Foundations
| TEACHER RESOURCES | FOCUS | FOUNDATIONS | GEC |
 
About General Education

Teacher Resources

Focus

Foundations

Diversification

Hawaiian or Second Language

Faculty Committees & Boards

Articulation & Transfer

Assessment

HOME
 
Jump to a section

Foundations requirements

Foundations hallmarks

Foundations proposal form (for UHM departments only)

Approved Foundations courses

Foundations Board members

 

Announcements

Click here: articulation information is available

Foundations Requirement

Foundation courses are intended to give students skills and perspectives that are fundamental to undertaking higher education. To promote student understanding of connections across fields of inquiry, Foundations courses may be linked and require co-registration. 

Students must complete:

  • Global & Multicultural Perspectives (FG) (6 credits/two courses)

    Global and Multicultural Perspectives courses provide thematic treatments of global processes and cross-cultural interactions from a variety of perspectives. Students will gain a sense of human development from pre-history to modern times through consideration of narratives and artifacts of and from diverse cultures. At least one component of each of these courses will involve the indigenous cultures of Hawai'i, the Pacific, and Asia.
     
  • Symbolic Reasoning (FS) (3 credits/1 course)

Courses fulfilling this requirement will expose students to the beauty and power of formal systems, as well as to their clarity and precision; courses will not focus solely on computational skills. Students should understand the concept of proof as a chain of inferences. They should be able to apply formal rules or algorithms. They should also be able to engage in hypothetical reasoning. In addition, the course should aim to develop the ability of students to use appropriate symbolic techniques in the context of problem solving, and in the presentation and critical evaluation of evidence.

  • Written Communication (FW) (3 credits/1 course)

Students will be introduced to the rhetorical, conceptual, and stylistic demands of writing at the college level; courses give instruction in composing processes, search strategies, and composing from sources. This course also provides students with experiences in the library and on the Internet and enhances their skills in accessing and using various types of primary and secondary materials.

TOP

Hallmarks and Explanatory Notes

(Foundations Board approved FG, 01/27/06; FW, 04/21/06; FS, 09/19/06)

Easy print format-current Hallmarks (pdf file)

Previous Hallmarks
October 2001 draft
December 2001 (used to designate Fall 2002 courses)

Link to student learning outcomes and assessment plans for Foundations courses.

To satisfy the Global and Multicultural Perspectives (FG) requirement, a course will (Hallmarks in bold; Notes in italics): 

1.   provide students with a large-scale analysis of human development and change over time. (Note: the two FG courses will together cover the whole time period from pre-history to present.

  • The course must fall into one of the following categories: Group A (content primarily before 1500 CE), B (content primarily after 1500 CE), or C (pre-history to present)

2.   analyze the development of human societies and their cultural traditions through time in different regions (including Africa, the Americas, Asia, Europe, and Oceania) and using multiple perspectives.

  • Students will study multiple perspectives across time, space, and cultures. Some of the cultural material studied should reflect cultural differences.

  • The course should not be solely about a people or a country; it needs to be a global course.

  • Clear emphasis on multiple ideologies and methodologies (e.g., capitalism vs. socialism, individualism vs. communalism, globalism vs. protectionism, or humanistic vs. scientific).
     

3.   offer a broad, integrated analysis of cultural, economic, political, scientific, and/or social development that recognizes the diversity of human societies and their cultural traditions.

  • The course should offer an integrative perspective on global change and diverse cultural traditions.

  • The course should identify common themes across multiple cultures.

  • The course should recognize diversity (examples could include within and between cultures and religions, subcultures within political units, or socio-economic class differences).
     

4.   examine processes of cross-cultural interaction and exchange that have linked the world's peoples through time while recognizing diversity.

  • The course should address how processes of interaction have shaped the world’s cultural mosaic through time.

  • The course should convey an understanding of how unique cultural traditions have survived cross-cultural interactions as well as how cultures have been changed through interaction.

  • The proposal should clearly identify the parts of the course that are cross-cultural, rather than isolating cultural groups or characteristics.

  • Dimensions of cross-cultural interaction such as religion should be examined as well as modes of interaction, e.g., migration, conquest, and trade.
     

5.   include at least one component on Hawaiian, Pacific, or Asian societies and their cultural traditions.

  • Students will study the development of unique cultural traditions and cross-cultural interactions from a wide variety of regions including Hawaii, the Pacific, or Asia.

6.   engage students in the study and analysis of writings, narratives, texts, artifacts, and/or practices that represent the perspectives of different societies and cultural traditions.

  • Students will gain an appreciation of the multiplicity of sources; there should be some balance between western and non-western sources of information (e.g., documents and text, oral traditions and performances, art, archaeological artifacts at different scales, paleontological remains, paleoenvironmental materials, or cultural landscapes).

  •  Students will learn how to identify, assess, and analyze various sources of information on cultural behaviors, to organize them into systems of meaning, and to evaluate conclusions relative to the kinds of information available.

