UH System Policies and Procedures
- Board of Regents Policies
- + 1. General Provisions
- + 2. Administration
- + 3. Organization
- + 4. Planning
- + 5. Academic Affairs
- + 6. Tuition, Financial Assistance, and Fees
- + 7. Student Affairs
- + 8. Business and Finance
- + 9. Personnel
- + 10. Land and Physical Facilities
- + 11. Miscellaneous
- + 12. Research
- Abolished Policies (Post Oct. 2014)
- Archived EP
- Administrative Procedures
UH‐Related Laws and Rules
- Hawaiʻi Revised Statutes (HRS) 304A
- Hawaiʻi Administrative Rules (HAR) Title 20
Executive Policy 8.200 Executive Policy 8.200
Policy on Contracts and Signing Authority
Executive Policy Chapter 8, Business and Finance
Executive Policy 8.200, Policy on Contracts and Signing Authority
Effective Date: November 2020
Prior Dates Amended: November 1, 2017, November 1, 2018, November 1, 2019
Responsible Office: Office of the Vice President for Legal Affairs and University General Counsel
Governing Board of Regents Policy RP 8.201, Contracts and Official Documents
Review Date: October 2021
This Policy makes uniform for the University (1) standard contractual provisions that should be in University contracts, (2) the approvals and signing authority required to enter written contracts which the Board of Regents has delegated authority to the President to execute on behalf of the University, and (3) the priority contracts that require additional scrutiny and review. This Policy supersedes any conflicting practice, policy, delegations or guidelines.
This Policy covers all written contracts between the University and non-University entities, including but not limited to county, state, federal, and foreign governments, educational institutions, financial institutions, vendors, contractors, consultants, and non-profit entities. This Policy does not apply to memoranda of understanding or similar agreements that govern internal relationships between University campuses or between colleges, schools, departments, institutes, centers, or other units within a University campus.
Note: Appendices are only available to current University employees and students, and can be accessed at: http://www.hawaii.edu/offices/legal/contractspolicy/appendices
“Contract” means any document intended to set forth an agreement or arrangement between the University and an outside party. A document need not be labeled “contract” to be covered by this Policy. A document labeled “contract,” “agreement,” “memorandum of understanding,” “MOU”, “memorandum of agreement,” “MOA”, “lease,” “license,” “permit,” “letter of intent,” and even a letter, or any other similar written item indicating or implying a legally enforceable document, is deemed a “Contract” under this Policy if it describes an obligation of the University, either to do or not do something or to pay money. A purchase order is considered a Contract as it is intended to govern the obligations between the University and a vendor. A Contract can be in electronic form, as electronic signatures are permitted under certain circumstances and copies of fully executed agreements that are electronically transmitted can be considered legally binding. Any question as to whether a document should be considered a Contract should be referred to the University’s Office of General Counsel (OGC).
“Counterparty” means any person or entity that is a party to a Contract with the University.
“Deans” are defined at UH Mānoa as the Deans of (1) the College of Arts, Languages & Letters, (2) the School of Architecture, (3) the Shidler College of Business, (4) the College of Education, (5) the College of Engineering, (6) Hawaiʻinuiākea School of Hawaiian Knowledge, (7) College of Natural Sciences (8) School of Nursing & Dental Hygiene, (9) the Outreach College, (10) the College of Social Sciences (11) Myron B. Thompson School of the Social Work, (12) College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, (13) John A. Burns School of Medicine, (14) William S. Richardson School of Law, (15) Graduate Division, (16) School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology. As defined in this Policy, the University Librarian is also included in this group as well as the Directors of (1) the UH Cancer Center, (2) Waikiki Aquarium, (3) Lyon Arboretum, (4) Institute for Astronomy, and (5) Athletics. The term “Deans” does not include deans other than those listed above, Center directors, or assistant or associate deans, assistant or associate directors, or assistant or associate vice chancellors.
“Fiscal Administrators” and “Assistant Fiscal Administrators” refer to that group or class of persons who perform the business and fiscal administration functions for a particular University unit and are subject to specified purchasing authority and purchasing dollar limits. The appropriate Vice Chancellor for Administration/Chancellor/UH Mānoa Provost/Vice President shall approve Fiscal Administrator appointments and requests for delegation of purchasing authority and purchasing dollar limits.
“Officers” mean all persons defined as officers of the University pursuant to Board of Regents Policy RP 2.201.
“Significant Commitment” is an obligation that meets any one of the following criteria:
"Template Agreement(s)" are written form agreements that have been approved by OGC for a specific purpose. Any material changes to a Template Agreement, or using a Template Agreement for other than its specified purpose, requires OGC approval.
“University” includes the University of Hawaiʻi and all of its constituent campuses, colleges, departments, institutes, centers, and units.
III. Executive Policy
A. Requirements for All Contracts
1. Requisite Authority and Delegations of Authoritya. Requisite Authority
Existing board and executive policies and administrative procedures identify proper approval and signing authority for different kinds of contracts. Appendix 1 identifies by category of contract those policies and procedures currently in existence, and who must approve and sign various types of common obligations or contracts (except in cases of unavailability, when any University Officer may sign.) An exception to this exists as to the Community College Chancellors as noted in Section III.A.1.(b)(3) below.
Others may not sign unless they are University Officers or unless they have been delegated authority elsewhere in this Policy or other University board or executive policy or administrative procedure, or in a written document on file with OGC. A listing of the delegations of authority on file with OGC is available to current University employees and students, and can be accessed at: http://www.hawaii.edu/offices/legal/contractspolicy/appendices. The table also identifies the appropriate review and approval process required for each type of Contract before signature. If a Contract does not appear on the table, consult OGC to determine the appropriate review and approval process.
