University of Hawaii

Measuring Our Progress Report 2008

This version of the U H Measuring Our Progress Report is designed to promote accessibility for people with disabilities in compliance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act. To ensure proper functioning of assistive technology tools such as screen readers, Hawaiian diacriticals were not included and spaces between selected acronyms were added (e.g., U H). We apologize for any inconvenience.

The President’s Message

I am proud to share with the people of Hawaii, the Hawaii State Legislature, and our alumni and friends the University of Hawaii Measuring Our Progress, 2008 Update. This report responds to Board of Regents’ policy that requires regular and systematic assessment of programs, services, campuses, and the University System as a whole. Each biennium the University of Hawaii produces an update to document our progress in meeting our goals in service to the State of Hawaii.

As we go to press with this edition in late 2008, we are keenly aware of the shifting economic and social landscape. The economy in Hawaii, the U.S., and the world is turbulent, and the U.S. has been declared to be in a recession. Unemployment has increased and so has the demand for the University’s services. The U H System fall 2008 enrollment of 53,500 in credit courses was at an all-time high. The most recent report card on higher education in the U.S., Measuring Up 2008, shows only modest improvements in educational attainment in the Nation, persistent gaps in achievement among minority groups, and a continuing erosion of our global competitiveness. Clearly, we will need to pull together as a State and a Nation to make progress on what is important to us in a time of scarce resources.

At U H, we have set our strategic outcomes to address the central issue of educational attainment. Hawaii has a long history of having a well-educated citizenry; only recently have the 25-year-olds had less education than the 35-, 45-, or 55-year-olds. The University of Hawaii is committed to support access to education for the citizens of Hawaii by increasing financial assistance and providing the support needed for students to succeed in attaining their educational objectives.

During the 2007–2008 academic year, we took a close look at the University of Hawaii Strategic Plan: Entering the University’s Second Century, 2002–2010. With the input of faculty, staff, students, and the community, we reaffirmed the strategic goals set in 2002 as well as the values underlying these goals. Measuring Our Progress continues our effort to provide measures of performance, benchmarks, and other indicators of our success in meeting the five broad strategic goals set forth in the U H Strategic Plan:

The University of Hawaii expects to be held accountable for the quality and success of its programs, services, students, and graduates. Measuring Our Progress demonstrates our commitment to excellence and accountability. With the guidance of the Board of Regents, and the support of the Executive Branch, the Legislature, and our alumni and friends, we continue to strive for the transformation of your University, the State of Hawaii, and the lives of those we serve.

David McClain
President
University of Hawaii

Table of Contents

Skip Table of Contents

Return to Measuring Our Progress main report page

President’s Message

Contents

Introduction

University of Hawaii Campuses

Goal 1: Educational Effectiveness and Student Success

Goal 2: A Learning, Research, and Service Network

Goal 3: A Model Local, Regional, and Global University

Goal 4: Investment in Faculty, Staff, and Their Environment

Goal 5: Resources and Stewardship

Distinctions and Achievements

Introduction

The University of Hawaii Measuring Our Progress, 2008 demonstrates the importance the University places on assessing its progress on the goals of the University of Hawaii System Strategic Plan: Entering the University’s Second Century, 2002–2010. As required by Act 161 of the 1995 legislative session, the Board of Regents acted to adopt benchmark/performance indicators that continue to form the basis for this biennium report.

Founded in 1907 under the auspices of the Morrill Act, the University of Hawaii is a land-grant, sea-grant, and space-grant institution. As Hawaii’s sole state public university system, it is governed by a single Board of Regents and is composed of graduate/research, baccalaureate, and community college campuses. In addition, the University of Hawaii operates three University Centers, multiple learning centers, and extension, research, and service programs at more than 70 sites in the State of Hawaii. The University of Hawaii System’s special distinction is found in its Hawaiian, Asian, and Pacific orientation and its position as one of the world’s foremost multicultural centers for global and indigenous studies.

The University celebrated its centennial anniversary in 2007. Highlights included the entry of U H West Oahu’s first freshman class in the fall semester and the campus’s transition from an upper division to a four-year baccalaureate institution, the first baccalaureate program at a community college was accredited at Maui Community College, the launching of an annual President’s Emerging Leaders Program in AY 2007–2008 to identify and groom future leaders within the University, and the successful completion of a $250 million Centennial Campaign. The U H community also established a broad set of strategic outcomes that updates and articulates the current U H System strategic plan in terms of the higher education needs of the state. Faculty, staff, and students identified ten performance benchmarks that will shape U H priorities from now until 2015. These ten indicators will be reported in a variety of venues. In 2008, a year after its centennial, the University experienced record high enrollments and awarded a record number of degrees and certificates to its graduating students. Such hallmarks are a testament to the efforts of all of those who contributed to the University’s history and growth since its inception.

The common purpose of the University of Hawaii System is to address the public agenda and prepare the liberally educated and highly skilled workforce essential for the future economic success, health, and well-being of this island state as it participates in a global society. Foremost on the University’s agenda is its commitment to increasing the educational capital of Hawaii. This goal aligns with the Hawaii P-20 Council goal of 55 percent of Hawaii’s working age population possessing a college degree by the year 2025 and reflects a coordinated vision of the state’s future. The P-20 Council, comprised of leaders in education, business, government, labor, and community, shares the same belief that all of Hawaii’s residents deserve a high quality education. As the State’s sole public institution of postsecondary education in Hawaii, the University is striving to do its part to reach the 55 percent goal.

The University provides all qualified people in Hawaii equal opportunity through a variety of entry points and the flexibility to move among parts of the system to achieve educational goals. Accredited as autonomous units, the ten campuses serve multiple missions and pursue distinct pathways in response to state needs. Together as a system, they are committed to improving the social, economic, and environmental well-being of current and future Hawaii generations.

> Return to Table of Contents

University of Hawaii Campuses

U H MANOA is a research university of international standing, offering bachelor’s degrees in 87 fields of study, master’s degrees in 87 fields of study, doctorates in 51 fields of study, first professional degrees in architecture, law, and medicine, and a number of certificates. It has widely recognized strengths in tropical agriculture, tropical medicine, oceanography, astronomy, electrical engineering, volcanology, evolutionary biology, comparative philosophy, comparative religion, Hawaiian studies, Pacific Islands studies, Asian studies, and Pacific and Asian regional public health. U H Manoa offers instruction in more languages than any U.S. institution outside the Department of State.

U H HILO is a comprehensive institution offering baccalaureate liberal arts and professional and selected master’s programs. It also offers a PhD in Hawaiian and Indigenous Language and Culture Revitalization and a doctorate in Pharmacy. Baccalaureate degrees are offered in various fields of the humanities, natural sciences, social sciences, and in agriculture, nursing, business, and computer science. Programs emphasize student-faculty collaboration, fieldwork, internships, and hands-on learning. Drawing on the geological, biological, and cultural diversity of the island of Hawaii, many programs are organized around the theme of “the island as a learning laboratory.”

U H WEST OAHU is a four-year, comprehensive university with an emphasis on baccalaureate education founded in the liberal arts, serving professional, career-related, and applied fields, based on state and regional needs. U H West Oahu is committed to providing access to residents throughout the state of Hawaii through its partnerships with the U H community colleges and its delivery of distance education programs. A new Bachelor of Applied Science degree has been established to meet the academic and professional needs of community college graduates.

U H COMMUNITY COLLEGES are open-door, low-tuition institutions offering associate degrees and certificate programs in academic, technical, and occupational subjects.

HAWAII COMMUNITY COLLEGE offers a strong liberal arts program, including basic skills, and a comprehensive career technical program that includes business, nursing, trades technology, hospitality, and public service careers. Unique programs at Hawaii Community College include a Hawaiian Lifestyles Program and Tropical Forest Ecosystem and Agroforestry Management or FOREST Team Program.

HONOLULU COMMUNITY COLLEGE offers a comprehensive liberal arts program and 24 technical-occupational programs including marine technologies, cosmetology, refrigeration and air conditioning, aeronautic maintenance, commercial aviation pilot training, music business, audio engineering technology, and occupational and environmental safety management. The college has created unique and innovative high school career programs, such as the “Construction Academy” located at 30 high schools and the “Hawaii Excellence in Science and Technology program” at seven high schools throughout the state. The college is also home to the Pacific Center for Advanced Technology Training (P C A T T) serving Hawaii’s telecommunications and I T community.

KAPIOLANI COMMUNITY COLLEGE offers a comprehensive liberal arts program. This campus is a statewide leader in health services education with nine unique programs in allied health professions; it offers the state’s only legal assisting program and an extensive food service and hospitality education program. The college also offers degree programs in emerging technology fields, including new media arts and biotechnology, as well as programs for those seeking degrees as educational paraprofessionals and as fitness professionals in exercise and sport science.

KAUAI COMMUNITY COLLEGE offers both a comprehensive liberal arts program and career and technical education responsive to community workforce needs, including nursing, culinary arts, visitor industry, accounting and business technology, transportation technology, building trades, and information technology/electronics. As a University Center and distance learning leader, the college also provides access to baccalaureate and graduate level education for Kauai County. Non-credit, short-term courses are focused on skills for the workforce and community interests.

LEEWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE offers an extensive liberal arts program, combined with selected career technical education offerings, and provides courses in 67 disciplines; unique programs include television production and information and computer sciences. Courses are also offered on-site at the educational center in Waianae which houses the Waianae Health Academy, Ka Lama Education Academy, and the Waianae Maritime Academy.

MAUI COMMUNITY COLLEGE offers a strong liberal arts program and a comprehensive career program that includes business, culinary arts, nursing, trade technology, and public service career fields. Courses are offered through various modalities including face-to-face, Web C T internet-based, and statewide cable and interactive television systems. The first baccalaureate degree in Applied Business and Information Technology (A B I T) was accredited in 2007. Through its University Center, the college provides access to baccalaureate and graduate level programs to Maui County residents.

WINDWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE offers a strong comprehensive liberal arts program and selected career educational programs, including business education and agriculture. The Employment Training Center, located at Windward Community College, provides job training for “at risk” populations in high demand areas such as food service, auto repair, construction occupations, and office technology.

> Return to Table of Contents

Goal 1

Educational Effectiveness and Student Success

Enabling student success requires an academic culture that supports students and student learning. Measures of student ACCESS, ENGAGEMENT, PERFORMANCE, SATISFACTION, and DIVERSITY are presented to demonstrate the University’s progress in establishing an optimum culture for student success.

Access

What is the status of access to the University of Hawaii?

In fall 2008, one year after the University celebrated its centennial anniversary, its enrollment reached an all-time high of 53,526. Future growth is anticipated, but at a modest rate of about 0.6% per year.

Graph entitled “Historical and Projected Enrollment, by Unit.” Depicts enrollment by campus, fall semesters, from 1907 projected through 2015. Hard copy and tabular data available by request from the Office of Academic Planning and Policy.

app@hawaii.edu

What are the chances of a Hawaii resident being admitted to the University of Hawaii and how many actually enroll?

Acceptance rates demonstrate that there is a place within the U H System for students who prepare themselves for postsecondary education. Yield rates indicate how many eventually enrolled. In fall 2007, 66 percent of the resident undergraduates admitted at the U H campuses enrolled. A somewhat larger proportion of the admitted graduate students enrolled.

Table: U H Admission Activity by Residents, by Level
Fall 2007
Acceptance
Rates
Yield
Rates
2-Year99%66%
4-Year80%65%
Grads71%88%
Note: Acceptance rate is the total accepted divided by the total applied. Yield rate is the total enrolled divided by the total accepted. “Grads” exclude applicants to U H Manoa Schools of Law and Medicine, U H Hilo College of Pharmacy, and post-baccalaureate certificate programs, and students applying as unclassified graduates.

What is the going rate of recent Hawaii high school graduates who attend the U H?

After reaching historical lows of approximately 32 percent since 2000, the going rate of recent Hawaii high school graduates into the University of Hawaii campuses increased to 38 percent in fall 2008. The University has addressed its declining going rates by focusing on campus recruitment efforts and working through the Hawaii P-20 Partnerships for Education (for more detail, refer to page 21). National and state going rates have averaged in the 55 to 60 percent ranges.

Graph entitled “Going Rates of Public and Private High Schools, U H System, State of Hawaii, and the Nation.” Depicts the going rates (in percent) into U H Manoa, U H Hilo, and U H Community Colleges from 1970 to 2006. Hard copy and tabular data available by request from the Office of Academic Planning and Policy.

app@hawaii.edu

What opportunities are available for high school students to take college courses?

Running Start is a dual-credit collaboration between the Department of Education and University of Hawaii whereby high school students can work toward a college degree and a high school diploma by taking U H courses. All seven U H community colleges, U H Hilo, and U H West Oahu participate in Running Start. Since the program’s inception in 2002, course enrollments in the Running Start program have more than tripled. The course completion rates of high school students enrolled through the Running Start program have remained consistently high, ranging from 90–97 percent.

Table: Running Start Student Enrollments
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Enrolled 195 375 553 648 691 631
Completed 182 (93%) 338 (90%) 539 (97%) 621 (96%) 661 (96%) 600 (95%)
Source: Hawaii P-20 Partnerships for Education

In addition, Hawaii Community College’s collaborative program with Keaau High School—Keaau Middle College High School (KMCHS)—emphasizes “rigorous instruction, relevant curriculum and supportive relationships.” At-risk high school seniors participating in this program can earn dual credit in high school and college. The program won three state awards in 2008.

What is the status of off-campus access to U H credit programs?

From fall 2007 to fall 2008, the percentage of online courses increased while the percentages of “off-campus, face-to-face,” interactive, and cable TV courses either decreased or remained the same.

Table: Distance/Distributed Learning Classes by Delivery Mode
Fall 2007 Fall 2008
Off-Campus, Face-To-Face 28% 23%
Online 57% 63%
Interactive TV 10% 8%
Cable TV 5% 5%
Correspondence <1%
Notes: “Off-campus, face-to-face” refers to instructors traveling to off-campus locations to teach students.
Online is defined as instructors using Internet-based technologies to teach students and refers to “online via the Internet” and “online and on/off-campus site.”
Cable TV refers to “public access cable TV.”
Interactive TV refers to “interactive TV (including HITS)” and “interactive TV and on/off-campus site.”
Correspondence refers to courses offered at a distance without requiring the use of interactive information technologies.

In fall 2008, 621 technology-assisted (excludes off-campus face-to-face) classes were delivered off-campus to students both in-state and out-of-state, a 29 percent increase from fall 2007. These classes accounted for 13,276 registrations. In particular, U H Manoa, Hawaii CC, Kapiolani CC, and Leeward CC increased their technology-assisted offerings from a year ago. Classes apply to certification, associate, baccalaureate, and graduate degrees.

Table: Technology-Assisted Distance/Distributed Learning Classes
By Offering Campus
Fall 2007 Fall 2008
U H Manoa 118 135
U H Hilo 15 17
U H West Oahu 29 37
Hawaii CC 61 80
Honolulu CC 44 49
Kapiolani CC 88 126
Kauai CC 3 3
Leeward CC 75 123
Maui CC 42 46
Windward CC 5 5

More than 50 credentials and degrees, in whole or in part, have been offered to Hawaii residents using distance delivery. Courses offered may range from island-specific to worldwide. For example, U H provides access to classes in education, nursing, and business internationally while the A A S in Applied Trades is offered only on Oahu at off-site locations. Many of the programs address state workers and professional development needs.

Table: Distance/Distributed Learning Programs
GRADUATE DEGREES GRADUATE CERTIFICATES BACHELOR’S DEGREES UNDERGRADUATE CERTIFICATES ASSOCIATE/
CERTIFICATES
  • China International (C H I M B A)
  • Computer Science (M S)
  • Curriculum Studies (M E d)
  • Early Childhood Education (M E d)
  • Educational Foundations (M E d)
  • Educational Technology (M E d)
  • Executive MBA Vietnam (V I M B A)
  • Human Resources Management (MHRM)
  • Library & Information Science (M L I S c)
  • Music Education (M A)
  • Neighbor Island MBA
  • Nursing (M S and PhD)
  • Rehabilitation Counseling (M E d)
  • Social Work (MSW)
  • Special Education (M E d)
  • Kahuawaiola Indigenous Teacher Education
  • Post-baccalaureate Certificate in Secondary Education
  • Post-baccalaureate Certificate in Special Education
  • Public Health Certificate in Maternal and Child Health Leadership
  • Telecommunication and Information Resource Management
  • Accounting (B A)
  • Early Childhood Education (B A)
  • Elementary Education (B E d)
  • General Business Administration (BBA)
  • Interdisciplinary Studies (B A)
  • Nursing (BS)
  • Psychology (B A)
  • Public Administration, Health Care Administration (B A)
  • Social Sciences, Applied Track (B A)
  • Social Sciences, Political Science (B A)
  • Disaster Preparedness and Emergency Management
  • Health Care Administration
  • Substance Abuse and Addiction Studies
  • Administration of Justice
  • Agricultural Careers
  • Applied Trades
  • Business Careers
  • Business Technology
  • Care Home Operator
  • Culinary Arts
  • Early Childhood Education
  • Educational Paraprofessional
  • Fire and Environmental Emergency Respiration
  • Forest TEAM
  • Hawaiian Lifestyles
  • Hospitality and Tourism
  • Human Services
  • Interpreting
  • Liberal Arts
  • Medical Assisting
  • Nursing Aide
  • Personal Care Attendant
  • Substance Abuse Counseling

What are the opportunities for non-credit continuing education across the U H system?

Registrations for University of Hawaii non-credit continuing education programs peaked in 1997 at approximately 128,000 but have declined over the past decade. Aside from a moderately large increase in 2002, registrations have declined 43 percent to 73,000 in 2007.

Graph entitled “Continuing Education Registrations.” Depicts enrollment in non-credit continuing education programs from calendar year 1997 through 2007. Hard copy and tabular data available by request from the Office of Academic Planning and Policy.

app@hawaii.edu

How do U H Manoa and U H Hilo perform on freshmen selectivity measures?

Average math and critical reading (formerly called verbal) Scholastic Assessment Test (S A T) scores for U H Manoa first-time freshmen have been consistently above both the U.S. and Hawaii state averages over the past decade.

U H Hilo’s average critical reading scores have fluctuated slightly above and below state averages and reached a low of 471 in fall 2007. U H Hilo’s average math scores have been below those of the state and nation.