  • Students will learn how different materials can reveal different aspects of contemporary and past human development.


TOP 

Courses in Symbolic Reasoning (FS) should present symbolism as a means to facilitate reasoning and not merely as a technique to represent course content. They should engage students in the active use and application of symbolic techniques, but should not present the use of symbolization strategies and techniques in a strictly mechanical way. Rather, they should focus on presenting concepts and tools of symbolic reasoning to further understanding of the course material. The majority of a FS course should address issues of symbolic reasoning, and impart an appreciation of the power and clarity that such reasoning brings to our thinking and understanding. Courses that apply for the FS designation should meet all six hallmarks.

To satisfy the Symbolic Reasoning (FS) requirement, a course:

1.   expose students to the beauty, power, clarity and precision of formal systems.

  • Students should understand the impact of formal or symbolic reasoning in its application to other disciplines and/or its historical place in civilization.

  • An objective of the FS requirement is to enhance students’ appreciation of abstraction and formal systems of analysis and to elevate their power of critical thinking through logical analysis and use of evidence.

  • Students may be exposed to the power, clarity and precision of formal systems by reading and understanding proofs, derivations of formulae, or expositions of applications. Students may also be exposed to the power, clarity and precision of formal systems by constructing proofs (including symbolic proofs of validity), deriving formulas of appreciable applicability, or justifying the uses of applications in concrete context. In any of these situations, formal reasoning and/or symbolism should play a significant or essential role.

  • The exposure to the beauty of formal systems can be provided by the presentation of elegant proofs, tricky, i.e., creative, applications of formulae, or the derivation of unexpected applications.

2.   help students understand the concept of proof as a chain of inferences.

  • A non-trivial component of the course should be deductive proof.

  • Students should be required to demonstrate an understanding of the difference between a correct and incorrect proof.

  • Students should understand the distinction between inductive and deductive, formal and informal reasoning.

  • Students should be familiar with all aspects of basic argumentation: (1) the recognition of premises, given statements or hypothesis, (2) the recognition of the conclusion as well as noticing that a proof has appropriately come to an end since the conclusion has been justified, (3) the recognition of the application of the principles of logic to the premises, earlier steps or recognized truths to justify subsequent steps.

  • Students should be able to construct formal arguments and be expected to justify most steps of an argument.

3.   teach students how to apply formal rules or algorithms.

  • Students should be able to correctly apply rules of a formal system.

  • Students should be introduced to a process of applying formal rules, so that students will understand the importance of paying attention to detail and why precision is crucial, and how rule generation works in carrying out mechanical, logical, and/or computational procedures.
     

4.   require students to use appropriate symbolic techniques in the context of problem solving, and in the presentation and critical evaluation of evidence.

  • Students should be able to recognize the elements, structure and standards of rigorous arguments and distinguish between correct and incorrect argument.

  • Students should be able to recognize appropriate and inappropriate use of words and symbolism, statements as opposed to meaningless sentences, valid and invalid arguments, as well as valid and invalid applications of symbolic reasoning.

5.   not focus solely on computational skills.

  • Students should be challenged to use symbolic trails of reasoning not only minimally but in maximally efficient and elegant ways.

  • Students should not be simply trained in mechanical, computational or formulaic techniques.

6.   build a bridge from theory to practice and show students how to traverse this bridge.

  • Students should be able to abstract from a real-world situation to formal, symbolic representation.

  • Students should be able to translate word problems or arguments into an appropriate symbolic formalism.

  • Students should see the development of a “useful” application from a theoretical or formal idea. In that development it should be made especially clear that the use of symbolism facilitated the exposition that lead from theory to practice.

  • Students will learn that arguments and procedures expressed in ordinary language can be checked with great precision by placing the reasoning patterns in symbolic form and manipulated via symbolic rules of inference.

TOP

To satisfy the Written Communication (FW) requirement, a course will:

1.   introduce students to different forms of college-level writing, including, but not limited to, academic discourse, and guide them in writing for different purposes and audiences.

  • The primary goal of W Foundations classes is learning to write. Course reading should serve as a basis for writing rather than as a body of material to be mastered per se.

  • The primary reading focus should be on expository texts. The course should consider a variety of college-level readings (e.g. summary/abstract, narrative, analysis, argument).

2.   provide students with guided practice of writing processes–planning, drafting, critiquing, revising, and editing–making effective use of written and oral feedback from the faculty instructor and from peers.

  • There should be a coherent sequence of various types of writing studied and assigned in the course. Generally, such a sequence will move from presumably simpler to more complex rhetorical tasks (e.g. from summary to analysis/interpretation to argument, or from narrative/serialization to comparative analysis to research-based inquiry).

  • Types of interaction concerning student writing will vary and may include in-class collaborative group work (including online or hybrid instruction), instructor/student conferencing (in person and/or online), student/student peer review, and tutorial feedback as available.

3.   require at least 5000 words of finished prose–equivalent to approximately 20 typewritten/printed pages.

