eCAFE: Course and Faculty Evaluations
Instructor: Frances Scarpinato
Available Survey Results
MATH1A, Fall 2013MATH1A, Fall 2013
MATH1A, Fall 2013
MATH1A, Fall 2013
MATH1B, Fall 2013
MATH1B, Fall 2013
MATH1B, Fall 2013
MATH1C, Fall 2013
MATH1C, Fall 2013
MATH1C, Fall 2013
MATH1C, Fall 2013
MATH1D, Fall 2013
MATH1D, Fall 2013
MATH1D, Fall 2013
MATH1D, Fall 2013
MATH1A, Spring 2013
MATH1B, Spring 2013
MATH1C, Spring 2013
MATH1D, Spring 2013
MATH55, Spring 2013
MATH1A, Fall 2012
MATH1B, Fall 2012
MATH1C, Fall 2012
MATH1D, Fall 2012
MATH24, Spring 2012
MATH50, Spring 2012
MATH55, Spring 2012
MATH1A, Fall 2011
MATH1B, Fall 2011
MATH1C, Fall 2011
MATH1D, Fall 2011
MATH22, Fall 2011
Frances Scarpinato: MATH1A, Fall 2013
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 1A  Basic Mathematics A  Crn (Section):  15312 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  

Frances Scarpinato: MATH1A, Fall 2013 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 1A  Basic Mathematics A  Crn (Section):  15316 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  

Frances Scarpinato: MATH1A, Fall 2013 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 1A  Basic Mathematics A  Crn (Section):  15328 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  

Frances Scarpinato: MATH1A, Fall 2013 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 1A  Basic Mathematics A  Crn (Section):  15332 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  

Frances Scarpinato: MATH1B, Fall 2013 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 1B  Basic Mathematics B  Crn (Section):  15313 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  

Frances Scarpinato: MATH1B, Fall 2013 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 1B  Basic Mathematics B  Crn (Section):  15329 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  

Frances Scarpinato: MATH1B, Fall 2013 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 1B  Basic Mathematics B  Crn (Section):  15333 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  

Frances Scarpinato: MATH1C, Fall 2013 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 1C  Basic Mathematics C  Crn (Section):  15314 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  

Frances Scarpinato: MATH1C, Fall 2013 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 1C  Basic Mathematics C  Crn (Section):  15318 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  

Frances Scarpinato: MATH1C, Fall 2013 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 1C  Basic Mathematics C  Crn (Section):  15330 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  

Frances Scarpinato: MATH1C, Fall 2013 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 1C  Basic Mathematics C  Crn (Section):  15334 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  

Frances Scarpinato: MATH1D, Fall 2013 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 1D  Basic Mathematics D  Crn (Section):  15315 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  

Frances Scarpinato: MATH1D, Fall 2013 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 1D  Basic Mathematics D  Crn (Section):  15319 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  

Frances Scarpinato: MATH1D, Fall 2013 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 1D  Basic Mathematics D  Crn (Section):  15331 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  

Frances Scarpinato: MATH1D, Fall 2013 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 1D  Basic Mathematics D  Crn (Section):  15335 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  

Frances Scarpinato: MATH1A, Spring 2013 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 1A  Basic Mathematics A  Crn (Section):  18044 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  

Frances Scarpinato: MATH1B, Spring 2013 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 1B  Basic Mathematics B  Crn (Section):  18045 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  

Frances Scarpinato: MATH1C, Spring 2013 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 1C  Basic Mathematics C  Crn (Section):  18046 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  

Frances Scarpinato: MATH1D, Spring 2013 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 1D  Basic Mathematics D  Crn (Section):  18047 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  

Frances Scarpinato: MATH55, Spring 2013 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 55  Technical Math II  Crn (Section):  18068 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  

Frances Scarpinato: MATH1A, Fall 2012 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 1A  Basic Mathematics A  Crn (Section):  17157 (0) 17161 (0) 17173 (0) 17177 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  

Frances Scarpinato: MATH1B, Fall 2012 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 1B  Basic Mathematics B  Crn (Section):  17158 (0) 17162 (0) 17174 (0) 17178 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  

Frances Scarpinato: MATH1C, Fall 2012 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 1C  Basic Mathematics C  Crn (Section):  17159 (0) 17163 (0) 17175 (0) 17179 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  

Frances Scarpinato: MATH1D, Fall 2012 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 1D  Basic Mathematics D  Crn (Section):  17160 (0) 17164 (0) 17176 (0) 17180 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  

Frances Scarpinato: MATH24, Spring 2012 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 24  Elementary Algebra I  Crn (Section):  16106 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  

Frances Scarpinato: MATH50, Spring 2012 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 50  Technical Mathematics I  Crn (Section):  16113 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  

Frances Scarpinato: MATH55, Spring 2012 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 55  Technical Math II  Crn (Section):  16114 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  

Frances Scarpinato: MATH1A, Fall 2011 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 1A  Basic Mathematics A  Crn (Section):  15045 (0) 15049 (0) 15065 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  

Frances Scarpinato: MATH1B, Fall 2011 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 1B  Basic Mathematics B  Crn (Section):  15046 (0) 15050 (0) 15066 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  

Frances Scarpinato: MATH1C, Fall 2011 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 1C  Basic Mathematics C  Crn (Section):  15047 (0) 15051 (0) 15067 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  

Frances Scarpinato: MATH1D, Fall 2011 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 1D  Basic Mathematics D  Crn (Section):  15048 (0) 15052 (0) 15068 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  

Frances Scarpinato: MATH22, Fall 2011 Back to top
Campus:  Hawaii Community College  Department:  Math 

Course:  MATH 22  PreAlgebra Mathematics  Crn (Section):  15077 (0) 
1. Course syllabus and procedures (for example, expectations regarding attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.  


2. Course activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were appropriate to the subject matter.  


3. The reading and course materials were relevant and useful.  


4. Assignments helped me learn about the subject.  


5. The total amount of course work was appropriate.  


6. The instructor was well prepared.  


7. The instructor’s delivery of course content demonstrated his/her knowledge of the subject matter.  


8. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.  


9. The instructor was willing to help me during office hours and/or via email.  


10. The instructor motivated me to learn the course material.  


11. The instructor gave me appropriate feedback on my course work  


12. Overall, the instructor was effective.  


13. What did you like about this course, such as activities, projects, assignments, etc.?  


14. Any suggestions to improve this course?  


15. Other comments:  
