|
![]() The Technology Newsletter for the University of Hawaii Community |
| Back to: MAIN MENU | MASTER INDEX |
The term
"distance education" usually indicates instruction which occurs when students
are physically separated from their instructor. This is most often
accomplished with the aid of telecommunications technology. Typically, the
instructor is situated in one location, while the students may be in multiple
locations (including at their homes) on different islands. Distance education
has been the primary use of the University of Hawai`i (UH) video networking
systems. However with budget cuts and the ease and effectiveness of
telecommunications technology, there have been increased requests for use of
the systems for meetings and even accreditation visits. So, what are these
video systems? The following are brief descriptions of the technologies
currently in use. The accompanying chart shows the technical capability at
each UH campus and education center.
SkyBridge - SkyBridge is Maui Community College's (Maui CC) microwave system which serves the three islands of Maui county. SkyBridge provides one channel of 2-way video among Maui CC and its education centers on Moloka`i, Lana`i, and in Hana. This provides residents in these locations with access to Maui CC and other courses taught on that campus. Skybridge was built with support from the Federal government.
HITS - The Hawai`i Interactive Television System, uses microwave and ITFS (Instructional Television Fixed Service) transmission technologies to provide 4 channels of video and audio communication among the islands. HITS programs may utilize both 2-way video or 1-way video with return audio only. Since mid-1990, the largest use of HITS has been for the delivery of credit programs between the UH campuses. The Hawai`i Department of Education (DOE) also makes extensive use of HITS for direct instruction and teacher in- service training programs. In January 1995, stewardship of HITS was transferred from Hawai`i Public Television to the University of Hawai`i.
Cable TV - As part of their cable franchise agreements, all commercial cable companies within Hawai`i provide access channels which may be used for educational programming. Most cable companies can receive live programming via HITS, thus providing UH and DOE with nearly statewide live cable programming capabilities. Programs on cable are either preproduced to be shown at a scheduled time, or broadcast live with return audio capabilities via telephone.
I-Net (Institutional Network) - Cable franchise agreements mandate that cable companies help the State develop an internal infrastructure by providing fiber optic cables and/or other telecommunications services to specific State locations, usually at cost. Fiber connecting O`ahu campuses allows another option for delivering video between campuses. For example, Leeward Community College (Leeward CC) cannot originate live video programming directly on the HITS system. However, since they are a video I-Net site, they can transmit live programs via the I-Net to UH Manoa, where the programs can be switched onto HITS. The I-Net video system transmit broadcast-quality video, using the same technology Oceanic Cable uses to distribute video around the island.
Compressed Digital Video - UH is now beginning to use compressed digital video, often referred to as videoconferencing technology. This differs from cable TV and the original HITS system in that the video signal is digitized and compressed before being transmitted. This permits the transmission of many more "channels" than the original analog HITS and SkyBridge technologies. There are two compressed digital video systems currently in use by UH. The VideoConnect pilot project connects eight UH and DOE sites on six islands in order to test this proposed new GTE Hawaiian Tel service. VideoConnect now serves as the primary means to connect UH West Hawai`i with UH Hilo and Hawai`i Community College. We have also installed videoconferencing equipment (from Compression Labs Inc., or CLI) at several UH O`ahu sites. This system has been used to provide Leeward CC classes at our Leeward CC at Wai`anae education center. This is the same technology installed by the State of Hawai`i for their statewide videoconferencing service.
Satellite - While the systems already described carry video signals within the State, satellite technology is the most common means for receiving programs from outside Hawai`i. Satellite teleconferences are generally received on a UH satellite dish and carried using one or more of the above systems to one or more locations where they can be viewed live. Audio interaction with the presenters is usually possible by calling a toll-free telephone number. Many campuses have satellite downlink facilities; most programs are received either on a campus dish or on the downlink facilities of the UH Manoa Language Telecommunications Resource Learning Center (LTRLC) or at Hawai`i Public Television. The LTRLC also operates a satellite uplink facility which can be used to broadcast live video programs from Hawai`i to the Mainland and Asia/Pacific regions.