Table: Average S A T Critical Reading
U H Manoa and U H Hilo
U H Manoa U H Hilo Hawaii U.S.
Fall 1997 520 479 483 505
Fall 1998 527 487 483 505
Fall 1999 525 494 482 505
Fall 2000 526 482 488 505
Fall 2001 525 485 486 506
Fall 2002 523 496 488 504
Fall 2003 527 489 486 507
Fall 2004 537 486 487 508
Fall 2005 534 499 490 508
Fall 2006 530 474 482 503
Fall 2007 533 471 484 502

Table: Average S A T Math
U H Manoa and U H Hilo
U H Manoa U H Hilo Hawaii U.S.
Fall 1997 565 486 512 511
Fall 1998 570 495 513 512
Fall 1999 570 503 513 511
Fall 2000 566 494 519 514
Fall 2001 563 493 515 514
Fall 2002 563 515 520 516
Fall 2003 564 497 516 519
Fall 2004 568 497 514 518
Fall 2005 570 507 516 520
Fall 2006 564 484 509 518
Fall 2007 562 484 506 515
Notes: The verbal section of the S A T was renamed critical reading effective March 2005.
U H West Oahu scores are not reported here. Unlike U H Manoa and U H Hilo, the campus does not require S A T scores for admission of its first-time freshmen.

Approximately one-half of the first-time freshmen at U H Manoa, and one-third of the first-time freshmen at U H Hilo, graduate in the top quintile (20%) of their high school class. The largest percentage of U H West Oahu’s inaugural freshmen class graduated in the third quintile (top 60%); the rest were evenly split among each of the remaining four quintiles.

Table: Matriculation by High School Rank
U H Manoa
Fall 2003 Fall 2005 Fall 2007
1st High School Quintile 51% 49% 48%
2nd High School Quintile 30% 31% 36%
3rd High School Quintile 16% 15% 12%
4th High School Quintile 3% 4% 4%
5th High School Quintile <1% <1% <1%

Matriculation by High School Rank
U H Hilo
Fall 2003 Fall 2005 Fall 2007
1st High School Quintile 40% 32% 34%
2nd High School Quintile 29% 40% 38%
3rd High School Quintile 21% 20% 18%
4th High School Quintile 8% 5% 7%
5th High School Quintile 3% 3% 2%

Matriculation by High School Rank
U H West Oahu
Fall 2007
1st High School Quintile 18%
2nd High School Quintile 18%
3rd High School Quintile 27%
4th High School Quintile 18%
5th High School Quintile 18%
Notes: Percentages are based on students for whom high school rankings are available.
U H West Oahu admitted its inaugural first-time freshman class of 35 students in fall 2007.

> Return to Table of Contents

Student Engagement

Research on college student development shows that the time and energy students devote to educationally purposeful activities is the single best predictor of their learning and personal development. Two national surveys, the National Survey of Student Engagement (N S S E) and the Community College Survey of Student Engagement (C C S S E), focus on student engagement—student behaviors and institutional practices that are highly correlated with student learning and retention.

How engaged are students in their educational experience at the University of Hawaii four-year campuses?

On the N S S E survey, five benchmarks of effective educational practice encompass multiple indicators. As benchmarks, these results provide comparisons with peer institutions and serve as baseline indicators against which future progress can be measured. U H Manoa, U H Hilo, and U H West Oahu participate in N S S E. Results from the 2007 survey are illustrated below.

Benchmark #1 Level of Academic Challenge
Academic Challenge represents the nature and amount of assigned academic work, the complexity of the cognitive tasks required of students, and the standards faculty members use to evaluate student performance.

U H Manoa and U H Hilo freshmen report lower levels of academic challenge than their peer counterparts. In contrast, their seniors perceive an increase in academic challenge, reporting comparable scores to their national counterparts. Likewise, U H West Oahu seniors report a similar level of academic challenge to their peers.

Table: Level of Academic Challenge
U H Manoa U H Hilo U H West Oahu
First-Year Senior First-Year Senior Senior
U H Mean 48 57 47 55 57
Comparison Group Mean 52 55 51 56 56

Benchmark #2 Active and Collaborative Learning
Active and Collaborative Learning represents the extent to which students are actively involved in their learning through discussions, presentations, group projects, and community projects.

U H Manoa and U H Hilo freshmen and seniors report fairly comparable levels of active and collaborative learning to their peer counterparts. U H West Oahu seniors report lower levels relative to their peers.

Table: Active and Collaborative Learning
U H Manoa U H Hilo U H West Oahu
First-Year Senior First-Year Senior Senior
U H Mean 38 49 40 51 44
Comparison Group Mean 40 48 40 49 49

Benchmark #3 Student-Faculty Interaction
Student-Faculty Interaction captures the personal interaction between students and their instructors as evidenced by discussions about grades and assignments, projects outside the classroom, and talks about career plans.

U H students, both first-year and seniors, report levels of student-faculty interaction similar to their national counterparts. The exception is U H Hilo seniors whose scores indicate a higher level of student-faculty interaction than their peers.

Table: Student-Faculty Interaction
U H Manoa U H Hilo U H West Oahu
First-Year Senior First-Year Senior Senior
U H Mean 28 39 31 43 38
Comparison Group Mean 31 39 30 37 37
Note: The N S S E survey was administered during U H West Oahu’s former standing as an upper division institution; therefore no first-year data are available.
Source: National Survey of Student Engagement 2007

Benchmark #4 Enriching Educational Experiences
Enriching Educational Experiences are those activities that complement the academic program, such as student government, community service, capstone experiences, and interacting with a diverse group of students.

U H Manoa and U H Hilo first-year students report having an enriching educational experience comparable to that of their peers while seniors report levels exceeding their peers. U H West Oahu seniors report fewer activities that complement their academic progress compared to their national counterparts.

Table: Enriching Educational Experiences
U H Manoa U H Hilo U H West Oahu
First-Year Senior First-Year Senior Senior
U H Mean 27 45 28 41 33
Comparison Group Mean 28 42 27 37 37

Benchmark #5 Supportive Campus Environment
Supportive Campus Environment provides support for student success, helps students cope with non-academic issues, and promotes quality relations among students, faculty, and staff.

In contrast to the previous benchmark, U H West Oahu seniors report a level of support on their campus that greatly exceeds their peers. U H Hilo freshmen and seniors also report levels exceeding their peers. U H Manoa freshmen report a less supportive campus environment.

Table: Supportive Campus Environment
U H Manoa U H Hilo U H West Oahu
First-Year Senior First-Year Senior Senior
U H Mean 52 53 59 58 66
Comparison Group Mean 58 54 56 53 53
Note: The N S S E survey was administered during U H West Oahu’s former standing as an upper division institution; therefore no first-year data are available.
Source: National Survey of Student Engagement 2007

In fall 2008, U H West Oahu launched its first Learning Community program designed to provide new freshmen with the skills necessary to succeed in college. Through the Learning Community, a small group of students take courses together, learn about university resources, and develop a greater understanding of the learning process. As reported by the Chronicle of Higher Education, Learning Community programs can help at-risk students feel more engaged in their studies and are more likely to remain in college into their senior year.

How engaged are University of Hawaii students in their educational experience at community college campuses?

The Community College Survey of Student Engagement (C C S S E) focuses on five benchmarks of student engagement—institutional practices and student behaviors that are highly correlated with student learning and retention.

The following percentiles from the 2008 C C S S E survey demonstrate the performance of each U H community college relative to its comparably-sized peers. These results serve as baseline data against which future progress can be measured.

Benchmark #1 Active and Collaborative Learning
Through collaboration with others to solve problems or master challenging content, students develop valuable skills that prepare them to deal with the kinds of situations and problems they will encounter in the workplace, community, and their personal lives.

Relative to comparably-sized peers, three out of seven U H community colleges are at or above the 80th percentile in the area of active and collaborative learning, three are at or above the 50th percentile, and one is at the 20th percentile.

Table: Active and Collaborative Learning
Percentile
Hawaii versus Small Colleges 90
Honolulu versus Small Colleges 20
Kapiolani versus Medium Colleges 80
Kauai versus Small Colleges 60
Leeward versus Medium Colleges 60
Maui versus Small Colleges 80
Windward versus Small Colleges 50
Note: Prior to C C S S E 2006, Honolulu CC was a Medium College.
Source: Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008

Benchmark #2 Student Effort
“Time on task” is a key variable in success, and there are a variety of settings and means through which students may apply themselves to the learning process.

Of the five benchmark categories, the U H community colleges scored least favorably in the area of student effort. When compared to like institutions, three campuses scored in the 50th percentile or above. Two campuses scored at the 10th percentile.

Table: Student Effort
Percentile
Hawaii versus Small Colleges 60
Honolulu versus Small Colleges 30
Kapiolani versus Medium Colleges 10
Kauai versus Small Colleges 50
Leeward versus Medium Colleges 10
Maui versus Small Colleges 50
Windward versus Small Colleges 20

Benchmark #3 Academic Challenge
Academic Challenge represents the nature and amount of assigned academic work, the complexity of cognitive tasks presented to students, and the standards faculty members use to evaluate student performance.

Students found the academic challenge of the U H community colleges at or above the 70th percentile at three out of seven campuses when compared to similar-sized colleges. Students at the remaining campuses report academic challenge at the 50th percentile, suggesting there is room for improvement in this area.

Table: Academic Challenge
Percentile
Hawaii versus Small Colleges 90
Honolulu versus Small Colleges 50
Kapiolani versus Medium Colleges 50
Kauai versus Small Colleges 50
Leeward versus Medium Colleges 50
Maui versus Small Colleges 90
Windward versus Small Colleges 70

Benchmark #4 Student-Faculty Interaction
Personal interaction with faculty members strengthens students’ connections to the college and helps them focus on their academic progress.

The U H community colleges’ scores relative to their peers ranged from lows in the 40th percentile to a high in the 90th percentile.

Table: Student-Faculty Interaction
Percentile
Hawaii versus Small Colleges 80
Honolulu versus Small Colleges 50
Kapiolani versus Medium Colleges 80
Kauai versus Small Colleges 40
Leeward versus Medium Colleges 40
Maui versus Small Colleges 90
Windward versus Small Colleges 50

Benchmark #5 Support for Learners
Community college students benefit from services targeted to assist them with academic and career planning, academic skill development, and other issues that may affect both learning and retention.

On this indicator, six of the colleges are at the 70th percentile or higher relative to comparable-sized colleges, suggesting a high level of support for learners at the U H community colleges.

Table: Support for Learners
Percentile
Hawaii versus Small Colleges 80
Honolulu versus Small Colleges 80
Kapiolani versus Medium Colleges 70
Kauai versus Small Colleges 70
Leeward versus Medium Colleges 40
Maui versus Small Colleges 90
Windward versus Small Colleges 70
Note: Prior to C C S S E 2006, Honolulu CC was a Medium College.
Source: Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008

How does U H student participation in community-based projects compare to national levels?

Opportunities for experiential learning include—but are not limited to—internships, cooperative education placements, volunteer positions, fellowships, and practica. Service learning opportunities involve instructional strategies that link community service and academic study so that one strengthens the other. The N S S E and C C S S E surveys include a question on how frequently students participate in community-based projects as part of a class requirement.

U H students participate in community-based activities more often than their national counterparts, though as a whole, participation is low for all groups. U H and national comparison group responses fell somewhere between Sometimes (2.0) and Never (1.0).

Table: How Often Have You Participated in a Community-Based Project as a Part of a Regular Course (e.g., Service Learning)?
U H Mean Comparison
Group Mean
U H Manoa 1.58 1.45
U H Hilo 1.87 1.75
U H West Oahu 1.61 1.75
Hawaii CC 1.61 1.29
Honolulu CC 1.43 1.30
Kapiolani CC 1.44 1.27
Kauai CC 1.44 1.27
Leeward CC 1.23 1.33
Maui CC 1.48 1.29
Windward CC 1.33 1.30
Notes: Based on a 4.0 scale. Never=1; Sometimes=2; Often=3; Very Often=4.
U H M, U H H, and U H W O reflect senior student responses.
Source: National Survey of Student Engagement 2007
Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008

What is the usual U H undergraduate student experience in terms of class size and faculty type?

The U H System lower division average class size was 23. Except for U H Community College Career and Technical Education classes, lower division average class sizes are lower than they were five years ago.

Table: U H Average Class Size
Lower Division
Fall 2003 Fall 2007
U H System 24 23
U H Manoa Arts & Sciences 32 30
U H Manoa Other 35 32
U H Hilo 25 23
U H West Oahu 11
U H Community College General 24 22
U H Community College Career
and Technological Education
17 18
Note: U H West Oahu admitted its first freshman class in fall 2007.

The U H System upper division average class size was 19 in fall 2007. In general, upper division average class sizes are slightly lower than they were five years ago. U H West Oahu was the only unit with a slight increase.

Table: U H Average Class Size
Upper Division
Fall 2003 Fall 2007
U H System 20 19
U H Manoa Arts & Sciences 21 19
U H Manoa Other 19 19
U H Hilo 18 17
U H West Oahu 23 24
U H Community College General 9
U H Community College Career
and Technological Education
8
Note: U H CC upper division courses include Applied Business and Information Technology (A B I T) at Maui CC, Computing, Electronics, and Networking Technology (C E N T) and Commercial Aviation (A V I T) at Honolulu CC, and Respiratory Care (R E S P) at Kapiolani CC.

Approximately 80 percent of all U H lower division and undergraduate classes enroll less than 30 students.

Table: Classes by Range of Enrollment, Fall 2007
U H System
1–9 10–29 30–49 50–99 100+
Lower Division Classes 10.4% 70.9% 15.6% 1.9% 1.2%
Undergraduate Classes 15.1% 66.5% 15.3% 2.1% 1.0%

At the undergraduate level, 65 percent or almost two-thirds of student semester hours were taught by regular faculty in fall 2007, down from 67 percent in fall 2003.

Table: SSH Taught, by Faculty Type
Undergraduate Level—U H System
Regular Faculty Lecturer Other Faculty
Fall 2003 67.2% 21.5% 11.3%
Fall 2007 65.0% 22.9% 12.1%

> Return to Table of Contents

Student Performance

What are the U H graduation and retention outcomes for entering students?

U H graduation and retention rates have remained relatively stable over time with about half of the campuses experiencing slight increases in the past year. U H Manoa’s rates have ranged from 62–66 percent over five years; U H Hilo’s rates have ranged from 37–42 percent; U H West Oahu’s rates have ranged from 71–82 percent over three years; and the U H community colleges’ rates have ranged from 25–40 percent.

Table: U H Average Graduation and Retention Rates by Campus
6 years after entry
1991–2001 cohorts
4 years after entry
2000–2002 cohorts
3 years after entry
1994–2004 cohorts
U H
Manoa
U H
Hilo
U H
West Oahu
U H CC
Average
Hawaii
CC
Honolulu
CC
Kapiolani
CC
Kauai
CC
Leeward
CC
Maui
CC
Windward
CC
Graduated 54% 31% 58% 14% 21% 14% 11% 18% 12% 18% 11%
Still Enrolled 11% 7% 20% 20% 14% 17% 26% 17% 24% 16% 18%
Note: Graduation rate is the percentage of full-time, first-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates that graduated six years after entry at U H M and U H H and three years after entry at the U H CC. U H W O’s graduation rate (pre-Banner data) is based on first-time transfers who graduated four years after entry into U H W O (or six years after entry into college). Retention rate is the percentage still enrolled at the same institution.

While the previous graph reflects a combination of graduation and retention data, the following illustrates U H graduation rates by cohort year. U H Manoa’s graduation rate has been in the low to mid-50 range, with its 2000 cohort reaching a low of 51 percent. U H Hilo rates have fluctuated around the 30 percent range with a moderate increase to 36 percent for its 2001 cohort. The U H community colleges have remained in the low to mid-teens after experiencing a high of 17 percent with their 1994 cohort.

U H Graduation Rates by Cohort
Fall 1 Fall 2 Fall 3 Fall 4 Fall 5 Fall 6 Fall 7 Fall 8 Fall 9 Fall 10 Fall 11
U H Manoa 54.9 54.5 54.0 53.6 52.4 52.9 54.0 55.9 55.6 51.2 54.8
U H Hilo 24.8 29.7 27.7 30.8 30.7 31.3 34.2 29.7 30.6 31.5 36.1
U H CC 17.2 14.5 13.6 15.2 14.3 13.2 15.0 14.1 13.5 13.4 14.2
Notes: For U H M and U H H, Fall 1=1991 cohort, Fall 11=2001 cohort.
For U H CC, Fall 1=1994 cohort, Fall 11=2004 cohort.
U H M and U H H graduation rates based on completion within six years. U H CC graduation rate based on completion within three years. U H W O data are excluded due to limited cohort years.

Six-year graduation and retention rates for first-time students at both U H Manoa and U H Hilo are lower than the average rates for their respective peer and benchmark groups.

Table: Average Six-Year Graduation and Retention Rates
U H Manoa (1990–2000) Cohorts
Benchmark Peer U H Manoa
Graduated 70% 66% 54%
Still Enrolled 3% 3% 10%
Total 72% 69% 65%
Notes: First-time, full-time, degree-seeking freshmen.
U H M=Fall 1990–2000 cohorts as of 2006.
Percentages may be slightly higher or lower due to rounding.
Source: Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange Surveys

Table: Average Six-Year Retention Rates
U H Hilo (1994–2000) Cohorts
Benchmark Peer U H Hilo
Graduated 47% 34% 31%
Still Enrolled 4% 6% 7%
Total 50% 40% 38%
Notes: First-time, full-time, degree-seeking freshmen.
U H H=Fall 1994–2000 cohorts as of 2006.
Percentages may be slightly higher or lower due to rounding.
Source: Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange Survey

The average one-year retention rate for first-time students at U H Manoa and U H Hilo is lower than the average rates for their peer and benchmark groups.

Table: Average One-Year Retention Rates
U H Manoa (1990–2005) Cohorts
Benchmark Peer U H Manoa
Still Enrolled 88% 85% 79%
Notes: First-time, full-time, degree-seeking freshmen.
U H M=Fall 1990–2005 cohorts as of 2006.
Source: Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange Surveys

Table: Average One-Year Retention Rates
U H Hilo (1994–2005) Cohorts
Benchmark Peer U H Hilo
Still Enrolled 75% 67% 62%
Notes: First-time, full-time, degree-seeking freshmen.
U H H=Fall 1994–2005 cohorts as of 2006.
Source: Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange Surveys

What are the graduation and retention outcomes for ethnic groups?

The graduation and retention rate for Asian/Pacific Islanders at U H Manoa is lower than the rates for peer and benchmark groups. Within U H Manoa’s Asian/Pacific Islander category, Chinese and Japanese graduation rates are higher than or comparable to peer and benchmark groups, while the rates for Filipino, Hawaiian, and the other Asian categories are lower.

