Researchers find unconscious racism in death-penalty juries
A new study by researchers at the University of Hawaiʻi, University of North Carolina and Rutgers University indicates that, on an unconscious level, Americans seem to value the worth of white lives over black lives. Researchers say this “unconscious racism” has particular consequences as juries make decisions in death-penalty cases.
In the new study “Devaluing Death: An Empirical Study of Implicit Racial Bias on Jury-Eligible Citizens in Six Death Penalty States” just published in the N.Y.U. Law Review, the researchers set out to explore whether unconscious racism accounts for continuing racial disparities in death-penalty decisions. To do so, they surveyed jury eligible citizens in six states and found that the majority of these citizens had moderate to strong unconscious biases—based on race—that relate to how they value human life.
“These study results are obviously troubling, but it could explain a lot about why racial disparities are still so prevalent in America,” said Professor Justin D. Levinson of the UH William S. Richardson School of Law and the lead author of the article. “If people indeed associate value with white citizens and lack of worth with black citizens, despite their best intentions, it opens up a whole new dialogue about inequality and what to do about it.”
In the study, the researchers measured the so-called “implicit (unconscious) biases” of the study sample, and compared the bias scores of “death-eligible” citizens (those who would be allowed to sit on a death-penalty jury) to non-death-eligible citizens (those who would be removed from such a jury due to their unwillingness to consider the death penalty as punishment).
In this context, the study found that jurors who are eligible to sit on juries in death-penalty cases actually harbored significantly more anti-black biases than those who would not be allowed to serve.
“How can a defendant get a fair trial when we exclude the jurors who are the least likely to hold implicit biases against the defendant?” asked Robert J. Smith, a co-author and an assistant professor of law at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Smith noted that the results of the study indicate that a legally sanctioned process actually increases racial bias during the types of trials with the highest stakes: whether a person lives or dies.
Read the William S. Richardson School of Law news release for the full story.
- Property law scholar gives free public lecture
- International land economics society honors law professor
- Legal topics on aging tackled in public seminar
- Second lowest debt load in the nation for UH law students
- Law Professor Shalanda Baker selected for Fulbright award