| 1 | May 15, 2012 11:54 AM | The web site is fairly up to date. |
| 2 | May 14, 2012 1:02 PM | I thought the web site was well maintained and almost "up-to-minute" in terms of changes and information added. |
| 3 | May 7, 2012 8:13 AM | Beginning of year issue list was great. But info about new issues that arise mid-year was not as good. Should send a short email to all Senators when a new issue is referred to a committee by the SEC. |
| 4 | May 3, 2012 5:44 PM | Again, provide a summary description for incoming senators -- the documents on the web are very long and hard to navigate. |
| 5 | May 3, 2012 3:01 PM | But constantly confused by the insider jargon in discussions -- especially the alphabet soup of abbreviations. |
| 6 | May 3, 2012 2:47 PM | minutes from other committees were often late or nonexistent, SEC minutes also lagged, minutes were also superficial |
| 7 | Apr 30, 2012 12:29 PM | I think CAB got a lot of us non-CAB senators in hot water with our constituents for their handling of the Faculty Housing situation. Their March resolution turned out to have been one-sided and uninformed, and voting for it made lots of folks upset. |
| 8 | Apr 28, 2012 1:35 PM | The minutes and the website for the Faculty Senate was helpful at keeping the Senators informed about the activities for each meeting. |