STATUS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
AT THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII
What follows is a straightforward assessment of the University's current
internal capacity in key areas of information technology. Such an
assessment is an essential component of any strategic plan. There are
many successes described in this assessment. These successes have tended
to be the acquisition of hardware however, and the hardware has seldom
been adequately supported to allow delivery of the excellent services
that the technology makes possible. These successes have often been the
result of outstanding leadership and hard work by individual members of
the University community. This is a healthy and desirable sign of
innovation within the University community, but the lack of support of
proven successes does not permit them to permeate the institution to
distribute the benefits. In some cases these initiatives are now
precariously balanced between long-term success and failure because of
inadequate ongoing support. The University must have a solid plan for
moving forward in the critical area of information technology. The frank
assessment that follows is the foundation on which the University can
build strategic objectives and priority actions. The specific objectives
and actions are contained in the last section of this plan.
Information technology at the University of Hawaii can be characterized
as lacking adequate infrastructure: organization, space, personnel,
ongoing maintenance, and support.
Organization, Policy, and Planning
The information technology organization at the University of Hawaii can
be characterized as highly fragmented (see following figure). There is
no senior executive other than the President with responsibility for
even the majority of the key information technology support units.
Several organizational initiatives during 1990 have improved
communication and cooperation among the support units and the user
communities, but there is much progress still to be made. There are two
major problems with the current organization: (1) lack of operational
integration and management of intimately related technologies; and (2)
lack of strong and effective executive leadership regarding information
technology.
The lack of operational integration is a barrier toward making the best
use of scarce existing resources. This has particularly been the case in
the areas of telecommunications, administrative computing, and user
support services, in which multiple units have fragmented and
overlapping responsibilities. For example, three separate offices are
actively involved in planning use of and paying for the new Manoa
telecommunications system. One additional office assists with data
wiring as necessary; thus there are three separate technical/wiring
staffs in addition to the contracted service provider. Different
systemwide networking technologies and protocols have evolved for
administrative and academic computing, and only now are being brought
together. Each systemwide administrative application relies on three
completely different organizations for effective operation. An
application area executive provides leadership and determines the
required functionality of each application. The Management Systems
Office performs software maintenance, programming, and technical support
of the application. And the Computing Center is responsible for
providing the underlying central hardware and for operating the
application. Two systemwide organizations, in addition to various
college and campus support groups, assist units in the development of
departmental computing and networking and do not always give the same
advice. And many other critical services such as hot-line support,
product evaluation, user training, and information dissemination are
duplicated, yet in each unit they are understaffed. End-users pay the
real price of this fragmentation, since it is difficult for them to know
who to rely on for what kind of services; in areas of overlapping
responsibility they may get different answers to the same questions or
requests depending on whom they call, and they may need to make multiple
contacts to assure the success of a particular project. Users are also
subject to independent procedures established by each unit in their
specific areas of responsibility.
With the key technology support units reporting to different executives,
each of whom has major responsibilities besides information technology,
there has been no executive-level advocacy for the whole area. This lack
has inhibited effective resource acquisition, particularly for basic
infrastructure needs. There is no executive other than the President
with responsibility or authority to advocate for or prioritize the
institution's overall information technology requirements.
The University's overall executive organization has continued to evolve
and change regularly to improve its ability to fulfill its mission. But
even in the face of technological evolution and convergence, the
organizational structures for information technology have remained
largely unchanged for the last 20 years, and they are no longer serving
the University well.
The University of Hawaii has almost no body of policy that addresses
important issues in technology today such as network usage, privacy of
information, ethical use of data and computing, free expression and
censorship, copyright issues, software piracy. Nor is there coherent
policy regarding general computing and information resource management.