During the fall we hope to use two additional technologies for video transmission. We will be installing desktop video systems in distance education facilities on different islands to permit more cost-effective small group and individual interaction, such as electronic office hours. We are also testing dialup videoconferencing, as a less expensive alternative to satellite for out-of-state video connections.

Hae Okimoto
hae@hawaii.edu
| Back to: August - September 1995 Index | Back to: Main Index |
We are adding 100 additional lines this fall, which will take our total dialup pool over 250 lines. These will include higher speed modems and an improved management capability which will reduce our staff workload and provide more options for managing this increasingly scarce resource. We are planning to partition some modems into an "express" modem pool to make it easier for people to be able to get in just to check email quickly. Additionally, we are working cooperatively with the State Information and Communications Services Division and the Department of Education to upgrade and expand the Hawai`i FYI modems to provide additional dialup capabilities, especially on the neighbor islands.
The bad news is that it is quite clear, particularly with the State's financial difficulties, that we will not be able to keep up with the demand for free dialup services. The UH community consists of some 60,000 faculty, staff, and credit students. To serve this population with high quality service, it would require at least a 10-fold expansion of our modem pool, with associated capital and recurring costs. We are pursuing several ways to reduce the cost of supporting dialup modems. One possibility is to utilize service and pricing options now being made available through the State's new telephone contract with GTE Hawaiian Tel. Another set of options will become available when the GTE Hawaiian Tel Central Office serving UH Manoa is upgraded this fall to permit a more flexible new digital trunking service. We have also investigated outsourcing possibilities. But there is no magic that will permit us to dramatically increase the level of service without a massive infusion of new funding. As an example, at the current market price of about $25/month for unlimited dialup access it would cost $18 million a year for 60,000 users. Obviously that's not the real cost, but it conveys a sense of the scale of the problem we face.
Fortunately, there are now many private Internet Service Providers who manage their own dialup modem pools and sell services to the public. We are now implementing direct connections with local providers through a project we call the Hawai`i Internet Exchange, or HIX. This will provide improved service for any member of the UH community who chooses to buy service from a private provider but still wants to reach UH resources. It will also improve connections from UH campuses to information services hosted by the private providers. We are also exploring opportunities for members of the UH community to pilot test new connectivity offerings becoming available as the telecommunications environment is opened to competition. The most exciting of these possibilities is Ethernet-over- CableTV to the home. UH and most public schools are already interconnected with Oceanic's first implementation of this service.
As the budget situation worsens, it will be increasingly difficult to continue to provide free services to all. There are many approaches that are being tried elsewhere as universities throughout the country grapple with this issue.
Many
universities are giving up and outsourcing dialup access by allowing a
private provider to sell access directly to students and faculty. And
some are beginning to charge to recover costs. I can assure you that,
to date, members of the UH community have not been shy about expressing
their opinions. Several faculty suggested giving priority to faculty over
students. Some technical students (e.g. Computer Science and Engineering)
suggested that non-technical students (e.g. English) really don't need
access as much as they do. We could ration access by limiting individual
dialup sessions more severely, perhaps to 20 minutes? We could ration
access by limiting cumulative usage, perhaps to 20 hours per user per
month. Or we could begin to charge faculty, staff, and students for
dialup access, perhaps in conjunction with one of these other approaches.
None of these solutions are very appealing, but it is clear to anyone who
thinks about it that either funding patterns or expectations have to change.
In a nutshell, the basic problem is that dialup costs are roughly linear with usage, dialup usage is growing exponentially, and institutional budgets are shrinking.
David Lassner
david@hawaii.edu
| Back to: August - September 1995 Index | Back to: Main Index |
In brief, all SLIP/PPP IDs will now be linked to users' UNIX login IDs. After September 1, 1995, all old SLIP/PPP IDs will be eliminated. The new SLIP/PPP ID and password will be same as the person's valid uhunix account or pulua account (for members of Honolulu Community College). This change also means that SLIP/PPP password changes must be made on uhunix or pulua and the password change will be processed within an hour. For new uhunix or pulua users, SLIP/PPP instructions will be given when the account is requested.
