Daniel Brayton

Available Survey Results

CHEM 162, Spring 2010
CHEM 100, Fall 2009
CHEM 161, Fall 2009

Daniel Brayton: CHEM 162, Spring 2010

Campus:	Windward Community College	Department:	Natural Sciences
Course:	CHEM 162 - General Chemistry II	Crn (Section):	63264 (0)

1. I learned to apply principles from this course to new situations.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.38	8	0.74	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (13%)	3 (38%)	4 (50%)	0 (0%)

2. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.38	8	1.06	Freq(%)	1 (13%)	0 (0%)	2 (25%)	5 (63%)	0 (0%)

3. What two or three single words best describe this instructor?

Unhelpful. Irresponsible.

Knowledgeable, practical, easygoing.

Prepares slides ahead of time for students to view.

Good at talking

Monotone

mellow

surfer, chemist, teacher

4. The assigned readings were instrumental in the development of my knowledge of the subject matter.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.25	8	0.71	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (13%)	4 (50%)	3 (38%)	0 (0%)

5. The exams were a fair test of your knowledge of the course material.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.5	8	1.2	Freq(%)	1 (13%)	0 (0%)	2 (25%)	4 (50%)	1 (13%)

6. The instructor clearly explains course procedures (attendance, assignments, exams, etc.).

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.13	8	0.83	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (25%)	3 (38%)	3 (38%)

7. The instructor is well-prepared and organized for class.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.75	8	0.71	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (38%)	4 (50%)	1 (13%)

8. The instructor is available for help outside of class.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.75	8	0.71	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (38%)	4 (50%)	1 (13%)

9. The instructor clearly explains the goals, objectives, and overall purpose of the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.75	8	0.46	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (25%)	6 (75%)	0 (0%)

10. The instructor speaks clearly and is easy to understand.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.75	8	0.71	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (38%)	4 (50%)	1 (13%)

11. The instructor makes good use of examples in class.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.38	8	1.06	Freq(%)	1 (13%)	0 (0%)	2 (25%)	5 (63%)	0 (0%)

12. The instructor appears to know his or her subject.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.13	8	0.83	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (25%)	3 (38%)	3 (38%)

13. The instructor effectively uses the blackboard, films, pictures, computers, slides, or other aids.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.5	8	1.07	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	2 (25%)	1 (13%)	4 (50%)	1 (13%)

14. The instructor clearly explains complex ideas.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.13	8	0.99	Freq(%)	1 (13%)	0 (0%)	4 (50%)	3 (38%)	0 (0%)

15. The instructor allows time for questions and encourages them.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.75	8	0.89	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	4 (50%)	2 (25%)	2 (25%)

16. The instructor treats all students fairly.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.5	8	0.76	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	5 (63%)	2 (25%)	1 (13%)

17. The instructor is interested in the subject matter.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.75	8	0.71	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (38%)	4 (50%)	1 (13%)

18. The instructor is genuinely interested in students.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.38	8	0.92	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (13%)	4 (50%)	2 (25%)	1 (13%)

19. The instructor grades tests fairly.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.0	8	0.76	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (25%)	4 (50%)	2 (25%)

20. The instructor clearly explains what is expected of students.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.75	8	0.46	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (25%)	6 (75%)	0 (0%)

21. The instructor clearly explains the grading system.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.5	8	1.2	Freq(%)	1 (13%)	0 (0%)	2 (25%)	4 (50%)	1 (13%)

22. The instructor treated students with respect.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.13	8	0.64	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (13%)	5 (63%)	2 (25%)

23. The instructor engages in a healthy exchange of ideas and opinions with students.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.38	8	0.74	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (13%)	3 (38%)	4 (50%)	0 (0%)

24. The instructor is actively helpful during lab activities.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
2.88	8	0.35	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (13%)	7 (88%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)

25. The instructor stimulates student's thinking about the subject.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.38	8	0.74	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (13%)	3 (38%)	4 (50%)	0 (0%)

26. The instructor's practical demonstrations make it easier for students to learn.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
2.75	8	1.04	Freq(%)	1 (13%)	2 (25%)	3 (38%)	2 (25%)	0 (0%)

27. The instructor makes the student want to learn.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
2.75	8	1.04	Freq(%)	1 (13%)	2 (25%)	3 (38%)	2 (25%)	0 (0%)

28. The instructor suggests specific ways students can improve.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
2.63	8	0.52	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	3 (38%)	5 (63%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)

29. How did the instructor show concern for students?

...

He answers all of our questions patiently and uses multiple methods of illustrating a concept until everyone gets it.

He asked if we had any questions.

um.........

30. What else would you like to say about this instructor?

Grading system not accurate, it's practically based on "whatever he wants to do"...

I think Brayton a pretty cool guy. eh makes fun of alcoholics and doesn't afraid of anything.

