skip to Main Content
New Analysis Reveals Large-scale Motion Around San Andreas Fault System
Aerial view of San Andreas Fault

Aerial view of San Andreas Fault in the Carrizo Plain, 8,500 ft. altitude. (credit: Ikluft/Wikimedia)

An array of GPS instruments near the San Andreas Fault System in Southern California detects constant motion of Earth’s crust—sometimes large, sudden motion during an earthquake and often subtle, creeping motion. By carefully analyzing the data recorded by the EarthScope Plate Boundary Observatory’s GPS array researchers from the University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, University of Washington and Scripps Institution of Oceanography (SIO) discovered nearly 125 mile-wide “lobes” of uplift and subsidence—a few millimeters of motion each year—straddling the fault system. This large scale motion was previously predicted in models but until now had not been documented.

The GPS array records vertical and horizontal motion of Earth’s surface. Vertical motion is affected by many factors including tectonic motion of the crust, pumping of groundwater, local surface geology, and precipitation. The challenge faced by Samuel Howell, doctoral candidate at the UH Mānoa School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology (SOEST) and lead author of the study, and co-authors was to discern the broad, regional tectonic motion from the shorter-scale, local motion.

New assessment revealed the pattern

To tease out such motions, the team used a comprehensive statistical technique to extract from the GPS data a pattern of large-scale, smoothly varying vertical motions of the local crust.

“While the San Andreas GPS data has been publicly available for more than a decade, the vertical component of the measurements had largely been ignored in tectonic investigations because of difficulties in interpreting the noisy data,” said Howell. “Using this technique, we were able to break down the noisy signals to isolate a simple vertical motion pattern that curiously straddled the San Andreas fault.”

Confirmation of predicted motion

The pattern resulting from their data analysis was similar in magnitude and direction to motions predicted by previously published earthquake cycle model results led by co-authors Bridget Smith-Konter, associate professor at SOEST, and David Sandwell, professor at SIO.

“We were surprised and thrilled when this statistical method produced a coherent velocity field similar to the one predicted by our physical earthquake cycle models,” said Smith-Konter. “The powerful combination of a priori model predictions and a unique analysis of vertical GPS data led us to confirm that the buildup of century-long earthquake cycle forces within the crust are a dominant source of the observed vertical motion signal.”

Improving hazard predictions

The new findings, published on June 20 in Nature Geoscience, indicate that researchers can use GPS vertical motion measurements to better understand the structure and behavior of faults, even in times of earthquake quiescence, when no major ruptures have occurred for several decades to centuries. As scientists patiently monitor the San Andreas Fault System for indications of the next big earthquake, these results will help constrain seismic hazard estimates and may allow for a more prudent mapping of the large-scale motion resulting from the next significant rupture of the San Andreas.

Uplift (red) and subsidence (blue) based on GPS data (top) confirm predicted motion (bottom).

Uplift (red) and subsidence (blue) based on GPS data (top) confirm predicted motion (bottom).

This Post Has 9 Comments
  1. Since it has long been my understanding that the San Andreas is a strike-slip fault, rather than down drop, I am curious how the vertical motion may affect the possible horizontal activity of the fault. Will it possibly somehow be a causing factor in setting off the horizontal damage? Or, could it actually help ease the stresses in some manner?

  2. Hi Wes! The San Andreas is certainly strike-slip, and the horizontal motions are about 10x the vertical motions that we’ve found. The signal we discuss, wish is a result of the horizontal motions, isn’t showing that the ground has just now started moving vertically, but rather we are getting a measurement of how it has been moving vertically since the last major earthquake. We knew that there should be some kind of motion, but this gives us a better idea of how things actually look, and will help improve how we look at the earthquake cycle.

  3. I am no longer fascinated by earthquakes.. nor afraid…the aftermath however is both a tribute to mankinds willingness to rebuild..understand and deal with mother nature..As are all natural hardships..stay fascinated..contribute..perhaps going upinto thr vortex of tornado would also excite you.STICK TO A THEMEPARK

  4. Is a high resolution version of the ‘San Andreas Fault in the Carrizo Plain’ photo available somewhere?

Leave a Reply to M Stein Cancel comment reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back To Top