Select the desired review year, college, and program from the drop down menus. Once a program has been selected, the results will be displayed.
Review Year: | College: | Program: |
College: Kauai Community College
|
Printer Friendly ![]() |
Program did not provide date of the last comprehensive review.
No Content.
Demand Indicators | Program Year | Demand Health Call | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
10-11 | 11-12 | 12-13 | |||
1 | Enrolled in any Remedial/Developmental | 378 | 380 | 325 | Unhealthy |
2 | Semester Hours Taught | 70 | 79 | 62 | |
3 | * Student Semester Hours (SSH) Taught | 1411 | 1469 | 1203 | |
4 | Full Time Students (Fall) Enrolled | 142 | 152 | 124 | |
5 | Full Time Students (Spring) Enrolled | 102 | 100 | 72 | |
6 | Number of Classes Taught | 23 | 25 | 19 | |
Achieving the Dream | AtD Fall Cohort | ||||
2009 | 2010 | 2011 | |||
7 | Percent AtD Cohort with Placement | 74% | 72% | 76% | |
8 | AtD Cohort Placing Remdial/Developmental | 59% | 57% | 59% | |
9 | Cohort Enrolling Remedial/Developmental | 155 | 130 | 129 | |
9a | Percent Cohort Enrolling Remedial/Developmental | 70% | 67% | 58% | |
10 | * Increase Percent Enrolling | 4% | -3% | -9% |
Efficiency Indicators | Program Year | Efficiency Health Call | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
10-11 | 11-12 | 12-13 | |||
11 | Average Class Size | 20.2 | 18.6 | 19.4 | Healthy |
12 | * Fill Rate | 89.2% | 83.2% | 87.8% | |
13 | Number of Low-Enrolled (<10) Classes | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
14 | * BOR Appointed Faculty (FTE) | 0.9 | 1 | 0.9 | |
15 | Non-BOR Appointed Faculty Teaching Classes | 4 | 4 | 4 | |
16 | Percentage Classes Taught by Regular Discipline Faculty | 39% | 36% | 47% | |
17 | Percentage Classes Taught by non Regular Discipline Faculty | 61% | 64% | 53% | |
18 | Program Budget Allocation | $91,476 | $91,476 | Not Reported | |
18b | Tution and Fees | $0 | $0 | Not Reported | |
19 | Cost per SSH | $65 | $62 | Not Reported |
*Data element used in health call calculation | Last Updated: August 13, 2013 |
Effectiveness Indicators | Program Year | Effectiveness Health Call | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
10-11 | 11-12 | 12-13 | |||
Retention (Course Completion) | Healthy | ||||
20 | 1 Level Below College Level | 89% | 94% | 95% | |
21 | 2 Levels Below College Level | 91% | 93% | 86% | |
22 | 3 or More Levels Below College Level | N/A | 92% | N/A | |
Successful completion (Equivalent C or Higher) | |||||
23 | 1 Level Below College Level | 59% | 70% | 72% | |
23a | 1 Level Below College Level | 196 | 92 | 94 | |
24 | Withdrawals (Grade = W) | 36 | 8 | 6 | |
25 | 2 Levels Below College Level | 54% | 56% | 55% | |
25a | 2 Levels Below College Level | 59 | 148 | 131 | |
26 | Withdrawals (Grade = W) | 10 | 18 | 33 | |
27 | 3 or More Levels Below College Level | N/A | 46% | N/A | |
27a | 3 or More Levels Below College Level | N/A | 33 | N/A | |
28 | Withdrawals (Grade = W) | N/A | 6 | N/A |
Achieving the Dream | AtD Fall Cohort | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2009 | 2010 | 2011 | |||
29 | Cohort Enrolled in Remedial Developmental Course | 155 | 130 | 129 | |
30 | Cohort Successful Completion at Least One Remedial/Developmental Course within First Academic Year | 93 | 76 | 86 | |
31 | Percent Cohort Successful Completion | 60% | 58% | 67% | |
Remedial/Developmental Pipeline | |||||
32 | AtD Cohort Size | 372 | 334 | 374 | |
33 | Percent AtD Students Placing Into Remedial/ Developmental Level | 59% | 57% | 59% | |
34 | Percent AtD Cohort Enrolled in Remedial/ Developmental Course | 42% | 39% | 34% | |
35 | Percent AtD Cohort Successfully Completing Any Remedial/ Developmental Course Within First Academic Year | 42% | 40% | 39% | |
36 | Percent AtD Cohort Successfully Completing College Level Course Within First Academic Year | 26% | 20% | 24% |
Successful Next Level | Program Year | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
10-11 | 11-12 | 12-13 | |||
Persistence (Fall to Spring) | |||||