The graduation and retention rate for Caucasians at U H Manoa is considerably lower than the rates for peer and benchmark groups.

Table: Average Six-Year Graduation and Retention Rates by Ethnicity
U H Manoa (1990–2000) Cohorts
Asian or Pacific Islander
Benchmark Peer U H Manoa
Graduated 76% 73% 57%
Still Enrolled 3% 3% 11%
Total 79% 76% 68%
Notes: First-time, full-time, degree-seeking freshmen, Fall 1990–2000 cohorts as of 2006.
Other institutions do not have a Mixed ethnic category and U H M enrollments for other ethnic groups such as Hispanics and African Americans are too small for comparison.
Though U.S. Office of Management and Budget (O M B) federal reporting standards on race and ethnicity have changed recently, they previously defined the Asian or Pacific Islander category to include Native Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders. Available data can only be aggregated as shown here.
Source: Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange Surveys

Table: Average Six-Year Graduation and Retention Rates by Ethnicity
U H Manoa (1990–2000) Cohorts
Caucasian
Benchmark Peer U H Manoa
Graduated 72% 67% 41%
Still Enrolled 2% 3% 5%
Total 74% 70% 46%
Notes: First-time, full-time, degree-seeking freshmen, Fall 1990–2000 cohorts as of 2006.
Other institutions do not have a Mixed ethnic category and U H M enrollments for other ethnic groups such as Hispanics and African Americans are too small for comparison.
Though U.S. Office of Management and Budget (O M B) federal reporting standards on race and ethnicity have changed recently, they previously defined the Asian or Pacific Islander category to include Native Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders. Available data can only be aggregated as shown here.
Source: Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange Surveys

Table: Average Six-Year Graduation and Retention Rates by Ethnicity
U H Manoa (1990–2000) Cohorts
Mixed
U H Manoa
Graduated 48%
Still Enrolled 11%
Total 59%
Notes: First-time, full-time, degree-seeking freshmen, Fall 1990–2000 cohorts as of 2006.
Other institutions do not have a Mixed ethnic category and U H M enrollments for other ethnic groups such as Hispanics and African Americans are too small for comparison.
Though U.S. Office of Management and Budget (O M B) federal reporting standards on race and ethnicity have changed recently, they previously defined the Asian or Pacific Islander category to include Native Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders. Available data can only be aggregated as shown here.
Source: Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange Surveys

Table: Average Six-Year Graduation and Retention Rates by Ethnicity
U H Manoa (1990–2000) Cohorts
Asian or Pacific Islander
Detailed Breakdown
Chinese Filipino Hawaiian Japanese Other Asian
Graduated 71% 52% 42% 65% 50%
Still Enrolled 9% 11% 10% 12% 12%
Total 80% 63% 52% 77% 63%
Notes: First-time, full-time, degree-seeking freshmen, fall 1990–2000 cohorts as of 2006.
Other institutions do not have a Mixed ethnic category and U H M enrollments for other ethnic groups such as Hispanics and African Americans are too small for comparison.
Though U.S. Office of Management and Budget (O M B) federal reporting standards on race and ethnicity have changed recently, they previously defined the Asian or Pacific Islander category to include Native Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders. Available data can only be aggregated as shown here.
Percentages may be slightly higher or lower due to rounding.
Source: Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange Surverys

The graduation and retention rates for Asian/Pacific Islanders at U H Hilo is lower than the rates for the peer and benchmark groups. This gap, however, has decreased as U H Hilo’s average six-year rates increased from 37 to 39 percent and the average benchmark and peer rates declined (51 to 49 percent and 44 to 42 percent, respectively) from two years ago (1994–1998 cohort).

Within U H Hilo’s Asian/Pacific Islander category, Japanese, Chinese, and Filipino students show higher or comparable graduation and retention rates to the peer group, while the rates for the Hawaiian and Other Asian categories are lower.

The graduation and retention rate for Caucasians at U H Hilo is lower than those for both the peer and benchmark groups.

No comparable peer category exists for U H Hilo’s Mixed ethnicity category; however, the combined graduation and retention rate for the Mixed group equals that of the Asian/Pacific Islander peer group. The Mixed group increased six percentage points from 36 percent (1994–1998 cohort as reported in 2006) to 42 percent (1994–2000 cohort).

Table: Average Six-Year Graduation and Retention Rates by Ethnicity
U H Hilo (1994–2000) Cohorts
Asian or Pacific Islander
Benchmark Peer U H Hilo
Graduated 45% 34% 31%
Still Enrolled 4% 8% 8%
Total 49% 42% 39%
Notes: First-time, full-time, degree-seeking freshmen, Fall 1994–2000 cohorts as of 2006.
Other institutions do not have a Mixed ethnic category and U H H enrollments for other ethnic groups such as Hispanics and African Americans are too small for comparison.
Though U.S. Office of Management and Budget (O M B) federal reporting standards on race and ethnicity have changed recently, they previously defined the Asian or Pacific Islander category to include Native Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders. Available data can only be aggregated as shown here.
Source: Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange Surveys

Table: Average Six-Year Graduation and Retention Rates by Ethnicity
U H Hilo (1994–2000) Cohorts
Caucasian
Benchmark Peer U H Hilo
Graduated 54% 39% 32%
Still Enrolled 3% 5% 5%
Total 57% 44% 37%
Notes: First-time, full-time, degree-seeking freshmen, Fall 1994–2000 cohorts as of 2006.
Other institutions do not have a Mixed ethnic category and U H H enrollments for other ethnic groups such as Hispanics and African Americans are too small for comparison.
Though U.S. Office of Management and Budget (O M B) federal reporting standards on race and ethnicity have changed recently, they previously defined the Asian or Pacific Islander category to include Native Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders. Available data can only be aggregated as shown here.
Source: Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange Surveys

Table: Average Six-Year Graduation and Retention Rates by Ethnicity
U H Hilo (1994–2000) Cohorts
Mixed
U H Hilo
Graduated 32%
Still Enrolled 10%
Total 42%
Notes: First-time, full-time, degree-seeking freshmen, Fall 1994–2000 cohorts as of 2006.
Other institutions do not have a Mixed ethnic category and U H H enrollments for other ethnic groups such as Hispanics and African Americans are too small for comparison.
Though U.S. Office of Management and Budget (O M B) federal reporting standards on race and ethnicity have changed recently, they previously defined the Asian or Pacific Islander category to include Native Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders. Available data can only be aggregated as shown here.
Source: Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange Surveys

Table: Average Six-Year Graduation and Retention Rates by Ethnicity
U H Hilo (1994–2000) Cohorts
Asian or Pacific Islander
Detailed Breakdown
Chinese Filipino Hawaiian Japanese Other Asian
Graduated 29% 35% 28% 35% 27%
Still Enrolled 14% 6% 7% 11% 6%
Total 43% 42% 35% 46% 33%
Notes: First-time, full-time, degree-seeking freshmen, Fall 1994–2000 cohorts as of 2006.
Other institutions do not have a Mixed ethnic category and U H H enrollments for other ethnic groups such as Hispanics and African Americans are too small for comparison.
Though U.S. Office of Management and Budget (O M B) federal reporting standards on race and ethnicity have changed recently, they previously defined the Asian or Pacific Islander category to include Native Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders. Available data can only be aggregated as shown here.
Source: Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange Surveys

What is the volume of credentials awarded annually by U H?

Since the early-1970’s, more than 6,000 degrees and certificates have been awarded annually to U H students. In F Y 2007–2008, the University awarded a record 7,996 degrees and certificates. The three most recent fiscal years (F Y 2005–2006 through F Y 2007–2008) mark the highest three years of degrees and certificates awarded in U H history. These highs follow a similar trend with U H’s record high enrollments over the past several years (refer to page 1).

Graph entitled “Historical Degrees and Certificates Awarded” Depicts degrees and certificates awarded from 1907 projected through 2015. Hard copy and tabular data available by request from the Office of Academic Planning and Policy.

app@hawaii.edu

The number of two-year certificates awarded has remained stable over the last ten years. In contrast, both four-year and post-baccaluareate/advanced degree output dipped in the early part of this decade, then began to grow. Since F Y 2001–2002 four-year degree production increased 27 percent from 2,910 to 3,698. Over the same period, post-baccaluareate/advanced degree production increased 39 percent from 1,177 to 1,638.

Table: U H Degrees and Certificates Awarded, by Level
2-Year 4-Year Post-baccalaureate/
Advanced Degrees
F Y 1997–1998 2,710 3,102 1,332
F Y 1998–1999 2,626 3,089 1,413
F Y 1999–2000 2,653 3,116 1,469
F Y 2000–2001 2,535 2,951 1,325
F Y 2001–2002 2,553 2,910 1,177
F Y 2002–2003 2,711 3,010 1,355
F Y 2003–2004 2,596 3,273 1,377
F Y 2004–2005 2,671 3,294 1,572
F Y 2005–2006 2,637 3,639 1,641
F Y 2006–2007 2,713 3,583 1,539
F Y 2007–2008 2,662 3,696 1,638
Notes: Bachelor’s degrees include the Bachelor of Applied Science (B A S) degree offered at Maui Community College, effective F Y 2006–2007.
U H community college certificates refer to Certificates of Achievement (C A) and Advance Professional Certificates only; certificates below the C A are excluded.

What share of eligible students pass external exams in their field of study?

University of Hawaii students and graduates are scoring well on national and state exams in their fields of study.

Community College Programs. During 2003–2005, over 90 percent of the U H community college graduates who sat for the following national and state licensing examinations passed on their first attempt.

Table: Licensing Examination Passed
Dental Assisting (Maui CC) Physical Therapist Assistant (Kapiolani CC)
Emergency Medical Technician (Kapiolani CC) Practical Nursing (Hawaii CC, Kapiolani CC, Maui CC)
Medical Assisting (Kapiolani CC) Radiologic Technician (Kapiolani CC)
Medical Laboratory Technician (Kapiolani CC) Respiratory Care (Kapiolani CC)

Dental Hygiene. From 2006 through 2008, 98 percent of U H students taking the national licensing exam passed on their first attempt and 100% passed on their second attempt. The Hawaii State Board of Dental Hygiene Examination reports statewide average pass rates for the same period at 92 percent for the clinical exam and 97 percent for the computer exam.

Education. In A Y 2006–2007, over 85 percent of U H Manoa College of Education and U H Hilo education graduates passed the professional knowledge portion of the Praxis Teacher Certification Exam. Pass rates for the various Praxis assessment areas for U H Manoa and U H Hilo graduates and for the state of Hawaii (which includes U H graduates) are provided below.

Table: Praxis Teacher Certification Exam, A Y 2006–2007
Assessment Area U H Manoa
C O E
Pass Rate
U H Hilo Education
Pass Rate
Hawaii
Pass Rate
PRINCIPLES OF LEARNING & TEACHING
 K–6 95% 100% 95%
 7–12 98% 88% 98%
ELEMENTARY
 Curriculum, Instruction, &  Assessment 89% 81% 89%
 Content Area Exercise 100% 100% 100%
ENGLISH
 Language, Literature, & Composition Content 80% not applicable 92%
 Language, Literature, & Composition Pedagogy 86% not applicable 93%
MATHEMATICS
 Content Knowledge 91% not applicable 88%
 Pedagogy not applicable not applicable 85%
SOCIAL STUDIES
 Content Knowledge 95% not applicable 98%
 Pedagogy 94% not applicable 98%
TEACHING SPECIAL POPULATIONS
 Application of Core Principles 95% not applicable 95%
 Education of Exceptional Students 100% not applicable 100%
Notes: For U H M, content areas with less than 10 test takers are not reported.
Teaching Special Populations: Knowledge-Based Core Principles not reported.

E T S. At U H Hilo, the Educational Testing Service (E T S) Major Field Achievement Test provides national comparisons and serves as a vehicle for program improvement. U H Hilo students usually perform at or above the national mean.

Table: U H Hilo E T S Major Field Achievement Mean Test Scores
2005 2006 2007 2008
U H Hilo National U H Hilo National U H Hilo National U H Hilo National
Accounting 43 45 44 45 47 50 47 50
Computer Science 172 149 162 149 155 149 152 149
Economics 48 43 44 43 48 48 49 48
Management 63 57 56 57 54 55 58 55
Quantitative Business Analysis 60 56 56 56 42 47 47 47
Finance 38 36 37 36 54 57 56 56
Marketing 54 47 51 47 52 53 51 53
Legal/Social Environment 52 50 47 50 45 46 43 46
International Issues 52 44 50 44 55 54 56 54

Law. Graduates of the U H Manoa William S. Richardson School of Law consistently outperform Hawaii bar exam test takers from other law schools. In 2007, 85 percent of U H Manoa Law School graduates passed the Hawaii state bar exam on their first attempt and the overall pass rate (79%) was higher than the state rate (73%).

Table: Hawaii State Bar Exam Pass Rate
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
U H First-Time Takers 96% 73% 89% 81% 85%
Overall U H 86% 68% 81% 77% 79%
Overall State 75% 62% 64% 67% 73%

Medical Technology. In 2006–2007, the first time pass rate of U H Manoa graduates on the American Society for Clinical Pathology national certification exam was 91 percent (10 out of 11). The national pass rate was 77 percent.

Medicine. Medical students need to pass two exams prior to the completion of one year of residency. Students at the U H Manoa John A. Burns School of Medicine (JABSOM) attained pass rates on the United States Medical Licensing Exam (U S M L E) Step 1 Examination that are generally close or comparable to the national average.

Table: U S M L E Step 1 Pass Rate
A Y 2002–2003 A Y 2003–2004 A Y 2004–2005 A Y 2005–2006 A Y 2006–2007
U H Medical
School
90% 89% 95% 93% 93%
National 92% 92% 93% 93% 94%

The U S M L E Step 2 Clinical Skills (CS) test was first required as a licensing component in 2004–2005 and is a separate component from the Clinical Knowledge (CK) test. U H’s CK and CS pass rates have fluctuated above and below the national rates. Both U H and national scores have consistently been above the 90th percentile.

Table: U S M L E Step 2 Pass Rate
A Y 2002–2003 A Y 2003–2004 A Y 2004–2005 A Y 2005–2006 A Y 2006–2007
CK CS CK CS CK CS CK CS CK CS
U H Medical
School
98% 96% 98% 100% 92% 95% 92% 98%
National 96% 94% 94% 96% 95% 98% 94% 97%

Nursing. Graduates of RN nursing programs must pass the National Council Licensure Examination for Registered Nurses (NCLEX RN) before they may practice nursing. The purpose of this exam is to ensure the public’s protection. The exam measures the competencies needed to safely and effectively perform as a newly licensed, entry-level registered nurse.

Table: National Council for Licensing Examinations (NCLEX) Pass Rates
2005 2006 2007
U.S. 87% 88% 86%
U H Manoa 93% 94% 90%
U H Hilo 55% 87% 100%
Hawaii CC 95% 79% 95%
Kapiolani CC 91% 86% 95%
Kauai CC 83% 94% 74%
Maui CC 94% 97% 97%
Note: First-time test takers; registered nurses (RN) only.

> Return to Table of Contents

Student Satisfaction

How satisfied are students with their educational experience?

The 2007 N S S E and 2008 C C S S E student surveys include one direct measure of student satisfaction: “How would you evaluate your entire educational experience at this institution?” The responses of students enrolled at the ten U H campuses ranged from 2.90 at U H Manoa to 3.51 at U H West Oahu (on a scale of 1 to 4, with 1=Poor and 4=Excellent). The range of responses from comparison group institutions is 3.08 to 3.21. Most U H campuses reported similar levels of satisfaction to their peers. U H Manoa seniors responded slightly less positively and U H West Oahu seniors responded more positively than their comparison group counterparts.

Table: How Would You Evaluate Your Entire Educational Experience?
U H Mean Comparison Group Mean
U H Manoa 2.90 3.21
U H Hilo 3.12 3.08
U H West Oahu 3.51 3.08
Hawaii CC 3.24 3.18
Honolulu CC 3.20 3.18
Kapiolani CC 3.22 3.15
Kauai CC 3.19 3.18
Leeward CC 3.06 3.16
Maui CC 3.20 3.18
Windward CC 3.31 3.18
Note: Based on a 4.0 scale. Poor=1; Fair=2; Good=3; Excellent=4.
Sources: National Survey of Student Engagement 2007
Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008

The N S S E survey includes a second question that measures satisfaction: “If you could start over again, would you go to the same institution you are now attending?” The range of responses (from 3.03 at U H Manoa to 3.53 at U H West Oahu) indicates that students attending the three upper division campuses would Probably attend the same institution if they could start over again. The range of responses from peer institutions was 3.13 to 3.27. U H West Oahu’s seniors indicated a level of satisfaction that exceeded their comparison group.

Table: If You Could Start Over Again, Would You Go to the Same Institution You Are Now Attending?
U H Mean Comparison Group Mean
U H Manoa 3.03 3.27
U H Hilo 3.20 3.13
U H West Oahu 3.53 3.14
Note: Based on a 4.0 scale. Definitely No=1; Probably No=2; Probably Yes=3; Definitely Yes=4.
U H M, U H H, and U H W O reflect senior student responses.
Source: National Survey of Student Engagement 2007

Similarly, U H Community College students were asked by C C S S E if they would recommend their college to a friend or family member. Between 95 and 98 percent responded positively.
Source: Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008

How prepared do U H students and alumni believe they are for employment?

Enrolled Students
When asked on the N S S E and C C S S E surveys to what extent their undergraduate experience has contributed to their ability to acquire job or work-related knowledge and skills, U H student responses ranged between Some and Quite a Bit.

Table: To What Extent Has Your U H Experience Contributed to Acquiring Job or Work-Related Knowledge and Skills?
U H Mean Comparison Group Mean
U H Manoa 2.88 2.95
U H Hilo 2.84 2.88
U H West Oahu 3.09 2.88
Hawaii CC 2.74 2.67
Honolulu CC 2.94 2.67
Kapiolani CC 2.52 2.56
Kauai CC 2.72 2.67
Leeward CC 2.39 2.56
Maui CC 2.74 2.67
Windward CC 2.44 2.67
Note: Based on a 4.0 scale. Very Little=1; Some=2; Quite a Bit=3; Very Much=4.
U H M, U H H, and U H W O reflect senior student responses.
Sources: National Survey of Student Engagement 2007
Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008

Graduates
In 2007, 96 percent of U H community college graduates and leavers indicated they were Adequately to Very Well Prepared for their current primary job.

