University of Hawaii Community Colleges
Instructional Annual Report of Program Data (ARPD)
Select the desired review year, college, and program from the drop down menus. Once a program has been selected, the results will be displayed.
| Review Year: |
College: |
Program: |
|
|
|
|
College: Honolulu Community College
Program: Remedial/Developmental Reading
|
|
Printer Friendly
 PDF
|
Part I: Program Quantitative Indicators
Overall Program Health:
Cautionary
| Demand Indicators |
Program Year |
Demand Health Call |
| 10-11 |
11-12 |
12-13 |
| 1 |
Enrolled in any Remedial/Developmental |
99 |
287 |
232 |
Unhealthy |
| 2 |
Semester Hours Taught |
24 |
69 |
48 |
| 3 |
* Student Semester Hours (SSH) Taught |
294 |
1032 |
747 |
| 4 |
Full Time Students (Fall) Enrolled |
0 |
114 |
71 |
| 5 |
Full Time Students (Spring) Enrolled |
37 |
55 |
23 |
| 6 |
Number of Classes Taught |
8 |
23 |
16 |
| Achieving the Dream |
AtD Fall Cohort |
| 2009
| 2010 |
2011 |
| 7 |
Percent AtD Cohort with Placement |
40% |
46% |
81% |
| 8 |
AtD Cohort Placing Remdial/Developmental |
0% |
0% |
40% |
| 9 |
Cohort Enrolling Remedial/Developmental |
0 |
0 |
180 |
| 9a |
Percent Cohort Enrolling Remedial/Developmental |
0% |
0% |
44% |
| 10 |
* Increase Percent Enrolling |
0% |
0% |
0% |
| Efficiency Indicators |
Program Year |
Efficiency Health Call |
| 10-11 |
11-12 |
12-13 |
| 11 |
Average Class Size |
12.3 |
15.0 |
15.6 |
Healthy |
| 12 |
* Fill Rate |
61.2% |
75.7% |
78.7% |
| 13 |
Number of Low-Enrolled (<10) Classes |
4 |
6 |
2 |
| 14 |
* BOR Appointed Faculty (FTE) |
0.6 |
1.2 |
0.8 |
| 15 |
Non-BOR Appointed Faculty Teaching Classes |
2 |
2 |
1 |
| 16 |
Percentage Classes Taught by Regular Discipline Faculty |
75% |
52% |
50% |
| 17 |
Percentage Classes Taught by non Regular Discipline Faculty |
25% |
48% |
50% |
| 18 |
Program Budget Allocation |
Not Reported |
Not Reported |
$241,081 |
| 18b |
Tution and Fees |
Not Reported |
Not Reported |
$40,793 |
| 19 |
Cost per SSH |
Not Reported |
Not Reported |
$323 |
| *Data element used in health call calculation |
Last Updated: November 13, 2013 |
| Effectiveness Indicators |
Program Year |
Effectiveness Health Call |
| 10-11 |
11-12 |
12-13 |
| Retention (Course Completion) |
Unhealthy
|
| 20 |
1 Level Below College Level |
68% |
96% |
97% |
| 21 |
2 Levels Below College Level |
86% |
91% |
95% |
| 22 |
3 or More Levels Below College Level |
0% |
93% |
93% |
| Successful completion (Equivalent C or Higher) |
| 23 |
1 Level Below College Level |
47% |
60% |
79% |
| 23a |
1 Level Below College Level |
43 |
141 |
143 |
| 24 |
Withdrawals (Grade = W) |
29 |
10 |
6 |
| 25 |
2 Levels Below College Level |
57% |
61% |
53% |
| 25a |
2 Levels Below College Level |
4 |
41 |
20 |
| 26 |
Withdrawals (Grade = W) |
1 |
6 |
2 |
| 27 |
3 or More Levels Below College Level |
0% |
61% |
57% |
| 27a |
3 or More Levels Below College Level |
0 |
25 |
17 |
| 28 |
Withdrawals (Grade = W) |
0 |
3 |
2 |
| Achieving the Dream |
AtD Fall Cohort |
|
| 2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
| 29 |
Cohort Enrolled in Remedial Developmental Course |
0 |
0 |
180 |
|
| 30 |
Cohort Successful Completion at Least One Remedial/Developmental Course within First Academic Year |
0 |
0 |
118 |
| 31 |
Percent Cohort Successful Completion |
0% |
0% |
66% |
| Remedial/Developmental Pipeline |
| 32 |
AtD Cohort Size |
1,048 |
984 |
1,018 |
| 33 |
Percent AtD Students Placing Into Remedial/ Developmental Level |
0% |
0% |
40% |
| 34 |
Percent AtD Cohort Enrolled in Remedial/ Developmental Course |
0% |
0% |
18% |
| 35 |
Percent AtD Cohort Successfully Completing Any Remedial/ Developmental Course Within First Academic Year |
0% |
0% |
29% |
| 36 |
Percent AtD Cohort Successfully Completing College Level Course Within First Academic Year |
0% |
0% |
4% |
| Successful Next Level |
Program Year |
|
| 10-11 |
11-12 |
12-13 |
| Persistence (Fall to Spring) |
|
| 37 |
* Percent From 1 Level Below College Level, To College Level |
|
0% |
0% |
| 37a |
From 1 Level Below College Level, To College level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 38 |
Percent From 2 Levels Below College Level, To 1 Level Below |
|
77% |
56% |
| 38a |
From 2 Levels Below College Level, To 1 Level Below |
0 |
17 |
9 |
| 39 |
Percent From 3 or More Levels Below College Level, To 2 Levels Below |
|
63% |
43% |
| 39a |
From 3 or More Levels Below College Level, To 2 Levels Below |
N/A |
12 |
3 |
| Success in Subsequent Level (Equivalent C or Higher) |
| 40 |
College Level From 1 Level Below |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 40a |
* Percent College Level From 1 Level Below |
|
0% |
0% |
| 41 |
1 Level Below From 2 Levels Below College Level |
0 |
13 |
9 |
| 42 |
2 Levels Below From 3 or More Levels Below College Level |
N/A |
9 |
1 |
| *Data element used in health call calculation |
Last Updated: November 13, 2013 |