« Back to Summary
I was well informed about the activities of the Faculty Senate.
#Response DateComments & suggestions for improvement:
1May 15, 2012 11:54 AMThe web site is fairly up to date.
2May 14, 2012 1:02 PMI thought the web site was well maintained and almost "up-to-minute" in terms of changes and information added.
3May 7, 2012 8:13 AMBeginning of year issue list was great. But info about new issues that arise mid-year was not as good. Should send a short email to all Senators when a new issue is referred to a committee by the SEC.
4May 3, 2012 5:44 PMAgain, provide a summary description for incoming senators -- the documents on the web are very long and hard to navigate.
5May 3, 2012 3:01 PMBut constantly confused by the insider jargon in discussions -- especially the alphabet soup of abbreviations.
6May 3, 2012 2:47 PMminutes from other committees were often late or nonexistent, SEC minutes also lagged, minutes were also superficial
7Apr 30, 2012 12:29 PMI think CAB got a lot of us non-CAB senators in hot water with our constituents for their handling of the Faculty Housing situation. Their March resolution turned out to have been one-sided and uninformed, and voting for it made lots of folks upset.
8Apr 28, 2012 1:35 PMThe minutes and the website for the Faculty Senate was helpful at keeping the Senators informed about the activities for each meeting.