| Total Sample size (must be 10 or more) | Number of successes (has had 2 or 3 HPV vaccine doses) | Success % | Review and summarize your practice's performance (50 words or more) | |
| Due Date | Apr 8 | Apr 8 | Apr 8 | Apr 22 |
| Dr. Henry Bernstein | 10 | 4 | 40% | Due Apr 22 |
| Dr. Ann Burke | 17 | 7 | 41% | Due Apr 22 |
| Dr. Donna D'Alessandro | 18 | 8 | 44% | Looks like my practice is about in the middle. I wonder if practices that see a lot of adolescents may do better than those that see less and if we could learn something from those practices. It will be interesting to see what we decide to do as an intervention. |
| Dr. Terry Kind | 15 | 10 | 67% | In our practice there was a big initiative last year to improve vaccination completeness for the <24 month pts, and I think there may have been some positive spillover to our teen vaccination rates, resulting in a percent as high as 67%. On the other hand, we might have been concentrating too heavily on the younger patients (because that’s where our practice focus was at the time) and perhaps our teen HPV vaccination rate would have been even higher! In our practice, we make extensive use of the online regional immunization registry. The front desk staff prints this for each pt that comes for a well check, and the registry is quite a smart system, letting us know what the patients are due to receive. However, I think we could improve if we printed this out for every visit, not just the well check visits. |
| Dr. John Parboosingh | 13 | 6 | 46% | Due Apr 22 |
| Dr. Robert Poth | 15 | 8 | 53% | I was actually surprised to that our practice was immunizing at least 50% given we have not been active in HPV immunization. In my group o f6 physicians, I know we each recommend it but I was not sure how well we were doing, hence my participation in this project. I am intrigued by Dr. Teitelbaum's use of a color coded system and the idea of signage encouraging teens to ask about their immunization status. I plan to present the data to my team and discuss some of the options we can use to increase our rates, including those used by Dr. Teitelbaum's group. |
| Dr. Jonathan Teitelbaum | 20 | 14 | 70% | My practice has worked hard to ensure that patients are fully immunized. We have placed a sheet on the front of each patients chart outlining the immunization schedule and have placed the years in which older children are targeted to receive the immunization. Each year is color coded so that 2010 is blue. If a nurse or doctor sees a blue year on the sheet they should be alerted to the fact that an immunization is due. In truth I am disheartened to see that my rate was not 100% and I now plan to have a meeting with all the docs and nurses in the practice to review our charting system for immunizations to ensure better performance. I will also put a sign in each exam room asking “Ask me if you are you up to date with your shots?” |
| Dr. Teri Turner | 12 | 5 | 42% | I always thought I was doing a lot better on immunizing the children in my practice. The other practitioners in the group and I are nearing time for board recertification and we were examining EQIPP modules. We opted NOT to do the one on immunizations because we felt we were doing a good job on immunizing our children. But this is not the case. I really like Jonathan’s idea about the color coded sticker. I think this is something we could easily do in our practice. I also want to try the idea about putting a sign up in the room. Another thing I will do is have all my adolescent patients sign a release of information at each well child check and at any initial new visit allowing me to obtain their immunization records from the school and I am going to measure other immunization rates in my practice to re-examine the need for the EQIPP module. |
| Dr. Susan Wiley | 15 | 9 | 60% | Due Apr 22 |
| Dr. Beverly Wood | 12 | 4 | 33% | It appears my practice is not doing its job up to the standard. Not closing the gap between performance and ideal. Jonathan should prepare some comments on his success and how it is achieved. If we are going to measure change, we need to institute some effective changes, that makes it a QI project with measurables to identify improvement. |
| Dr. Loren Yamamoto | 12 | 3 | 25% | It looks like my practice is the worst performing practice in our community. I am looking forward to thinking about an improvement plan that will improve the performance of my practice. Perhaps some of the other practices are already doing something in their practices that might be working well. Dr. Kind and Dr. Teitelbaum have the best performing practices in our community so perhaps they can point out why their pratices are performing well so that the rest of us can benefit form these strategies. |
| Total | 159 | 78 | 49% |
|
April 15 -- 16:12
Dear John: That was a great article you sent us. Thanks, Terry. ----- April 14 -- 23:12 Dear Loren and MYQIP Colleagues: I just want to apologize for not getting my review and reflection in yet. I will be completing it soon. I have been attending a meeting at the Royal College of Reviewers and Reflectors where we discussed some cutting edge and state of the art Review and Reflection articles. Here's a reference for everyone to read: Parboosingh J, Wood B. Review and Reflection is the Dominant Lifelong Learning Facet of QI Projects. J Rev Reflect 2011;32(1):134-126. Thanks, John P. ----- Apr 9 -- 11:43 Dear Hank: Go the MYQIP web site and take a look at what my review and reflection looks like. Basically, look at your data and comment on how you compare with others and think about why you did really well or why you did less well than you would have desired. Thanks, Loren ----- April 9 -- 08:12 Dear Loren: I have a question about this review and reflection stuff. What exactly does