VNR: New findings: Pacific marine national monuments do not harm fishing industry
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa
John Lynham, professor in the Department of Economics at the University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa
Papahanaumokuakea expansion boundaries. Image credit: NOAA
Link to video and sound (details below): https://bit.ly/2P65LfO
New scientific findings released today in the peer-reviewed journal Nature Communications, show that expansion of the Pacific Remote Islands and Papahānaumokuākea marine national monuments did not cause overall economic harm to the Hawai‘i-based longline tuna fishing fleet.
The results of this study, which was supported by the Pew Bertarelli Ocean Legacy Project, represent the first economic analysis of two of the largest protected areas on Earth. The monuments protect an area larger than the land mass of Alaska, Texas and California combined. The study's co-authors, led by John Lynham, professor in the Department of Economics at the University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, analyzed observer records of individual fishing events, logbook summary reports, and detailed satellite data on vessel movements.
“By analyzing independently collected data, we found that catch per unit effort has increased overall for the Hawaii-based longline industry following each expansion,” said Lynham. “The bottom line is that these monuments are not causing substantial economic losses to the fishery.”
In 2014 and 2016, President Barack Obama significantly expanded the monuments, collectively protecting a little more than 1 million square miles (2.78 million square kilometers) of healthy coral reefs, undocumented deep-sea creatures and large predatory species such as sharks, tuna, and marine mammals. This built upon actions taken by President George W. Bush—who designated both the Pacific Remote Islands and Papahānaumokuākea marine national monuments in 2006 and 2009, respectively.
“The effect of a marine protected area on a fishery is often difficult to assess because of the many factors that affect catch such as ocean conditions, prices and changing regulations,” said Lynham. “A strength of this study is that by comparing the longline tuna fishery to two other fisheries unaffected by the monument designation, we’ve controlled for factors that could be biasing the results.”
“Our conclusion from this is clear: Papahānaumokuākea and the Pacific Remote Islands marine national monuments have not hurt the fishing industry overall,” Lynham continued. “This is not too surprising when you consider that, in 2015, when Papahānaumokuākea was open to fishing, 97 percent of fishing was taking place outside the monument in waters that are still open to fishing today.”
Prior to the expansion of the Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument, representatives of the longline fishing industry in Hawai‘i argued that the expansion would result in direct losses as high as $10 million annually, and that total indirect losses to the fishing-dependent economy could reach $30 million. The new analysis shows that after the expansions, the Hawai‘i-based longline industry has been catching more fish, while the distance fleet the travels has remained unchanged. Moreover, the total catch and total revenue in the fishery have increased since the expansions began. Specifically, the average revenue from 2014 to 2017 was 13.7 percent higher than from 2010 to 2013.
VIDEO
BROLL: (1 minute 10 seconds)
0:00-0:06 Map showing the expanded area of Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument. The new boundary extends out to the U.S. EEZ (shown in purple). The monument's original area is shown in blue. Credit: NOAA
0:07-0:13 Colorful reef fish found in Papahānaumokuākea. Credit: NOAA
0:14-0:23 Clip of open ocean in Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument
0:24-0:34 clip of apex predators such as ulua (giant trevally) that dominate the deep reef ecosystems of the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands.
SOUND:
0:37-0:57 (20 seconds)
John Lynham, UH economics professor
“Our study is the first study to use data from the fishing industry to evaluate what have been the impacts, positive or negative, of these protected areas. And we basically find that the negative impacts are extremely small and, in some cases, close to zero.”
0:58-1:10 (12 seconds)
Lynham
“Big picture, the longline industry is catching more and bringing in more revenues since the marine monuments were expanded.”