|
1. Course objectives and procedures (for example, attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
6 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (100%) |
|
|
2. Course objectives were met.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
6 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (100%) |
|
|
3. The text(s) and class materials were helpful.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
6 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (100%) |
|
|
4. Class activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were helpful and well suited to the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
6 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (100%) |
|
|
5. Assignments were clear and helpful in mastering course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.83 |
6 |
0.41 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
5 (83%) |
|
|
6. Assignment and exams were fair and appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
6 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (100%) |
|
|
7. The total course workload was fair and appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
5 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (100%) |
|
|
8. Regular attendance or participation was important to student success in the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
6 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (100%) |
|
|
9. The instructor was always prepared.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
6 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (100%) |
|
|
10. The instructor presented difficult concepts clearly and understandably.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.83 |
6 |
0.41 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (17%) |
5 (83%) |
|
|
11. The instructor knew the subject matter well.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
5 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (100%) |
|
|
12. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
6 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (100%) |
|
|
13. The instructor was willing to help students during office hours and/or via email.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
6 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (100%) |
|
|
14. The instructor clearly motivated the students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
6 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (100%) |
|
|
15. The instructor encouraged critical thinking.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
6 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (100%) |
|
|
16. The instructor graded fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
6 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (100%) |
|
|
17. The instructor made helpful comments on assignments and exams in a timely manner.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
6 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (100%) |
|
|
18. I would rate the overall effectiveness of the instructor: F=Inferior; D=Poor; C=Average; B=Good; A=Superior.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
F |
D |
C |
B |
A |
| 5.0 |
6 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
6 (100%) |
|
|
19. If you were teaching this course:
a. What would you do to improve it?
b. What would you change?
|
| I wouldn't change a thing it was perfect in every way possible! |
| I wouldnt have multiple choice tests. It raised my grade but without other choices on a question, I would have gotten the answers wrong. |
| Sometimes the teaching on the tv was difficult to understand. I liked when she would go to the board and go step by step. For some reason, the power points got confusing at times. |
| nothing |
| nothing. |
| No comments. |
|
|
20. What do you think of the teacher and his/her teaching methods?
|
| Wonderful! She was so patient with the class. I have never liked math and I was surprised to find myself enjoying the course. Everything was explained so clearly and she was always there to help a student if they needed one on one help. Thank you! |
| I like her teaching methods, even though it can get confusing at times. The power points do help a lot with getting things done quick. Sometimes it is confusing but I do enjoy them. I love how she gives enough bonus opportunities for the students to take. I think they help a lot and they are great. |
| great teaching. I never thought i would ever have fun in math |
| it helps us think out side the box. |
| The class was fun and enjoyable. |
|
|
21. Has he/she contributed to your general knowledge or to learning job skills?
|
| Yes! I will use the lessons taught in this course throughout my college career! |
| I learned a lot from her class. The way she teaches is great. |
| what a brain she has |
| yes |
| Yes. |
|
|
22. Other comments:
|
| Thank you for a wonderful course- I look forward to seeing you next semester in Math 22! |
| Annabelle is a great math teacher, and I'm glad I took her class. I love her personality and she makes class fun. Her stories she will tell the class sometimes are funny and shows her true self. I love the riddles she tells us. I like how she will make the class fun and not a strict math class. |
| love this teacher. she is so nice and really motivates you |
|
|
1. Course objectives and procedures (for example, attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.91 |
11 |
0.3 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
10 (91%) |
|
|
2. Course objectives were met.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.91 |
11 |
0.3 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
