Federated States of Micronesia
Economic Environment
For the past two decades, the economy of the Federated States
of Micronesia has been driven largely by grants from the US
government.
Under the first phase of the Compact of Free Association
which ended last year, FSM has received most of the more than
$1
billion from the US since 1986, with smaller grants in
each succeeding five-year increment.
Since 1986, FSM has grown at an average annual rate of 2.3 %.
This modest growth rate has provided an acceptable increase in
GDP, as direct payments from the US has declined. By 1998, after
two incremental reductions in Compact funding, the government’s
contribution to the economy had fallen by an annual average of
0.6 percent. However, this reduction was compensated by an increase
in private sector activity, which grew by an annual average rate
of 2.8 percent. [top]
The emergence of FSM as a new nation in 1986 created many opportunities
for expansion in the private sector. However, private sector
growth peaked by the mid-1990’s, and the phased reduction
in US funding has dominated FSM’s economic performance.
Economic activity slumped between 1994 and 1999, when growth
was positive in only two of those years. Between 1995 and 1998,
while the government’s contribution to the GDP fell by
7 percent annually, private activity also fell by 5 percent.[top]
Compact and grant funds account for approximately two-thirds
of the government budget in FSM. The government has responded
by increasing some taxes and reducing work hours and some government
programs. However, FSM continues to depend on outside funding.
Government leaders are reluctant to lay off large numbers of
workers, who are equally reluctant to leave their jobs, which
pay more and have more status and job security than private sector
jobs. Nevertheless, the FSM national government, with a loan
from the Asian Development Bank, implemented an early retirement
program to reduce the number of government workers. At the same
time, all of the states in the FSM are looking at ways to privatize
as many government functions as possible.[top]
However, the private sector economy in the FSM is currently
too small to absorb government workers losing their jobs, as
unemployment in the FSM is estimated to be 27 percent. Private
employers in the FSM pay substantially less than the government
and offer few opportunities for trained workers with specialized
skills. Unless the private sector expands rapidly and substantially,
FSM standard of living will decline and emigration will increase.[top]
Opportunities for growth in the private sector exist, but the
barriers that constrain this growth are significant. Some of
these barriers include:
•
The FSM is remote. It is expensive to get there, and expensive
to ship goods to and from FSM destinations.
•
The local market is dispersed over thousands of square miles
of ocean, which makes it an expensive market to serve.
•
The local market is small. There are no economies of scale to
balance the high cost of serving a limited market.
•
The basic infrastructure is often either inadequate or unreliable,
due to inconsistent maintenance. Coping with an inadequate infrastructure
adds to the cost of doing business.
•
Land tenure laws and foreign investment regulations are costly,
time consuming and may discourage investors.
•
Finally, and probably most important, entrepreneurship, the driving
force behind economic development in a capitalist economy, is
a relatively foreign concept in the FSM.
Despite these barriers, opportunities exist for growth in tourism,
fishing and agriculture.
Tourism: All of the FSM states have unique characteristics that
make each a potentially world-class tourist destination. However,
FSM's distance from the large tourist markets in the U.S., Europe
and Asia makes it more difficult and expensive to visit than
other Pacific destinations. Also, FSM destinations do not provide
extensive resort accommodations and shopping and sightseeing
opportunities tourists find elsewhere in the Pacific.
The FSM, however, does offer the dive tourist opportunities unmatched
anywhere else in the world. FSM can also be marketed as a sport-fishing
destination, with the abundance of tuna, mahimahi, wahoo and
giant trevally in its waters. The lack of development in the
FSM also presents opportunities in the rapidly growing ecotourism
market.[top]
While there is currently an overabundance of hotel rooms, FSM
lacks a focused, effective marketing effort. State and national
marketing programs to support tourism are limited and inadequate.
Almost all of the marketing costs that go with developing a remote-site
destination must be borne by the developer. [top]
Fishing & Aquaculture: The FSM is located in the world’s
largest tuna fishing grounds. Yellow fin and bigeye tuna command
high prices in the Japanese fresh fish market. Demand is also
rising for frozen tuna loins in the U.S. and European markets.
The national and the state governments have all made substantial
investments in infrastructure and processing facilities to capitalize
on this rich resource. To date, however, neither the national
government nor any of the states has seen a positive return on
its investment.[top]
Open ocean fishing is expensive, requiring a fleet of well-equipped
boats and experienced fishermen. Both are lacking in the FSM.
The distance between the FSM and the major tuna markets also
increases the cost and risk. As a recent National Fisheries Policy
Study points out, FSM laws and regulations burden foreign fleets
with additional costs and risks, leading them to fish in less
productive but less costly areas. Thus, much of the facilities
FSM has built for tuna processing and shipping is idle.[top]
In contrast with commercial tuna fishing, aquaculture requires
much smaller capital investment and less public infrastructure.
Good markets exist for several high-end aquaculture products
that can be grown in the clean, protected waters that encircle
many FSM islands. For example, a sponge farm can be set up for
very little money. The farmer can sell a sponge for about two
dollars in a market where the demand for natural sponge far exceeds
the supply. Sponges are very light and compact and can be shipped
by surface carrier. Hard and soft corals, as well as giant clams,
can also be grown in the FSM. Surveys must be done to determine
what can be grown and where. However, instead of being sponsored
by the government, aquaculture projects should be encouraged
in the private sector, supported by business plans and commercial
loans.[top]
Agriculture: While FSM’s climate is well suited for year-round
agriculture, farmland is in short supply, because of the FSM's
mountainous terrain. Some export crops, such as copra, pepper
and limes, have been raised in sufficient quantity, but all have
struggled for a variety of reasons. Copra production in the FSM
never recovered from the drop in the world prices for copra in
the 1980’s. Attempts to manufacture and market high-end,
specialty coconut oil soap have failed due to inconsistent production
and marketing. A very successful high-end pepper product failed,
when the government intervened on behalf of disgruntled pepper
growers who wanted processors to buy all of their harvest, instead
of only the best pepper. A government-financed and operated pepper
processing plant competed with the private sector pepper manufacturer,
leading to the collapse of that industry. Attempts to export
lime export also failed, due to inconsistent airfreight service.
|