Faculty, staff, students, consultants, and independent contractors do not have authority to sign Contracts that bind the University.
Signing a Contract on behalf of the University is an important responsibility and should be done only by someone with the proper authority and an understanding of the obligations being undertaken. A person who signs a Contract on behalf of the University knowing he/she lacks authority or in reckless disregard of obtaining proper authority, will be in violation of this Policy. In addition, a person who signs without authority in some cases may even be personally liable for the obligations, debts and risks under that Contract, including any payment obligations. The University will not be bound by the terms of a Contract signed by an individual without authority unless the University, through an Officer of the University with authority to commit a sufficient amount of available funding to meet the Contract obligations, subsequently agrees that the University will honor the Contract.
b. Delegation of Authority
(1) The President
The President of the University must be informed in advance about all Significant Commitments, before any Significant Commitment is confirmed. Contracts containing Significant Commitments must be: (a) reviewed and signed by an Officer of the University or as otherwise authorized by the President and (b) reviewed by OGC.
Generally, as noted in Appendix 1, Officers have authority to approve and sign Contracts except those reserved to the President and the Board of Regents. The President also may delegate authority to University employees other than Officers to sign Contracts on behalf of the University. It is expected that Officers and other authorized University signatories will only sign Contracts within their general areas of authority, except in cases of unavailability.
(3) Community College Chancellors
Authority to sign contracts for the community colleges has been delegated to the Vice President for Community Colleges. The Vice President for Community Colleges will delegate as appropriate the signing authority for the community colleges to the community college chancellors. These delegations will be given in the manner specified in subparagraph (7) below, and these delegations supersede the authority given to community college chancellors where “chancellor” is mentioned in Appendix 1.
Deans have authority to approve and sign Contracts that:
This section of the Contracts Policy does not modify nor affect the delegation of signing authority as provided by other Executive Policies with respect to the University’s procurement of goods, services and/or construction.
(5) Fiscal Administrators/Assistant Fiscal Administrators
Generally, as noted in Appendix 1, Fiscal Administrators and Assistant Fiscal Administrators have authority to approve and sign Contracts for procuring goods, services, and construction within the limits of their delegated purchasing authority.
(6) Department Chair, Unit Head, Administrators and Individual Faculty Members
(a) Department Chair/Unit Head. The Department Chair or head of the Unit whose budget will bear an expense does not have authority to sign Contracts by virtue of the budgetary effect alone. Contracts can be signed only by the administrators who are named elsewhere in this Policy or by administrators who have been delegated authority to sign that kind of Contract by a delegation on file with Office of General Counsel. A listing of the delegations of authority on file with OGC is available to current University employees and students, and can be accessed at: http://www.hawaii.edu/offices/legal/contractspolicy/appendices.
Those who are authorized by policy or procedure to approve and sign Contracts may further delegate their authority, provided that such authority to delegate is described in a policy or procedure other than this EP 8.200. Delegation must be in writing and specifically limited by agreement type and dollar amount. (See Appendix 3 for Sample Delegation Document). A person to whom authority is delegated cannot then further delegate that authority to another, without the written approval of the person who made the original delegation. The person who delegates authority retains responsibility for the actions of the person to whom authority is delegated.
A copy of all delegations, re-delegations, or revocation of delegations of authority to approve and sign Contracts must be kept by the Administration of respective campuses, and if executed at the System level, a copy must be sent to OGC to be effective and honored by the University. A listing of the delegations of authority on file with OGC is available to current University employees and students, and can be accessed at: http://www.hawaii.edu/offices/legal/contractspolicy/appendices.
Copies of delegations that are temporary or personal, e.g., delegation only while delegator is out of the office on travel, do not have to be sent to and acknowledged by OGC to be effective. This includes delegations that are less than 2 months in duration.
2. Due Diligence, Adherence to Policies, and Confirmation of FundingEmployees who execute Contracts have the responsibility to personally, or assign appropriately experienced staff to: (a) review and understand the terms of the Contract, (b) verify that the business terms of the Contract are fair and reasonable to the University, (c) confirm that the Contract is processed in accordance with this Policy and the normal business practices and policies of the University relating to initiating a business relationship or transaction, including adherence to applicable procurement requirements, (d) confirm the counterparty business registration and signatory authority (see Section III.D. Execution of the Contract), and (e) confirm the availability and commitment of sufficient funding to meet the University's obligations set forth in the Contract.1
3. Prohibition Against Conflicts of InterestIn addition, under Hawaiʻi law2 and the University’s policies on conflict of interest,3 a University employee who has a conflict of interest with respect to any given Contract does not have authority to sign the Contract and should not be involved in the negotiation of or approval process with respect to the Contract. This applies whether the subject of the Contract is commercial or academic.
4. Requirement of a Written AgreementAll University Contracts must be in writing, which may include electronic (but not email) form. No contract will bind the University unless in writing and signed in accordance with this Policy. This Policy applies equally to amendments and terminations of Contracts.
B. Contracts Review ProcessThe Contracts Review Process set forth in this Section III.B. applies to all Contracts that are not already subject to review pursuant to a separate policy or procedure. Examples of Contracts excluded from this Contracts Review Process (shown also in Appendix 1) include the following:
If there are particular aspects of these agreements that involve significant commitments or carry inherent risks, the unit designated as the primary reviewer may seek additional review or guidance.
1. Review By Office of General CounselThe following Contracts require OGC review before they can be signed, except if Template Agreements are used:
Except for the types of Contracts listed above, OGC review is not required for Contracts involving expenditures (including any renewal or option terms) that do not exceed $25,000, whether it is over a single year or multiple years.
OGC review is not required if a Template Agreement is used for the purpose specified and no substantive deviations or changes are made to the form template. If substantive deviations or changes are proposed, OGC review will be required for those changes only.