10 (91%) |
|
|
3. The text(s) and class materials were helpful.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.91 |
11 |
0.3 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
10 (91%) |
|
|
4. Class activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were helpful and well suited to the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.91 |
11 |
0.3 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
10 (91%) |
|
|
5. Assignments were clear and helpful in mastering course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.91 |
11 |
0.3 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
10 (91%) |
|
|
6. Assignment and exams were fair and appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.91 |
11 |
0.3 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
10 (91%) |
|
|
7. The total course workload was fair and appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.91 |
11 |
0.3 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
10 (91%) |
|
|
8. Regular attendance or participation was important to student success in the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.82 |
11 |
0.4 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (18%) |
9 (82%) |
|
|
9. The instructor was always prepared.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.91 |
11 |
0.3 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
10 (91%) |
|
|
10. The instructor presented difficult concepts clearly and understandably.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.91 |
11 |
0.3 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
10 (91%) |
|
|
11. The instructor knew the subject matter well.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.91 |
11 |
0.3 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
10 (91%) |
|
|
12. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.82 |
11 |
0.4 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (18%) |
9 (82%) |
|
|
13. The instructor was willing to help students during office hours and/or via email.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.91 |
11 |
0.3 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
10 (91%) |
|
|
14. The instructor clearly motivated the students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.91 |
11 |
0.3 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
10 (91%) |
|
|
15. The instructor encouraged critical thinking.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.91 |
11 |
0.3 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
10 (91%) |
|
|
16. The instructor graded fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.91 |
11 |
0.3 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
10 (91%) |
|
|
17. The instructor made helpful comments on assignments and exams in a timely manner.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.91 |
11 |
0.3 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
10 (91%) |
|
|
18. I would rate the overall effectiveness of the instructor: F=Inferior; D=Poor; C=Average; B=Good; A=Superior.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
F |
D |
C |
B |
A |
| 5.0 |
8 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
8 (100%) |
|
|
19. If you were teaching this course:
a. What would you do to improve it?
b. What would you change?
|
| I felt that the course was went very well and nothing needed to be improved or changed. |
| This class does not need any improvement! Its awesome the way it is! |
| Nothing this was one of the best teachers i had this semester. |
| The only challenge came from the technology that was used, nothing to do with Dr. Treacy. Some
of the information presented on the televisions weren't clear which Dr. Treacy would re-write on
the board. Dr. Treacy made mention of the technical issue to the schools I.T. personnel. He
mentioned that it was resolvable but resolution never came. Not a huge deal but a slight
inconvenience. |
| I honestly wouldnt change much at all. Annabelle has been my favorite teacher since I started college. |
| I wouldn't use the My Math Lab. |
| Nothing, the course was well presented and the instruction provided excellent. |
|
|
20. What do you think of the teacher and his/her teaching methods?
|
| Annabelle Treacy is a wonderful, excellent teacher that any student could ever ask for. I've never enjoyed math until i stepped foot in her class. She explains the material on a level where it is easy to comprehend and learn. I never thought I'd say this but thanks to Annabelle Treacy........ I LOVE MATH!!
It's teachers like her that really make a difference in this world. |
| love the way she has patients with her students. If we don't get it shes not moving one till we got it! That was one of the good things I loved about her! |
| Professor Treacy is an excellent teacher! Her methods of explanation make the most difficult problems doable and enjoyable. |
| I felt you taught the class well even if Bob ruined it for all of us. |
| excellent |
| I love Dr. Treacy's style of teaching and on a personal note, she was the best math instructor I've
ever had. She was fair and taught difficult concepts in a clear, step by step manner. Dr. Treacy
made Math enjoyable, this is coming from a student who's always struggled with this subject. |
| I feel that she teaches the course VERY well. She keeps the class in a good mood. She always has fun with her students while still being able to keep everyones attention and explaining everything clearly and answering everyones questions. She never gets frustrated with us and is always happy. |
| I love Annabelle! She is an awesome teacher, and she has done nothing but make a subject that I struggle with so much easier! |