Table: U H Community Colleges Graduates and Leavers
Job Preparation for Current Primary Job
2007 2006 2005
Very Well Prepared 32.0% 30.4% 32.8%
Well Prepared 39.5% 34.2% 36.2%
Adequately Prepared 24.6% 29.5% 26.1%
Poorly Prepared 3.9% 5.9% 4.9%
Note: Results for 2005 and 2006 are included only as points of reference for the current year. Any comparisons should be interpreted with caution as respondents and data distribution vary by study.
Source: Community Colleges Graduate and Leavers Survey

> Return to Table of Contents

Diversity

What are the demographic trends in the composition of the U H student body?

University of Hawaii attendees are members of student populations in which no one ethnic group constitutes a majority, and the educational experience is enriched by the diversity of their classmates.

Ethnicity
U H is one of the most ethnically diverse institutions of higher learning in the nation—20.8 percent of the students are Caucasian, 15.5 percent are Hawaiian or Part-Hawaiian, 14.4 percent are Japanese, 12.9 percent are Filipino, 5.3 percent are Chinese, and 11.0 percent report Mixed ethnicity.

Students of Japanese ethnicity no longer comprise the largest share of enrollment as they did ten years ago. Likewise, the percentages of Chinese and Filipino students have decreased while the percentages of Hawaiian, Caucasian, Pacific Islander, and Mixed ethnic students have increased. Currently, the share of enrollment of Hawaiian students are second only to the Caucasian ethnic group.

Table: U H Enrollment by Ethnicity
Hawaiian Filipino Chinese Japanese Caucasian Pacific
Islander
Mixed All Other
Fall 1997 13.6% 14.9% 7.4% 19.4% 19.2% 2.3% 10.6% 12.6%
Fall 2007 15.5% 12.9% 5.3% 14.4% 20.8% 3.5% 11.0% 16.6%

Similar to the trend in enrollment, the shares of degrees earned by Japanese, Chinese, and Filipino students have decreased over the past decade. Shares of degrees earned by Caucasian, Hawaiian/part-Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, Mixed, and the All Other ethnic categories increased over the same period with Caucasians posting the largest increase.

Table: U H Degrees Earned by Race/Ethnicity
Hawaiian Filipino Chinese Japanese Caucasian Pacific
Islander
Mixed All Other
Fall 1997–1998 10.9% 14.3% 9.2% 20.0% 20.7% 2.0% 8.7% 14.2%
Fall 2007–2008 12.0% 11.1% 6.6% 17.4% 24.1% 3.0% 10.0% 15.8%

Age
The mean age for the U H System has declined over the past five years. In 2007, the mean age was 25.3 years.

Table: Mean Age of U H Students
Fall Semester
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Mean Age 25.9 26.0 26.2 26.2 26.2 26.2 26.0 25.7 25.5 25.4 25.3

Gender
The percentage of total enrollment comprised by women at U H has ranged from 55.8–58.2 percent over the last ten years. Women comprised 57 percent of U H’s enrollment in fall 2007. This gender disparity is consistent with a national trend in which the educational progress of males in higher education over several decades has been on a slow decline. According to a January 2007 article from The Chronicle for Higher Education entitled “The New Gender Divide,” women make up 58 percent of college undergraduates nationally. Women outperform men in many measures: they earn better grades, study more, hold more leadership positions, earn more honors and awards, and are more likely to earn a bachelor’s degree. The Chronicle article cites an American Council on Education (A C E) report that found the gender gap was greatest among low-income students, and disappeared for students from high-income families. The A C E report concludes that the disparity may be due to race and class, rather than gender.

Table: U H Enrollment by Gender
Fall Semester
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Women 55.8% 55.9% 56.1% 56.3% 56.7% 57.3% 57.9% 58.2% 57.8% 57.3% 57.3%
Men 44.2% 44.1% 43.9% 43.7% 43.3% 42.5% 41.7% 41.4% 41.9% 42.5% 42.5%

Full-Time Status
U H full-time enrollment has declined slightly over the last ten years, from 56.3 percent to 55.0 percent.

Table: U H Full-Time Enrollment
Fall Semester
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Percent of Students 56.3% 56.5% 55.8% 56.6% 56.1% 56.4% 55.7% 55.9% 55.9% 55.5% 55.0%
Note: Demographic data on ethnicity, age, gender, and full-time status include undergraduate and graduate level students.

How do U H students relate to issues of diversity?

Hawaii’s unique demographic makeup and U H’s commitment to improving the entry, retention, and graduation of diverse student populations offer students opportunities to interact with others from different backgrounds.

The 2007 N S S E and 2008 C C S S E survey results indicate U H students interact with students from different ethnic backgrounds more frequently than do their national counterparts. They tend to have the same number of or more frequent conversations involving differing beliefs, opinions, and personal values.

Table: How Often Have You Had Serious Conversations with Students of a Race or Ethnicity Different Than Your Own?
U H Mean Comparison Group Mean
U H Manoa 3.02 2.71
U H Hilo 3.06 2.79
U H West Oahu 2.80 2.79
Hawaii CC 2.78 2.29
Honolulu CC 2.45 2.29
Kapiolani CC 2.45 2.36
Kauai CC 2.48 2.29
Leeward CC 2.54 2.36
Maui CC 2.66 2.29
Windward CC 2.78 2.29
Note: Based on a 4.0 scale. Never=1; Sometimes=2; Often=3; Very Often=4.

Table: How Often Have You Had Serious Conversations with Students Who Differ from You in Terms of Their Religious Beliefs, Political Opinions, or Personal Values?
U H Mean Comparison Group Mean
U H Manoa 2.79 2.78
U H Hilo 2.89 2.72
U H West Oahu 2.66 2.72
Hawaii CC 2.53 2.30
Honolulu CC 2.26 2.30
Kapiolani CC 2.34 2.33
Kauai CC 2.38 2.30
Leeward CC 2.36 2.33
Maui CC 2.46 2.30
Windward CC 2.56 2.30
Note: Based on a 4.0 scale. Never=1; Sometimes=2; Often=3; Very Often=4.

Survey results suggest U H students have a greater understanding of and more frequent interaction with others from different backgrounds than their national comparison group counterparts.

Table: To What Extent Has Your U H Experience Contributed to Understanding People of Other Racial and Ethnic Backgrounds?
U H Mean Comparison Group Mean
U H Manoa 2.86 2.55
U H Hilo 2.95 2.70
U H West Oahu 2.97 2.70
Hawaii CC 2.92 2.34
Honolulu CC 2.74 2.34
Kapiolani CC 2.68 2.33
Kauai CC 2.68 2.34
Leeward CC 2.56 2.33
Maui CC 2.83 2.34
Windward CC 2.64 2.34
Note: Based on a 4.0 scale. Very Little=1; Some=2; Quite a Bit=3; Very Much=4.

Table: To What Extent Does U H Encourage Contact Among Students from Different Backgrounds?
U H Mean Comparison Group Mean
U H Manoa 2.60 2.37
U H Hilo 2.77 2.47
U H West Oahu 2.82 2.47
Hawaii CC 2.85 2.45
Honolulu CC 2.76 2.45
Kapiolani CC 2.71 2.46
Kauai CC 2.62 2.45
Leeward CC 2.58 2.46
Maui CC 2.82 2.45
Windward CC 2.74 2.45
Notes: Based on a 4.0 scale. Very Little=1; Some=2; Quite a Bit=3; Very Much=4.
U H M, U H H, and U H W O reflect senior student responses.
Sources: National Survey of Student Engagement 2007
Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008

> Return to Table of Contents

Goal 2

A Learning, Research, and Service Network

Serving the state of Hawaii demands that the University of Hawaii engage its diverse resources to contribute to the state’s economy, workforce and training needs, and the creation and application of knowledge. Measures of affordability, the educational pipeline, workforce development, information and technology resources, research and scholarly productivity, and economic impact are presented to demonstrate the University’s progress in fostering the intellectual capital of the state of Hawaii, and preparing citizens educated for participation in democracy.

Affordability

How affordable is higher education in the U.S. and in Hawaii for students and their families?

College affordability in the U.S. as a whole has been on the decline as higher education institutions deal with growing expenses and decreasing state support. Families in Hawaii, as well as nationally, can be expected to devote a larger share of their family income to pay for college in the future.

According to an October 2008 report by the National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education and Public Agenda entitled “The Iron Triangle: College Presidents Talk About Costs, Access, and Quality,” increasing costs are attributed to higher salaries, healthcare costs, need for greater campus security, and more remedial help for struggling students. With less state funding to support public institutions, most university presidents are concerned about the need to raise tuition, which places a greater burden on students and families and makes higher education less accessible. As described in the following section, U H has substantially increased financial aid to address access.

The share of family income needed to pay for college has risen on average in the U.S., even in the top states. To attend public two-year colleges in Hawaii, students and families pay less than the U.S. average but more than those in the best performing states. To attend public four-year colleges, they pay close to the national average, which is more than those in the best states pay.

Table: Percent of Income Needed to Pay for College Expenses
Minus Financial Aid
U H Community
Colleges
U H 4-Year
2000 2008 2000 2008
Hawaii 19% 21% 21% 27%
U.S. 19% 24% 20% 28%
Top States 13% 19% 10% 15%
Note: Better performance is indicated by lower figures.
Source: The National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education
Measuring Up 2008 ©2008

What is the distribution of financial aid at U H campuses?

The share of first-time freshmen receiving aid in A Y 2006–2007 ranged from 73 percent (U H Hilo) to 25 percent (Kapiolani CC). Average financial aid ranged from $3,522 (U H Manoa) to $1,770 (Kauai CC).

Table: Financial Aid to U H First-Time Freshmen
Percent Receiving Aid, A Y 2006–2007
U H Manoa 54%
U H Hilo 73%
Hawaii CC 51%
Honolulu CC 33%
Kapiolani CC 25%
Kauai CC 30%
Leeward CC 26%
Maui CC 38%
Windward CC 36%

Table: Financial Aid to U H First-Time Freshmen
Average Aid Amount Received, A Y 2006–2007
U H Manoa $3,522
U H Hilo $3,235
Hawaii CC $2,425
Honolulu CC $1,882
Kapiolani CC $2,466
Kauai CC $1,770
Leeward CC $2,069
Maui CC $2,624
Windward CC $2,272
Notes: Consists of fall 2006 first-time, full-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students (IPEDS survey terminology). For U H purposes, this equates to “first-time freshmen.”
U H W O admitted its first freshman class in fall 2007 and is therefore not included.
Financial aid includes federal, state, and institutional grants (no pay back required) and student loans (pay back required).

How many students received Pell awards and what was the total value disbursed?

The number of federal Pell recipients and the total value disbursed by U H decreased three consecutive years, from A Y 2004–2005 through A Y 2006–2007. A U.S. Department of Education change in the Expected Family Contribution (E F C) formula in A Y 2005–2006 accounted for part of the decline in the latter two years while a slight increase in U H enrollments and larger numbers of applicants for federal financial aid accounted for the recent A Y 2007–2008 increase.

Table: U H Disbursement of Pell Grants
A Y 2004 A Y 2005 A Y 2006 A Y 2007 A Y 2008
Total Pell Disbursed (in millions) $22.8 M $22.4 M $19.9 M $19.4 M $22.6 M
Number of Pell Recipients 9,227 8,992 8,184 7,850 8,657
Note: Average amount awarded: A Y 2003–2004, $2,471; A Y 2004–2005, $2,488; A Y 2005–2006, $2,437; A Y 2006–2007, $2,477; A Y 2007–2008, $2,612.

What is the breakdown of tuition assistance awarded by U H?

The total amount of financial assistance awarded increased by 69 percent over five years, most notably in A Y 2007–2008, when a new financial assistance program was instituted. This new B O R Financial Assistance Policy converted most tuition waivers to scholarships, enabling campuses to use more of their tuition revenues to increase financial assistance to students.

In A Y 2006–2007, the first year of the current six-year tuition schedule, the amount of need-based aid awarded by U H was 1.5 times the amount awarded in A Y 2005–2006. In A Y 2007–2008, the A Y 2005–2006 amount was doubled. U H’s commitment is to quadruple the amount of need-based aid by the end of the tuition schedule in A Y 2011–2012.

Table: Financial Assistance by Type
(in millions)
A Y 2003–2004 A Y 2004–2005 A Y 2005–2006 A Y 2006–2007 A Y 2007–2008
Need-Based $4.8 M $5.3 M $4.9 M $7.5 M $10.3 M
Merit/Service-Based $7.0 M $7.7 M $7.4 M $7.8 M $9.7 M
Graduate Assistant
Tuition Exemptions
$5.4 M $6.1 M $6.4 M $7.8 M $9.5 M
Other $1.2 M $1.3 M $1.4 M $1.7 M $1.8 M
Total Assistance $18.5 M $20.4 M $20.1 M $24.8 M $31.2 M
Note: “Other” includes Regents, Presidential, and Pacific Asian scholarships, band, institutional agreements, employee, summer session, extension, and undergraduate nursing clinical categories.
Amounts may be slightly higher or lower due to rounding.

Certain nonresident students, by B O R policy, are afforded the benefit of paying resident rates as shown below. Pacific Island students (from islands without a baccalaureate-granting institution) and those participating in the Western Undergraduate Exchange (W U E) program (a reciprocal program for Hawaii residents) pay 150% of the resident rate.

Table: Nonresident Tuition Exemptions, A Y 2007–2008
(in millions)
East West
Center
Faculty/
Staff
Military Native
Hawaiian
Pacific/
Asian-
Outstanding
Student
Exchange
D O E Teacher
Exemption
Pacific
Islander
Western Undergraduate
Exchange
Tuition
Charged
$0.9 M $0.9 M $1.6 M $1.2 M $3.1 M $0.9 M $0.4 M $2.1 M $14.3 M
Forgone
Tuition
$1.2 M $1.2 M $5.2 M $2.1 M $4.5 M $1.6 M $0.6 M $3.3 M $14.6 M
Total $2.1 M $2.1 M $6.8 M $3.3 M $7.6 M $2.5 M $1.0 M $5.4 M $28.9 M

How do U H tuitions compare with like institutions elsewhere?

U H resident tuition rates are below W I C H E (institutions from 15 states that are members of the Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education) averages except for U H Hilo’s graduate rate, which is slightly above the average. All U H nonresident rates are below the W I C H E average, except the U H community colleges rate, which is slightly above.

Table: 2007–2008 U H Tuition and Required Fees
as a Percentage of 2007–2008 W I C H E Averages
Resident Nonresident
U H Manoa Undergraduate 84% 67%
U H Manoa Graduate 86% 80%
U H Hilo Undergraduate 88% 94%
U H Hilo Graduate 106% 94%
U H West Oahu 77% 86%
U H Community Colleges 66% 101%
Note: W I C H E law and medicine tuition comparisons were discontinued.

How much in private aid has been raised for U H students?

The amount of student assistance funds raised through the U H Foundation’s ongoing Centennial Campaign has steadily increased since it began in F Y 2002–2003. Private support has been provided by individuals, corporations, and foundations.

The total market value of endowed funds for student assistance as of June 30, 2008 was $63.3 million. The total expendable funds available for A Y 2008–2009 for student assistance is $12.5 million.

Table: U H Foundation
Student Assistance Funds Raised by Fiscal Year
(in millions)
F Y 2002–2003 F Y 2003–2004 F Y 2004–2005 F Y 2005–2006 F Y 2006–2007 F Y 2007–2008
Expendable $1.6 M $4.9 M $6.7 M $5.9 M $10.2 M $5.3 M
Endowed $2.8 M $2.6 M $2.3 M $4.2 M $2.8 M $8.5 M
Total $4.4 M $7.5 M $9.0 M $10.2 M $13.0 M $13.9 M
Note: Amounts may be slightly higher or lower due to rounding.

> Return to Table of Contents

Educational Pipeline

What is the role of the University in facilitating a seamless educational pipeline in Hawaii?

Data assembled by the National Center for Higher Education Systems (N C H E M S) in 2008 indicate that the outcomes of the Hawaii pipeline are slightly below the national average and considerably below that of each best performing state in four transition areas of the educational pipeline. The differences between the U.S. and Hawaii’s averages increase as students enter their second year of college and move toward graduation.

Table: Success Rate Per 100 Ninth Graders at Each Transition Point
U.S. and Hawaii, 2006
Best Performing State U.S. Average Hawaii
Graduate from High School 86% 69% 68%
Enter College 60% 42% 40%
Enroll Sophomore Year 42% 28% 24%
Graduate On Time 30% 20% 12%
Notes: “Graduate on time” is defined as within three years for an associate degree and six years for a baccalaureate degree. For more detailed information, see www.higheredinfo.org.
Source: N C H E M S Information Center for State Higher Education Policymaking and Analysis, 2008

If current trends continue, the current generation of Hawaii’s young people will be less well-educated than previous generations. In the past, Hawaii’s working age adults have consistently held educational attainment levels above the national average; however, the educational attainment level of our state’s younger cohort of 25- to 34-year-olds is lower than that of their predecessors.

In partnership with the State Department of Education and the Good Beginnings Alliance, the University provides leadership for Hawaii P-20 Partnerships for Education, a statewide effort to strengthen the educational pipeline from early childhood through higher education. The Hawaii P-20 Council set a goal of 55 percent of Hawaii’s working age adults having a two- or four-year college degree by the year 2025 to enhance Hawaii’s global competitiveness.

The University’s Strategic Outcomes address the P-20 Council’s goal directly. The strategic performance indicators of college going rates and degrees completed are aligned with the goal of increasing Hawaii’s educational capital. The University is actively involved in working with its Hawaii P-20 partners to improve the educational pipeline by:

Table: D O E Graduates Receiving B O E Recognition (Honors) Diploma
Academic Year 2007–2008
Percent of Graduates
of Each Subgroup
n
GEAR UP Scholars 46% 685
Graduates statewide 32% 11,303
Low-income GEAR UP Scholars 37% 205
Non-low-income graduates statewide 35% 2,876
Low-income graduates statewide 23% 761
Source: Hawaii Department of Education

What is the status of articulation within the U H System?

Articulation is the acceptance of courses from one campus to another which enables students to transfer. The University has taken great measures to make transfer within the system simpler and more predictable. Completion of an Associate of Arts degree with a G P A of 2.0 or higher from a U H community college fulfills admission and lower division general education (G E) core requirements at all U H baccalaureate degree-granting institutions. All courses that are 100 level and higher transfer across U H campuses. Their applicability or how the credits apply toward graduation is determined by the requirements of a specific degree.

Articulation agreements have been developed to provide for a smooth transfer to specific programs. These agreements describe the courses that transfer and the requirement they fulfill. Current articulation agreements are available at http://www.hawaii.edu/vpaa/system_aa/articulation/articulation.html.