In general, OGC review is limited to assessing the legality of each Contract and the terms affecting such assessment. It does not usually include a review and evaluation of the business terms or whether the University should enter into the Contract based on such business terms, with the University signatories remaining ultimately responsible for such decisions. The University unit which desires to enter into the Contract or which is responsible for initiating or implementing the Contract, has the primary responsibility to negotiate and review the overall Contract to make sure that it is in the best business interests of the University and consistent with University policies, including this Policy, to ensure that a risk analysis has been performed and any identified risks mitigated, and to confirm the counterparty business registration and signatory authority.
Contracts can include terms that may seem innocuous or insignificant to the University units, but may be legally important. All personnel are encouraged to consult with the OGC if they have any questions about this Policy, the Contract Review Process, a Contract, and/or the interpretation of any provisions within a Contract.
Use of standard University Contract terms (see Section III.C.) and Template Agreements will expedite Contract execution, including when necessary, OGC review. Contracts under $25,000 do not require OGC'sreview unless there are specific questions that require legal consultation, and any legal service request seeking OGC review of a Contract under $25,000 should be accompanied by a completed checklist found in Appendix 11. If units identify inconsistencies between the Contract language proposed by counterparties and this Policy, e.g., regarding indemnification, the unit should begin to negotiate with the counterparty to resolve those inconsistencies in the University’s favor to the greatest extent possible, prior to or during OGC'sreview of the Contract. If the inconsistencies cannot be resolved then units should seek higher campus level authorization for answers to policy questions, appropriate risk tolerance, or business decisions.
2. Early Reviews of Significant Commitments By AdministrationAnyone that initiates or becomes involved in a potential Significant Commitment on behalf of the University should report the Significant Commitment to appropriate University Officers and/or top campus administration officials even before a memorandum of understanding, letter of intent, or a Contract is prepared.
3. Review of Insurance Termsa. Contracts Requiring Proof of Other Party Insurance
The University has standard insurance requirements that generally apply to other entities doing business with the University (see Appendix 2). If the counterparty(ies) cannot or will not meet University’s insurance requirements, consideration should be given to selecting another alternative. Waivers of or changes to the standard insurance requirements must be approved by the office authorized to sign the particular Contract and the University’s Office of Risk Management (ORM), with input from OGC.
b. Contracts Requiring Proof of University Insurance
Contracts often require the University to maintain and show proof of certain types and amounts of insurance coverage. In general, the University does not purchase insurance to cover the University’s performance under the Contracts. The University is considered a “self-insured” entity and certificates to this effect may be obtained from the State of Hawaiʻi’s risk management office. Please consult with ORM with respect to obtaining such certificates.
Some Contracts also require the other party to be named as “additional insured” under University insurance policies. In virtually all situations, naming the counterparty(ies) as additional insured under any University insurance policy will not be feasible or possible. Appendix 2 describes the representations that can be made in a Contract about the University’s insurance coverage, without further review by OGC. Contracts that require the University to provide insurance of different types or specific amounts must be reviewed by ORM, with input from OGC, who may recommend approval by appropriate Officers.
4. Priority AgreementsThe University believes that certain Contracts carry inherent risk such that additional scrutiny and controls are warranted. For purposes of this Policy, these Contracts are referred to as “Priority Agreements.” The following are “Priority Agreements.”
a. Affiliation/Student Field Experience Agreements
The University enters into numerous affiliation agreements, the purpose of which is to make available to its students a broad range of field and clinical experience opportunities by allowing the students to be placed short term into various facilities. Appendix 4 contains four healthcare clinical experience affiliation agreement templates. If the template agreements are completed without any material changes, they need not be submitted to OGC for review. Any material changes to the template agreements require OGC review before execution.
Appendix 4 also contains a sample educational fieldwork experience affiliation agreement, e.g., for students providing afterschool tutoring in a low-income housing facility. The sample contains alternative University responsibility/liability provisions depending on whether the other party is a private entity or a state, county, or federal government entity.
Educational fieldwork varies greatly, as do the risks associated with these experiences, so templates are not as useful.
The sample agreement is designed to raise questions for your consideration regarding the terms and conditions that are typically included in affiliation agreements, before negotiating and finalizing an agreement. Preparation of affiliation agreements based on a sample agreement should be done in consultation with OGC; OGC review will be required before such affiliation agreements are executed.
b. Facilities Use Agreements
Each campus of the University enters into numerous facilities use agreements granting permission to use or rent University facilities for a broad range of functions. Appendix 5 contains six (6) facilities use agreement templates:
Appendix 13 (Guidelines regarding UH users and Non-UH Users) sets forth guidelines and factors for determining whether a prospective user is a UH user or a non-UH user.
Unless a prospective user is able to show that it is officially affiliated with the University or a State of Hawaiʻi government entity, the non-UH user facilities use agreement templates should be used. UH affiliated users include (i) the Board of Regents or a UH System chartered organization; (ii) registered student, faculty, or staff organizations; (iii) UH Campus chartered organizations; (iv) University of Hawaiʻi Foundation; (v) ʻAhahui Koa Ānuenue; (vi) University Clinical, Education, and Research Associates dba University Health Partners of Hawaiʻi; and (vii) Hawaiʻi State Cancer Consortium. RCUH should use the template for State of Hawaiʻi government users.
Facilities use agreements should be used when the use of University property/facilities by a non-UH user is a one-time, sporadic, occasional, or periodic use, i.e., less than 30 consecutive days or 30 days per fiscal or calendar year. If the contemplated use exceeds these timeframes, use and occupancy agreements, right of entry agreements, leases or other similar rental agreements should be used (see Section III.B.7.). All of these agreements allowing entry onto and/or use and occupancy of University owned, leased, or controlled property are considered real property documents and are covered by Board of Regents Policy RP 10.201. Real property agreements at least require the approval of the Vice President for Budget and Finance or his/her designee, if not the President or the Board, as well as the approval of the Office of the Vice President for Legal Affairs and University General Counsel as to form.