37 | * Percent From 1 Level Below College Level, To College Level | 64% | 67.3% | ||
37a | From 1 Level Below College Level, To College level | 28 | 41 | 64 | |
38 | Percent From 2 Levels Below College Level, To 1 Level Below | 45% | 61% | ||
38a | From 2 Levels Below College Level, To 1 Level Below | 26 | 38 | 51 | |
39 | Percent From 3 or More Levels Below College Level, To 2 Levels Below | 38% | N/A | ||
39a | From 3 or More Levels Below College Level, To 2 Levels Below | N/A | 8 | N/A | |
Success in Subsequent Level (Equivalent C or Higher) | |||||
40 | College Level From 1 Level Below | 20 | 33 | 45 | |
40a | * Percent College Level From 1 Level Below | 80.4% | 70.3% | ||
41 | 1 Level Below From 2 Levels Below College Level | 18 | 28 | 30 | |
42 | 2 Levels Below From 3 or More Levels Below College Level | N/A | 0 | N/A |
*Data element used in health call calculation | Last Updated: August 13, 2013 |
In R/D math 325 students were enrolled in the 12-13 year for a decrease of 55 students from the previous year. Especially spring enrollment was 72 in the 12 - 13 year for a decrease of 28 from the previous year. There were less students enrolling in R/M classes because we shortened the R/D path way. More students spent one semester in Math 26 instead of takeing Math 24 and Math 25 for two semesters. There was a 9% decrease in enrollment for the AtD cohort with placement, which is considered unhealthy according to the instructional benchmarks.This suggests that new students are delaying their study of mathematics. One of the possible solutions is to require students who test into rem/dev to take it in their first semester. The average class size was 19.4 with the fill rate of 87.8%. We did a good job in filling our R/D classes. Retention in the courses that are one level below college level is at 95% and for courses that are two levels below it is at 86%. The successful completion statistic for Math 21 is at 61% ( a 16% increase from last year.) The teaching variations of Math 21 is standardized with the new full time developmental math instructor was hired. The successful completions for one level below courses have increased.
Tutoring - Peer tutoring continues to be important support service for students in R/D math courses. Under the coordination of Tina Castro, the tutoring center continues to have math tutors available throughout the day. Furthermore, all math faculty are currently offering tutoring sessions in the tutoring center 2 hours/ week.
Accelerated Courses- KCC is currently offering an accelerated Math 26 course ( a combination of Math 24 and 25 courses,) and Math 21 (a combination of basic math skill and the Math 22 course.) Both success rate and retention rate for Math 26 / 21 have been successful. A hybrid Math 26 is currently implementing in Fall 13.
IS 103- Starting in the Fall 2012 semester, KCC students who place into two or more remedial/developmental courses are required to take IS 103, Intro to College, in their first semester. IS 103 is a college success course which covers study skills, college resources, technology as well as time managememnt and motivation. The purpose of the course is to increase student retention and success.
Math Bootcamp - In the summer 2013, more than 30 students who place into remedial/developmental courses spent a week at the Math Bootcamp, immersing themselves in math for five hours a night. Students' response was overwhelmingly positive. We are still collating the data from Fall 2013 semester and plan for another Math Bootcamp in Summer 2014.
Mandatory placement for students tested in Dev. Math courses - There was a 9% decrease in enrollment for the AtD cohort with placement, which is considered unhealthy according to the instructional benchmarks.This suggests that new students are delaying their study of mathematics. One of the possible solutions is to require students who test into rem/dev to take it in their first semester. The Math department has researched the mandatory placement for R/D Math courses.
No additional resources are being requested at this time.