Degree Pathway Agreements allow for dual admission and dual enrollment of students at the U H community colleges and U H baccalaureate degree-granting campuses. Current agreements exist between U H Manoa and Kapiolani CC, and between U H West Oahu, Kapiolani CC, and Honolulu CC.

GENERAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS
Since 2001, with the adoption of the current G E requirements based on “hallmarks” or specific characteristics rather than specific courses, the number of courses that transferred into U H Manoa and met a specific G E requirement increased sixfold. Eight U H campuses (U H Manoa, U H West Oahu, Honolulu CC, Kapiolani CC, Kauai CC, Leeward CC, Maui CC, and Windward CC), have adopted similar hallmarks, increasing the number of transfer courses that meet G E requirements and adding to the ease and predictability of student transfer between campuses.

U H Manoa. The majority of past articulation issues have centered on transfer to U H Manoa. With the adoption of the hallmarks approach to G E, a number of issues have been resolved. A list of courses that transfer from other U H campuses is available online (www.hawaii.edu/gened/articulation.htm).

In addition, courses not offered at U H Manoa have the potential to meet a U H Manoa G E requirement. A more streamlined process now makes it possible to have courses approved within a few weeks. Multicampus boards, such as the Foundations Multicampus Board, allow other U H campuses to approve their own courses to meet specific G E requirements at U H Manoa. A similar board on Hawaiian, Asian, and Pacific (H A P) G E requirements has been established.

U H Hilo. The campus continues to refine its transfer evaluation policy to maximize the applicability of transfer credits. Formal articulation agreements have been signed or are being finalized between U H Hilo and the U H community colleges to foster seamless transfer. Services to U H community college students include special advising, dual enrollment, and priority registration. Course to course equivalencies for all U H campuses to U H Hilo are available online (www.hilo.hawaii.edu/studentaffairs/admissions/TransferInformation.php).

U H West Oahu. Prior to 2007, U H West Oahu was an upper division campus that focused on meeting the academic needs of transfer students. With its first freshman class admitted in fall 2007, the campus’ revised mission statement states in part, “U H West Oahu is committed to providing access to residents throughout the state of Hawaii through its partnerships with the U H community colleges and its delivery of distance education programs.” New programs include a Bachelor of Applied Sciences (B A S) designed to meet the academic and professional needs of community college graduates who earned an associate in science degree, and the Bachelor of Arts in Social Sciences with a concentration in Early Childhood Education, which builds upon the Associate of Science in Early Childhood offered at four U H community colleges. In fall 2008, the B A S degree will offer concentrations in Computing, Electronics, and Networking Technology (C E N T), Culinary Management, and Respiratory Care.

U H West Oahu adopted the common hallmarks for their G E requirements. Program articulation agreements with U H West Oahu are located at www.westoahu.hawaii.edu/articulation.

RELATED LINKS

What is the number of U H Community College students who transfer to U H four-year campuses?

Transfers from the U H community colleges to U H four-year campuses has increased steadily since 2003.

Table: Transfers from the U H Community Colleges into the U H Four-Year Campuses
U H
Manoa
U H
Hilo
U H
West
Oahu
Total
Fall 1997 719 188 151 1,058
Fall 1998 695 176 125 996
Fall 1999 721 172 215 1,108
Fall 2000 632 169 133 934
Fall 2001 701 178 165 1,044
Fall 2002 631 182 159 972
Fall 2003 602 72 156 830
Fall 2004 745 97 55 897
Fall 2005 859 185 67 1,111
Fall 2006 863 147 239 1,249
Fall 2007 963 145 221 1,329
Note: U H West Oahu transitioned from an upper division institution to a four-year campus in fall 2007. Therefore, fall 2007 data includes sophomores while previous years included only juniors and seniors.

What proportion of transfer students to U H Manoa receive a baccalaureate degree?

U H community college transfers to U H Manoa consistently graduate at higher rates than their non-U H community college transfer counterparts.

Table: Average Graduation Rates of Full-Time
U H Community College Transfers to U H Manoa
U H CC
transfers to
U H Manoa
Non-U H CC
transfers to
U H Manoa
1 year after entry 1% 1%
2 years after entry 20% 9%
3 years after entry 43% 29%
4 years after entry 58% 46%
5 years after entry 68% 54%
6 years after entry 72% 57%
Note: U H M=Fall 1990–Fall 2005 cohorts as of 2006.

> Return to Table of Contents

Workforce Development

What is the University’s response to jobs in demand in Hawaii?

Workforce development is a priority for the University and a key objective in system and community college strategic plans. System representatives participate in the State Workforce Development Council, as do campus representatives on county workforce development councils and local workforce investment boards. Shortages in the following employment areas and U H’s efforts to meet these job demands are outlined below.

Teachers. Annually, approximately 400 individuals from University of Hawaii programs are recommended for teacher licensure in Hawaii. However, the Hawaii Department of Education (D O E) needs more than 1,600 new teachers each year.

The University has made a special effort to increase numbers of teachers in critical areas. A large federal grant to the U H Manoa College of Education (C O E) provides scholarships and other assistance to individuals preparing to teach mathematics or science in Hawaii schools.

All U H Manoa C O E teacher licensure programs are available to anyone statewide on all of the neighbor islands. At this time over 250 individuals are enrolled in statewide programs. In addition, the college provides programs on-site on the leeward coast, an area with high teacher turnover.

The U H Manoa C O E continues to provide a wide variety of routes to teaching in order to attract and accommodate as many potential teachers as possible. The college offers initial teacher preparation programs at the baccalaureate, post-baccalaureate, and master’s degree levels. The Master of Education in Teaching (M E d T) program offers three tracks leading to licensure: a school track, the Hawaiian Language Immersion and Hawaiian communities focus, and a partnership with the D O E in support of Teach for America.

U H Hilo’s education department offers a Teacher Education Program (T E P) which leads to licensure in the state. From F Y 2005–2008, an average of 46 students completed the Elementary or Secondary Teaching program each year.

U H West Oahu developed a baccalaureate degree program (B A) in early childhood education in cooperation with Hawaii, Kapiolani, Kauai, and Maui Community Colleges. Enrollments in this program began in fall 2006 with 38 students. Seventy students enrolled in fall 2008. A Bachelor of Education (B E d) program started in fall 2007 with 45 students. One hundred students enrolled in fall 2008.

Leeward Community College’s Associate in Arts in Teaching (A A T) degree program is designed to attract students to teaching and prepare them for entry to a licensure program at a four-year campus. The Leeward A A T has articulated agreements with U H Manoa, U H West Oahu, and Chaminade University. The degree pathway was established to address the critical shortage of teachers in Hawaii.

Kapiolani and Leeward CC expanded teacher assistant certificate and associate degree programs in an effort to prepare more teaching assistants, attract more people into teaching, and meet the requirements of the federal law, No Child Left Behind.

Nurses. The six U H nursing programs, through the coordinated leadership of the U H Statewide Nursing Consortium, developed a statewide baccalaureate nursing curriculum with multiple exit points. The Consortium is designed to meet the current and future health needs of the people of Hawaii by responding to the nursing shortage and providing for a more educated workforce. Students will begin the nursing courses in the statewide curriculum in fall 2010.

The Hawaii State Center for Nursing, established in the U H Manoa School of Nursing and Dental Hygiene, has taken the lead in compiling supply and demand data for the state’s nursing workforce and in developing innovative programs to address the shortage. The following table on admissions and enrollments of nursing students in U H programs during A Y 2005–2006 reports that the associate of science in nursing (A D N) and master of science in nursing (MSN) programs were filled to capacity and licensed practical nursing (LPN) and PhD programs were very close to capacity.

Table: Capacity of U H Nursing Education Programs and Enrollment
A Y 2005–2006
Programs
LPN Ladder A D N BSN MSN PhD
Number of admission slots 40 130 90 139 Limited/Unspecified 9
Newly enrolled students 39 82 90 126 41 11
Number of unfilled slots 1 48 0 13 0 1
Note: All unfilled slots in the BSN program are in the RN to BS program.
Source: Hawaii State Center For Nursing
Survey of Nursing Education Programs, 2005–2006

Despite ongoing efforts to address this workforce shortage, demand for RNs in Hawaii is expected to grow by 24 percent while supply is expected to grow by seven percent between 2006 and 2018. Nursing programs will require an aggressive growth in capacity to produce enough graduates to address the gap.

The U H Institutional Research Office reports 113 LPN, 138 A S, 131 BS, 21 MS, and 10 PhD graduates in A Y 2005–2006.

Tourism and Hospitality. To meet the management demands of the state’s leading industry, U H Manoa offers certificate, bachelor’s degree, and master’s degree programs in travel industry management (T I M). Undergraduate enrollment is currently 419 as of fall 2007. Ninety percent of graduates gain entry-level management or higher positions. The T I M faculty are currently developing an online BS program to better serve the neighbor islands.

Graduates from the U H community colleges hotel operations programs fill entry level positions in Hawaii’s tourism industry. The community college programs also attract industry workers who wish to upgrade their skills. These graduates then qualify for supervisory positions.

Construction. The Construction Academy was initiated in 2004 with a $1.4 million grant from the U.S. Department of Labor, and more recently, with $5.5 million from the state legislature. The academy is a partnership between Honolulu Community College and Department of Education schools to meet the state’s need for more qualified construction workers. Students actively participate in an integrated program that promotes the use of math, reading, and writing in the classroom with the technical, academic, and employability skills necessary to pursue a career in the construction industry. The Construction Academy has grown from servicing over 200 students at eight pilot schools during the 2005–2006 school year to a capacity of over 2,220 students in 35 high schools statewide in fall 2008.

Students benefit by entering college better prepared and with a greater skill set. The Academy’s goals are to help produce qualified workers for an industry that is experiencing tremendous growth, standardize a building and construction curriculum with the D O E, create teacher mentorship and internship opportunities with businesses, and establish a statewide industry advisory council.

Honolulu Community College hosted an inaugural event known in many states as the Construction Career Day. This was the first time the state of Hawaii has hosted such an event. The partnership included the Hawaii Local Technical Assistance Program, the Hawaii Department of Transportation, and more than a hundred volunteers. More than 800 students were bused to the event from public and private high schools, as well as some home-schools. There were many hands-on activities to stimulate and engage the high school students. One student reported on the evaluation form, “What made this event different from the rest was the hands-on activity and getting a chance to talk to the pros about their trade.” Planning is underway for the second Construction Career Day.

Rapid Response Fund. The Rapid Response Fund, created last year by the Legislature to meet workforce related high-demand training needs, is being used by the University of Hawaii community colleges, in cooperation with the State of Hawaii Workforce Investment Board, to assist recently displaced workers by setting aside approximately $70,000 for special education and training. The fund provides a one-time only, 50 percent discount on the cost of tuition, up to a maximum of $500 per eligible laid-off employee. The funds are available on a first-come, first-served basis until funds are exhausted or until the tuition discount expires on June 30, 2009.

Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM). STEM occupations in Hawaii are expected to demand about 1,650 new workers per year to fill vacant positions as well as newly created jobs. About 77 percent of those jobs will require postsecondary education. Hawaii’s community colleges and universities offer a wide array of the STEM programs needed to grow the state’s science and technology industries.
Source: Innovation and Technology in Hawaii: An Economic and Workforce Profile
www.HISciTech.org

The Department of Information and Computer Sciences (I C S) at U H Manoa offers six degree programs that provide students the means to support Hawaii’s high technology information infrastructure. These degrees consist of a bachelor of arts, a bachelor of science, a master of science, a master of library and information science, a PhD in computer science, and a certificate program that focuses on technology. Two of the four programs participate in an interdisciplinary PhD in Communications and Information Sciences offered by the I C S department and the College of Business. Through these degree offerings, the department provides higher education to over 700 students. In A Y 2006–2007, 126 bachelor’s, master’s, and doctoral degrees were earned in the areas of Computer Science, Communication and Information Science, Information and Computer Sciences, and Library and Information Science. Students from these programs are recruited by organizations both in private industry and government, and are involved in fields such as aerospace, intelligence, software development, and networking.

U H Hilo received a 2008 Hewlett-Packard Technology for Teaching grant valued at more than $77,000 to enhance learning in engineering, math, science, or computer science. Computer science students will use wireless HP tablet PCs to develop custom software applications for field volcanology applications with the Center for the Study of Active Volcanoes.

U H Hilo’s College of Pharmacy is the only school in the Pacific basin to offer a doctorate in pharmacy degree. The degree, also called a Pharm.D., is a professional degree requiring four years of study after completion of at least two years in a pre-pharmacy program in an accredited college or university. The college enrolled 91 students in its first fall 2007 cohort and 87 students in its second fall 2008 cohort.

U H West Oahu received $2.5 million in Title III grant funding from the U.S. Department of Education to support the development of a highly interactive, interpersonal learning environment and the expansion of its academic curriculum following the transition to a four-year baccalaureate institution. The money will be awarded over the next five years to develop programs to promote academic and psychosocial engagement and increase student participation in STEM disciplines.

The Hawaii Excellence in Science and Technology (HiEST) Academy program is a partnership between the Department of Education high schools and the University of Hawaii community colleges. The purpose of the HiEST Academy is to increase the readiness of Hawaii high school graduates for postsecondary training and career options in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics disciplines. The program embeds college faculty into the teaching environment at the high schools. Funded through a contract between the state’s Department of Human Services and the U H community colleges, the HiEST Academy currently has seven Department of Education high schools participating statewide with plans to expand to other high schools in upcoming years.

From 2006–2008, Kapiolani Community College garnered more than $3.25 million in external grants to strengthen its Science, Technology, Engineering and Math programs. The campus also established the first Associate of Science Degree in Natural Sciences with concentrations in Physical Science and Life Science.

Maui Community College received high performance computing equipment in 2008 from IBM valued at more than $400,000 for use in its Electronics and Computer Engineering Technology (E C E T) program. The grant is part of a Shared University Research (S U R) awards program, created to demonstrate the partnership between academia and the technology industry to explore research in areas essential to innovation. Students will have direct access to computing capabilities that will aid them in the high technology field. Maui Community College is investigating innovative ways to integrate the new supercomputer with other E C E T programs such as the “Marine Animal Life Tracking” project and a National Science Foundation grant on telescope data. The campus is also looking at ways to integrate the new system into its Applied Business and Information Technology (A B I T) program.

What is the likelihood of a U H Community College career and technical education student getting a job in Hawaii?

U H career and technical education graduates have a very good chance of getting a job in Hawaii. For those seeking employment in 2006–2007, between 93 and 100 percent indicated they were successful.

Table: Employment of Career Technical Education Graduates
A Y 2004–2005 A Y 2005–2006 A Y 2006–2007
Hawaii CC 88% 100% 100%
Honolulu CC 100% 100% 100%
Kapiolani CC 94% 93% 100%
Kauai CC 80% 100% 93%
Leeward CC 96% 96% 100%
Maui CC 100% 100% 100%
Windward CC 86% 83% 100%
Note: Career and Technical Education was formerly known as Vocational-Technical Education.
Past survey results are included only as a point of reference to the current year. Any comparisons should be interpreted with caution as respondents and data distribution vary by study.
Source: Community Colleges Graduate and Leavers Survey

> Return to Table of Contents

Information and Technology Resources

Library

How does U H’s major library compare on a national basis?

U H Manoa ranks 87th among the 113 ranked university libraries (2006–2007) that are members of the Association of Research Libraries (A R L). This ranking is down from 77th ten years earlier.
Source: 2006–2007 A R L Membership and Statistics

Since 2002–2003, A R L’s ranking is based on total expenditures (library materials, staff, equipment, and total operating costs). Prior to that, the ranking also included library holdings as part of its indexing formula.

Though the library’s ranking has declined since the late 1990’s and early 2000’s, increased subscriptions to electronic journals and databases have helped U H Manoa library maintain quality services to students and faculty. The Asia and Pacific special collections enhance U H Manoa’s Hamilton Library as a premier resource for research and scholarship in the region.

Ground floor restoration construction from the October 2004 flood will be completed in 2009, enabling staff to return to appropriate working quarters. The restored section will be converted back to its former public services and library shelving areas.

Table: U H Manoa Library Rankings
Among Ranked A R L Member Libraries
Rank
F Y 1996–1997 78
F Y 1997–1998 77
F Y 1998–1999 62
F Y 1999–2000 64
F Y 2000–2001 60
F Y 2001–2002 87
F Y 2002–2003 80
F Y 2003–2004 81
F Y 2004–2005 88
F Y 2005–2006 81
F Y 2006–2007 87
Note: The number of university libraries that are A R L members may change from year to year.
Source: U H Manoa Library Services

How is U H capitalizing on technological change?

Information Technology Resources
As with any university, the primary activities of U H involve the creation, preservation, and dissemination of knowledge. In the 21st century, these activities are increasingly enabled by the capability of modern information technologies. Despite funding levels well below national benchmarks and peers, U H continues to make substantial progress in harnessing technologies to support teaching & learning, research, and administration. Centralization of key information systems and services at the U H System provides substantial economies of scale and consistency of service for campuses and students throughout the state of Hawaii.

Electronic Communication

Teaching & Learning

Research

Business Processes

U H Information Technology Services

To what extent do U H students use electronic media in their coursework and to communicate with instructors?

Online
Online courses represent courses which are taught primarily using online technologies which include the web-based applications, podcasts, and other instructional technologies. Web C T is the web-based, online course management tool institutionally supported by Information Technology Services (I T S). The numbers in the table below represent courses that use WebCT, podcasts, and other instructional technologies to deliver fully online courses. Many courses now use a hybrid approach to teaching and learning that incorporates both face-to-face and online methodologies.

After almost 10 years of using Web C T as the University’s course management system, beginning fall 2008, the University switched to an open source learning management system. With the purchase of Web C T by Blackboard, there was a requirement from Blackboard for U H to move to another version of Web C T, which would have required significant changes in both infrastructure and faculty experience and a significant increase in license fees. The decision was made to review all options. Laulima, our implementation of Sakai Open Source, was selected as it provides integration with SCT Banner, our student information system, and provides a collaborative platform in addition to a course management system. All credit courses at UH have Laulima accounts beginning fall 2008.

I T V (Interactive/Instructional Television)
I T V represents 2-way video and 2-way audio courses that are offered from one campus to another campus (often referred to as HITS, or Hawaii Interactive Television System).

Public Access Cable
I T S supports delivery of U H courses on public access cable channel 55. Most of these courses support the U H community colleges’ delivery of an associate of arts degree. U H programming is on public access channel 55 statewide.