If the template facilities use agreements are completed without any material changes, they need not be submitted to OGC for review prior to execution. Any material changes to the template agreements require OGC review before execution.
(1) Long and Short Form Agreements in General
Both long and short form agreements require consideration of use of appropriate waiver and release forms in connection with the activities or events conducted on University property/facilities. See template facilities use agreements and Section III.B.6.a. (Waiver and Release Forms) below for descriptions and samples of waiver and release forms.
The long form agreement templates should be used when: (a) expected attendance is more than 100 people, (b) the time of use is more than 2 days, or (c) the rental or use fee is greater than $5,000. Conversely, the short form agreement templates should be used when: (a) expected attendance is 100 people or less, (b) the time of use is 2 days or less, and (c) the rental or use fee is $5,000 or less.
To the extent that any changes are sought to the standard insurance provisions in any of the long form facilities use agreements, approval must be obtained from ORM.
Both long form facilities use agreements contain: (a) a requirement to obtain pollution liability insurance unless the UH Campus determines that hazardous materials will not be used in connection with the event and (b) optional provisions which specify the conditions under which food and alcohol may be served at the event.
The long form agreement for non-UH users also contain the following optional provisions:
(a) Optional fees/charges. Charge the non-UH user: (1) a percentage of the gross revenues received by the non-UH user for the event, i.e., participation fee, and/or (2) a ticketing fee if the University would like to require the non-UH user to use the University’s ticketing system for the event.
(2) State of Hawai’i Government Users
The facilities use agreement templates (long and short form) for State of Hawaiʻi government users should be used when the non-UH user is any of the State of Hawaiʻi government entities, including but not limited to, the RCUH, the Department of Education (including individual public schools and/or complexes), the Hawaiʻi Community Development Authority, and the Office of Hawaiian Affairs.
The primary differences with the State government user facilities use agreement template include: (1) replacing the indemnity requirement with the standard State of Hawaiʻi responsibility obligation and (2) allowing the State to satisfy the insurance requirement through its self-insurance program.
c. International Agreements.
Because of the unusual compliance and risk issues associated with transactions involving other states or countries, any University transaction or arrangement that requires permanent University operations, presence, or offices in a state outside Hawaiʻi or a country outside the U.S., or the transfer of material or technology outside the U.S., must be reviewed by the President, appropriate Vice Presidents, the Office of Export Controls (“OEC”), OGC, and the UH Mānoa Provost or Chancellor and the Office of the Vice Chancellor of Academic Affairs for the appropriate campus.
All international agreements must comply with University policies, including EP 5.212 and EP 12.218, and must be reviewed by the Office of the Vice President for Academic Planning and Policy (“OVPAPP”) or designee, screened by the OEC for export control concerns, and signed on behalf of the University by the President or designee pursuant to EP 5.212. Review and approval by the President and the Board of Regents as required are particularly critical if an office, other physical presence, or operations will be maintained by or on behalf of the University in other countries, whether by University employees or agents. A copy of the fully executed international agreement must be sent to OVPAPP.
At the earliest stage of discussions concerning an initiative involving a foreign party, the campus must determine how the initiative could impact its U.S. accreditation and whether the initiative will trigger the requirement of notices to or requests for approval from the accrediting body. To ensure all parties involved in the negotiation have realistic expectations about the timing and nature of the collaboration, the campus should be very clear with the foreign party about U.S. accreditation requirements.
Where a draft agreement requires that an office, other physical presence, or operations will be maintained by or on behalf of the University in other countries, whether by University employees or agents, the draft should be reviewed as early as possible by campus administration, including the UH Mānoa Provost or Chancellor, as applicable, as well as President and appropriate Vice Presidents.
When contracting with foreign entities to conduct research or academic programs abroad, the University may require in the agreement that the foreign party make various certifications and representations regarding its compliance with applicable law and regulations, including federal sponsor terms and conditions where applicable, trade controls, and anti-corruption laws.
Each campus must have an internal vetting process for international agreements in which there are early reviews of the draft agreement by the campus Provost (in the case of UH Mānoa) or Chancellor’s Office for academic issues (including accreditation) and the System OEC for export controls and other related issues. Part of the internal campus processes should also assess impact to student, financial and human resources. These reviews must be completed and any issues identified addressed prior to the forwarding of these agreements to the other System Offices for review. OGC must review all international agreements that send UH employees to work in another country as part of their UH work.
Given the potential risks to personal health and safety associated with out-of-state, international, and overseas travel and residence in another state, territory, or foreign country, consideration should be given to using student participation agreements that include an assumption of risk, consent, waiver, release, and indemnity. A template participation, waiver and release form for University students participating in an out-of-state or international exchange or study abroad program is found in Appendix 6.
At UH Mānoa, any UH Mānoa credit course that is offered abroad must also be reviewed and recommended for approval by the Council on Study Abroad (the policy advisory body of the UHM Study Abroad Center). The Study Abroad Center has been identified as the UH Mānoa unit that specializes in minimizing the risk and liability to the University, e.g., health, safety and security, while delivering academic programs to the University’s students at overseas locations. The Study Abroad Center also provides training to faculty members in health, safety, risk, and liability areas as well as conducts pre-departure cross-cultural training for UHM students.
Individual students or faculty intermittent travel contracts are outside the scope of this Policy.