Alan Whinery
whinery@hawaii.edu
| Back to: August - September 1995 Index | Back to: Main Index |
For more information about ID requests, please see the following resource: " 'Access for All' is Here" (Aug-Sept 1994 issue of InfoBITS) on World Wide Web or Gopher.

| Back to: August - September 1995 Index | Back to: Main Index |
These changes should not affect email in any way. All email directed to userid@uhunix.uhcc.hawaii.edu, userid@uhunix.its.hawaii.edu, or userid@hawaii.edu will reach its destination just the same.
One possible problem may be listserv or listproc mail servers rejecting mail from uhunix users saying that the user is not subscribed to the list although he/she is subscribed and has been able to email to that list before. Users of uhunix who experience this problem, please type:
Julio Polo
julio@hawaii.edu
| Back to: August - September 1995 Index | Back to: Main Index |
ITS is now researching the use of X terminals to replace the SPARCstations that were formerly in Keller 204.

| Back to: August - September 1995 Index | Back to: Main Index |

Walter Yee
| Back to: August - September 1995 Index | Back to: Main Index |
Veteran users of the Internet expect others, especially newcomers, to learn and observe proper network etiquette or netiquette. Here are the most common-yet grave-faux pas one can commit on the Internet:
Posting an article to a usenet newsgroup whose contents have nothing to do with the newsgroup's topic: Unfortunately, when this happens, the irrelevant article is often sent to more than one newsgroup, magnifying the offense and causing a barrage of reactions to be sent back and forth across the Net. Although postings about controversial topics, commercial advertising and promotion of private interest tend to draw the most clamor for resolution, seemingly valid and innocuous postings like a survey about email usage also draw angry reactions from the Net.
Sending irrelevant email to one or more mailing lists: People subscribe to mailing lists because they want to participate in discussions and receive information related to the topic of the list. Because mail processing requires the message to be appended to each individual's mailbox, this type of netiquette violation wastes an incredible amount of computer and network resources. Furthermore, because an intrusion on their personal mailbox has occurred, users will react and reply to the offender with usually not-so-kind words. The most recent and notorious example of this type of netiquette violation is the "green card lottery" mail message sent to hundreds of mailing lists which caused a flood of angry replies to be sent back to the originating site and affecting the performance of that system.
Sending email to a random number of users on a system: This is exactly the same as the previous type of offense with the exception that instead of a subject-specific mailing list, mail is sent to a random number of users on one or more systems. Everything we said about the previous type of offense applies to this type just as well. A notorious example is the "free money" message sent by someone supposedly named Robert S. Laurent which was recently received by all uhunix users. Another example of this type of violation is a message sent by a uhunix user to other fellow uhunix users inviting them to try IRC from his home directory.
Sending chain mail: Unfortunately this annoying activity has made its way into email. Chain mail greatly upsets and annoys those who receive it, regardless of whether the recipient believes in it or not. It simply boils down to misused and wasted computing resources.
Netiquette violations do a lot more than raise eyebrows. Those who get upset will reply and because a large audience is usually involved, the number of responses traveling back and forth across the Net takes up precious bandwidth that could have been used for more worthwhile traffic. An overwhelming number of replies also puts stress on the system where the unwanted message originated from. System managers need to monitor their system's well-being and have to spend time responding to complaints from angry users who demand that the individual who sent the unsolicited message be immediately brought to justice. A good day's work can quickly be spent doing damage control caused by bad network etiquette. Therefore, exercise restraint before sending a reply to the offender or a complaint to the system manager because there is a good chance that someone else has already done so.
The Internet's spirit of harmonious, free-flowing information exchange that researchers, educators, and professionals have come to love and expect is constantly being challenged by an ever increasing population brought about by media coverage and commercial hype about the so-called information superhighway. To put it in terms of this overused buzzword, new drivers jump onto the information superhighway without proper driver education instilled in them. This article is a first lesson in Internet driver education.
Observing the simple network etiquette rule of not sending unsolicited or irrelevant material to a widespread audience makes the Internet a more productive and pleasant place for all of us.
Julio Polo
julio@hawaii.edu
| Back to: August - September 1995 Index | Back to: Main Index |