Some campuses have computing plans and some have telecommunications
plans. In 1990 the Management Systems Office prepared VIM, a master plan
for administrative computing, however a lack of funding and space has
prevented them from moving forward with the plan. There is no current
systemwide academic computing plan. Only recently has there been major
activity in integrated telecommunications planning systemwide with a new
executive policy on telecommunications management, an external needs
assessment contracted by the Vice President for Finance and Operations,
and an internal plan for utilization of the State's microwave backbone.
There have been several ad-hoc reports done in the middle and late
1980s. However, the University's key action-oriented planning document,
the 1985-95 "A Strategy for Academic Quality," has not been updated
with respect to information technology since it was written in 1984.
This Strategic Plan for Information Technology provides that needed
update.
Telecommunications
It is in this area that the University's plans have been most ambitious,
its successes most dramatic, but where its future is most precarious.
- Intercampus Data Network
This year the University expects to make the most dramatic expansion of
its intercampus data network since the original voice-grade circuits
brought connectivity between campuses in the 1970s. Leveraging a number
of State initiatives, the University will have high-speed data
connectivity among the Community Colleges for the first time. However,
the funding for this initiative is largely through a special one-time
legislative appropriation for public access and there will be greater
need for network support at both the campus and system levels.
- Data Network Services
Electronic mail is the most widely utilized network service. At the
University of Hawaii, as at many other institutions, it has transformed
the way many people work, study, and do research. The electronic mail
systems currently in use, however, are not all well connected with all
the important external networks. Further, while nearly all faculty and
staff have access to electronic mail, student access is often limited.
The situation with computer conferencing (electronic bulletin boards) is
even less developed than electronic mail. There is relatively limited
systemwide coherence and connectivity, and less access for students than
faculty/staff. There are few systemwide networked administrative
services generally available, and no specific plans for advanced
applications such as forms processing or electronic data interchange
(EDI).
- Library Networks
Library networks in support of teaching and research are rapidly
developing at the local, national, and international levels. With the
implementation of the UHCARL library information system in January 1991,
the University of Hawaii community has access to the bibliographic and
limited text databases of libraries in some 80 institutions. With the
expansion of access through the Internet, the holdings and services of
the University of Hawaii are accessible from Australia, New Zealand,
Japan, Korea, and North America. And with the reemergence of PEACESAT,
Pacific island territories and nations will also have access.
Increasingly, the capabilities of these networks will be utilized for
the exchange of digitized and/or facsimile images and database services
in support of distance education, local instruction, research, and
service to the community.
- External Data Network
The PACCOM project, based in the Information and Computer Science
Department at Manoa, has made Hawaii the hub of high-speed academic data
networking in the Pacific Basin and has linked the State's huge
scientific resources and research community with the world. The federal
funds for this project have helped provide the data link to the U.S.
mainland which is widely used by faculty in all disciplines for
communications with their colleagues worldwide and is increasingly used
to link students with their peers in other places. However, the
University's share of this mainland link (currently about 50%) is
partially collected through an ad-hoc plea to users for contributions.
The high-speed data link to the mainland can no longer be considered a
research project; the management and support of this link must be
provided for, organizationally and fiscally, as part of the cost of
being a major university in the 1990s.
- Voice Systems
UH-Manoa is just completing a major telecommunications upgrade that
provides new and advanced voice services as well as data and video
capability throughout the Manoa campus. While the physical
infrastructure provided is superb, the campus capability to manage,
fund, and support the use of the facilities is marginal at best. With
three different organizations managing the voice, data, and video
networks; with as yet undetermined levels of user fees to subsidize the
cost of the system; and with no new staff added to install new
connections, maintain the system, or support users, the University will
be unable to make the best use of the investment already made in the
system itself.
Honolulu, Kapiolani, and Leeward Community Colleges already have the
same type of telephone system as UH-Manoa, and both Maui and Kauai
Community Colleges are desperately in need of and are now procuring new
telephone systems. The University has the real opportunity to build a
systemwide voice network that allows such features as toll-free calling
between campuses, toll-free calls to student and public services offices
on any island by members of the community on any other island, voice-
mail, 5-digit extension dialing among campuses, and integrated
voice/data applications and services. Furthermore, it is most cost-
effective to provide for data and video telecommunications requirements
during the construction and installation of new voice systems.