Appendix 6 contains the following international agreement templates:
If a University template agreement in Appendix 6 is used without any material changes, no further OGC review is required. Any material deviations or changes require OGC review before execution.
d. Minors on Campus
Colleges and schools of each campus of the University host and are part of programs that involve minors. The University as a post-secondary institution is generally geared to working with students aged 18 and older. Thus, special attention needs to be given to arrangements and agreements that involve minors. Thus, these agreements must be reviewed by OVPAPP and OGC, and must be signed by the President as the chief executive officer of UH Mānoa , Chancellor of the other 4-year University campuses, or the Vice President for Community Colleges, as applicable, or their respective designees, and the student affairs office of the appropriate campus.
In agreements that have minors dually enrolled as students in a University program and a K-12 school, e.g. Early College, there should be provisions that delineate the responsibilities of each institution in the event that the dually enrolled student or employee in the joint program violates either institution’s policies. Appendix 16 contains a recommended sample provision.
(1) Waiver and Release Forms
Consideration should be given to using parental/guardian waiver and release forms in connection with events involving minors. See Section III.B.6.a. (Waiver and Release Forms) below for descriptions and samples of waiver and release forms.
(2) Screening of Employees
Consideration should be given to further screening employees who will possibly work with minors. All University instructors who work directly with State of Hawaiʻi Department of Education (DOE) students through the Early College, Dual Credit, Running Start and other P-20 Programs shall be subject to DOE’s background check procedures.
e. Letters of Hire for Employees
Colleges and schools of each campus of the University issue numerous letters of hire. No other employment contracts are allowed unless they are specifically provided for and in compliance with applicable University policies and procedures.
(1) Offer Letter Templates
The University System Office of Human Resources has developed Offer Letter Templates that can be used and/or adapted to fit most employment situations, found in Appendix 8. The intent is to streamline and expedite the processing of offer letters in part by exempting from further review the use of templates that do not deviate from or change the template terms and are in compliance with the University’s policies on compensation and hiring.
(2) Authority to Approve and Execute Letters of Hire
Any deviations or changes to the Offer Letter Templates and the University’s policies must be reviewed and approved by the appropriate Vice Chancellor, and if at the System, by the Director of the Office of Human Resources. Any Letters of Hire or offer letters that do not conform to the following conditions must be reviewed and approved by the appropriate Vice Chancellor, and if at the System, by the Vice President for Administration.
(3) Mandatory Conditions for Letters of Hire
Letters of Hire must comply with the following:
1) Program-only impact. Impact solely the programs and budgets overseen by the issuer of the Letter of Hire;
“Start-up Costs” are costs to the University beyond the normal salary for faculty to help them with their work. These costs can include but are not limited to funds for laboratory supplies, equipment, support staff, facilities, laboratory space, office space, computers and software, travel support and submission and publication fees. Support staff can include administrative/clerical support, students and postdocs.
(4) Conditions for Accepted Letters of Hire
Letters of Hire involving an employee in Bargaining Unit 07 must comply with the Memorandum of Understanding on Letters of Hire / Offer Letters entered into between the University of Hawaiʻi and the University of Hawaiʻi Professional Assembly in January 2017.
f. Information Technology Purchases
The Office of the Vice President for Information Technology and/or Chief Information Officer (“OVPIT/CIO”) is required to review and approve the following types of proposed contracts and transactions, in accordance with the processes described below:
(1) Purchases of electronic equipment, hardware, software, and related services. Proposed contracts (including purchase orders) relating to the purchase of electronic equipment, hardware, software, and related services that either:
(a) Exceeds $25,000 in the aggregate, whether it is over a single year or multiple years; or
This OVPIT/CIO process is separate and apart from and in addition to the OPM review process and is consistent with EP 2.210.
Any questions regarding the process or variations from standard contracting practices should be referred to the appropriate unit fiscal administrator, OPM or OGC.
(2) Shrink-wrapped software/subscriptions (less than $2,500). Small purchase transactions (P-card) relating to the purchase of “shrink-wrapped” software and software subscriptions that:
(a) do not exceed $2,500 in the aggregate, whether it is over a single year or multiple years; and
Requesting units are generally required to attempt negotiations with the vendor to modify or remove inconsistent terms prior to submitting a request for the review and approval of OVPIT/CIO.
Larger transactions for the purchase of “shrink-wrapped” software and software subscriptions, including transactions requiring an actual signature by the vendor (which provides an opportunity to modify terms), do not qualify for the OVPIT/CIO review and approval process described above, and must be processed in accordance with Section III.B.4.f.(1) above (Purchases of electronic equipment, hardware, software, and related services), if applicable, the OPM review process, and/or the contract review process described in this Policy. Such requests may be returned for clarification, or denied unless additional rationalization is provided with the request.
g. Data Commitments Involving Software and/or Services
OVPIT/CIO, OVPAPP, and/or the UH System Data Governance Office (“UH DGO”) are required to review and approve all proposed contracts for software and/or services from parties outside of the University that involve the collection, management, sharing, exchange, use and/or release of Protected Data (as defined below), regardless of the dollar value of the contract. This review and approval process applies to software and services being purchased for both institutional (academic and administrative) purposes and research projects, regardless of dollar value of the contract. Software to which this Policy applies includes, without limitation, software that is hosted on a UH server or a non-UH server. Services to which this Policy applies includes, without limitation, outsourced institutional functions, education-related studies, and cloud-related services.
“Protected Data” refers to data subject to privacy and/or security considerations, i.e., data that is not public. This includes Restricted, Sensitive, and Regulated data as defined by Executive Policy EP 2.214, Institutional Data Classification Categories and Information Security Guidelines.
Additionally, any contracts for information technology products or services that require integration with any centrally-managed University information system, such as Banner, Peoplesoft, and the Kuali Financial System, and/or transmission over the University’s centrally managed network infrastructure are subject to this provision. This includes, without limitation, any type of data activity touching UH information systems.
