University of Hawaii Community Colleges
Instructional Annual Report of Program Data (ARPD)

Select the desired review year, college, and program from the drop down menus. Once a program has been selected, the results will be displayed.

Review Year: College: Program:

College: Honolulu Community College
Program: Administration of Justice

Printer Friendly

PDF PDF

The last comprehensive review for this program can be viewed at:
http://programs.honolulu.hawaii.edu/intranet/node/862

Program Description

Program Mission: The Administration of Justice program’s mission is to serve the community as a learning-centered, open door program that provides technical training to meet the demands of the industry and the needs of the individual. An open-exit option allows the students to identify their career objectives and participate in program exploration.

Program Description: This program is designed to prepare the student academically for entry into the Administration of Justice career field; i.e., law enforcement, courts, corrections or private security. Courses are also provided to meet the training needs of the in-service professional. A student at Honolulu Community College who completes twelve (12) units of Administration of Justice work may receive up to twelve (12) additional units for completing Basic Recruit Training in law enforcement or corrections, as required by governmental agencies:

Faculty. There is one full time faculty member and 4 to 5 lecturers each semester

Part I. Quantitative Indicators

Overall Program Health: Cautionary

Majors Included: AJ     Program CIP: 43.0107

Demand Indicators Program Year Demand Health Call
10-11 11-12 12-13
1 New & Replacement Positions (State) 209 117 131 Healthy
2 *New & Replacement Positions (County Prorated) 152 85 93
3 *Number of Majors 140 151.5 140.5
3a     Number of Majors Native Hawaiian 31 34 40
3b     Fall Full-Time 50% 53% 51%
3c     Fall Part-Time 50% 47% 49%
3d     Fall Part-Time who are Full-Time in System 3% 4% 7%
3e     Spring Full-Time 50% 52% 54%
3f     Spring Part-Time 50% 48% 46%
3g     Spring Part-Time who are Full-Time in System 5% 4% 1%
4 SSH Program Majors in Program Classes 936 1,107 1,302
5 SSH Non-Majors in Program Classes 216 177 143
6 SSH in All Program Classes 1,152 1,284 1,445
7 FTE Enrollment in Program Classes 38 43 48
8 Total Number of Classes Taught 21 20 24

Efficiency Indicators Program Year Efficiency Health Call
10-11 11-12 12-13
9 Average Class Size 18.3 21.4 20.1 Cautionary
10 *Fill Rate 74.1% 78.5% 69.8%
11 FTE BOR Appointed Faculty 1 1 1
12 *Majors to FTE BOR Appointed Faculty 140 151.5 140.5
13 Majors to Analytic FTE Faculty 60 68.2 55.8
13a Analytic FTE Faculty 2.3 2.2 2.5
14 Overall Program Budget Allocation $94,053 $58,755 $126,736
14a General Funded Budget Allocation $94,053 $56,880 $126,455
14b Special/Federal Budget Allocation $0 $0 $0
14c Tuition and Fees $0 $1,875 $281
15 Cost per SSH $82 $46 $88
16 Number of Low-Enrolled (<10) Classes 3 3 3
*Data element used in health call calculation Last Updated: January 27, 2014

Effectiveness Indicators Program Year Effectiveness Health Call
10-11 11-12 12-13
17 Successful Completion (Equivalent C or Higher) 78% 88% 87% Cautionary
18 Withdrawals (Grade = W) 12 10 23
19 *Persistence Fall to Spring 67.1% 66.6% 67.1%
19a Persistence Fall to Fall     40.4%
20 *Unduplicated Degrees/Certificates Awarded 32 23 26
20a Degrees Awarded 32 23 26
20b Certificates of Achievement Awarded 0 0 0
20c Advanced Professional Certificates Awarded 0 0 0
20d Other Certificates Awarded 0 0 0
21 External Licensing Exams Passed   Not Reported Not Reported
22 Transfers to UH 4-yr 10 8 6
22a Transfers with credential from program 4 3 3
22b Transfers without credential from program 6 5 3

Distance Education:
Completely On-line Classes
Program Year  
10-11 11-12 12-13
23 Number of Distance Education Classes Taught 0 0 0  
24 Enrollments Distance Education Classes N/A N/A N/A
25 Fill Rate N/A N/A N/A
26 Successful Completion (Equivalent C or Higher) N/A N/A N/A
27 Withdrawals (Grade = W) N/A N/A N/A
28 Persistence (Fall to Spring Not Limited to Distance Education) N/A N/A N/A