Table: Use of Electronic Media in Coursework
Fall 2006 Spring 2007 Fall 2007 Spring 2008
Online Classes 207 281 380 417
Student accounts 4,179 5,653 7,731 9,074
I T V Classes 74 65 64 62
Students 1,220 1,063 1,171 1,125
Public Access Cable Classes 33 36 36 36
Students 795 993 962 1,016
Note: Headcounts for students and student accounts are duplicated.
Source: U H Information Technology Services

E-mail and Other Electronic Media
According to the results of the N S S E/C C S S E surveys, U H students often employ the use of electronic media for coursework. Their level of use approximates that of their peer and national counterparts.

Table: How Often Have You Used an Electronic Medium (List-Serve, Chat Group, Internet, etc.) to Discuss or Complete an Assignment?
U H Mean Comparison Group Mean
U H Manoa 2.82 2.85
U H Hilo 2.66 2.80
U H West Oahu 3.10 2.80
Hawaii CC 2.78 2.85
Honolulu CC 2.70 2.85
Kapiolani CC 3.00 2.84
Kauai CC 2.75 2.85
Leeward CC 2.85 2.84
Maui CC 3.15 2.85
Windward CC 3.02 2.85
Note: Based on a 4.0 scale. Never=1; Sometimes=2; Often=3; Very Often=4.

U H students use e-mail as frequently or more frequently to communicate with their instructors than their peer and national counterparts. Within U H, students at four-year campuses use e-mail for this purpose more often than students at two-year campuses.

Table: How Often Have You Used E-mail to Communicate with an Instructor?
U H Mean Comparison Group Mean
U H Manoa 3.31 3.33
U H Hilo 3.19 3.24
U H West Oahu 3.37 3.24
Hawaii CC 2.60 2.52
Honolulu CC 2.39 2.52
Kapiolani CC 2.98 2.53
Kauai CC 2.51 2.52
Leeward CC 2.64 2.53
Maui CC 2.94 2.52
Windward CC 2.71 2.52
Note: Based on a 4.0 scale. Never=1; Sometimes=2; Often=3; Very Often=4.
U H M, U H H, and U H W O reflect senior student responses.
Sources: National Survey of Student Engagement 2007
Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008

U H students feel that their campus experience contributed Quite a Bit to their use of computing and information technology. Their responses are similar to national norms.

Table: To What Extent Has Your U H Experience Contributed to Your Use of Computing and Information Technology?
U H Mean Comparison Group Mean
U H Manoa 3.21 3.06
U H Hilo 3.05 3.14
U H West Oahu 3.25 3.14
Hawaii CC 2.96 3.15
Honolulu CC 3.09 3.15
Kapiolani CC 3.28 3.10
Kauai CC 3.17 3.15
Leeward CC 3.01 3.10
Maui CC 3.26 3.15
Windward CC 3.11 3.15
Note: Based on a 4.0 scale. Very Little=1; Some=2; Quite a Bit=3; Very Much=4.
U H M, U H H, and U H W O reflect senior student responses.
Sources: National Survey of Student Engagement 2007
Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008

> Return to Table of Contents

Research and Scholarly Productivity

How have U H research and training activities fared in recent years?

Extramural funds—grants and contracts from federal, state, private, and foreign sources—have held steady at over $300 million the last two years following a record high of over $400 million in F Y 2006. Preliminary F Y 2008 figures report U H received extramural awards of $373 million, $221 million for research, and $152 million for non-research (i.e., training).

Several of the larger funded research organizations at U H Manoa include: the School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology (receiving $77 million), the John A. Burns School of Medicine (receiving $50 million), and the Institute for Astronomy (receiving $30 million).

Several graduate programs at U H Manoa ranked among the nation’s top 10 in the 2008 Faculty Scholarly Productivity Index, a listing of programs ranked on faculty output in the Chronicle of Higher Education. They include oceanography; physical sciences (2nd); marine sciences (4th); teacher education (second-language acquisition) (6th); geophysics (7th); and epidemiology (8th). The index ranks faculty members’ scholarly output from 8,182 doctoral programs at 387 of the nation’s universities.

The National Science Foundation reports that in F Y 2006, U H Manoa’s rankings among U.S. institutions were:

Table: U H Office of Research Services
Extramural Fund Support
(in millions)
Research Non-Research Total
F Y 1997–1998 $92 M $68 M $160 M
F Y 1998–1999 $93 M $71 M $164 M
F Y 1999–2000 $103 M $78 M $181 M
F Y 2000–2001 $133 M $83 M $216 M
F Y 2001–2002 $142 M $111 M $252 M
F Y 2002–2003 $190 M $134 M $324 M
F Y 2003–2004 $200 M $129 M $329 M
F Y 2004–2005 $209 M $145 M $354 M
F Y 2005–2006 $237 M $197 M $433 M
F Y 2006–2007 $210 M $144 M $354 M
F Y 2007–2008 $221 M $152 M $373 M
Note: F Y 2007–2008 data are preliminary.
Amounts may be slightly higher or lower due to rounding.
Source: U H Office of Research Services

Research Breakthroughs in the Last Two Years

Source: U H Office of Research Services

> Return to Table of Contents

Economic Impact on Hawaii

What is the economic impact of U H on Hawaii?

Statewide. The University of Hawaii is a $1.66 billion enterprise and represents a major economic force in Hawaii.

The following statements are based on “The Contribution of the University of Hawaii to Hawaii’s Economy in 2006,” an analysis conducted by a faculty member in U H Hilo’s Department of Economics published in September 2007. This is the second update to an Economic Impact Study initially completed in 2000 and updated in 2004. Highlights from the 2006 update indicate:

Foreign Investment in U H
The external non-U.S. economic investment in the U H continues to be substantial. For the past eleven years, the average number of awards from foreign sources was 43 and the average amount awarded was $8.2 million.

Table: Awards from Foreign Sources
Number of
Projects
Amount Awarded
(in millions)
F Y 1996–1997 45 $7.6 M
F Y 1997–1998 36 $7.3 M
F Y 1998–1999 36 $4.1 M
F Y 1999–2000 49 $11.2 M
F Y 2000–2001 39 $6.6 M
F Y 2001–2002 44 $3.8 M
F Y 2002–2003 52 $9.2 M
F Y 2003–2004 47 $10.4 M
F Y 2004–2005 42 $7.9 M
F Y 2005–2006 40 $7.2 M
F Y 2006–2007 44 $15.4 M
Source: U H Office of Research Services

Technology Transfer

The Office of Technology Transfer and Economic Development (O T T E D) serves as a gateway for access to the University’s rich educational, scientific, and technical resources by actively promoting new University inventions and discoveries to industry and by working with business and government leaders throughout the state to encourage economic development.

Licensing to startups has taken on a new importance as the University’s commitment to diversifying Hawaii’s economy becomes ever more evident. Due to the often complicated and time-consuming nature of working with startups, fluctuations in the number of annual licenses signed is expected. Nonetheless, O T T E D is optimistic about the future of many of these companies, several of which have returned sponsored research dollars to the University, have hired U H graduates, and are already making an impact on the local economy through their fundraising and other business activities.

Year to year variations in invention disclosure and patent activity are common, as seen by the fluctuations over time.

Table: U H Invention Disclosures
Number of
Disclosures
F Y 1997–1998 18
F Y 1998–1999 45
F Y 1999–2000 20
F Y 2000–2001 33
F Y 2001–2002 34
F Y 2002–2003 26
F Y 2003–2004 44
F Y 2004–2005 48
F Y 2005–2006 61
F Y 2006–2007 42
F Y 2007–2008 53

Table: U.S. Patents Issued
Number of
Patents
F Y 2000–2001 14
F Y 2001–2002 6
F Y 2002–2003 7
F Y 2003–2004 13
F Y 2004–2005 7
F Y 2005–2006 3
F Y 2006–2007 9
F Y 2007–2008 10

The downward trend in annual licensing activity and income over the past several years reflects, in large part, O T T E D’s recent focus on licensing U H technologies to Hawaii-based start up companies.

As with invention disclosures, the number of licenses and options tends to fluctuate annually. O T T E D granted licenses to 16 U H-technology based startups over the past six years. Four (25%) no longer exist, six (38%) have just started or are hanging on, and six (38%) have good to excellent prospects.

Table: Annual U H Licenses/Options Signed
Amount
F Y 2000–2001 7
F Y 2001–2002 3
F Y 2002–2003 18
F Y 2003–2004 15
F Y 2004–2005 17
F Y 2005–2006 11
F Y 2006–2007 6
F Y 2007–2008 1

Annual licensing revenues peaked in F Y 2004–2005, when a patent for a diagnostic test for cervical cancer generated nearly 90 percent of total licensing revenues over the last two years prior to its expiration. Other licensing revenues have helped offset some of the impact of the expiring cervical cancer patent. It should be noted that large revenue-generating licenses are infrequent and their royalties typically grow slowly. Several recent licenses, however, have the potential to eventually replace and surpass the royalties earned from the diagnostic test.

Table: U H Licensing Revenues
(in thousands)
Amount
F Y 2000–2001 $268 K
F Y 2001–2002 $381 K
F Y 2002–2003 $530 K
F Y 2003–2004 $809 K
F Y 2004–2005 $1,036 K
F Y 2005–2006 $899 K
F Y 2006–2007 $210 K
Source: U H Office of Technology Transfer and Economic Development

Economic Development Highlights

> Return to Table of Contents

Goal 3

A Model Local, Regional, and Global University

Establishing the University as a distinguished resource in Hawaiian and Pacific-Asia affairs depends on a strong commitment to perpetuating Hawaiian culture and language and on focusing the international dimension of the University on the Pacific-Asia region. Measures of student participation in Hawaiian language and cultural studies, the Pacific-Asia focus of international activity on campuses, and the efforts to internationalize the campus experience demonstrate the University’s progress in positioning itself as one of the world’s foremost multicultural centers for global and indigenous studies.

Hawaiian Language and Cultural Studies

How well is the University doing in its commitment to preserve and disseminate Hawaiian history, language, and culture?

Hawaiian studies courses offered at U H Manoa, U H Hilo, and the U H community colleges continue to grow in popularity.

Hawaiinuiakea School of Hawaiian Knowledge at U H Manoa offers programs in Hawaiian language (Kawaihuelani Center for Hawaiian Language) and Hawaiian studies (Kamakakuokalani Center for Hawaiian Studies). The school also hosts an experiential learning laboratory in traditional and contemporary aina related activities at Ka Papa Loi o Kanewai, which serves large numbers of students from pre-K through high school, U H Manoa students and researchers, and community groups.

Undergraduate degrees are offered in Hawaiian language and Hawaiian studies. Each semester, between 1,100 and 1,500 students enroll in a general education course focusing on Hawaiian, Pacific, and Asian issues.

Hawaiinuiakea offers two graduate degrees, one in Hawaiian studies and another in Hawaiian language. Improved funding of Hawaiian programs in the recent past and strong faculty leadership have contributed toward building consistent governance and coordinated growth.

Table: Registration in Hawaiian Language and Hawaiian Studies Courses
U H Manoa
Fall Semester
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Hawaiian Language 1,065 1,000 877 733 754 742 692 707 755 720 790
Hawaiian Studies 383 323 417 399 518 616 1,200 1,417 1,275 1,566 1,531

The Kiwila Civics Curricula Project, developed by the U H Manoa College of Education’s Center on Disability Studies, was awarded $1.3 million over three years by the U.S. Department of Education. The project is one of nearly two dozen Native Hawaiian Education programs on Oahu, Maui, and the island of Hawaii that have been selected to receive more than $1.6 million to develop, assist, and expand innovative programs that provide supplemental services and address the educational needs of Native Hawaiian children and adults.

U H Manoa’s College of Education Curriculum Research and Development Group received first place in the School Evaluation and Program Development Division’s outstanding publications competition in 2007 with a DVD presentation using traditional Hawaiian culture to enhance the education of today’s Native Hawaiian children.

At U H Hilo, registrations in Hawaiian language increased in the past year, while registrations in Hawaiian studies courses have decreased slightly, but still remain strong.

The Ka Haka Ula O Keelikolani College of Hawaiian Language has offered introductory Hawaiian language courses online and asynchronously to students across the state, on the mainland, and internationally.

Table: Registration in Hawaiian Language and Hawaiian Studies Courses
U H Hilo
Fall Semester
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Hawaiian Language 210 241 212 198 225 250 300 279 257 244 288
Hawaiian Studies 275 230 217 217 218 265 350 311 358 373 360

At the U H community colleges, student registrations in Hawaiian studies courses continue their upward trend and are currently at their peak.

Table: Registration in Hawaiian Language and Hawaiian Studies Courses
U H Community Colleges
Fall Semester
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Hawaiian Language 996 957 888 750 706 712 726 679 623 588 598
Hawaiian Studies 570 682 769 717 767 911 1,266 1,441 1,684 1,835 1,987

> Return to Table of Contents

Pacific-Asia Focus

How is U H strengthening its Pacific-Asia focus?

> Return to Table of Contents

Internationalizing the Campus Experience

How is the University ensuring an international dimension to students’ education?

Overseas Study/Research Programs
Of the 738 students who participated in an international program of study, research, internship, or service learning in calendar year 2007, almost half went to Asia, 28 percent went to Europe, and the remainder went to the Pacific/Oceania region, the Americas, and the Caribbean. Students from U H Manoa comprised 72 percent of the participants.

Table: Student Participation in Education Abroad, U H System, C Y 2007
Asia Europe Pacific/
Oceania
Americas
& the
Caribbean
Africa Total
Percent 49% 28% 10% 13% <1%
Number Enrolled 361 207 73 96 1 738

Faculty/Staff Activities

Visiting Scholars and International Faculty
In calendar year 2007, 606 international faculty/staff and visiting scholars taught, conducted research, worked in academic institutional support positions, or participated in international exchange activities under U H sponsorship. More than 52 percent came from Asia, 30 percent from Europe, and the remainder from Canada, Mexico, Latin America, Oceania, the Middle East, and Africa. The largest number was from China, followed by Japan, South Korea, Germany, and Canada.

Table: Visiting Scholars and International Faculty
Amount
C Y 1999 339
C Y 2000 376
C Y 2001 446
C Y 2002 420
C Y 2003 457
C Y 2004 532
C Y 2005 565
C Y 2006 688
C Y 2007 606

International Student Enrollment
In fall 2007, 2,879 international degree-seeking students were enrolled at a U H campus, with the majority coming from Asia.

Table: Enrollment of Degree-Seeking International Students
U H System
Fall Semester
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Asia 1,549 1,511 1,599 1,721 1,867 1,970 1,748 2,278 2,286 2,220
Pacific/Oceania 70 161 373 179 341 226 226 374 207 271
Other 257 291 318 336 386 366 582 371 377 388
Total 1,876 1,963 2,290 2,236 2,594 2,562 2,556 3,023 2,870 2,879
Note: Students who did not specify place of origin are included in the “Other” category.

Language Study
U H students can earn a certificate with an international component in nearly 40 fields. Students have the opportunity to participate in international exchange, study abroad, and specially designed campus-based overseas programs. U H offers 30 languages other than English.

Over the past decade, registrations in foreign languages increased 11 percent overall.

Table: Registration in Languages
U H System
Fall Semester
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
East Asian Language 3,169 3,434 3,154 3,155 3,091 3,234 3,390 3,490 3,403 3,617 3,722
European Language 2,714 2,910 2,869 2,850 2,734 2,930 3,354 3,538 3,540 3,505 3,326
Hawaiian/Indo-Pacific Language 2,740 3,046 2,756 2,426 2,433 2,454 2,632 2,645 2,561 2,460 2,545

> Return to Table of Contents

Goal 4

Investment in Faculty, Staff, Students, and Their Environment

Creating a university culture of excellence requires attention to the value and development of human resources and the work environments that sustain them. Measures of the University’s investment in faculty and staff and investment in the physical plant are presented to demonstrate the University’s progress in recognizing and investing in its most important assets.

Investment in Faculty and Staff

How are campuses investing in their faculty and staff?

U H System
The President’s Emerging Leaders Program, now in its second year, is a professional development opportunity for highly motivated U H faculty and staff sponsored by the U H President’s Office and ten chancellors’ offices. The program seeks to identify and develop future campus and system leaders by investing in the University’s most valuable asset, its human resources, and creating an institutional culture that honors diversity and inclusion. Participants in the President’s Emerging Leader Program have the opportunity to:

U H’s inaugural program began in A Y 2007–2008 with a cohort of 30. The A Y 2008–2009 cohort consists of 27 participants.

Table: President’s Emerging Leaders Program Evaluation, A Y 2007–2008 Cohort
Strongly
Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
Disagree
Learned new facts/concepts/principles
of higher ed
59% 41% 0% 0% 0%
Increased understanding of higher ed
central issues
55% 41% 4% 0% 0%
Developed a broader perspective of
U H issues
63% 26% 7% 4% 0%
Developed a clearer sense of where to
make a difference as a leader
22% 59% 15% 4% 0%
Developed a better appreciation of how
various units contribute to U H’s success
55% 41% 4% 0% 0%
Increased understanding of the resources/
data needed to make informed decisions
27% 54% 19% 0% 0%
Better prepared to work with others to
solve problems
26% 63% 11% 0% 0%

Information Technology Services (I T S)

Table: Participation in I T S Training and Informational Sessions
A Y
2004–2005
A Y
2005–2006
A Y
2006–2007
A Y
2007–2008
Number
of Participants
Number of Sessions Number
of Participants
Number of Sessions Number
of Participants
Number
of Sessions
Number
of Participants
Number
of Sessions
TALENT 105 12 209 17 212 16 281 18
Brown Bags 157 7 277 7 487 20 491 19
Training Courses 197 32 159 17 348 20 363 22
Source: U H Information Technology Services

Sabbatical and Professional Leave

The University invests in faculty and staff by providing funding for leaves of six months at full pay or twelve months at half pay to pursue scholarly activities and academic renewal. In 2007, the University supported 184 employees on sabbatical and professional leaves.

Table: U H Sabbatical/Professional Improvement Leave
Employee Type 2005 2007
Staff 5 6
Faculty 161 178
Total 166 184
Source: U H Office of Human Resources

U H Manoa
The U H Manoa’s Office of Faculty Development and Academic Support (O F D A S) provides a range of faculty professional development and academic support services through its Center for Teaching Excellence, Center for Instructional Support, and Faculty Mentoring Program. Through the following programs and services, O F D A S attempts to address pedagogical and professional issues that relate directly to teaching and learning and to ethical and professional development: lecture series on professional development; mid-semester diagnosis of teaching effectiveness; course and faculty evaluation (CAFÉ); discussion groups on issues in higher education; grant writing series; teaching assistant training and future professoriate series; new faculty orientation program; departmental leadership workshops; media and graphic services; library of dossiers; faculty mentoring; and assessment workshops.