Continuing systemwide leadership, support, and additional funding are
required to help bring the telecommunications infrastructure of every
campus up to the level of the more advanced campuses. And additional
support personnel are needed both at the campus and system levels to
encourage and facilitate the use of these systems.
- Video Networks
Maui Community College pioneered the use of interactive video within the
University by building the Skybridge system to bring higher education to
the isolated populations of Molokai, Lanai, and Hana. As a 2-way, full-
motion video system, Skybridge set a high standard for interactive
distance education. However, Skybridge is limited by its single channel
capacity, and funding is required to upgrade the system to bring more
educational offerings to the remote residents it serves.
The Hawaii Interactive Television System (HITS) is an interisland
television system managed by the Hawaii Public Broadcast Authority
(HPBA, which operates Hawaii Public Television). After less than a full
year of operation to all islands, HITS is already bringing high-demand
instructional programs to the neighbor islands. Programs and courses are
being offered in Nursing, Educational Administration, Counseling and
Guidance, Public Health, Library and Information Science, and Allied
Health. HITS also brings instruction from UH-Hilo to West Hawaii and
helps provide a wide range of teleconferences, seminars, workshops and
non-credit programs to campuses and communities throughout the state.
HITS is currently limited to 4 channels and has limited capability for 2-
way video interaction. Furthermore, HITS was built to serve needs of the
Department of Education and other state agencies as well as the
University, and HPBA actively markets the system to those agencies. Yet
the biggest problem with the systematic use of HITS for distance
education in the University is not these technical and capacity
limitations, but the lack of an adequate support infrastructure. Only
limited support has been available for development of distance education
classrooms on most campuses. No new permanent staff positions were
allocated to operate the new distance education classrooms, for advising
and counseling, for remote registration, for extended campus and library
hours, or for access to library materials required to support the new
programs and courses. Whatever success has been enjoyed has been at the
expense of other critical instructional support activities on each
campus. Continued successful expansion to meet state needs in the face
of these problems is questionable.
The Language Telecommunications, Resource and Learning Center at Manoa
is developing a Ku-band satellite uplink facility, but there is
currently no C-band satellite uplink within the University or State
Government that can provide the capability to deliver instruction or
training to the Pacific Basin or U.S. mainland.
- PEACESAT
For more than 20 years the University's PEACESAT program has provided
medical and environmental emergency support as well as distance
education throughout the Pacific Rim and Basin. Over the last three
years the Federal Government has invested $2.7 million through the
University of Hawaii for the expansion and reemergence of the program
using newer technology. This will allow improved voice and data
capability for the provision of distance education, connection to the
University of Hawaii network for access to library systems and the
Internet, and other services for developing countries in the Pacific.
Although the network headquarters have always been at the University of
Hawaii, the University of Hawaii has not actively provided credit
courses to the Pacific over PEACESAT. A lack of programmatic leadership
from the University and the lack of adequate funding for ongoing
operation of the University's PEACESAT office, if not remedied, may
result in the relocation of the project headquarters to another Pacific
institution.
Space and Facilities
The two major systemwide computing support units, the Computing Center
and Management Systems Office, are located on the Manoa campus and are
completely out of space for machines, public computer labs, user service
areas, training facilities, staff offices, training rooms, work
laboratories, or anything else. They are at opposite ends of campus,
both located in facilities built for other purposes and converted to
their current uses as well as possible within the building constraints.
They operate and staff three separate machine rooms, none of which has
adequate security or protection against natural disaster.
The situation on most other campuses and in most colleges and institutes
at Manoa is not much better. On some campuses critical
telecommunications and computer systems are literally housed in
converted closets. These facilities is not always air-conditioned, and
backup power provisions for critical administrative systems is
practically nonexistent.