|
|
21. Has he/she contributed to your general knowledge or to learning job skills?
|
| She has contributed a generous amount of knowledge to my brain. I get math now its fun, easy, and great! |
| Yes totally helped me these past two semesters, now I can move on to starting my degree in accounting! |
| Absolutely. |
| Yes this teacher has taught my alot. I wish she would teach math 100. |
| Absolutely! I will be retaking my Pre-Nursing exam next year and have a huge amount of
confidence due to this class. |
| Yes, most definitely. In high school I barely passed my math classes and in her classes I got A's. I have a good feeling that itll take me a loong time to forget everything Ive learned in her classes. |
| For sure |
|
|
22. Other comments:
|
| BEST TEACHER IN THE WORLD!!!!!! |
| Annabelle taught me not only math and what I needed to know, but she also taught me how to love math, and why I should love math. Before I started here, I hated math with a passion, but since i had her as my teacher, I enjoy math to the fullest. If she taught math 100 I would be taking that class for one of my electives!! Please hire her for math 100!! Shes the best teacher I have had and I hope I get to have a chance to have her again for my teacher!! |
| I just hope my next math teacher will be just as good as Annabelle. |
| Keep her going! Shes great! |
|
|
1. Course objectives and procedures (for example, attendance, participation, grading, etc.) were clearly explained at the beginning of the term.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
12 |
0.45 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (25%) |
9 (75%) |
|
|
2. Course objectives were met.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.83 |
12 |
0.39 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (17%) |
10 (83%) |
|
|
3. The text(s) and class materials were helpful.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.82 |
11 |
0.4 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (18%) |
9 (82%) |
|
|
4. Class activities (lectures, group work, student presentations, etc.) were helpful and well suited to the subject matter.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.83 |
12 |
0.39 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (17%) |
10 (83%) |
|
|
5. Assignments were clear and helpful in mastering course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
12 |
0.62 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
1 (8%) |
10 (83%) |
|
|
6. Assignment and exams were fair and appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
12 |
0.62 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
1 (8%) |
10 (83%) |
|
|
7. The total course workload was fair and appropriate.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.73 |
11 |
0.65 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (9%) |
1 (9%) |
9 (82%) |
|
|
8. Regular attendance or participation was important to student success in the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.83 |
12 |
0.39 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (17%) |
10 (83%) |
|
|
9. The instructor was always prepared.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.83 |
12 |
0.39 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (17%) |
10 (83%) |
|
|
10. The instructor presented difficult concepts clearly and understandably.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.83 |
12 |
0.39 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (17%) |
10 (83%) |
|
|
11. The instructor knew the subject matter well.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.83 |
12 |
0.39 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (17%) |
10 (83%) |
|
|
12. The instructor used a variety of instructional techniques and methods to present course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
12 |
0.62 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
1 (8%) |
10 (83%) |
|
|
13. The instructor was willing to help students during office hours and/or via email.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
12 |
0.78 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (17%) |
0 (0%) |
10 (83%) |
|
|
14. The instructor clearly motivated the students.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
12 |
0.45 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (25%) |
9 (75%) |
|
|
15. The instructor encouraged critical thinking.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.58 |
12 |
0.67 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
3 (25%) |
8 (67%) |
|
|
16. The instructor graded fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.58 |
12 |
0.67 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
3 (25%) |
8 (67%) |
|
|
17. The instructor made helpful comments on assignments and exams in a timely manner.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.64 |
11 |
0.5 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (36%) |
7 (64%) |
|
|
18. I would rate the overall effectiveness of the instructor: F=Inferior; D=Poor; C=Average; B=Good; A=Superior.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
F |
D |
C |
B |
A |
| 4.83 |
12 |
0.39 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (17%) |
10 (83%) |
|
|
19. If you were teaching this course:
a. What would you do to improve it?
b. What would you change?