U H Hilo
The U H Hilo Faculty Research Council awards intramural grants for conference travel, and start-up projects, as well as grants for scholarly activity in academic fields that have relatively little opportunity for external funding. Grants are awarded for scholarly and/or creative activities, as well as for training to enhance instructional capabilities.

Through a five-year Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (S T E M) grant, science and math faculty are learning different approaches to studying the natural world and adapting to different student learning styles. The new Student Learning and Success Center, scheduled to open in 2009, will offer faculty workshops and guidance in improving pedagogy, especially in high risk gateway courses. U H Hilo faculty have participated in several series of on-campus workshops on instructional technology and online instruction, including podcasting and production of multimedia materials for online delivery.

U H West Oahu
U H West Oahu offers professional development activities, including a professional development day for the faculty prior to the start of each semester, as well as workshops and seminars throughout the year for faculty and staff. Intramural funds are provided for seed money research grants and for funding faculty travel to conferences. The campus funded a substantial amount of these expenses for faculty and staff in A Y 2006–2007 and A Y 2007–2008.

U H Community Colleges
The U H community colleges support professional development efforts through system and campus planning and resource allocation. New and continuing initiatives are funded by chancellors, fundraisers, and external grants. Workshops on assessing student learning outcomes and support for faculty travel are among the types of professional development activities offered. All colleges have staff and faculty development committees and have continued the annual practice of a college-wide, non-instructional professional development and enrichment day. The Wo Learning Champions and the Tsunoda Community College Leadership Champions programs are examples of major investments in faculty and staff development by the community colleges.

The Wo Learning Champions are a representative group of faculty and staff from each of the community colleges and the Employment Training Center whose purpose is to design professional development activities to promote learning, foster innovation, and build community. The Wo Learning Champions program invests in junior members of the academic community, renews its senior faculty, and promotes the enrichment of all at the state’s community colleges. This initiative is funded by a $1 million endowment generously donated by the Robert and Betty Wo Family Foundation and James and Juanita Wo Family Foundation.

The Tsunoda Community College Leadership Champions are a representative group of faculty and staff from the seven community colleges whose focus is to develop the next generation of community college leaders, committed to the values and mission of the community college.

How do U H faculty salaries compare with national averages?

Faculty salaries at the University of Hawaii campuses compare favorably to their national public institution counterparts. The average salaries of all ranks at U H Hilo exceed the national averages in its category. Salaries in ranks 2, 3, and 4 at U H Manoa exceed those of other public doctoral level institutions, while at U H West Oahu salaries in ranks 2 and 3 exceed those of their counterparts.

Table: Comparison of Average Faculty Salaries
with Other Public Institutions, 2007–2008
U H Manoa, U H Hilo, U H West Oahu
Rank 5 Rank 4 Rank 3 Rank 2
U H
Manoa
U H
Hilo
U H
West Oahu
U H
Manoa
U H
Hilo
U H
West Oahu
U H
Manoa
U H
Hilo
U H
West Oahu
U H
Manoa
U H
Hilo
U H
West Oahu
U H Average $105,832 $82,699 $75,809 $79,035 $69,052 $63,505 $67,298 $60,860 $58,172 $52,909 $45,770 $46,890
National
Average
$109,569 $80,408 $80,408 $77,033 $65,431 $65,431 $65,416 $54,844 $54,844 $44,116 $44,349 $44,349

U H community college faculty salaries continue to reflect favorably in relation to their national public institution counterparts. Salaries at all ranks exceed the national averages in comparison to other public two-year institutions with academic ranks.

Table: Comparison of Average Faculty Salaries
with Other Public Institutions, 2007–2008
U H Community Colleges
Hawaii Honolulu Kapiolani Kauai Leeward Maui Windward National
Averages
Rank 5 $73,777 $74,605 $75,472 $75,886 $74,855 $75,759 $73,517 $71,910
Rank 4 $66,989 $65,335 $66,019 $65,840 $62,590 $64,511 $63,277 $58,708
Rank 3 $60,401 $61,928 $58,103 $61,513 $56,083 $61,818 $59,733 $51,329
Rank 2 $50,044 $48,806 $51,788 $56,118 $50,621 $54,182 $47,935 $44,174
Note: The national averages are the averages of all public institutions surveyed that are in the same category as the U H campus.
Source: Academe Mar/Apr 2008 Bulletin of the American Association of University Professors (A A U P)

What share of their time do U H faculty spend on instruction and research and how does this compare with counterparts elsewhere?

Instructional workload remained about the same at U H Manoa and the U H community colleges, but decreased at U H Hilo and U H West Oahu from fall 2003 to fall 2007. U H regular faculty teach from two to four courses a semester and some teach five. For comparative purposes, equivalent semester hours per regular faculty at the U H community colleges include general academic instruction only.

Table: U H Equivalent Semester Hours/Regular Faculty
Fall 2007 Fall 2003
U H Manoa 8.0 8.1
U H Hilo 7.2 8.8
U H West Oahu 7.5 9.9
U H Community Colleges 11.9 11.7
Note: Equivalent semester hours consist of fixed semester hours plus defined equivalencies for directed reading, thesis or dissertation classes, and other variable credit classes.

What is the turnover rate for faculty (excluding retirement)?

The number of faculty resignations has fluctuated over the last ten years, reaching a low in 1998–1999 and a high in 2000–2001. After remaining constant over the last three years, faculty turnover rates increased half a percentage point (+23) from F Y 2005–2006 to F Y 2006–2007. The reasons for leaving tend to be fairly consistent from year to year. In F Y 2006–2007, the top reasons faculty left U H were:

Table: U H Faculty Resignations (Turnover Rate)
Number of
Resignations
Percent of
Total Faculty
F Y 1996–1997 110 3.5%
F Y 1997–1998 109 3.5%
F Y 1998–1999 79 2.5%
F Y 1999–2000 95 3.1%
F Y 2000–2001 145 4.6%
F Y 2001–2002 128 4.0%
F Y 2002–2003 109 3.3%
F Y 2003–2004 103 3.1%
F Y 2004–2005 103 3.0%
F Y 2005–2006 103 3.0%
F Y 2006–2007 126 3.5%
Note: Does not include retirements.
Source: Personnel Exit Questionnaire, U H Office of Human Resources

What are the demographic trends in the composition of U H employees?

Ethnicity
The ethnic makeup among all UH employees has shifted slightly from a decade ago, with an increase in Hawaiian/Part-Hawaiian and Other Asian/Pacific Islander employees.

Table: All Employees by Ethnicity
Fall 1997 Fall 2007
Caucasian 40% 38%
Filipino 5% 5%
Hawaiian/Part-Hawaiian 7% 9%
Chinese 10% 9%
Japanese 29% 27%
Other 6% 7%
Other Asian/Pacific Islander 3% 6%

The share of U H faculty members with Hawaiian/Part-Hawaiian, Filipino, and Other Asian/Pacific Islander ethnicities increased while the largest decrease was in the Caucasian category.

Table: Faculty by Ethnicity
Fall 1997 Fall 2007
Caucasian 59% 54%
Filipino 2% 3%
Hawaiian/Part-Hawaiian 4% 6%
Chinese 9% 9%
Japanese 19% 17%
Other 4% 6%
Other Asian/Pacific Islander 4% 5%
Source: U H Office of Human Resources

Gender
Women comprise slightly more than half of the University’s workforce. A decade ago, that share was slightly less than half. Similarly, the number of women in the faculty ranks increased, representing 45 percent of U H faculty in fall 2007.

U H Manoa’s John A. Burns School of Medicine was ranked first in the U.S. for its percentage of women department chairs in 2007. These departments include cell and molecular biology, psychiatry, medicine, complementary and alternative medicine, geriatric medicine, Native Hawaiian health, and obstetrics.

Percent of U H Women Employees
Fall 1997 Fall 2007
All Employees 48.7% 51.2%
Faculty 39.9% 45.0%
Source: U H Office of Human Resources

> Return to Table of Contents

Investment in the Physical Plant

What is the level of C I P appropriations/authorizations received by U H from the state?

State capital improvements program (C I P) appropriations totaled $322 million in fiscal years 2008 and 2009.

Table: Capital Improvements Program
Appropriation of State Funds ($ Thousand)
MEANS OF
FINANCE
Act 259/
F Y 2002
Act 177/
F Y 2003
Act 200/
F Y 2004
Act 41/
F Y 2005
Act 178/
F Y 2006
Act 160/
F Y 2007
Act 213/
F Y 2008
Act 158/
F Y 2009
General Funds 0 0 0 0 0 42,500 0 12,500
General Obligation
Bond Fund
69,515 84,044 22,804 88,561 128,783 62,988 183,036 126,446
Other 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 219,515 84,044 22,804 88,561 128,783 105,488 183,036 138,946
Note: “Other” means of finance includes $150 M (revenue bonds) from Act 14, Third Special Session of 2001.

What is the level of investment for maintaining the U H physical plant?

During fiscal year 2007–2008, the University conducted its first comprehensive survey of the condition of its facilities. The survey identified a maintenance backlog of $351 million, a figure significantly higher than previously reported. The difference is attributed to a change in methodology in collecting building data, the inclusion of off-campus facilities and non-general funded facilities, and infrastructure that was omitted from prior reports.

Table: Total Repairs and Maintenance Backlog
CAMPUS F Y 2003 F Y 2004 F Y 2005 F Y 2006 F Y 2007 F Y 2008
U H Manoa $52,635,390 $82,902,000 $99,105,500 $100,588,000 $114,159,000 $242,754,000
U H Hilo $22,664,453 $30,090,000 $36,209,500 $23,236,000 $34,576,000 $40,467,000
U H West Oahu $0 $0 $0 $0 $440,000 $0
U H Community
Colleges
$29,622,549 $48,053,876 $39,981,890 $40,830,671 $50,939,000 $68,273,000
Total Unfunded
Deferred R&M
$104,922,392 $161,045,876 $175,296,890 $164,654,671 $200,144,000 $351,494,000
Note: F Y 2008 includes entire U H facility inventory, including on- and off-campus facilities, and facilities that are self-supporting

The University has received significant support from the state in addressing its repairs and maintenance (R&M) needs through the C I P budget.

Table: C I P Appropriations for Repairs and Maintenance
STATE FUNDING F Y 2004 F Y 2005 F Y 2006 F Y 2007 F Y 2008 F Y 2009
Capital Renewal and
Deferred Maintenance
$5,000,000 $30,000,000 $35,000,000 $50,000,000 $32,067,000 $58,511,000

Although the University received sizable support in the C I P budget for R&M, the University projects an average capital renewal requirement of $58.7 million a year for the next six fiscal years. This $58.7 million average, in 2008 dollars, is the minimum required to keep from adding to the University’s maintenance backlog.
Source: U H Office of Capital Improvements

> Return to Table of Contents

Goal 5

Resources and Stewardship

Achieving the goals of the University’s strategic plan depends on the University’s ability to acquire, allocate, and manage public and private revenue streams and exercise exemplary stewardship over these assets. Measures of investment from the state, investment from private sources, environmental initiatives, and measures of accountability in the management of these resources are presented to demonstrate the University’s commitment to manage its resources in service to the state and its citizens.

Investment from the State

What proportion of U H’s revenues come from the state?

About half of the University’s funding comes from state general fund appropriations. The University’s share of federal funds has increased over the past decade, due in large part to the outstanding performance of its research communities.

Table: U H Funding Sources
F Y 1997 F Y 1998 F Y 1999 F Y 2000 F Y 2001 F Y 2002 F Y 2003 F Y 2004 F Y 2005 F Y 2006 F Y 2007
State 49% 45% 45% 44% 52% 55% 51% 49% 50% 52% 52%
Federal 21% 22% 24% 23% 21% 23% 27% 28% 28% 26% 26%
Tuition & Fees 15% 16% 16% 17% 15% 12% 12% 13% 12% 12% 12%
Sales/Services,
Endowments,
and Other
12% 12% 11% 13% 10% 7% 7% 8% 8% 7% 7%
Private and Local 3% 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Note: Percentages may be slightly higher or lower due to rounding.

How does U H expend the resources to support instruction, research, and other activities?

The primary use of funds continues to be in support of instruction and research. The increased expenditure in research is consistent with the increase in external funding received by the University.

Table: U H Funding Uses
F Y 1997 F Y 1998 F Y 1999 F Y 2000 F Y 2001 F Y 2002 F Y 2003 F Y 2004 F Y 2005 F Y 2006 F Y 2007
Instruction 36% 36% 35% 34% 33% 32% 32% 32% 31% 32% 32%
Research 20% 21% 22% 22% 21% 25% 26% 27% 28% 28% 28%
Student Services,
Scholarships,
and Fellowships
7% 7% 8% 8% 8% 8% 8% 8% 8% 8% 8%
Public Service 7% 6% 6% 6% 6% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
Academic and
Institutional Support
18% 16% 15% 16% 17% 17% 17% 16% 15% 15% 15%
Auxiliary,
Independent,
and Operation
& Maintenance
13% 14% 15% 15% 15% 13% 11% 12% 13% 13% 13%
Note: Percentages may be slightly higher or lower due to rounding.

What is the relationship between U H’s share of the state budget and U H enrollment?

U H enrollment increased from approximately 45,000 to a high of 53,526 over the past decade while the share of general funds has remained steady (8–9%). This trend suggests that the University’s reliance on tuition and fee revenues has increased.

Table: U H Enrollment and Share of State General Funds
Enrollment
(Headcount)
Percent Share of
General Funds
F Y 1998–1999 45,337 8.7%
F Y 1999–2000 46,479 9.2%
F Y 2000–2001 44,579 9.2%
F Y 2001–2002 45,994 8.4%
F Y 2002–2003 48,173 8.1%
F Y 2003–2004 50,317 8.4%
F Y 2004–2005 50,569 8.1%
F Y 2005–2006 50,157 8.5%
F Y 2006–2007 49,990 8.1%
F Y 2007–2008 50,454 8.3%
F Y 2008–2009 53,526 8.7%
Note: Enrollment figures are as of the fall semester.
Source: M A P S (Enrollment Data); U H Budget Office (General Funds Data)

> Return to Table of Contents

Investment from Private Sources

What are the trends in private giving through the U H Foundation?

Private giving to the University through the U H Foundation is an increasingly important source of revenue. The University and Foundation are in the final year of a comprehensive Centennial Campaign, which began on July 1, 2002 and ends June 30, 2009, The fundraising goal for the campaign is $250 million. As of October 2008, that goal has been exceeded with funds raised of $251 million. Fundraising efforts will continue through June 30, 2009 with prospects to exceed the goal by 10 percent. In addition to the fundraising goal of $250 million the U H Foundation has a goal of $50 million for bequest intentions during the campaign period. So far $48 million has been identified toward this goal.

In F Y 2006–2007, the University received the largest gift in its history—$25 million for the Shidler College of Business. Results for F Y 2007–2008 include numerous seven figure gifts, suggesting a positive culture of philanthropy is taking hold in the community in support of the University.

Table: University of Hawaii Foundation
Funds Raised by Campaign Year
(in millions)
F Y 2002–2003 F Y 2003–2004 F Y 2004–2005 F Y 2005–2006 F Y 2006–2007 F Y 2007–2008
Funds $22.0 M $25.9 M $34.6 M $35.1 M $63.3 M $54.2 M
Note: Total funds raised as of F Y 2007–2008 is $235.1 M.
Source: U H Foundation

Private gifts come from a wide variety of sources. In F Y 2007–2008, $20.8 million, nearly 40 percent of the total, came from alumni and friends of the University.

Table: University of Hawaii Foundation
Gifts by Source, F Y 2007–2008
(in millions)
Foundations
& Trusts
Friends Alumni Corporations Organizations Total Gifts
Gifts $21.1 M $13.4 M $7.4 M $7.3 M $5.0 M $54.2 M
Percent 39% 25% 14% 13% 9%

Private support helps the University in a variety of ways. In F Y 2007–2008, $13.9 million was raised to provide support for students. Click here for more detail on student scholarships raised.

Table: University of Hawaii Foundation
Gifts by Purpose, F Y 2007–2008
(in millions)
Academic Support Research Student Aid Special Programs Other Total Gifts
Gifts $18.7 M $11.2 M $13.9 M $6.1 M $4.3 M $54.2 M
Percent 34% 21% 26% 11% 8%
Source: U H Foundation

What is the status of the University’s endowment?

The endowment grew modestly in fiscal year 2008. The total investment return was -1.7%. This return was offset by new donations to the endowment.

Table: University of Hawaii Foundation
Investment Portfolio
(Market Value)
(in millions)
Market Value
F Y 1997–1998 $86.5 M
F Y 1998–1999 $94.4 M
F Y 1999–2000 $112.2 M
F Y 2000–2001 $106.9 M
F Y 2001–2002 $94.7 M
F Y 2002–2003 $96.5 M
F Y 2003–2004 $115.8 M
F Y 2004–2005 $128.2 M
F Y 2005–2006 $142.9 M
F Y 2006–2007 $178.1 M
F Y 2007–2008 $181.4 M
Source: U H Foundation

The University holds a second endowment from private and institutional donors which, invested separately, had a market value of $70.0 million in F Y 2006–2007.

Table: University of Hawaii
Net Assets/Endowment Fund Balance
(Market Value)
(in millions)
Market Value
F Y 1996–1997 $49.7 M
F Y 1997–1998 $62.0 M
F Y 1998–1999 $68.3 M
F Y 1999–2000 $75.8 M
F Y 2000–2001 $65.5 M
F Y 2001–2002 $57.7 M
F Y 2002–2003 $55.8 M
F Y 2003–2004 $61.1 M
F Y 2004–2005 $61.3 M
F Y 2005–2006 $64.4 M
F Y 2006–2007 $70.0 M
Source: U H General Accounting and Loan Collection Office

> Return to Table of Contents

Environmental Initiatives

What measures has the University taken in the area of sustainability?

U H System
The eWaste Disposal Days 2008 recycling program successfully topped its 2006 electronics recycling numbers with the collection of 1.5 million pounds of eWaste. This amount represents 75 shipping containers of broken and obsolete electronic equipment that will not go into Hawaii’s landfills, but will be responsibly recycled and disposed of. Containers collected per island: Oahu 65.25, Big Island 6.25, Maui 3.00, and Kauai 0.50.

U H has reduced printing of routine administrative reports by about 75 percent with an online system that enables viewing anywhere and anytime via the Internet.