Human Resources
There are some excellent information technology support staff at all
levels; however, three factors lower the overall quality of service
provided to end-users in the University community:
- Not enough staff, at any level, to provide adequate training and
support. While technology use in the university has exploded, the
personnel infrastructure to support that use has increased, at best,
only slightly. The effect of this has been to divert the energies of
many faculty and program staff into technology support and away from
their principal responsibilities.
- Lack of inter-organizational agreements on a family of basic
hardware, software, and communications standards. This means that
each technology support organization may recommend and support
different products that do the same thing -- preventing the most
efficient use of scarce existing support resources and confusing
many end-users who deal with multiple support organizations.
- In spite of ongoing efforts by the Personnel Management Office and
others, position descriptions, personnel practices, and salary
scales still make it difficult to recruit and even more difficult to
retain top-notch individuals to support technology use in the
University. Many of the jobs in technology and network management
and support are not adequately described by the few personnel
classes available. There is no advanced technical track for
information technology professionals so they must either move into
management or leave the University to get salary increases above the
collective bargaining norm.
Access to Computer and Information Resources
Access to computers has improved dramatically over the last several
years. Through a combination of legislative funding, federal funding,
and reallocation, all campuses have developed at least one major student
computer lab and many have multiple labs. However, in some cases the
computers originally placed in the labs are inadequate for the kinds of
computing requirements now faced by students. Ongoing funding is not
always available for the upgrading required in today's fast-moving world
of computing. And on most campuses the need for new labs for student
access far outstrips the available space and staffing resources, even if
the computers are made available.
An aggressive resale program through the University Bookstores has
helped make several types of personal computers far more affordable to
students and faculty, and thousands of individuals have taken advantage
of this opportunity. The provision of faculty/researcher desktop devices
has primarily been left up to the colleges. Several colleges within the
University have already implemented "computer on every desktop"
programs, but others have moved more slowly. In research institutes
individual researchers are usually left to find funding for their own
desktop devices. Even so, procurement procedures are widely considered
to be obstructions to effective acquisition of technology. Problems
cited include lack of knowledgeable advice on equipment and process,
lack of ability to see technology before buying, delays and paperwork
imposed by various approval processes, and delays and paperwork
associated with the bid process required by state law.
Although some campuses have made substantial progress in providing
public labs and/or networking, at this point only a fraction of all the
desktop and public lab computers in the University are effectively
connected to networks to allow access to other information resources and
computing services. Numerous departments have developed valuable public
and quasi-public databases that are not currently available to members
of the university or public outside the department of origin. Several
campuses have on-line information services that provide directories,
schedules, policies, and other kinds of useful information. With the
exception of the library systems, however, these services are not
widespread and no such systemwide information is available on-line.
There is no clearinghouse for information about these services,
consistency among them, or "friendly" user interface to all of what is
available.
Instruction
There have been a number of highly innovative and successful
applications of information technology for instruction throughout the
University system, including the development and use of computer-based
education, interactive video, and instructional telecommunications.
Active work in hypermedia is taking place in a number of colleges.
However, information technology resources for instruction are unevenly
distributed throughout the University system. The result is that some
faculty have access to considerable resources but many have little or no
access. This applies to production facilities and delivery systems both
in and out of the classroom. For example, Manoa has no campuswide video
studio or production facilities, seriously limiting its ability to
support video production for direct classroom use or to incorporate
video into locally-produced hypermedia and distance education programs.
To some extent this is a natural reflection of college priorities,
however, standards need to be developed and implemented for classroom
facilities and support. Otherwise the University cannot expect its
successes to be institutionalized, nor will they spur further
instructional innovation.
Even if there were adequate facilities and resources, given the focus on
research of the Manoa tenure and promotion system there is little
incentive for most junior faculty to become actively involved in the use
of instructional technology unless they consider it as their area of
research. In fact, it is usually considered unwise for untenured faculty
to even get involved in this area.