He is a nice guy. He did not teach Chemistry 162 well. He used a different textbook for lectures than that of the required book for the class. He is not able to clearly explain complex ideas (maybe due to time restrictions).

31. Other comments:

I felt as if this teacher was very unengaged and unhelpful.

He should not read slideshow slides taken from a textbook out loud following with a laser pointer. He should not face his back to the class. He should focus on preparing students for the final exam.

Daniel Brayton: CHEM 100, Fall 2009 Back to top

Campus:	Kapiolani Community College	Department:	Math & Science
Course:	CHEM 100 - Chemistry and Man	Crn (Section):	31141 (0)

1. The instructor did not speak clearly.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
1.83	12	1.11	Freq(%)	6 (50%)	4 (33%)	0 (0%)	2 (17%)	0 (0%)

2. The instructor explained course procedure. (attendance, assignments, grading policy, exams, etc.)

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.58	12	0.67	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	3 (25%)	8 (67%)

3. The instructor was available during office hours and/or via email.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.42	12	0.79	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (17%)	3 (25%)	7 (58%)

4. The instructor explained the course goals and objectives.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.42	12	0.79	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (17%)	3 (25%)	7 (58%)

5. The instructor knew the subject area.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.42	12	0.79	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (17%)	3 (25%)	7 (58%)

6. The instructor was prepared for class.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.92	12	1.16	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	2 (17%)	2 (17%)	3 (25%)	5 (42%)

7. The instructor encouraged students' participation.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.33	12	1.44	Freq(%)	2 (17%)	1 (8%)	3 (25%)	3 (25%)	3 (25%)

8. The instructor provided a good atmosphere for learning.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.75	12	1.36	Freq(%)	1 (8%)	1 (8%)	3 (25%)	2 (17%)	5 (42%)

9. The instructor's way of teaching assisted my learning.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.25	12	1.6	Freq(%)	3 (25%)	0 (0%)	4 (33%)	1 (8%)	4 (33%)

10. The instructor encouraged me to think for myself.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.0	12	1.04	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	3 (25%)	3 (25%)	5 (42%)

11. The instructor graded tests and assignments fairly.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.08	12	1.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	2 (17%)	4 (33%)	5 (42%)

12. The instructor informed students of their grades on exams and assignments promptly.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.25	12	0.97	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)	1 (8%)	4 (33%)	6 (50%)

13. The instructor demonstrated concern for students.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.42	12	1.31	Freq(%)	1 (8%)	2 (17%)	3 (25%)	3 (25%)	3 (25%)

14. The instructor treated students fairly.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.33	12	0.78	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (17%)	4 (33%)	6 (50%)

15. The instructor spoke clearly.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.83	12	1.11	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	2 (17%)	2 (17%)	4 (33%)	4 (33%)

16. What are the instructor's major strengths as a teacher?

he knows his subject well

His major strentghs were he was very knowledgable about chemistry. He answered back promptly to emails. He graded exams fast so you got your grades back fast.

He is very free and individualizes each students own learning into a self-reliant status and still offers assistance to them when needed.

I think he relates to the students well. He has an easy going personality and that makes him much more approachable for a student.

Mr.Brayton is a friendly and funny guy.

He knows a lot about chemistry. But too much sometimes and it made it more confusing than it needed to be.

he's knowledgable in the subject he's teaching.

17. The instructor was not available during office hours and/or via email.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
2.0	12	1.21	Freq(%)	5 (42%)	4 (33%)	2 (17%)	0 (0%)	1 (8%)

18. What changes, if any, do you suggest to the instructor?

n/a

Classes were very boring because he just read off of the power points every class. Even the way he spoke was very monotone and made the class even more boring. I would have to say think of another way to get your students attention more and make learning a little more interesting. I didn't learn anything in that class.

to interact with the class more. be more hands on with the material that he's teaching. i felt like i had to teach myself the whole semester!!!!

N/A

More hands on learning.

No changes, awesome class.

Speak up, Read the powerpoints before class instead of looking at them for the first time WHILE teaching the class. Don't make everything so complicated and don't assume the students "already know" what you're talking about. Also, there was a statement made at the beginning of class that the conversion factors would Maybe allowing a 3x5 card or having a Jeopardy style review would help students to memorize the formulas better. Also, there are no opportunities for extra credit, as well as no homework. Our grade was only based on tests. Some students are bad test takers and it creates more anxiety when your grade is based on only 4 tests.

encourage more class participation.

19. How did the instructor show concern for students?

always informed us about the grades, prints out practice exams for us to study, responds to emails quickly

His communication via email was very good but in class it seemed like he was just going through the lesson and not really paying attention to how the class was reacting to his lectures.

i didn't see him show any concern!!!

Emails students promptly upon missing exams and offers retakes almost immediately.

Mr. Brayton recommended tutors that were available in KCC if we were to need additional help.