The following table summarizes the types of contracts and submission and approval processes.
In approving any of the foregoing contracts, OVPIT and/or UH DGO may require the inclusion of appropriate contractual provisions, including, without limitation, all or a portion of the sample provisions contained in Appendix 9 (UH Data Sharing Protection Provisions).
The review and approval process in this Section III.B.4.g. precedes the OPM review process (when applicable) and the OGC process.
5. RecordsContracts as defined in this Policy are University records. Retention of contract documents, including keeping the original signed Contract, should follow EP 2.216 Institutional Records Management and Electronic Approvals/Signatures and AP 8.450 Records Management.
6. Template AgreementsIn addition to the Template Agreements attached as Appendices 4, 5, 6 and 8, the following templates have been approved by OGC:
a. Waiver and Release Forms
Appendix 7 contains the following waiver and release templates for use in connection with the types of events and activities described below. These waiver and release forms supersede and replace the waiver and release forms contained in AP A8.400.
b. Mutual Non-Disclosure Agreement
The template Mutual Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) contained in Appendix 14 may be used when the University and a third party wish to exchange and protect confidential information to facilitate discussions and negotiations leading to possible collaborative research or other business arrangements, and where neither party pays a fee for the exchange and safeguarding of confidential information.
If the template NDA is used without any material changes, no further OGC review is required. Any material deviations or changes require OGC review before execution. A complex real property or commercial transaction may require a more involved NDA, and consultation with OGC is encouraged.
7. Right of Entry and Use and Occupancy Agreement Templates
The following real property agreement templates have been approved by OGC and included in Appendix 15 (Template Property Agreements). The Template Property Agreements are considered forms pre-approved by OGC consistent with the requirements contained in RP 10.201. Therefore, no “approved as to form” signature blocks for OGC are included on the Template Property Agreements.
To the extent that there are any additional conditions or requirements, such conditions may be added as a separate Exhibit C (Special Conditions) to the applicable right of entry agreement or use and occupancy agreement. Such conditions could include designating specific access routes, limiting activities to certain hours, and implementing measures to protect or reduce any specific adverse impacts on facilities, significant campus features, utility systems or adjacent use areas (such as noise, dust, and vandalism and damage). Adding special conditions would require OGC review prior to submission to the Vice President for Budget and Finance/Chief Financial Officer (VPBF) or the Director of the UH System Administrative Services (SAS Director), as appropriate. OGC will insert an OGC approved as to form signature block for such Template Property Agreement.
If a Template Property Agreement is used for its specified purpose without any material changes, no further OGC review is required. Such Template Property Agreement, however, must be signed by either the VPBF or the SAS Director, as such authority has been delegated under Board of Regents Policy RP 10.201.
a. Right of Entry Agreements for Non-Invasive/Investigative Work
This set of templates provides a third party (usually consultants retained by a prospective developer or government entity interested in a specific project) the ability to enter University property to conduct limited non-invasive investigative/due diligence work:
(1) Consultant Non-Invasive Right of Entry Agreement.
This second set of templates authorizes a third party (usually a contractor or a government agency) to use and occupy University property to support nearby construction projects. Examples of such uses are to access the project construction area, store construction materials, dry out dredged sludge, and park/stage vehicles and equipment:
(1) Private Party Construction Support Use and Occupancy Agreement.
C. Specific Provisions in ContractsWhen preparing contracts involving the University as a party, there are a number of common legal issues that may need to be addressed. To assist you in your review of contract provisions, a contract issue checklist has been prepared and is attached as Appendix 11. The following section also provides guidelines for addressing some of these common legal issues. OGC may always be consulted on issues or concerns beyond the scope of this Policy and these guidelines, or when the third party rejects the University’s standard provisions or its Template Agreements.
1. Proper Party.The University of Hawaiʻi is the State university and a body corporate of the State of Hawaiʻi. In all agreements involving the University of Hawaiʻi as a party, the University should be named as follows: “University of Hawaiʻi, the state university and body corporate of the State of Hawaiʻi.” The University of Hawaiʻi is the only legal entity that is capable of contracting as a party, and the individual campuses are not separate legal entities.
2. Address.The address designated in the Contract for the University of Hawaiʻi should be Bachman Hall, 2444 Dole Street, Honolulu, Hawaiʻi. The address of the responsible campus/department/unit/administrator may be added in the manner described in the next paragraph.
3. Identify Responsible Campus/Department/Unit/Administrator.The specific campus/department/unit/administrator responsible for administration of the Contract should be identified in the Contract. The following can be added after the identification of the University of Hawaiʻi as the contracting party: “for the benefit of [Name of University of Hawaiʻi campus, college, school, institute, center, department, office, or other unit], whose business address is [appropriate address of the University of Hawaiʻi campus, college, school, institute, center, department, office, or other unit].”
4. Contract Scope, Deliverables and Deadlines.It is critical that each Contract identify and describe with sufficient particularity and detail the subject matter of the Contract, including the goods, services, and/or benefits that the University will be receiving, the obligations the University is being required to commit to perform, the obligations to be performed by other parties to the Contract, the payment amounts, and the time frame/deadlines for performance. For Contracts having extended terms, consideration should be given to establishing certain performance milestones that need to be achieved before the counterparty(ies) would be entitled to payment for such milestone or milestones so achieved. Some of the more specific issues to check in your review include:
a. Consideration. Determine the consideration or items of value being provided by each party, e.g., cash payment for a product/service or a promise to do or refrain from doing an action.
b. Term or Duration of Contract. Identify the term/duration of the Contract, including a specific beginning and end date and whether there are options to renew. Automatic renewals without end, or “evergreen” contracts, are prohibited. If the Contract is for a multi-year term, the University’s standard “subject to funding” provision (below) covering future years should be inserted as the University is usually only able to commit to funding the current year of the Contract.