Research
Research computing is flourishing at the University of Hawaii. There are
now some 300 Unix workstations on the Manoa campus, mostly in research
units. The overall computing capacity this represents dwarfs the total
power of centralized systems available in the University. The Computing
Center has recognized this activity and has moved to support Unix
workstations through a new public lab, software licenses and servers,
management of the network integral to the Unix workstation philosophy
and effectiveness, and limited assistance with system management.
However, this initiative has been undertaken without addition of staff,
and therefore at the expense of other important support activities. Even
at that, the combined level of support available through departmental
and central resources is already inadequate and growing more so as
workstation use burgeons throughout the University.
The University of Hawaii was the first institution to formally join the
San Diego Supercomputer Consortium when it was created. However, the
amount of supercomputer time used by the University has not grown
substantially. The San Diego facility is so heavily used that
competition for that resource is severe. Also, network bandwidth between
Hawaii and the mainland limits researchers' ability to use that Center
to take advantage of supercomputing and visualization technologies in a
modern fashion. Other than that first step, the University has made
little progress in moving seriously into the computing areas attracting
most attention in research today: high performance parallel processing
and visualization of data.
Administrative Computing
The University's systemwide administrative computing needs have been the
most neglected area of information technology in the past years. In
part, this has been the result of a fuzzy and poorly understood locus of
responsibility and, in part, the result of an overall inattention to
infrastructure needs. The systemwide fiscal information system is a 20-
year old batch system that effectively meets audit requirements but does
not begin to address end-user needs for timely information. As a result,
nearly every operational unit has implemented its own limited fiscal
system and laboriously updates its own system from the central system's
batch printouts. Although the majority of the University budget is spent
on personnel, there is no modern comprehensive systemwide human
resources information system; the University relies on 20-year old batch
programs with limited functionality. This makes it difficult-to-
impossible to answer routine queries, assess the impact of new policies
and practices, or react to changes mandated by the State. There are now
four different student information systems in use, and on many campuses
they do not provide faculty and advisers with access to needed student
information, much less give students access to information about
themselves.
Studies indicate that the overall budget, hardware capacity, floor
space, and staffing levels for administrative computing at the
University of Hawaii are far below those of comparable institutions. The
result of all this is that there is limited, generally inconvenient
access to data -- data that is required to support both the academic and
administrative work of the institution. Activities such as student
advising, program planning and evaluation, routine reporting, budgeting,
institutional research, and assessment are made much more difficult and
time-consuming than if reasonable on-line access to data was available.
In spite of these problems, there has been progress. The Management
Systems Office has moved aggressively to assist systemwide and
administrative offices in the move from typewriters and centralized word-
processing to microcomputers and local area networks. They implemented
the first systemwide electronic mail network for administrators and have
now brought that network into the mainstream of academic electronic
mail.
Public Service
Community Services units on each campus have been providing computer and
technology training for a number of years. Some of these units have been
extremely successful and are viewed as the premier providers of computer
training in the community. And the Community Colleges have aggressively
moved to update or add vocational curricula in response to the changing
use of technology in the workplace.
Many units also provide media and technology-related services to the
public, but there is little uniformity among the units regarding the
types of services that are appropriately provided to the community and
what kinds of chargeback mechanisms or fees are applied.
The University has established an Office of Technology Transfer and
Economic Development (OTTED), which has service to the State as a
principal aspect of its mission. OTTED works with units throughout the
University to make their specialized skills and resources available to
the general public and business community. A new external services
program based in the Library will provide many specialized services such
as customized research and database access.
With the exception of the Computing Center's modem bank that serves
Oahu, there is no general provision or funding for public access to the
University's electronic information resources. Even with that modem
bank, many key information resources such as databases and bulletin
boards at Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources are not internally
networked so as to be widely available through the university network to
the entire general public that could benefit from them.