that mean? I'm not used this jargon. Thanks, Hank ----- Apr 8 -- 16:25 Dear Group Participants: Thank for submitting your baseline data. Since this is a group project, it is essential that we all meet all our deadlines (or perhaps a little earlier to make Jonathan happy). You should have received an e-mail from MYQIP reminding you to do the next step which is to go to the MYQIP web site to review all the baseline data results; not just yours, but everyone's data. You should review and reflect on this by considering whether your results were better than you expected or not as good as you expected and how you compare with others. Enter your review and reflection commentary in the big green box on the MYQIP web site. This step is required and we have two weeks to complete this. If we can complete it sooner than the two weeks, we will move onto the next step. Thanks, Loren ----- April 2 -- 08:52 Dear Hank: Thanks for submitting your data. Sorry to be putting so much pressure on you. I'll try to not to rush the process too much. Thanks, Jonathan ----- Apr 3 -- 07:45 Dear Hank: Thanks for responding to Jonathan's concern. I agree that we shouldn't place too much pressure on participants to accelerate this process since this could inappropriately encourage them to send us phoney data. We want this done the right way and this takes time. Hopefully the group will see this. Perhaps we shouldn't have agreed to an accelerated time line. But as long as everyone submits their data with integrity and honesty and we follow the QI process, we might be able to finish a bit early. Thanks, Loren ----- April 2 -- 08:52 Dear Jonathan: Sorry that I'm the last one to enter my baseline data. I can't believe that I am part of group with such high performers. I feel like I'm in last place so I'll try to do better in the future. I entered my baseline data today. I hope that no one is making up their data just to get this over with. We wouldn't want that. Thanks, Hank ----- Apr 3 -- 07:45 Dear Jonathan: I sent an e-mail to Hank. MYQIP also sends automated reminders to him. We agreed to the original timeline and we agreed that if we went faster that we could accelerate this. However, he technically has until the deadline date to complete his baseline entry so we will just have to be patient. Feel free to e-mail him directly. Thanks, Loren ----- April 2 -- 08:52 Dear Loren: I wish we could go faster but Hank has still not entered his data. Can we get him to submit his baseline data earlier so we can go to the next step. Thanks, Jonathan ----- Mar 8 -- 10:10 Sorry, but I didn't check my messages earlier. I agree. Thanks, Teri T ----- Mar 6 -- 13:04 I agree. Thanks, Terry K ----- Mar 6 -- 12:47 I agree. Thanks, Donna ----- Mar 6 -- 09:01 I definitely would like to shorten the length of the project if possible so I agree. Thanks, Rob ----- Mar 5 -- 20:17 I have the same concerns as Susan, but I agree that we should try to do this. Thanks, Ann ----- Mar 5 -- 1514 I'm not sure if I can go faster than the original time line, but I will try. It seems like most people in the group want to do this. So I will try to get things done ahead of schedule so we can finish faster. Thanks, Susan ----- Mar 5 -- 07:55 What a great idea. I agree. Thanks, John P. ----- Mar 4 -- 21:39 I agree too. I'll be entering my baseline data soon. Thanks, Hank ----- Mar 3 -- 10:06 I agree. -- Bev ----- Mar 3 -- 08:20 Dear Group Participants: I just sent an e-mail to the entire group. Jonathan is suggesting that if everyone finishes their requirements early, we can go on to the next step early. This would permit us to complete this MYQIP project faster. Please let us know if you agree or disagree. Enter your responses on the MYQIP project web site. Thanks, Loren ----- Mar 8 -- 07:04 Dear Jonathan: This sounds reasonable to me. This is the first time that I'm a PCL. I did hear that some groups do what you're suggesting while other groups will stick to a fixed schedule. These MYQIP projects do take a long time to complete. If you ask me, we should do what you're suggesting. But we should ask everyone in the group. I'll send an e-mail to the group and will post this question on this blog. Thanks, Loren ----- Mar 6 -- 10:32 Dear Loren: I noticed that most of us have completed our baseline data collection ahead of schedule. There are a few people who have not completed their baseline data collection yet. What if everyone completes their baseline data collection ahead of schedule? Would we be able to proceed to the next step earlier. Thanks, Jonathan ----- Mar 3 -- 08:20 Dear Donna: This is a great question. I actually thought it should be three HPV doses also. But then someone pointed out to me that if we are going to show improvement, it would take a long time to take a patient from no vaccine doses to all 3 vaccine doses. If we instead consider two doses to be a success, taking a patient from 1 dose to 2 doses would be a success. You're right that the patient is still not fully immunized, but it is still an improvement. Improvement often results from smaller improvements. Linking these together results in larger improvements. Thanks, Loren ----- Mar 2 -- 13:52 Dear Loren: Can you tell me why we considered to two HPV doses to be a success, when three doses are actually required? Thanks, Donna D'Alessandro ----- Feb 16 -- 08:20 Dear Teri: Yes you can do this. I hope you decide to join us and enroll in this MYQIP project. Thanks, Loren ----- Feb 15 -- 17:55 Dear Loren: I like this topic, but I don't see any patients on my own. I am largely a pediatric educator. I teach residents, but I don't have my own practice. Could I use the patients in the resident teaching clinic? When I supervise the residents, these could be my patient encounters. Would this be OK. Sincerely, Teri Turner. ----- |