Perkins IV Core Indicators
2011-2012
Goal Actual Met  
29 1P1 Technical Skills Attainment 90.00 88.37 Not Met  
30 2P1 Completion 50.00 25.58 Not Met
31 3P1 Student Retention or Transfer 74.25 73.86 Not Met
32 4P1 Student Placement 60.00 70.45 Met
33 5P1 Nontraditional Participation 17.00 29.14 Met
34 5P2 Nontraditional Completion 15.25 30.77 Met

Performance Funding Program Year  
10-11 11-12 12-13
35 Number of Degrees and Certificates     26  
36 Number of Degrees and Certificates Native Hawaiian     6
37 Number of Degrees and Certificates STEM     Not STEM
38 Number of Pell Recipients     69
39 Number of Transfers to UH 4-yr     6
*Data element used in health call calculation Last Updated: January 27, 2014
Glossary | Health Call Scoring Rubric

Part II. Analysis of the Program

DEMAND INDICATORS- Healthy

The large number of majors has kept a favorable ratio of number of majors to replacement positions. The number of part time students continues to be around 50%.  The increase in FTE enrollment has steadily grown despite the high number of part time students.

EFFICIENCY INDICATORS – Cautionary.

The File Rate fell below 75% which contributes to the Cautionary call. The fill rate drop may be due to the fact that four more classes were offered which reduced the Fill Rate for each class.

The ratio of majors to full time faculty also caused the Cautionary call because of the high number of majors and only one full time faculty member. Until an additional full time faculty member is approved, additional release time should be awarded to the present full time member.

EFFECTIVENESS INDICATORS  - Cautionary

All three indicators: ratio of degrees to majors, degrees to replacement positions, and persistence are all just below the Healthy threshold.  Other indicators remain good: Successful Completions remains high (87%) and the degrees awarded were three higher than the previous year.  This is not a large improvement, but shows a fairly stable outcome. 

 

Part III. Action Plan

The program is without a full time instructor.  Interviews are in process and it is hoped that one is selected prior to the Spring 2013 semester.  In addition to teaching, this is a program director position.

 

The departing program director left a recommended curriculum change that appears accurately describe the present deficiencies in the program. This recommendation needs to be reviewed by the Advisory Committee and the experienced lecturers.

 

One of the recommended changes is to create distance education courses that would benefit many of the part time students and students living on the outer islands.

 

A computer course that uses police and security  applications has never been implemented.

Part IV. Resource Implications

Additional funding is not needed for the next Academic Year.

Program Student Learning Outcomes

For the 2012-2013 program year, some or all of the following P-SLOs were reviewed by the program:

Assessed
this year?
Program Student Learning Outcomes

1

Yes
• Use critical observation skills.

2

Yes
• Communicate with a diverse population in a culturally sensitive manner

3

Yes
• Assess and respond appropriately to potential conflict situations.

4

Yes
• Write clear and accurate reports.

5

No
• Maintain a drug free lifestyle

6

Yes
• Maintain a drug free lifestyle

7

Yes
Develop Administration of Justice career plans.

8

Yes
• Practice within the legal/ethical parameters of the Justice profession

A) Evidence of Industry Validation

Approximately three years ago the Advisory Committee approved the Program SLOs

 

NOTE:  SLO #6 Should read: "Work independently and interdependently to accomplish shared professional outcomes"

B) Expected Level Achievement

Course and Program SLOs were assessed using knowledge surveys.  An arbitrary criteria was established to determine if SLOs were met.  Data Analysis and conclusions reached can be found on a separate document located at:

 

http://programs.honolulu.hawaii.edu/intranet/node/1625

C) Courses Assessed

Three courses were assessed:  AJ 101, 221, and 224.

 

It should be noted that all courses have assigned SLOs.  Course SLOs have been mapped to Program SLOs to ensure adequate course SLOs are achieved in order for the student to in turn achieve the desired Program SLOs.  The mapping diagrams are found at the following URL:

            http://programs.honolulu.hawaii.edu/intranet/node/1253

D) Assessment Strategy/Instrument

Both Program and Course SLOs were used knowledge survey instruments.  Numbers were crunched and charts created using Excel spreadsheets

E) Results of Program Assessment

All Program SLOs were met.  No weaknesses were noted.

 

AJ 101 had one Course SLO that fell below the established criteria.  Course, syllabus and delivery content will be reviewed.

 

Review the methodology, analysis, and conclusions reach in the AJ document found at:

 

            http://programs.honolulu.hawaii.edu/intranet/node/1253

 

F) Other Comments

NONE

G) Next Steps

See paragraph III above for proposed actions.