U H Manoa
As one of the state’s largest consumers of energy and water, U H Manoa is committed to transforming its campus into one that is more sustainable, and providing first-class educational opportunities to students who want to graduate with the knowledge and skills to effect positive environmental change. Since the 2006 Chancellor’s Energy Summit established a benchmark of energy use across the campus, numerous activities and projects that promise to yield long-term benefits to the environment and the university community have begun.

Educational Curriculum

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Student Involvement in Campus Sustainability Efforts

Construction and Renovation Projects

Alternative Transportation

Recycling and Composting Programs

Other Sustainability Initiatives in Administration or Policy Development

U H Hilo
The campus’s Student Life Center may become the Big Island’s first building to earn a L E E D Gold rating. Currently, the only L E E D rated buildings on the island are the Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawaii (Certified) and the Hawaii Gateway Energy Center at the Natural Energy Laboratory of Hawaii Authority (Platinum). The Student Life Center employs natural elements to reduce energy use and its landscaping will utilize native or adapted species which require no irrigation. The project has recycled 17 tons of scrap drywall into usable products.

U H West Oahu
Design plans for phase I of U H West Oahu’s new campus in Kapolei involve developing a sustainable, state-of the art campus with a complementary mix of residential, commercial, retail, and mixed-use facilities to create a well-planned community to support the long term growth of the campus. Through the incorporation of sustainable features, the focus will be on creating a healthy, energy efficient, and environmentally sound campus.

U H Community Colleges
“Going Green” was the theme of the 18th Annual Leeward Community College Family Fun Fair on November 15, 2008. The fair featured an array of informational exhibits and practical activities dealing with sustainability and environmental responsibility, including drive-through recycling, a new car show featuring energy efficient models, and a local food market offering organic produce and locally baked goods.

Maui Community College is the 2008 winner of the Bellwether Award in the category of Workforce Development. This award recognizes the nation’s best and most innovative educational programs and practices in community colleges throughout the U.S. The campus was recognized for its groundbreaking practices in sustainability and in meeting present and future workforce and institutional development needs. Its presentation, entitled “Sink or S L I M: A Model to Promote Sustainable Change Through Education, Partnerships, and Workforce Development,” highlights the campus’s numerous initiatives and partnerships that promote sustainability on the campus and in the community while preparing students for living wage careers.

Efforts include creating the Sustainable Living Institute of Maui (S L I M), which promotes sustainability initiatives on campus and in the community, providing funds for student internships, securing a 250 kW windmill so students will have access to the latest in energy technology, implementing campus-wide recycling programs, hosting a community Water Resources Forum and an international Islands of the World Conference, and creating strong public and private partnerships that support the college’s educational efforts. An example of a successful partnership is Maui Community College’s Rural Development Project, which has trained over 21,000 residents in rural Hawaii since 1997 and generated over $83.7 million since 1990 to benefit workforces in Maui County and rural Hawaii. The campus continues to work toward overcoming challenges faced by the community, such as the high cost of energy, housing, and fuel, workforce shortages, and providing living wage careers in a service-based economy. Maui Community College’s presentation will be published in the Community College Journal of Research and Practice and will serve as a model for other community colleges across the nation.

Since 2004, Windward Community College’s Department of Natural Sciences Pacific Center for Environmental Studies (PaCES) has offered an intensive summer program on education and research in environmental science to high school juniors and seniors. Students participate in an integrated mix of conventional lectures, hands-on laboratory exercises, outdoor field exercises, field trips, research projects, and stewardship activities. The program broadens their understanding of watersheds and coral reef ecosystems, introduces them to pioneering scientific research and adds to their knowledge of current scientific methodology and research techniques. The program is a partnership between PaCES and U H Manoa’s Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology situated on Coconut Island in Kaneohe Bay.

> Return to Table of Contents

Accountability

How does the University demonstrate its accountability to the public?

Accountability
This document, Measuring Our Progress, responds to Act 161 of the 1995 Legislature to provide benchmarks and performance indicators that reflect the systematic assessment of U H programs and services. This 2008 update is intended to demonstrate to the public the University’s progress in meeting the goals set forth in the University of Hawaii System Strategic Plan: Entering the University’s Second Century 2002–2010. Each campus demonstrates its accountability through accreditation, program review, and institutional assessment activities.

In addition, the University reviewed its system strategic plan in 2008 and developed ten specific and measurable outcomes. These outcomes focus the University’s priorities on meeting the higher education needs of the state of Hawaii through 2015.

Accreditation
Regional Accreditation
All ten campuses of the University of Hawaii are separately and regionally accredited by the Western Association of Schools and Colleges (W A S C). Regional accreditation means that, as the result of an external review process, the University is judged to be fulfilling its stated purposes and can be expected to continue to do so. Students and the public can be assured that University of Hawaii campuses have met standards of quality across the entire range of institutional activities.

Table: University of Hawaii Status of Accreditation
Campus Accrediting Body Status
U H Manoa W A S C-Senior Commission Accreditation reaffirmed, 2003 for seven years. Capacity and preparatory review, spring 2009. Educational effectiveness review, spring 2011.
U H Hilo W A S C-Senior Commission Accreditation reaffirmed, 2004 for ten years. Special visit, fall 2009. Capacity and preparatory review, spring 2013. Educational effectiveness review, fall 2015.
U H West Oahu W A S C-Senior Commission Accreditation reaffirmed, 2005 for seven years. Capacity and preparatory review, fall 2011. Institutional effectiveness review, spring 2013.
 Hawaii CC W A S C - A C C J C Commission Each college is separately accredited. Accreditation reaffirmed for all colleges, 2007 for six years—the maximum allowed by ACCJC policy. Comprehensive visits to all seven campuses, fall 2012.
 Honolulu CC W A S C - A C C J C Commission
 Kapiolani CC W A S C - A C C J C Commission
 Kauai CC W A S C - A C C J C Commission
 Leeward CC W A S C - A C C J C Commission
 Maui CC W A S C - A C C J C Commission
 Windward CC W A S C - A C C J C Commission

Each U H community college, as well as the Office of the Vice President for Community Colleges, prepared for the regular professional peer review that is part of the accreditation process for an institution. Campuses conducted rigorous self-appraisals in terms of the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges (A C C J C) Standards. Self-appraisal requires a conscious and self-reflective analysis of strengths and weaknesses and an examination of every aspect of institutional function against Commission Standards. The ultimate goal of accreditation is to help an institution improve attainment of its own mission—improving student learning and student achievement. The results of the appraisal, the institutional Self Study 2006, are posted on each college’s website.

The U H community colleges received a positive report from the Accrediting Commission of Community and Junior Colleges (A C C J C) after a team visited the colleges in fall 2007. According to the report, U H has improved its participatory, data-driven structure and enhanced the effectiveness of its community college organization.

Professional Accreditation
More than 50 University of Hawaii academic programs hold separate professional accreditation. These programs have been subjected to rigorous external reviews that ensure high standards of professional practice. As a result, the U H credentials conferred convey a special merit of quality within these specialized fields of study.

U H Manoa. U H Manoa has 25 professionally accredited programs which are reviewed every five to ten years. Among the accredited programs are law, medicine, nursing, architecture, accounting, business, travel industry management, social work, engineering, biosystems engineering, ocean engineering, journalism, chemistry, dental hygiene, dietetics, library and information studies, clinical psychology, audiology, speech-language pathology, education, special education, rehabilitation counseling, medical technology, music, public health and epidemiology, and urban and regional planning. In addition, the Counseling and Student Development Center, the U H Manoa Children’s Center, and U H Manoa’s University Health Services are professionally accredited.

U H Hilo. The nursing, business, and education programs at U H Hilo are separately accredited. The pharmacy program was admitted to candidacy status in fall 2007.

U H Community Colleges. Twenty-five community college programs hold separate accreditation, including: a variety of culinary and nursing programs at multiple campuses; aeronautics maintenance; architectural engineering and C A D technology; auto body repair and painting; automotive maintenance; children’s center programs; commercial aviation; computers, electronics, and networking technology; cosmetology; dental assistant; hospitality; human services/substance abuse counseling; information and computer science; intensive English; medical assistant; medical lab technician; motorcycle safety; occupational therapy; paralegal; phlebotomy; physical therapy; radiologic technology; respiratory care; surgical technology.

Academic Program Actions and Centers
The heart of the University is its instructional programs. Campuses routinely review established academic programs, assess the need for new programs, make major modifications of curriculum, and update the names of departments and degrees.

During A Y 2007–2008, the Board of Regents

The UH administration

In all, 214 academic programs underwent review in this past academic year.

In accordance with Board of Regents policy, instruction, research, and public services centers are reported on annually. During A Y 2006–2007, the University administration approved three new centers and closed six centers. As of June 2007, the University of Hawaii housed 95 centers.

Institutional Assessment and Research
U H Manoa. U H Manoa’s assessment of student learning outcomes addresses W A S C accreditation standards and U H Manoa’s mission as a research university. Assessment is conducted by faculty and academic leaders in individual programs as a scholarly endeavor informed by data, comparative information with peer institutions, and other evidences of educational performance.

All U H Manoa departments are engaged in the regular assessment of their programs. Capstone programs/courses, internships, theses, design projects, and other culminating course-based experiences are commonly used to assess student performance and learning. Assessment of U H Manoa’s general education program is led by U H Manoa’s General Education Committee and newly hired assessment specialists. Departmental assessment efforts are posted at www.manoa.hawaii.edu/assessment/.

U H Hilo. The U H Hilo Office of Institutional Research responds to priorities identified by the Faculty Congress General Education & Assessment Support Committees and routinely engages in institutional effectiveness and learning outcomes assessment efforts through: a) administering student, alumni, and community surveys; b) developing specialized studies and analyses to evaluate and enhance academic programs and student learning/developmental outcomes; and c) supporting campus goals through dissemination and discussion of findings.

U H West Oahu. The Office of Assessment & Institutional Research maintains institutional data; tracks graduation/retention rates; conducts surveys, course evaluations, and pre- and post-testing; and develops ad hoc reports for special projects.

In 2005 and 2006, the Director of Assessment completed a series of Collaborative Assessment Project (C A P) workshops to assist faculty in developing measurable learning outcomes and assessment tools. In 2007 and 2008, the campus held retreats and workshops on student learning and assessment for faculty and staff in preparation for accreditation reviews and to ensure educational effectiveness.

U H Community Colleges. Ongoing leadership and support of institutional effectiveness comes from the Office of the Vice President for Community Colleges and the Council of Community College Chancellors. Programs and activities that provide data to support assessment for institutional effectiveness include the community colleges’ Comprehensive Program Reviews, annual reviews of program data, annual Program Health Indicator reports, U H Community Colleges Fact Book, participation in the national Community College Survey of Student Engagement (C C S S E) as individual colleges and as a consortium, Strategic Planning Key Performance Indicators, and the analysis of the current course placement process and placement testing procedures.

> Return to Table of Contents

Distinctions and Achievements

Honolulu Community College received a Norman Loui Estate Gift of over $3 million which will be used for student financial support. It is the largest single donation awarded to a U H community college.
Honolulu Community College

U H Manoa’s College of Education received the United States Distance Learning Association’s 21st Century Award for Best Practices in Distance Learning.
U H Manoa

U H West Oahu professors will co-produce “Primal Quest,” a high-definition, full-length feature film sequel to “The Great Dance: A Hunter’s Story,” a groundbreaking documentary heralded for its epic portrayal of the rare “running hunt” of the Kalahari San Bushman. “Primal Quest” is being prepared for worldwide cinema and television release as part of a larger educational package which includes a scholarly book and website articulated with courses at a variety of university campuses.
U H West Oahu

The Imiloa Astronomy Center of Hawaii received a $670,000 grant from the Moore Foundation to assist in its goal of having every Big Island student visit its facility over the next two years. More than 8,000 elementary school students from the Big Island, neighbor islands, the U.S. mainland, Saipan, Okinawa, and Japan visited the Center in A Y 2007–2008.
U H Hilo

The Shidler College of Business awarded 211 scholarships totaling over $735,000 for A Y 2008–2009, an increase of more than 26 percent from the previous academic year.
U H Manoa

Hawaii Community College ranked 16th out of 30 among “America’s Best Community Colleges” which indicated smaller “two-year institutions actually offer more rigorous and successful teaching than many four-year universities ranked in the U.S.’s top tier.”
The Washington Monthly

The American Scholastic Press Association, which serves over 2,000 schools, honored Windward Community College’s literary and art journal, Rain Bird, with a first place award in their annual magazine competition.
Windward Community College

A professor and former interim dean of the U H School of Travel Industry Management was elected as the first woman president of the International Academy for the Study of Tourism, which she will lead for the next two years.
U H Manoa

A former chancellor and her two sisters established a scholarship fund to benefit students in financial need at Kauai Community College. Preference will be given to single parents and first generation college students.
Kauai Community College

A John A. Burns School of Medicine second year student was one of only 12 medical students in the country named a 2008 Minority Scholars Award recipient by the American Medical Association Foundation. He is the first student of Native Hawaiian heritage to win the scholarship.
U H Manoa

Kapiolani Community College was selected by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching as one of 14 colleges and universities nationally to assist in the development of a new elective classification of community engagement.
Kapiolani Community College

Leeward Community College was recognized as the “Most Productive Site—Tax Season 2008” by the Lieutenant Governor. Leeward and U H West Oahu students completed over 400 tax returns for low-income families during the January to April tax season.
Leeward Community College

William S. Richardson law students earned top honors at national competitions. The Native American Moot Court Teams brought home four awards and the Environmental Law Moot Court Team won third place overall.
U H Manoa

A team of U H Hilo student delegates received the Distinguished Delegation award at the 2008 National Model United Nations competition in New York City. The team placed in the top ten percent among 290 universities. This was the third consecutive year a U H Hilo team won an award at this international competition.
U H Hilo

A U H Manoa scientist has been reappointed to serve on the Space Studies Board of the National Academy of Sciences until 2010. He is one of 23 members chosen from across the United States that currently serve on the Space Studies Board.
U H Manoa

Windward Community College’s Atelier is the only workshop of its kind in Hawaii and one of the few atelier experiences in the United States where students train intensively for six weeks in the classical drawing and painting techniques of great European masters.
Windward Community College

Real estate entrepreneur Jay Shidler donated an additional gift of over $1 million (in addition to his original gift of $25 million) for ongoing renovations at the Shidler College of Business.
U H Manoa

The 2008 edition of Who’s Who Among Students in American Universities and Colleges includes the names of 50 U H Hilo students who have been selected as national outstanding campus leaders.
U H Hilo

U H Manoa’s law, education, social work, and library and information science graduate programs are ranked among the nation’s best in the 2009 edition of America’s Best Graduate Schools.
U.S. News and World Report

Maui Community College awarded its first bachelor’s degrees in Applied Business and Information Technology during its spring 2007 commencement ceremony.
Maui Community College

A U H Manoa assistant professor of physics received a highly competitive U.S. Department of Energy Advanced Detector Research Award for the second time. He was one of three recipients nationwide.
U H Manoa

In 2007, Honolulu Community College’s architectural engineering and C A D students won first place in the Pacific International Space Center for Exploration Systems (P I S C E S) competition held to design a lunar habitat. P I S C E S was a collaborative project of the Japan-U.S. Science, Technology & Space Applications Program, the Hawaii State Department of Business, Economic Development & Tourism, and U H Hilo.
Honolulu Community College

U H faculty continue to receive top honors in a variety of fields, including:

U H Manoa

Ka Ohana, Windward Community College’s student newspaper, received its 12th first-place national honor award from the American Scholastic Press Association in 2007.
Windward Community College

A U H Hilo marine science major was awarded a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Hollings Scholarship. Each year, approximately 100 two-year scholarships are awarded to eligible college sophomores.
U H Hilo

According to Princeton Review’s 2006 Best Law School rankings, the William S. Richardson School of Law ranks second for Best Environment for Minority Students and fifth for Most Diverse Faculty.
The Princeton Review

A $5 million Clarence T. C. Ching Foundation donation will assist in transforming Cooke Field, U H Manoa’s only on-campus, all-purpose track and field, football, soccer, and recreational facility, into a center of student activity.
U H Manoa

U H Hilo computer science teams took first and second place honors in the 2007 Association for Computing Machinery International Collegiate Programming Contest. Teams must combine technical programming skills with mathematical abilities to find solutions to difficult programming problems.
U H Hilo

The U H Manoa football program received a $2.195 million gift from James Bolte to support its facilities and to provide student scholarships for members of the team.
U H Manoa

A Hawaii Community College student was the only community college student in the computer science category to receive an award at the national Society for Advancement of Chicanos and Native Americans in Science conference.
Hawaii Community College

Honolulu Community College offered its first courses in music business in fall 2007. The new program, Music and Entertainment Learning Experience, offered two introductory courses in the History of the Recording Business and Survey of Music Business.
Honolulu Community College

The School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology and College of Engineering have established the Hawaii Space Flight Laboratory. The first launch of a small satellite into Earth’s orbit from Kauai is slated for fall 2009.
U H Manoa

> Return to Table of Contents

Acknowledgements

The University of Hawaii Council of Chief Academic Officers (C C A O) provided overall direction for this project. The 2008–2009 Chief Academic Officers are:

Peter Quigley, U H Manoa
Philip Castille, U H Hilo
Linda Randall, U H West Oahu
Doug Dykstra, Hawaii Community College
Erika Lacro, Honolulu Community College
Charles Ramsey, Kauai Community College
Louise Pagotto, Kapiolani Community College
Mike Pecsok, Leeward Community College
Suzette Robinson, Maui Community College
Richard Fulton, Windward Community College

This report was prepared under the guidance of the Vice President for Academic Planning and Policy. Sandra Furuto of the Office of Academic Planning and Policy and members of her staff—Stephan Doi, Chatney Graham, and Laurie Tomooka—took lead responsibility for the document preparation. Sharyn Nakamoto and the Institutional Research staff provided management data and analyses. The following campus/system representatives provided data and analyses and worked collaboratively with us in shaping this report: Tim Merrill, U H Manoa; Brendan Hennessey, U H Hilo; Elaine Lee, U H West Oahu; Cheryl Chappell-Long and Sam Prather, U H Vice President for Community Colleges. Numerous other individuals from campus and system offices also provided data and assistance. The Office of Creative Services provided campus photos. Cover photograph by James Goodman, Leeward Community College, of mosaic by Debra Koonohiokala Gregory. We extend our appreciation to all contributors and advisers.

Linda K. Johnsrud
Vice President for Academic Planning and Policy

> End of Document Return to Table of Contents