5. Payment Terms.The Contract should accurately describe with sufficient detail the payment terms, including the payment amounts and the time frame/ deadlines/ requirements for payment. Clearly identify the amount and extent of the party’s responsibility to pay for costs associated with contract performance.
a. Reimbursement of Expenses. If expense reimbursement is required by the University, the other party should be required to submit documentation, e.g., receipts, acceptable to the University as a precondition to being reimbursed. A ceiling or maximum limit should be established for any expense reimbursement obligation of the University.
b. Sharing monies collected. If the other party is collecting money and paying a portion to the University, e.g., a concession agreement, the amounts (whether or not based on a percentage of the monies collected) should be clear. The Contract should include the University’s right to review and audit the records of the other party to verify that the University has received the correct amount.
6. Indemnification.Except for four (4) limited circumstances, the University is not legally authorized or permitted to indemnify, defend or hold harmless other parties to a Contract (“Other Parties”) against claims by a third party (not a party to the Contract) for damage or injuries resulting from the acts or omissions of the University. To agree to such obligations would require the University to: (1) defend the Other Parties against third party claims, which includes paying for the Other Parties’ defense costs, including attorneys’ fees; and (2) pay for any monetary judgment obtained against the Other Parties by third party claimants. Appendix 12(Guidelines re Indemnification Issues) sets forth additional guidelines regarding the University’s authority to indemnify Other Parties against third party claims.
7. Subject to Funding.University employees are not legally permitted to commit the University to obligations in excess of available and authorized funding. Because of this, unless all of the funding necessary to meet or satisfy all obligations under the Contract has been approved, authorized, and made available for payment under the Contract, the following condition should be included to qualify the University’s obligation to perform any obligations for which funding has not yet been obtained:
“Subject to Funding. To the extent that the University is: (1) obligated to perform under this Agreement, (2) obligated to make any payments under this Agreement, or (3) deemed liable under this Agreement, the University’s ability to satisfy such obligations or liabilities, particularly any obligations requiring the payment of any amount of monies, is limited to that which is permitted by law and is subject to the condition that funds are properly appropriated, allotted, or otherwise properly made available for the purpose of satisfying such obligations or liabilities.
8. Common Beneficial Terms.a. Indemnity. While the University may not agree to indemnify, defend, or hold harmless a counterparty (except for certain limited circumstances), this should not discourage the University from requiring the counterparty(ies) to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the University against claims and/or actions arising from the Contract, particularly those attributable to the acts or omissions of the counterparty(ies).
b. Insurance. Insurance coverage in favor of or also protecting the University should be requested. This is usually accomplished by naming the University as an additional insured under the applicable insurance policies obtained by the counterparty.
c. Assignment. The University should have the right to approve any assignment or other transfer of the counterparty’s interest in the Contract, with one of the conditions being that the counterparty is not released from liability under the Contract, particularly for acts, omissions, events, or incidents occurring prior to any assignment.
9. Confidentiality.Absent extraordinary circumstances, the University will not be able to promise that the existence of a Contract or its terms can be kept confidential. The University, like other State government entities, is subject to applicable public disclosure laws, primarily Hawaiʻi Revised Statutes chapter 92F. There may be some exceptions to the public disclosure laws that allow state governmental entities to withhold disclosure of a Contract or one or more of its specific terms, e.g., proprietary business information. Generally, however, a copy of the fully executed Contract would be disclosable to a requesting person or entity, particularly the portions pertaining to the amounts, fees, and/or prices to be paid by the University under the Contract. The University has occasionally agreed in the past to a provision under which neither party would proceed with a public announcement regarding the Contract without coordinating/obtaining approval of the other party prior to making such an announcement. Appendix 10 (Sample Contract Provisions) contains a recommended contractual provision covering the issue of confidentiality.
a. Proprietary business information. The University is subject to open records laws. A blanket assertion, without limitation as to time, that all of the other party’s proprietary information submitted is confidential is not acceptable. At a minimum, the other party should be required to clearly mark and designate that portion of the information submitted to the University that the other party deems confidential.
b. Other party advised of University constraints. The other party should be advised that the University’s ability and authority to agree to express confidentiality obligations is constrained, the University cannot promise confidentiality, and the University will, upon receiving a disclosure request, disclose or release the Contract, its terms, and such other related and supporting documents that the University deems responsive to such request.
c. University may notify but not obtain consent. The other party may request that the University obtain the other party’s approval before releasing or disclosing any confidential information. Rather than agree to obtain such prior consent, the University has in the past agreed to notify the other party of a disclosure request to allow the other party time to seek a protective order or take other action to restrict or prevent disclosure.
d. University to be protected in disclosure contest. The other party should agree to pay for any costs the University may incur due to the other party’s efforts to prevent or restrict disclosure together with indemnifying and defending the University against any claims or actions arising from such efforts to prevent or restrict disclosure.
10. Data handling and security.If University data will be furnished to the other party, the University shall require that the other party have data handling, privacy, and security policies in place, consistent with applicable federal and state privacy laws, to protect against the disclosure, release or exposure of University data, including non-public personal information.
Executive Policies EP 2.214 and EP 2.215 set forth data governance and security policies applicable to the handling of University data. Obligations to transmit University data to the other party or to third parties must be carefully reviewed, particularly if PII will be included. Appendix 9 (Data Sharing Protections and Requirements) contains recommended contractual provisions covering the data handling and security issues.
11. University Representations and Warranties.The University may not agree to grant or provide warranties to others as they are in the nature of an indemnity and hold harmless obligation. The University may make representations within the Contract provided or to the extent that a University employee is able to confirm the accuracy of the representation and/or is in a position to cause the representation to be accurate or monitor the University’s performance with respect to that representation. The University should limit the number and extent of any representations it is required to make.