  •  “Finished prose” is defined as writing which has received peer and/or instructor feedback, has usually undergone student revision, and has been formally evaluated by the instructor. Writing such as journal entries, e-mail letters, pre-writing exercises, unrevised in-class writing, or feedback to peers should not normally be considered “finished prose.”

4.   help students develop information literacy by teaching search strategies, critical evaluation of information and sources, and effective selection of information for specific purposes and audiences; teach appropriate ways to incorporate such information, acknowledge sources and provide citations.

  • “Information literacy” includes knowledge of and competence using Internet as well as print materials.

5.   help students read texts and make use of a variety of sources in expressing their own ideas, perspectives, and/or opinions in writing.

 

Link to student learning outcomes and assessment plans for Foundations courses.

TOP

 

Proposal Form (UHM only)

To propose a course please

1) complete and submit the proposal form to the General Education Office

Proposal Form--Microsoft Word     or       Proposal Form--Adobe PDF

2) Complete the UHM-1 or UHM-2 form. Check the box to "Request approval of the ___ Foundations designation (FW, FS, or FG)." Submit the UHM-1 or -2 form as required by your department.

General Information About Designations

1. Students must complete their Foundations requirement during their first year. Thus, Foundations courses must be at the 100- or 200-level. [NOTES: Lower-division requirement approved January 2003; ECON 301 was approved prior to this decision so its approval will continue through Spring 2008.]

2. All instructors of the course must agree to meet the appropriate Foundations Hallmarks because all sections will have the Foundations designation every time the course is offered.

3. A new course must be approved by the department and college prior to submission of a proposal.

4. The course description in the upcoming Catalog must be consistent with Foundations Hallmarks. In some cases, this will require modifications to the official course description.

5. Once given a Foundations designation, the course cannot have a Focus or Diversification designation. In addition, students who take a Global & Multicultural Perspectives course from a department may not fulfill their Diversification requirements with courses from that department. [Effective March 2007, students can take Foundations and Diversification courses from the same department.]

6. Once approved, the designation will maintain for five years. During the five-year period, the General Education Committee will assess the course in light of the goals of the Foundations requirement. The department will need to renew the designation each five years.

TOP

Approved UHM Foundations Courses

Written Communication (FW) (3 credits)

Effective term=Fall 2002 unless otherwise noted.

  • English 100
  • English 100A
  • English 101 + 101 Lab
  • English Language Institute 100

Symbolic Reasoning (FS) (3 credits)

Effective term=Fall 2002 unless otherwise noted

  • Business 250 [effective F03-]
  • Economics 301 [FS effective F03-S08]
  • Information Computer Science 141
  • Information Computer Science 241
  • Math 100
  • Math 100A
  • Math 111 [FS effective F03-SS05]
  • Math 112 [effective F05-]
  • Math 140
  • Math 203
  • Math 215
  • Math 215A
  • Math 241
  • Math 241A
  • Math 251 [course no longer offered]
  • Math 251A
  • Natural Resources & Environmental Management 203 [effective F03-]
  • Philosophy 110
  • Philosophy 110A
  • Philosophy 111 [effective F03-]

"A" courses are offered by the Selected Studies/Honors Program

Global & Multicultural Perspectives (FG) (6 credits)

Courses taken must be from different groups. Effective term=Fall 2002 unless otherwise noted.

Early (Group A)
  • Anthropology 151

  • Art 175

  • History 151

  • History 161A

  • WS 175 [effective F07-]

Modern (Group B)
  • American Studies 150 [effective F03-]

  • Anthropology 152

  • Art 176

  • Geography 102

  • History 152

  • History 155 [effective S04-]

  • History 162A

  • WS 176 [effective F08-]

Early to modern (Group C)
  • Art --number to be announced [effective F08-]

  • Botany 105 [effective F07-]

  • Geography 151

  • Geography 151A [no longer offered, FG effective F02-F06]

  • Languages, Linguistics, & Literature 150 [effective F04-]

  • Music 107

  • Religion 150

  • Religion 150A [no longer offered, FG effective F02-F06]

"A" courses are offered by the Honors Program.

 

External transfer students who transfer a Western Civilization course to UHM may take one FG course to satisfy the FG requirement. If the transfer course covered a particular time period, their FG course must cover a different time period. 
[This is a change from the 2002-03 policy which stated that HIST 155 was an option for students with a 2-semester sequence in Western Civilization.]

Effective March 2007, students may take Diversification courses from the same department as their Foundations Global & Multicultural courses. Please note that the 2007-08 Catalog is incorrect. Students may take ANTH 175 and ART 176 to meet FG requirements and take ANTH and ART to satisfy Diversification requirements.

TOP

updated March 3, 2008; report errors to gened@hawaii.edu

   

General Education Office · 2545 McCarthy Mall, Bilger Hall 104 · Honolulu, HI 96822 · (808) 956-6660 · gened@hawaii.edu 

© 2006-2008 University of Hawai`i at Mānoa