|
| N/A |
| there is not really anything that I felt needed to be improved. I felt that the course was very effective in learning the material. |
| i love this teacher. she did very well |
| it was fine the way it is because she explaned everything and layed it out to understand. |
| nothing to improve |
| Honestly, she did a great job and there is nothing that i would change or improve. |
| Nothing, the instructor did an excellent job, and she is a great teacher. |
| nothing I like this class the way it is |
| i would assign more homework. |
| i would have made the course a little bit more formal and less chit chatty |
|
|
20. What do you think of the teacher and his/her teaching methods?
|
| Truly enjoyed her teaching methods! Math finally made sense to me! |
| I really liked her methods of teaching it was right to the point and understandable. |
| she did great. i really learned more things |
| Her teaching methods were easy and understandable. and every class we went over something new. |
| love her! she is the best teacher I had. she is the reason i love to come to school. |
| She has great teaching methods. It's hard to find a good math teacher that is willing to help you succeed and understand the work. She's probably one of the best math teachers I've ever had. |
| I thought the instructor's teaching methods were excellent. She explained difficult concepts in an easy way, and she was always willing to offer additional help. Also, because of this instructors style, I loved going to class, actually looked forward to learning more math. |
| I think its very good. it is fun and she always makes it interesting. |
| very good. she effectivley taught the material in a clear way |
| i think her teaching methods were alittle unusual but effective |
|
|
21. Has he/she contributed to your general knowledge or to learning job skills?
|
| Yes! |
| She definetly helped us by applying the material to everyday things that we use. |
| yes |
| yes the math was explained so well that I now love math. She made algebra fun!! |
| She had big a big part of contributing great math knowledge too me. |
| The material that I learned will be benefical both personally and professionally. |
| yes |
| i learned how to appley percantages in real life situations |
| she contributed to my general knowledge considerably. lots of financial information |
|
|
22. Other comments:
|
| great class....im so excited to be in her class for my math 26 class. |
| i will see if shes will be teaching math 100 nexts semseter. so that i can take her class again |
| hope she stays longer and teaches other math classes!! |
| Believe it or not, Anabelle Treacy has mad math fun for me. I enjoy math! |
| The instructor also made learning fun by telling a joke each day. Although the instructor gave a lot of quizzes and exams, I understood the reasons and thought it was beneficial. I was able to see my progress and identify areas that I needed more help in, and I would not have been able to do that without quizzes/exams. |
| chhheee |
| good teacher nice lady |
|
|
23. The instructor stresses important points in lectures/discussions.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
12 |
1.17 |
Freq(%) |
1 (8%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (17%) |
9 (75%) |
|
|
24. The instructor was enthusiastic about the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
12 |
0.65 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
2 (17%) |
9 (75%) |
|
|
25. The instructor treated students with respect.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.92 |
12 |
0.29 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
11 (92%) |
|
|
26. The instructor keeps students informed of their progress.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
12 |
0.78 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (17%) |
0 (0%) |
10 (83%) |
|
|
27. The instructor has everything going according to schedule.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.83 |
12 |
0.39 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (17%) |
10 (83%) |
|
|
28. The instructor seems well prepared for each class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.75 |
12 |
0.45 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (25%) |
9 (75%) |
|
|
29. The instructor presented the course materials in a clear and organized way.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.83 |
12 |
0.39 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (17%) |
10 (83%) |
|
|
30. Examinations cover the important aspects of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.83 |
12 |
0.39 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (17%) |
10 (83%) |
|
|
31. The exams cover the lecture material well.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.83 |
12 |
0.39 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (17%) |
10 (83%) |
|
|
32. Exams are reasonable in length and difficulty.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
12 |
0.49 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (33%) |
8 (67%) |
|
|
33. The exams are returned in a reasonable amount of time.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.83 |
12 |
0.39 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (17%) |
10 (83%) |
|
|
34. I had enough time during the examination periods.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
12 |
0.65 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
2 (17%) |
9 (75%) |
|
|
35. The exams were a fair test of your knowledge of the course material.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.67 |
12 |
0.49 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (33%) |
8 (67%) |
|
|
36. Exams and assignments were returned promptly so that learning was reinforced.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.83 |
12 |
0.39 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (17%) |
10 (83%) |
|
|
37. Requests for re-grading or review were handled fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
12 |
0.67 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (8%) |
4 (33%) |
7 (58%) |
|