12. No Arbitration.Contracts usually contain proposed dispute resolution procedures that include non-binding mediation and binding arbitration options. While non-binding mediation is acceptable, binding arbitration is not. Except in very limited circumstances (such as the collective bargaining process and lease rent re-openings for the use of State of Hawaiʻi land), the University does not generally agree to submit itself to binding arbitration. By submitting to a binding arbitration process, instead of pursuing litigation in court to resolve a dispute, the University waives some protections that it would otherwise be entitled to if it litigated the dispute in court.
13. Attorneys' Fees.Contracts often contain provisions that call for the non-prevailing party in a dispute or legal action to pay for the other party’s attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in connection with the dispute or legal action. The University usually requests that the provision be revised to require that each party bear their own attorneys' fees and costs incurred in connection with any dispute, legal action, or any performance under the Contract.
14. Governing Law and Jurisdiction.In negotiating with other contracting parties who are based in other states and/or countries, there are frequent disputes over which laws govern the interpretation and enforcement of the Contract terms. The laws of the State of Hawaiʻi should govern. If the other contracting party declines and insists that the laws of their state or country govern, the University has compromised in the past by proposing and agreeing to have the Contract remain silent on which laws govern.
Contracting parties based in other states and countries prefer to have their courts adjudicate any legal actions involving the Contract. The University generally identifies State of Hawaiʻi courts as having jurisdiction over legal actions involving the Contract. If the other contracting party is not willing to subject itself to the jurisdiction of the State of Hawaiʻi courts, the University has agreed to remain silent on which courts will adjudicate any legal actions involving the Contract.
15. Supplemental Terms and Conditions.Vendor contracts may try to incorporate by reference terms and conditions that are contained on their website, include a link to their website in the Contract, and reserve the right to change such terms and conditions.
Identify and review any terms or conditions that are being incorporated into the Contract but are not physically attached to or included in the body of the Contract. These should be printed and attached to the Contract. Further, the other party should be required to: (a) provide the University with written notification of any changes prior to the effective date of such changes (preferably at least 30 days) and (b) grant to the University the right to terminate the contract if the parties are unable to resolve any disputes relating to such changes by the effective date of such changes. Appendix 10 (Sample Contract Provisions) contains a recommended contractual provision covering this issue of supplemental terms and conditions.
16. Force Majeure.Contracts often contain a “force majeure” provision which allows either party to excuse, delay, or suspend performance of the Contract when their performance is prevented by certain types of catastrophic events that are beyond the control of the parties. Appendix 10 (Sample Contract Provisions) contains a recommended force majeure provision.
17. Faculty Workload.Some academic and instructional contracts may affect an individual faculty member’s workload. In those instances, the University’s collective bargaining agreement with University of Hawaii Professional Assembly (CBA) should be reviewed to ensure that the Contract is consistent with the provisions of the CBA. For example, the CBA (as of Nov. 1, 2020) states that, “[u]sing the planned professional objectives and activities of the Faculty Member, and the objectives of the division or the department, the Chair and the Faculty Member will determine the Faculty Member's instructional workload in accordance with Board of Regents Policy.” Art. IV.B.3.
D. Execution of the Contract
1. Authority.The Contract should be executed by the University employee who has the authority to so sign on behalf of the University. The President has the authority to sign any Contract on behalf of the University. All other University employees should be able to identify the document by which authority was delegated to him/her to sign the Contract. Such delegation could have been made through the President’s executive policies or specific delegation of authority memoranda. Delegation of authority to sign Contracts is described in more detail above in Section III.A.1.b. (Delegation of Authority).
2. Notarization.Signatures on a Contract (except for certain real property-related documents) usually do not need to be notarized. The counterparty(ies) may prefer to have the signatures notarized, particularly if such counterparty(ies) are based in another state or country. The University itself might prefer that signatures on certain contracts be notarized, e.g., initial Contract with a new vendor, in order to confirm the identity of the persons signing on behalf of the counterparty(ies). Notary assistance is available in OGC.
3. Evidence of Authority to Sign.Confirmation should be obtained that the person executing the Contract on behalf of any counterparty is in fact or has been duly authorized by such counterparty to sign the Contract. Such confirmation could be in the form of a document evidencing or verifying the authority of the signatory to bind the counterparty, e.g., corporate resolution or certified letter.
4. Evidence of Business Registration of the Counterparty.Confirmation should be obtained that the Contracting Party is a validly registered business by researching the business registration where the business was formed and/or is registered for business (for Hawaiʻi registration see State of Hawaiʻi Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs at http://cca.hawaii.gov/breg/) and verifying the legal name of the counterparty and its registered officers. Note: tradename entities do not have the legal capacity to be a contracting party.
1Under Hawaiʻi law, no person may obligate the University to commitments beyond that which can be met with authorized funding. See Article VII, Section 5 of the Hawaiʻi State Constitution.↵
2 See Hawaiʻi State Constitution, Art. XIV, “Code of Ethics”; Hawaiʻi Revised Statutes Ch. 84, “Standards of Conduct”.↵
3 See, e.g., EP 12.214, Conflicts of Interest and Commitment; AP 5.504, Procedures for Disclosing and Addressing Conflicts of Interest and Commitment; AP 12.304, Procedures for Disclosing and Addressing Conflicts of Interest Related with Extramurally-Funded Activities.↵
IV. Delegation of Authority
There is no policy-specific delegation of authority.
V. Contact Information
Office of the Vice President for Legal Affairs and University General Counsel (808) 956-2211
VII. Exhibits and Appendices
November 02, 2020
TopicsContracts; signing authority; official documents