He answered questions when asked.

20. Would you recommend this instructor to students? Why or why not?

yes, because he makes everything straight forward so its easier to understand

I would not recommend this instructor because chemistry is a tough subject for me and this instructor showed no real interest in making classes more interesting for his students. I had a hard time learning from him because he spoke softly during class and I couldn't really understand anything he was teaching me. I ended up trying to teach myself by reading the book which was why I ended up doing bad in this class.

NO sorry i wouldn't!!!

If you're the type of student who would rather study at home then I would recommend him. The class is mostly based upon lecture which is taken from Laulima. In that case, you don't necessarily have to attend class. It is without consequence if you feel that you can study on your own.

Yes, I'd recommend this instructor to students. Theres a great atmosphere here.

No, I felt like he was too in depth. This is a basic chemistry class and most are taking it just to satisfy a requirement. I felt like things weren't explained very well.

21. The instructor actively listened to students.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.92	12	1.0	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	6 (50%)	1 (8%)	5 (42%)

22. What else would you like to say about this instructor?

very good professor.

I think he just needs to have a better approach at teaching his students. Many of his students ended up not attending his classes or dropping out of it because he was not a good teacher.

i hope you improve next semester!!!!

N/A

He doesn't like peanut butter sandwiches.

I think as he gains more experience and gets a little more used to teaching he will be good. It seemed to me like maybe he was recently out of school and hadn't quite gotten into the groove that many of my other professors do.

Daniel Brayton: CHEM 161, Fall 2009 Back to top

Campus:	Windward Community College	Department:	Natural Sciences
Course:	CHEM 161 - General Chemistry I	Crn (Section):	62087 (0)

1. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.6	10	1.51	Freq(%)	2 (20%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	4 (40%)	3 (30%)

2. What two or three single words best describe this instructor?

Goes over all the slides, and problems in power point.

laid back

Funny, interested, clear

surfer, cool, knowledgable

Boring, monotone

Knowledgeable, approachable, concise.

3. The assigned readings were instrumental in the development of my knowledge of the subject matter.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.7	10	0.95	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	3 (30%)	4 (40%)	2 (20%)

4. The exams were a fair test of your knowledge of the course material.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.7	10	1.25	Freq(%)	1 (10%)	0 (0%)	3 (30%)	3 (30%)	3 (30%)

5. The instructor clearly explains course procedures (attendance, assignments, exams, etc.).

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.1	10	0.57	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	7 (70%)	2 (20%)

6. The instructor uses class time well.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.6	10	1.26	Freq(%)	1 (10%)	1 (10%)	1 (10%)	5 (50%)	2 (20%)

7. The instructor is well-prepared and organized for class.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.7	10	1.25	Freq(%)	1 (10%)	1 (10%)	0 (0%)	6 (60%)	2 (20%)

8. The instructor is available for help outside of class.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.8	10	0.63	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (30%)	6 (60%)	1 (10%)

9. The instructor clearly explains the goals, objectives, and overall purpose of the course.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.1	10	0.57	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	7 (70%)	2 (20%)

10. The instructor speaks clearly and is easy to understand.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.8	10	1.32	Freq(%)	1 (10%)	1 (10%)	0 (0%)	5 (50%)	3 (30%)

11. The instructor makes good use of examples in class.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.4	10	1.43	Freq(%)	2 (20%)	0 (0%)	2 (20%)	4 (40%)	2 (20%)

12. The instructor effectively uses the blackboard, films, pictures, computers, slides, or other aids.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.7	10	1.25	Freq(%)	1 (10%)	1 (10%)	0 (0%)	6 (60%)	2 (20%)

13. The instructor allows time for questions and encourages them.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.1	10	0.99	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	1 (10%)	4 (40%)	4 (40%)

14. The instructor emphasizes important points.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.2	10	1.23	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	2 (20%)	0 (0%)	2 (20%)	6 (60%)

15. The instructor asks questions to see if students understand.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.33	9	0.87	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (22%)	2 (22%)	5 (56%)

16. The instructor encourages an atmosphere of good feeling in the class.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.1	10	1.2	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	2 (20%)	0 (0%)	3 (30%)	5 (50%)

17. The instructor treats all students fairly.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.4	10	0.84	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (20%)	2 (20%)	6 (60%)

18. The instructor is willing to help with individual problems.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.3	10	0.67	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	5 (50%)	4 (40%)

19. The instructor grades tests fairly.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.5	10	0.71	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	3 (30%)	6 (60%)

20. The instructor clearly explains the grading system.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
4.3	10	0.67	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	1 (10%)	5 (50%)	4 (40%)

21. The instructor stimulates student's thinking about the subject.

Mean	N-Size	Std Dev		Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
3.8	10	1.23	Freq(%)	0 (0%)	2 (20%)	2 (20%)	2 (20%)	4 (40%)