|
1. Class Level (pick one)
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Freshman |
Sophomore |
Junior |
Senior |
Grad |
Other |
| 3.6 |
5 |
0.55 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (40%) |
3 (60%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
|
|
2. Course
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Elective |
Required |
| 2.0 |
5 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (100%) |
|
|
3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.8 |
5 |
0.45 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (20%) |
4 (80%) |
|
|
4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.6 |
5 |
0.55 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (40%) |
3 (60%) |
|
|
5. The instructor communicated effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
5 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (100%) |
|
|
6. I learned to apply principles from this course to new situations.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.8 |
5 |
0.45 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (20%) |
4 (80%) |
|
|
7. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.6 |
5 |
0.55 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (40%) |
3 (60%) |
|
|
8. I was stimulated to discuss related topics outside of class.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.6 |
5 |
0.89 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (20%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (80%) |
|
|
9. I reconsidered many of my former attitudes.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.5 |
4 |
0.58 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
2 (50%) |
2 (50%) |
|
|
10. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
|
| Having a broader mind in how social theory is related into everyday decisions |
| Open class discussion. |
| The aspect of the course which were most valuable are:
Marx's capitalism, Weber's Structural Functionalism,Race and Femininity. |
| How he used examples to explain something. He would try to relate the topic to us, students, such as Sports or college athletes. |
| His lectures |
|
|
11. The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.8 |
5 |
0.45 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (20%) |
4 (80%) |
|
|
12. The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
5 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (100%) |
|
|
13. The instructor treated students fairly.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 5.0 |
5 |
0.0 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
5 (100%) |
|
|
14. The instructor's feedback about my writing helped me become a better writer.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.6 |
5 |
0.89 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (20%) |
0 (0%) |
4 (80%) |
|
|
15. The amount of work required is appropriate for the credit received.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.8 |
5 |
0.45 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (20%) |
4 (80%) |
|
|
16. How can the instructor improve the teaching of this course?
|
| He is an awsome intructor. Keep it up |
| More in-class assignments. Not as many take home assignments necssarily,being that the class involved a lot of open discussion. Students should be challenged a little bit more IN CLASS to display knowledge and understanding of the material rather than at home. |
| Yes he can improve the teaching of this course by introducing more real-life examples for instance, Youtube etc. |
| I think if he had a greater span of time to teach class (such as a fall semester) he could explain more. but overall, Great. |
| I think he is doing fine with the class. He makes things interesting. |
|
|
17. Assignments make students think.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.4 |
5 |
0.55 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (60%) |
2 (40%) |
|
|
18. Exams are reasonable in length and difficulty.
|
| Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
| 4.4 |
5 |
0.55 |
Freq(%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (60%) |
2 (40%) |
|
|
19. My overall evaluation of this course is...
|
| Interesting |
| I liked the course and it was interesting to get a perspective on different theories and views of life from various theorists and sociologists. |
| I would take this course again, if it was taught by Sang-hyoun Pahk. |
| Great |
| Awesome |
|
|
20. Other comments:
|
| Great person in and out of class |
| Recommended for any Soc. major. |
| Great |
|
